NationStates

Infected Mushroom wrote:

Scomagia wrote:How do you define "athletic"?

I'll agree that bodybuilders aren't very attractive to me, though I think that's got more to do with the comparative uselessness of all their mass. Female powerlifters, on the other hand? Yowza! None of that muscle is for show! Strength is sexy. Pointless hypertrophy is not.

If a male or a female has a frontal body that is so hard and firm that it looks like there are massive muscular chunks of hard meat... (on the scale of Arnold) then for me a line has been crossed

Obviously there’s a scale and a spectrum that’s hard to delineate, but if it’s crossed

It just feels really “meaty” if you get what I mean? The idea of rubbing against/getting rubbed against by that kind of a hard mass is a bit of a turn off

Scomagia wrote:

Infected Mushroom wrote:
If a male or a female has a frontal body that is so hard and firm that it looks like there are massive muscular chunks of hard meat... (on the scale of Arnold) then for me a line has been crossed

Obviously there’s a scale and a spectrum that’s hard to delineate, but if it’s crossed

It just feels really “meaty” if you get what I mean? The idea of rubbing against/getting rubbed against by that kind of a hard mass is a bit of a turn off

Yeah, that's definitely a bodybuilder physique. Powerlifters have muscle for performance, not show. They usually have a pretty healthy amount of body fat, so they don't have the "chunk of meat" look.

Scomagia wrote:

Western Vale Confederacy wrote:
Age has definitely taken its toll on ol' Arnold's bodybuilder physique, but yeah, anything above the "athletic" body type is not very attractive to me.

How do you define "athletic"?

I'll agree that bodybuilders aren't very attractive to me, though I think that's got more to do with the comparative uselessness of all their mass. Female powerlifters, on the other hand? Yowza! None of that muscle is for show! Strength is sexy. Pointless hypertrophy is not.

Scomagia wrote:

Pax Nerdvana wrote:That's what I do. I buy books, old video game cartridges, tapes, and DVDs.

Right on! I understand the convenience of digital media but I'm very attached to tactile things like reading a physical book or popping open a DVD case.

Prusenreich wrote:Unless you keep them for the purpose of hiding drugs/ illegal items or to throw at people I don't have a problem

Sovaal wrote:Is it harming anyone? No? Than why should anyone give a fuck?

Karu Nadu wrote:

Sovaal wrote:Is it harming anyone? No? Than why should anyone give a fuck?

Quite a logical statement.

Infected Mushroom wrote:This is a thread to discuss stuffed animal toys.

It is common to give children stuffed animal toys to play with. Many children go to sleep hugging stuffed animal toys like giraffes, teddies, and hello kitties. However, are stuffed animal toys for kids only? Or can older people and adults keep them?

Specifically, the discussion point is: at what age, if any age, (based on your own personal subjective standard) does it become "problematic" to sleep with stuffed animal toys? (by sleep with, I mean just sleep with, for instance, hugging the toy and falling asleep, nothing more). What would be your reasoning for setting that age as a standard metric?

Alternatively, you might personally find that it is acceptable for people of all ages to play with and sleep with stuffed toy animals.

Please explain whatever you position you adopt.

A poll is up.

Stuffed animals are adorable. So it shouldn't be a problem if people of all ages might be interested in keeping and playing with them. Everyone needs toys.

If someone comes up to you and says "Are you not TOO OLD to be playing with stuffed animals?" then in my view that is a bit close minded.

Atlantiona wrote:

Infected Mushroom wrote:This is a thread to discuss stuffed animal toys.

It is common to give children stuffed animal toys to play with. Many children go to sleep hugging stuffed animal toys like giraffes, teddies, and hello kitties. However, are stuffed animal toys for kids only? Or can older people and adults keep them?

Specifically, the discussion point is: at what age, if any age, (based on your own personal subjective standard) does it become "problematic" to sleep with stuffed animal toys? (by sleep with, I mean just sleep with, for instance, hugging the toy and falling asleep, nothing more). What would be your reasoning for setting that age as a standard metric?

Alternatively, you might personally find that it is acceptable for people of all ages to play with and sleep with stuffed toy animals.

Please explain whatever you position you adopt.

A poll is up.

Stuffed animals are adorable. So it shouldn't be a problem if people of all ages might be interested in keeping and playing with them. Everyone needs toys.

If someone comes up to you and says "Are you not TOO OLD to be playing with stuffed animals?" then in my view that is a bit close minded.

It is only problamatic if you are not collecting for reasons....ex having multiple Pokémon plush toys and not having them as a display when you are older than 12

Foxfound wrote:

Atlantiona wrote:
It is only problamatic if you are not collecting for reasons....ex having multiple Pokémon plush toys and not having them as a display when you are older than 12

*laughs nervously while hiding Fennekin and Zorua* Yeah, that would be... uh, very immature and unreasonable!

Atlantiona wrote:

Foxfound wrote:*laughs nervously while hiding Fennekin and Zorua* Yeah, that would be... uh, very immature and unreasonable!

Lol your fine......long as you have the cards and you are actually into Pokémon i dont care.......i actually like the fact that people are dedicated enough to Pokémon that they actually buy plushes, regardless if they ever sleep with them or not.....though personally the only plushes that i personally would ever consider sleeping with would be leafeon or victini cause they always held a spot in the top 5 best Pokémon ever......respectively spots 2 and 1.......victini being #1
Note: would never sleep with them btw just the 2 canadites whose percentage are above 0...........respectively 0.00000000000000001% and 0.000000002%

Atlantiona wrote:

Foxfound wrote:*laughs nervously while hiding Fennekin and Zorua* Yeah, that would be... uh, very immature and unreasonable!

Lol your fine......long as you have the cards and you are actually into Pokémon i dont care.......i actually like the fact that people are dedicated enough to Pokémon that they actually buy plushes, regardless if they ever sleep with them or not.....though personally the only plushes that i personally would ever consider sleeping with would be leafeon or victini cause they always held a spot in the top 5 best Pokémon ever......respectively spots 2 and 1.......victini being #1
Note: would never sleep with them btw just the 2 canadites whose percentage are above 0...........respectively 0.00000000000000001% and 0.000000002%

Foxfound wrote:

Atlantiona wrote:
It is only problamatic if you are not collecting for reasons....ex having multiple Pokémon plush toys and not having them as a display when you are older than 12

*laughs nervously while hiding Fennekin and Zorua* Yeah, that would be... uh, very immature and unreasonable!

The blAAtschApen wrote:Are there any arnold Schwarzenegger plushies?

Hatterleigh wrote:

Foxfound wrote:*laughs nervously while hiding Fennekin and Zorua* Yeah, that would be... uh, very immature and unreasonable!

You have poor taste in Pokémon.

Hatterleigh wrote:It depends on a lot of things. I'd say females just be like that sort of way where they like cute things way more then men, so probably around 14 for them. For boys probably around 11 or 12. But everyone has had some stuffed animal or blanket or pillow they've had since they were a baby or something which they ain't gonna part ways with. Still doe, if I see a grown man with a bunch of stuffed animals in his bed or even a 15 year old man I would be pretty weirded out. Sort of a childish thing.

Foxfound wrote:

Hatterleigh wrote:You have poor taste in Pokémon.

Hmph. You're just like that kid at school who called my zorua a 'knock-off eevee'.

Infected Mushroom wrote:

Hatterleigh wrote:It depends on a lot of things. I'd say females just be like that sort of way where they like cute things way more then men, so probably around 14 for them. For boys probably around 11 or 12. But everyone has had some stuffed animal or blanket or pillow they've had since they were a baby or something which they ain't gonna part ways with. Still doe, if I see a grown man with a bunch of stuffed animals in his bed or even a 15 year old man I would be pretty weirded out. Sort of a childish thing.

oh no! (gasp)

you being judgemental! =(

Hatterleigh wrote:

Foxfound wrote:Hmph. You're just like that kid at school who called my zorua a 'knock-off eevee'.

Ok, first of all why do u bring a pokemon plush to school and second of all what grade are u in to still be having conversations about pokemon with passerby? Also, my point still stands.

Hatterleigh wrote:

Infected Mushroom wrote:
oh no! (gasp)

you being judgemental! =(

You are judging me for being judgemental.