NATION

PASSWORD

2019-2020 US Elections Megathread I- It Begins

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Which Candidate do you support?

Bernie
102
33%
Beto
3
1%
Biden
15
5%
Buttigieg
27
9%
Harris
4
1%
Warren
17
6%
Yang
24
8%
Trump
88
29%
Weld
3
1%
Other
25
8%
 
Total votes : 308

User avatar
Bahktar
Envoy
 
Posts: 302
Founded: Mar 16, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Bahktar » Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:00 am

New haven america wrote:Yeah, and we thought he wasn't gonna win in 2016 and look at what that got us.


FiveThirtyEight gave him around of a 1/3 chance of winning, or 28.6% chance. Things with a 1/3 chance happen every day.

Trump's victory was won by the slightest margins. Considering he has a under 45% approval rating for the most of his term so far, I don't think he has a great chance in 2020 if trends continue.

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:06 am

Novus Wrepland wrote:Reminder that Gabbard is a member of a fucking cult.

https://www.meanwhileinhawaii.org
https://www.civilbeat.org/2015/03/krishna-cult-rumors-still-dog-tulsi-gabbard/
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/11/06/what-does-tulsi-gabbard-believe/amp
http://www.hawaiifreepress.com/ArticlesMain/tabid/56/ID/20879/Tulsi-Gabbard-Hires-Russian-Agent-to-Keep-Hawaii-Media-in-Check.aspx

written by her own aunt:

As Representative Tulsi Gabbard’s aunt, it gives me no pleasure to publicly air my doubts regarding my niece’s political agenda, which Kelefa Sanneh describes in his Profile (“Against the Tide,” November 6th). However, I take my role as a citizen seriously, and I would be remiss not to share my concerns. Sanneh raises the issue of Gabbard’s lifelong immersion in the Science of Identity Foundation, an opaque religious organization that she and its founder, Chris Butler, have attempted to reframe as a “resource.” Gabbard’s answer to a basic question about Butler is troubling: despite calling him her “guru dev” (spiritual master) in her own promotional video, she denies that he is more important than any of her other teachers. She also has a notably mixed voting record, and associations that veer from certain progressive causes to the apparent courting of such strongmen as Narendra Modi, Bashar al-Assad, and Abdel Fattah el-Sisi (not to mention Trump)—this zigzagging path through positions is vexing. Sanneh’s article walks the fine line of investigation and exposition in a way that points to shadows worthy of further illumination.


She is by far the most despicable if not corrupt Democrat I can think of and people love her because she’s anti-establishment. What a depressing situation.


If you can actually give a coherent distinction between "cult" and "religion", that might actually be relevant.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44088
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:52 am

Knockturn Alley wrote:
New haven america wrote:Yeah, and we thought he wasn't gonna win in 2016 and look at what that got us.

He would have lost if it was anyone other than Clinton.

:rofl:

I'm sorry, but no, despite popular belief Bernie was not the savior of America, he couldn't even get his own followers to listen to him and vote for Clinton.
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
Page
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17486
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Page » Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:57 am

The Archregimancy wrote:
I just don't think the United States is going to elect a 39-year-old* half-Polynesian vegetarian Hindu woman from American Samoa who represents Hawaii in Congress as its president.


I remember 2007 and people were saying stuff like "I don't think the United States is going to elect a young, black junior Senator from Illinois who spent his childhood in Indonesia and whose middle name is Hussein."
Last edited by Page on Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
Anarcho-Communist Against: Bolsheviks, Fascists, TERFs, Putin, Autocrats, Conservatives, Ancaps, Bourgeoisie, Bigots, Liberals, Maoists

I don't believe in kink-shaming unless your kink is submitting to the state.

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54796
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:58 am

New haven america wrote:
Knockturn Alley wrote:He would have lost if it was anyone other than Clinton.

:rofl:

I'm sorry, but no, despite popular belief Bernie was not the savior of America, he couldn't even get his own followers to listen to him and vote for Clinton.


He does have a point though. The Clinton name in general is toxic in the Midwest cuz of NAFTA and Bernie certainly had a greater appeal to working class whites than she did. While yeah it's impossible to say for sure how it would have gone I'd wager Bernie would have done better than Clinton in the area.
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
Page
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17486
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Page » Sun Jan 13, 2019 4:00 am

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
New haven america wrote: :rofl:

I'm sorry, but no, despite popular belief Bernie was not the savior of America, he couldn't even get his own followers to listen to him and vote for Clinton.


He does have a point though. The Clinton name in general is toxic in the Midwest cuz of NAFTA and Bernie certainly had a greater appeal to working class whites than she did. While yeah it's impossible to say for sure how it would have gone I'd wager Bernie would have done better than Clinton in the area.


Bernie would have definitely actually visited Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania instead of ignoring them altogether because he assumed these states would serve as a "firewall."
Anarcho-Communist Against: Bolsheviks, Fascists, TERFs, Putin, Autocrats, Conservatives, Ancaps, Bourgeoisie, Bigots, Liberals, Maoists

I don't believe in kink-shaming unless your kink is submitting to the state.

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45100
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Sun Jan 13, 2019 4:12 am

This thread is doomed to periodically become the 2016 election thread.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Seraven
Senator
 
Posts: 3570
Founded: Jun 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Seraven » Sun Jan 13, 2019 4:20 am

The Archregimancy wrote:Leaving aside the disagreements - and the slightly heated thread rhetoric - over her actual politics, I don't for a second think that Tulsi Gabbard has the slightest chance of being elected president in 2020.

I just don't think the United States is going to elect a 39-year-old* half-Polynesian vegetarian Hindu woman from American Samoa who represents Hawaii in Congress as its president.

Is that fair? Almost certainly not. Is it realistic? Likely yes.

Even leaving aside all of the other factors, she'd be the youngest person elected to the presidency by a good four years (beating Kennedy; Theodore Roosevelt was a year younger than Kennedy on assuming office, but wasn't elected). She'd also only the be the second person to be elected to to the presidency straight from the House; Garfield was the other, and even he was a senator-elect at the time. Surely she has an eye on either 2024 or the vice-presidency rather than seriously thinking she's going to win the Democratic nomination for 2020.


*Age at the 2020 election, if I'm calculating correctly.


Man, I would probably vote her the best. But I don't think she'll get much support in America since she opposed the removal of Assad from power, despite the fact it would be the best for him to stay.
Copper can change as its quality went down.
Gold can't change, for its quality never went down.
The Alma Mater wrote:
Seraven wrote:I know right! Whites enslaved the natives, they killed them, they converted them forcibly, they acted like a better human beings than the Muslims.

An excellent example of why allowing unrestricted immigration of people with a very different culture might not be the best idea ever :P

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44088
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Sun Jan 13, 2019 4:21 am

Cannot think of a name wrote:This thread is doomed to periodically become the 2016 election thread.

Time officially halted after the 2016 election and will not resume until 2024.

We thank you for your patience and hope you have a nice 6 years.
Last edited by New haven america on Sun Jan 13, 2019 4:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
Seraven
Senator
 
Posts: 3570
Founded: Jun 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Seraven » Sun Jan 13, 2019 4:28 am

2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries

I really wonder, though, from this presidential primaries from Democrat, who would most likely able to be elected as President, judging by current situation?
Copper can change as its quality went down.
Gold can't change, for its quality never went down.
The Alma Mater wrote:
Seraven wrote:I know right! Whites enslaved the natives, they killed them, they converted them forcibly, they acted like a better human beings than the Muslims.

An excellent example of why allowing unrestricted immigration of people with a very different culture might not be the best idea ever :P

User avatar
Novus Wrepland
Attaché
 
Posts: 83
Founded: Nov 24, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Novus Wrepland » Sun Jan 13, 2019 10:23 am

Salandriagado wrote:
Novus Wrepland wrote:Reminder that Gabbard is a member of a fucking cult.

https://www.meanwhileinhawaii.org
https://www.civilbeat.org/2015/03/krishna-cult-rumors-still-dog-tulsi-gabbard/
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/11/06/what-does-tulsi-gabbard-believe/amp
http://www.hawaiifreepress.com/ArticlesMain/tabid/56/ID/20879/Tulsi-Gabbard-Hires-Russian-Agent-to-Keep-Hawaii-Media-in-Check.aspx

written by her own aunt:

As Representative Tulsi Gabbard’s aunt, it gives me no pleasure to publicly air my doubts regarding my niece’s political agenda, which Kelefa Sanneh describes in his Profile (“Against the Tide,” November 6th). However, I take my role as a citizen seriously, and I would be remiss not to share my concerns. Sanneh raises the issue of Gabbard’s lifelong immersion in the Science of Identity Foundation, an opaque religious organization that she and its founder, Chris Butler, have attempted to reframe as a “resource.” Gabbard’s answer to a basic question about Butler is troubling: despite calling him her “guru dev” (spiritual master) in her own promotional video, she denies that he is more important than any of her other teachers. She also has a notably mixed voting record, and associations that veer from certain progressive causes to the apparent courting of such strongmen as Narendra Modi, Bashar al-Assad, and Abdel Fattah el-Sisi (not to mention Trump)—this zigzagging path through positions is vexing. Sanneh’s article walks the fine line of investigation and exposition in a way that points to shadows worthy of further illumination.


She is by far the most despicable if not corrupt Democrat I can think of and people love her because she’s anti-establishment. What a depressing situation.


If you can actually give a coherent distinction between "cult" and "religion", that might actually be relevant.

There is no difference. "Cult" is only a term used to disqualify unorthodox, new religious movements. :o
Last edited by Novus Wrepland on Sun Jan 13, 2019 10:30 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Sun Jan 13, 2019 10:51 am

Novus Wrepland wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
If you can actually give a coherent distinction between "cult" and "religion", that might actually be relevant.

There is no difference. "Cult" is only a term used to disqualify unorthodox, new religious movements. :o


So what you actually said was "Tulsi Gabbard is a member of an organised religion", which she has in common with just about every other Presidential candidate in US history.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163908
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Sun Jan 13, 2019 11:00 am

Cannot think of a name wrote:This thread is doomed to periodically become the 2016 election thread.

All threads are ultimately the 2016 election thread.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Page
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17486
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Page » Sun Jan 13, 2019 11:05 am

Cannot think of a name wrote:This thread is doomed to periodically become the 2016 election thread.


Perhaps we can all be disciplined enough to stay on topic and not say things about the 2016 election like how Bernie would have won.

Bernie would have won.
Anarcho-Communist Against: Bolsheviks, Fascists, TERFs, Putin, Autocrats, Conservatives, Ancaps, Bourgeoisie, Bigots, Liberals, Maoists

I don't believe in kink-shaming unless your kink is submitting to the state.

User avatar
Valrifell
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31063
Founded: Aug 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Valrifell » Sun Jan 13, 2019 12:09 pm

Novus Wrepland wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
If you can actually give a coherent distinction between "cult" and "religion", that might actually be relevant.

There is no difference. "Cult" is only a term used to disqualify unorthodox, new religious movements. :o


Cults tend to revolve around one person and everyone else giving them nice things. Like that one guy who spent donations on Rolls Royces, definitely a cult.
HAVING AN ALL CAPS SIG MAKES ME FEEL SMART

User avatar
Novus Wrepland
Attaché
 
Posts: 83
Founded: Nov 24, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Novus Wrepland » Sun Jan 13, 2019 12:18 pm

Salandriagado wrote:
Novus Wrepland wrote:There is no difference. "Cult" is only a term used to disqualify unorthodox, new religious movements. :o


So what you actually said was "Tulsi Gabbard is a member of an organised religion", which she has in common with just about every other Presidential candidate in US history.

No, I was jibing your knee-jerk response to make the predictable “cult is not salient term” argument assumedly before reading about the group with which Gabbard is associated with (as it certainly is a cult.)
Last edited by Novus Wrepland on Sun Jan 13, 2019 12:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34994
Founded: Dec 18, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Sun Jan 13, 2019 12:19 pm

Cannot think of a name wrote:This thread is doomed to periodically become the 2016 election thread.

Yes, only with physical proof that Trump is a POS POTUS

User avatar
Valrifell
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31063
Founded: Aug 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Valrifell » Sun Jan 13, 2019 12:21 pm

The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:
Cannot think of a name wrote:This thread is doomed to periodically become the 2016 election thread.

Yes, only with physical proof that Trump is a POS POTUS


You'd be shocked at how little that gets you in 2019.
HAVING AN ALL CAPS SIG MAKES ME FEEL SMART

User avatar
The South Falls
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13353
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby The South Falls » Sun Jan 13, 2019 12:23 pm

Valrifell wrote:
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:Yes, only with physical proof that Trump is a POS POTUS


You'd be shocked at how little that gets you in 2019.

As long as he's white he'll win. I know it. If a black guy was pulling all the shit that Trump has done or attempted to achieve, he'd be impeached within days.
This is an MT nation that reflects some of my beliefs, trade deals and debate always welcome! Call me TeaSF. A level 8, according to This Index.


Political Compass Results:

Economic: -5.5
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.51
I make dumb jokes. I'm really serious about that.

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Sun Jan 13, 2019 12:40 pm

Novus Wrepland wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
So what you actually said was "Tulsi Gabbard is a member of an organised religion", which she has in common with just about every other Presidential candidate in US history.

No, I was jibing your knee-jerk response to make the predictable “cult is not salient term” argument assumedly before reading about the group with which Gabbard is associated with (as it certainly is a cult.)


I don't disagree that it's a cult. It's just that so the same is true of the Roman Catholic Church, and I don't hear you objecting to Catholics.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Horatius Cocles
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 8
Founded: Jan 03, 2014
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Horatius Cocles » Sun Jan 13, 2019 12:58 pm

Side-tracking from the political posts here, the Catholic Church isn't a cult by either general definition or Christian context.
Social Democrat

Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: -3.63
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.87

Pros: Environmentalism, marijuana legalization, feminism

User avatar
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34994
Founded: Dec 18, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Sun Jan 13, 2019 1:11 pm

The South Falls wrote:
Valrifell wrote:
You'd be shocked at how little that gets you in 2019.

As long as he's white he'll win. I know it. If a black guy was pulling all the shit that Trump has done or attempted to achieve, he'd be impeached within days.

I don't think that it has anything to do with race.

User avatar
Northern Davincia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16960
Founded: Jun 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Davincia » Sun Jan 13, 2019 1:33 pm

The South Falls wrote:
Valrifell wrote:
You'd be shocked at how little that gets you in 2019.

As long as he's white he'll win. I know it. If a black guy was pulling all the shit that Trump has done or attempted to achieve, he'd be impeached within days.

Perhaps the media shouldn't desensitize the nation to Trump's shenanigans.
Hoppean Libertarian, Acolyte of von Mises, Protector of Our Sacred Liberties
Economic Left/Right: 9.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.05
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."

User avatar
Valrifell
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31063
Founded: Aug 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Valrifell » Sun Jan 13, 2019 1:55 pm

Northern Davincia wrote:
The South Falls wrote:As long as he's white he'll win. I know it. If a black guy was pulling all the shit that Trump has done or attempted to achieve, he'd be impeached within days.

Perhaps the media shouldn't desensitize the nation to Trump's shenanigans.


Maybe Trump shouldn't be up to so many shenanigans?

Just, you know, a thought.
HAVING AN ALL CAPS SIG MAKES ME FEEL SMART

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163908
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Sun Jan 13, 2019 2:03 pm

Northern Davincia wrote:
The South Falls wrote:As long as he's white he'll win. I know it. If a black guy was pulling all the shit that Trump has done or attempted to achieve, he'd be impeached within days.

Perhaps the media shouldn't desensitize the nation to Trump's shenanigans.

You think that the media should stop doing what's most profitable?

Good heavens, ND, how anti-capitalist of you.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cyptopir, Dauchh Palki, Statesburg, Zurkerx

Advertisement

Remove ads