Gun bans. Or, alternatively, the Democrats to stop pushing gun bans.
Advertisement

by Telconi » Mon May 06, 2019 2:20 pm

by Telconi » Mon May 06, 2019 2:20 pm

by San Lumen » Mon May 06, 2019 2:22 pm

by Telconi » Mon May 06, 2019 2:26 pm
San Lumen wrote:Telconi wrote:
Gun bans. Or, alternatively, the Democrats to stop pushing gun bans.
Yeah and who cares if the next generation has a ruined environment, only knows many species from books, has debt up the the wazoo, no healthcare or social safety nets and a gutted education system. A long as you have your guns. Its funny you claim to care about other things yet its patently obvious your guns are all that matter and everything else can go to hell even if that means rigged elections only your party can win.

by Thermodolia » Mon May 06, 2019 2:29 pm
San Lumen wrote:Telconi wrote:
Gun bans. Or, alternatively, the Democrats to stop pushing gun bans.
Yeah and who cares if the next generation has a ruined environment, only knows many species from books, has debt up the the wazoo, no healthcare or social safety nets and a gutted education system. A long as you have your guns. Its funny you claim to care about other things yet its patently obvious your guns are all that matter and everything else can go to hell even if that means rigged elections only your party can win.
by Cannot think of a name » Mon May 06, 2019 2:31 pm
Thermodolia wrote:San Lumen wrote:Yeah and who cares if the next generation has a ruined environment, only knows many species from books, has debt up the the wazoo, no healthcare or social safety nets and a gutted education system. A long as you have your guns. Its funny you claim to care about other things yet its patently obvious your guns are all that matter and everything else can go to hell even if that means rigged elections only your party can win.
Could you stop acting like a broken record for once?

by San Lumen » Mon May 06, 2019 2:35 pm
Thermodolia wrote:San Lumen wrote:Yeah and who cares if the next generation has a ruined environment, only knows many species from books, has debt up the the wazoo, no healthcare or social safety nets and a gutted education system. A long as you have your guns. Its funny you claim to care about other things yet its patently obvious your guns are all that matter and everything else can go to hell even if that means rigged elections only your party can win.
Could you stop acting like a broken record for once?

by Thermodolia » Mon May 06, 2019 2:37 pm

by Idzequitch » Mon May 06, 2019 2:43 pm

by Idzequitch » Mon May 06, 2019 2:45 pm

by Thuzbekistan » Mon May 06, 2019 2:46 pm

by Idzequitch » Mon May 06, 2019 2:46 pm

by Telconi » Mon May 06, 2019 2:46 pm

by Idzequitch » Mon May 06, 2019 2:48 pm
Telconi wrote:Idzequitch wrote:And relatively speaking, both parties are so far away from ideal that it's not even worth wasting breath arguing about which one is closer to being "right."
Are they both far from ideal, yeah. But one is quite clearly farther than the other. And the unfortunate fact is that "lesser of two evils" is the name of the game.

by San Lumen » Mon May 06, 2019 2:49 pm
Thuzbekistan wrote:San, dude, you're way overly focused on this electoral college and rural vs urban vote. Can you chill on that?

by Telconi » Mon May 06, 2019 2:49 pm
Idzequitch wrote:Telconi wrote:
Are they both far from ideal, yeah. But one is quite clearly farther than the other. And the unfortunate fact is that "lesser of two evils" is the name of the game.
Call me overly idealistic, but that's a reality I refuse to accept. When presented with two evils, I must choose neither.

by Thuzbekistan » Mon May 06, 2019 2:49 pm

by San Lumen » Mon May 06, 2019 2:50 pm
Thuzbekistan wrote:San Lumen wrote:And which third party has a viable chance of winning?
Why does this matter? Prior to the Civil War, parties rose and reformed all the time. 3rd parties affect the race all the time. Think of Ross Perot. Winning isn't as important as voting with your conscience, Lumen.

by Thuzbekistan » Mon May 06, 2019 2:50 pm

by Thuzbekistan » Mon May 06, 2019 2:52 pm
San Lumen wrote:Thuzbekistan wrote:Why does this matter? Prior to the Civil War, parties rose and reformed all the time. 3rd parties affect the race all the time. Think of Ross Perot. Winning isn't as important as voting with your conscience, Lumen.
I agree you should vote your conscience but third parties elected Trump

by San Lumen » Mon May 06, 2019 2:53 pm
Thuzbekistan wrote:San Lumen wrote:I agree you should vote your conscience but third parties elected Trump
No, they don't. Green didn't steal the vote form hillary. In fact, the protest votes for Johnson were enough that it would have been insanely closer had those libertarians voted for Trump instead just to pick the candidate. Trump is not the end all and be all of our politics either. 2016 was just a horrible year which we will hopefully not live to see another like.

by Idzequitch » Mon May 06, 2019 2:53 pm
San Lumen wrote:Thuzbekistan wrote:San, dude, you're way overly focused on this electoral college and rural vs urban vote. Can you chill on that?
That wasn't about rural vs urban or the electoral collegeIdzequitch wrote:Any of them, as soon as the blind partisan sheep lose the blindfolds.
They never put up people that are viable. The libertarian that ran for Governor of New York last year wanted to cut all state funding for public transit and have the municipalities or counties run it. The MTA would go bankrupt with such a proposal as no one but the rich would be able to afford the exorbitant fares

by San Lumen » Mon May 06, 2019 2:54 pm
Idzequitch wrote:San Lumen wrote:That wasn't about rural vs urban or the electoral college
They never put up people that are viable. The libertarian that ran for Governor of New York last year wanted to cut all state funding for public transit and have the municipalities or counties run it. The MTA would go bankrupt with such a proposal as no one but the rich would be able to afford the exorbitant fares
Which is why we need to keep yanking those blindfolds off. The bigger the pool of people who can see how awful this bipartisan government truly is, the more options we have on people who can run for office against the political duopoly.

by Idzequitch » Mon May 06, 2019 2:55 pm
San Lumen wrote:Thuzbekistan wrote:Why does this matter? Prior to the Civil War, parties rose and reformed all the time. 3rd parties affect the race all the time. Think of Ross Perot. Winning isn't as important as voting with your conscience, Lumen.
I agree you should vote your conscience but third parties elected Trump
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Bavarno, Comfed, Commonwealth of Adirondack, DutchFormosa, Galloism, Google [Bot], Grinning Dragon, GuessTheAltAccount, Hidrandia, Ifreann, Kvylia, MLGDogeland, Necroghastia, Ordo, Port Caverton, Sheizou, Tarsonis, The Jamesian Republic, The Rickpublic, The Shaymen, Umeria, Vikanias, Washington Resistance Army, Washington-Columbia, Zurkerx
Advertisement