NationStates

Mardla wrote:

Internationalist Bastard wrote:I hardly see how adultry is bad if everyone consents to it

I don't know what your moral criteria are.

If it is between consenting adults and no physical harm is done, literally nobody cares about what IB does behind bedroom doors.

Mardla wrote:

Internationalist Bastard wrote:I hardly see how adultry is bad if everyone consents to it

I don't know what your moral criteria are.

I mean, like, if in this case all three people are fine with it, it doesn’t really matter if the boinking is adultry because everyone is aware and ok with it

Western Vale Confederacy wrote:

Mardla wrote:
I don't know what your moral criteria are.

If it is between consenting adults and no physical harm is done, literally nobody cares about what IB does behind bedroom doors.

Or barnyard doors
Or club room doors
Or library doors

Internationalist Bastard wrote:

Western Vale Confederacy wrote:
If it is between consenting adults and no physical harm is done, literally nobody cares about what IB does behind bedroom doors.

Or barnyard doors
Or club room doors
Or library doors

You say that as if you boinked behind all of 'em.

Western Vale Confederacy wrote:

Internationalist Bastard wrote:Or barnyard doors
Or club room doors
Or library doors

You say that as if you boinked behind all of 'em.

Internationalist Bastard wrote:

Western Vale Confederacy wrote:
You say that as if you boinked behind all of 'em.

You did...you bloody did!

*runs to fainting couch*

Ifreann wrote:I don't really care what configurations people have their relationships in, but these two wanting this badly to be as identical as possible seems weird as fuck. What's going to happen when their poor children aren't identical? What if one has a boy and the other has a girl?

Lots of parents have this problem though, expecting that their child will be exactly how they want the child to be, that the kid will share the same interests as the parents, the same values, the same beliefs, the same politics. They think their kid will never want to wear clothes or style their hair in a way that the parents hate, and some actually forget that one day their child will grow up into an independent adult.

IMO everyone who wants to have kids should first ask themselves if they will be okay if their child is completely different than what they're expecting, and only those who can accept that should have children.

Western Vale Confederacy wrote:
If it is between consenting adults and no physical harm is done, literally nobody cares about what IB does behind bedroom doors.

until polygamy starts demanding state recognition and a judge rules any state without it violates the 14th Amendment

Mardla wrote:

Western Vale Confederacy wrote:
If it is between consenting adults and no physical harm is done, literally nobody cares about what IB does behind bedroom doors.

until polygamy starts demanding state recognition and a judge rules any state without it violates the 14th Amendment

You say this like it would be a bad thing. If someone else's definition of marriage ruins the sanctity of yours, the problem is your weak convictions/faith, not their marriage.

Page wrote:

Ifreann wrote:I don't really care what configurations people have their relationships in, but these two wanting this badly to be as identical as possible seems weird as fuck. What's going to happen when their poor children aren't identical? What if one has a boy and the other has a girl?

Lots of parents have this problem though, expecting that their child will be exactly how they want the child to be, that the kid will share the same interests as the parents, the same values, the same beliefs, the same politics. They think their kid will never want to wear clothes or style their hair in a way that the parents hate, and some actually forget that one day their child will grow up into an independent adult.

IMO everyone who wants to have kids should first ask themselves if they will be okay if their child is completely different than what they're expecting, and only those who can accept that should have children.

Truer words have yet to be spoken.

Mardla wrote:

Western Vale Confederacy wrote:
If it is between consenting adults and no physical harm is done, literally nobody cares about what IB does behind bedroom doors.

until polygamy starts demanding state recognition and a judge rules any state without it violates the 14th Amendment

You act as if polygamy is this new dangfangled thing "deh degenerate youngins" are all gossiping about when it has been a thing for millenia...

Mardla wrote:

Western Vale Confederacy wrote:
If it is between consenting adults and no physical harm is done, literally nobody cares about what IB does behind bedroom doors.

until polygamy starts demanding state recognition and a judge rules any state without it violates the 14th Amendment

Yeah but uh, anyway point is it doesn’t matter to anyone

Internationalist Bastard wrote:

Mardla wrote:
until polygamy starts demanding state recognition and a judge rules any state without it violates the 14th Amendment

Yeah but uh, anyway point is it doesn’t matter to anyone

It clearly does though, otherwise people wouldn't object.

Mardla wrote:

Western Vale Confederacy wrote:
If it is between consenting adults and no physical harm is done, literally nobody cares about what IB does behind bedroom doors.

until polygamy starts demanding state recognition and a judge rules any state without it violates the 14th Amendment

If a polygamous marriage is composed of consenting adults, no harm is done.

I'm against the sort of polygamy in which religious fanatics "marry" (rape) 14 year old girls and treat their "wives" like chattel, but equal polyamorous relationships do exist and I don't see any reason such groups of people shouldn't have the same rights as a couple.

Western Vale Confederacy wrote:

Mardla wrote:
until polygamy starts demanding state recognition and a judge rules any state without it violates the 14th Amendment

You act as if polygamy is this new dangfangled thing "deh degenerate youngins" are all gossiping about when it has been a thing for millenia...

So has pederasty, but the promotion of Desmond is Amazing is part of a new mainstream movemeny. Same with polygamy

Washington Resistance Army wrote:

Internationalist Bastard wrote:Yeah but uh, anyway point is it doesn’t matter to anyone

It clearly does though, otherwise people wouldn't object.

Not everyone who objects to something has a *valid* objection.

Mardla wrote:

Western Vale Confederacy wrote:
You act as if polygamy is this new dangfangled thing "deh degenerate youngins" are all gossiping about when it has been a thing for millenia...

So has pederasty, but the promotion of Desmond is Amazing is part of a new mainstream movemeny. Same with polygamy

Desmond is a different bowl of soup, and I genuinely view it as disgusting and bordering on outright pedophilia.

Page wrote:

Ifreann wrote:I don't really care what configurations people have their relationships in, but these two wanting this badly to be as identical as possible seems weird as fuck. What's going to happen when their poor children aren't identical? What if one has a boy and the other has a girl?

Lots of parents have this problem though, expecting that their child will be exactly how they want the child to be, that the kid will share the same interests as the parents, the same values, the same beliefs, the same politics. They think their kid will never want to wear clothes or style their hair in a way that the parents hate, and some actually forget that one day their child will grow up into an independent adult.

IMO everyone who wants to have kids should first ask themselves if they will be okay if their child is completely different than what they're expecting, and only those who can accept that should have children.

Somehow I suspect that the people dropping big money on becoming as identical as possible and insisting on having the same boyfriend and wanting to get pregnant at the same time would be somewhat different in their expectations for their children than most parents.

---

Mardla wrote:

Western Vale Confederacy wrote:
If it is between consenting adults and no physical harm is done, literally nobody cares about what IB does behind bedroom doors.

until polygamy starts demanding state recognition and a judge rules any state without it violates the 14th Amendment

The 14th Amendment to...Australia's constitution? What's that about?

Mardla wrote:

Western Vale Confederacy wrote:
You act as if polygamy is this new dangfangled thing "deh degenerate youngins" are all gossiping about when it has been a thing for millenia...

So has pederasty, but the promotion of Desmond is Amazing is part of a new mainstream movemeny. Same with polygamy

Nice job ignoring all the emphasis on consent and compare a relationship between consenting adults to child rape

Mardla wrote:

Western Vale Confederacy wrote:
If it is between consenting adults and no physical harm is done, literally nobody cares about what IB does behind bedroom doors.

until polygamy starts demanding state recognition and a judge rules any state without it violates the 14th Amendment

My suggestion is to abolish marriage on the government level No more tax benefits, etc. just for being married.

Ifreann wrote:

Page wrote:
Lots of parents have this problem though, expecting that their child will be exactly how they want the child to be, that the kid will share the same interests as the parents, the same values, the same beliefs, the same politics. They think their kid will never want to wear clothes or style their hair in a way that the parents hate, and some actually forget that one day their child will grow up into an independent adult.

IMO everyone who wants to have kids should first ask themselves if they will be okay if their child is completely different than what they're expecting, and only those who can accept that should have children.

Somehow I suspect that the people dropping big money on becoming as identical as possible and insisting on having the same boyfriend and wanting to get pregnant at the same time would be somewhat different in their expectations for their children than most parents.

---

Mardla wrote:
until polygamy starts demanding state recognition and a judge rules any state without it violates the 14th Amendment

The 14th Amendment to...Australia's constitution? What's that about?

I think they only have 8

Western Vale Confederacy wrote:

Mardla wrote:
So has pederasty, but the promotion of Desmond is Amazing is part of a new mainstream movemeny. Same with polygamy

Desmond is a different bowl of soup, and I genuinely view it as disgusting and bordering on outright pedophilia.

Pederasty will be normal to the next generation, you will considered bigoted for trying to "protect" kids from being gay. Desmond was featured on Good Morning America. No LGBT organization or publication has a problem here, they all support it

The blAAtschApen wrote:

Mardla wrote:
until polygamy starts demanding state recognition and a judge rules any state without it violates the 14th Amendment

My suggestion is to abolish marriage on the government level No more tax benefits, etc. just for being married.

No, make homosexuality and polyamory mandatory for all of those aged 18 and up.

Truly a revolutionary solution!

Mardla wrote:

Western Vale Confederacy wrote:
Desmond is a different bowl of soup, and I genuinely view it as disgusting and bordering on outright pedophilia.

Pederasty will be normal to the next generation, you will considered bigoted for trying to "protect" kids from being gay.

One of these two things is true.

Mardla wrote:

Western Vale Confederacy wrote:
Desmond is a different bowl of soup, and I genuinely view it as disgusting and bordering on outright pedophilia.

Pederasty will be normal to the next generation, you will considered bigoted for trying to "protect" kids from being gay. Desmond was featured on Good Morning America. No LGBT organization or publication has a problem here, they all support it

Except we all have problems with it you just don’t listen to us

Ifreann wrote:

Page wrote:
Lots of parents have this problem though, expecting that their child will be exactly how they want the child to be, that the kid will share the same interests as the parents, the same values, the same beliefs, the same politics. They think their kid will never want to wear clothes or style their hair in a way that the parents hate, and some actually forget that one day their child will grow up into an independent adult.

IMO everyone who wants to have kids should first ask themselves if they will be okay if their child is completely different than what they're expecting, and only those who can accept that should have children.

Somehow I suspect that the people dropping big money on becoming as identical as possible and insisting on having the same boyfriend and wanting to get pregnant at the same time would be somewhat different in their expectations for their children than most parents.

---

Mardla wrote:
until polygamy starts demanding state recognition and a judge rules any state without it violates the 14th Amendment

The 14th Amendment to...Australia's constitution? What's that about?

IB is Australian? When WVC mentioned IB I imagined he meant the poster.