Tekania wrote:Person012345 wrote:The serpent is not supposed to be omniscient, even if god DID mean that, how would the serpent have known, and how could he have predicted their deaths in hundreds of years? He didn't tell them to eat it, and as far as I'm concerned he did not decieve them.
Omniscience has nothing to do with this. The serpent knew the commission, and therefore would have known the punishment since they were presented to Adam at the same time. He denied the punishment would happen before Eve.
"Eventually" bears no part in it. The penalty is the penalty, doesn't really matter if it is executed in 2 seconds or 2000 years.
You're right, he didn't say "eat this". He tricked her into wanting to eat it... As we know, even in a soceity dedicated to free speech, said freedom does not itself abrogate one of the effect of their speech, or penalties imposed. You yell fire in a crowded theater and you will be penalized.
He provided information which was not 100% accurate for the purpose of getting her to engage in actions which were damaging to her in a manner which can be nothing else but intentional on his part... there is a word for this called "disinformation", and it's a form of deceit.
Actually, the word we tend to use for that is 'advertising'. I'm just saying.
Interesting thought, though - are you saying the serpent was more than just a serpent?






nice one! Anyway, I would counter the ignorant and close-minded individual who created this thread with this: How 
LOL).