NationStates

Posted: **Mon Jan 07, 2019 5:42 am**

Ethel mermania wrote:A source.

https://nypost.com/2019/01/03/worlds-mo ... boyfriend/

1. Those women are nuts, there is no law against nuts.
2. It is morally wrong to disappoint a woman, so I think poor Ben must stiffen up and do his duty.

Ultimately it’s a good media story along the lines of ‘these are the sort of people immoral libtards support and why we should vote for Brexit/Trump/Bolsonaro/Duterte’ that people lap up.

Posted: **Mon Jan 07, 2019 5:43 am**

That's screenplay material, right there.

Posted: **Mon Jan 07, 2019 5:52 am**

The Grims wrote:
The New California Republic wrote:They have likely got some really creepy sex rota system in place that is timed to the millisecond during periods of ovulation, to maximize the odds of both of them getting pregnant at the same time.

Seems.to take all the fun out of sexy times.
Perhaps that is the catch.

There are likely some people out there that would get a thrill from such regimented sex.

Settrah wrote:
The New California Republic wrote:They have likely got some really creepy sex rota system in place that is timed to the millisecond during periods of ovulation, to maximize the odds of both of them getting pregnant at the same time.

It'll be bad though if one had an issue where she couldn't bear his child (or any child), but the other could no problem.

Or they both can, but one had complications and the baby died, but the other baby with the other woman was fine.

Imagine the resentment.

Yeah, it would be a recipe for a complete family meltdown.

Posted: **Mon Jan 07, 2019 5:56 am**

Posted: **Mon Jan 07, 2019 5:59 am**

I just looked at a picture of 'em...

Are they humans or are they mannequins!?

Posted: **Mon Jan 07, 2019 6:05 am**

Western Vale Confederacy wrote:I just looked at a picture of 'em...

Are they humans or are they mannequins!?

They do look creepy as fuck. And look at her in the middle with them, she looks like fucking Morticia from The Addams Family...

Posted: **Mon Jan 07, 2019 6:07 am**

Risottia wrote:What really puzzles me is how do they plan to become pregnant at exactly the same time.

Maybe after blowing 250 k$ on their own cosmetic surgery they blew some more on penile surgery for him...

Settrah wrote:There's gotta be a catch.

There's always a catch.

Well, they're objectively fugly.

IVF and two doctors?

Posted: **Mon Jan 07, 2019 6:18 am**

The New California Republic wrote:
Western Vale Confederacy wrote:I just looked at a picture of 'em...

Are they humans or are they mannequins!?

They do look creepy as fuck. And look at her in the middle with them, she looks like fucking Morticia from The Addams Family...

A bit cruel to poor Angelica Huston...

Now, "Morticia after botched Botox and a couple of failed facelifts"... yeah, I see it.

Posted: **Mon Jan 07, 2019 6:22 am**

The blAAtschApen wrote:IVF and two doctors?

Or Jack Harkness and two Doctors.

Posted: **Mon Jan 07, 2019 7:02 am**

Disgusting.

Posted: **Mon Jan 07, 2019 7:03 am**

So as I understand it, both of these twins are upfront about their intentions to each be impregnated by this guy and this guy is consenting to participate. So no, there's nothing wrong with it.

Posted: **Mon Jan 07, 2019 7:13 am**

Haha! I helped make poll look slightly phallic in shape.

...that's the extent to which this issue concerns me; it doesn't really. I have little problem with it. The only thing is they are not particularly pleasant to look at, I think, but that's not up to me.

Posted: **Mon Jan 07, 2019 7:14 am**

I’m poly so more power to them

Posted: **Mon Jan 07, 2019 7:15 am**

Duvniask wrote:Haha! I helped make poll look slightly phallic in shape.

I just made a contribution.

Posted: **Mon Jan 07, 2019 7:16 am**

Internationalist Bastard wrote:I’m poly so more power to them

I assume you mean polyamorous by virtue of your career and not that stupid animated cartoon show.

Posted: **Mon Jan 07, 2019 7:18 am**

Western Vale Confederacy wrote:
Internationalist Bastard wrote:I’m poly so more power to them

I assume you mean polyamorous by virtue of your career and not that stupid animated cartoon show.

Correct

Posted: **Mon Jan 07, 2019 7:22 am**

Internationalist Bastard wrote:I’m poly so more power to them

I am mono.

Let's destroy game night together

Posted: **Mon Jan 07, 2019 7:23 am**

The blAAtschApen wrote:
Internationalist Bastard wrote:I’m poly so more power to them

I am mono.

Let's destroy game night together

I am polio--

Wait a fucking minute...

Posted: **Mon Jan 07, 2019 7:26 am**

Keeping adultery in the family?

Posted: **Mon Jan 07, 2019 7:27 am**

Mardla wrote:Keeping adultery in the family?

I hardly see how adultry is bad if everyone consents to it

Posted: **Mon Jan 07, 2019 7:27 am**

I don't really care what configurations people have their relationships in, but these two wanting this badly to be as identical as possible seems weird as fuck. What's going to happen when their poor children aren't identical? What if one has a boy and the other has a girl?

Posted: **Mon Jan 07, 2019 7:29 am**

Ifreann wrote:I don't really care what configurations people have their relationships in, but these two wanting this badly to be as identical as possible seems weird as fuck. What's going to happen when their poor children aren't identical? What if one has a boy and the other has a girl?

Perhaps they will not wish to know who birthed which child.

Posted: **Mon Jan 07, 2019 7:29 am**

Ifreann wrote:I don't really care what configurations people have their relationships in, but these two wanting this badly to be as identical as possible seems weird as fuck. What's going to happen when their poor children aren't identical? What if one has a boy and the other has a girl?

Infanticide prolly

Posted: **Mon Jan 07, 2019 7:30 am**

Internationalist Bastard wrote:
Mardla wrote:Keeping adultery in the family?

I hardly see how adultry is bad if everyone consents to it

I don't know what your moral criteria are.

Posted: **Mon Jan 07, 2019 7:32 am**

Well that's... certainly strange.

NationStates

World's happiest man..