The Caleshan Valkyrie wrote:Elenir wrote:Then you are a gnostic lmao, you actively deny the existance of god
Your assessment is flawed. Would you like me to link you to the relevant chart?
Here it is anyway:
You’ll note that in my previous statements I’ve specifically stated that without evidence to back up your claim, I’ve no reason to treat your god as anything more than an imaginary friend that you’re just a little too invested in. I could just as easily presume that the universe was sneezed into existence by the Great Green Arkleseizure, and that would have every bit the same amount of material support as the idea of this god thingie.
Does this mean that I deny the fact that it cannot fully be DISproven? Nope.
That chart is slightly flawed. Agnosticism is a statement about the possibility of knowledge. An agnost believes it is not possible to know for certain if a God or gods exist, while a gnostic believes such knowing is possible. This distinction changes the gnostic theist quadrant: a gnostic theist believes god exists and also thinks it is possible to know this for certain - but does not need to claim to actually know it themselves.