NATION

PASSWORD

2019-2020 US Elections Megathread I- It Begins

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Which Candidate do you support?

Bernie
102
33%
Beto
3
1%
Biden
15
5%
Buttigieg
27
9%
Harris
4
1%
Warren
17
6%
Yang
24
8%
Trump
88
29%
Weld
3
1%
Other
25
8%
 
Total votes : 308

User avatar
The South Falls
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13353
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby The South Falls » Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:15 pm

Pasong Tirad wrote:
The South Falls wrote:That's true. He did have some parliamentary influence.

"He had some parliamentary influence" is a pretty tame way of saying a framed headshot of LKY still adorns the bedrooms of PAP parliamentarians, and made it virtually impossible for any other party in Singapore to gain a majority.

No, I meant the other way round. But yes.
This is an MT nation that reflects some of my beliefs, trade deals and debate always welcome! Call me TeaSF. A level 8, according to This Index.


Political Compass Results:

Economic: -5.5
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.51
I make dumb jokes. I'm really serious about that.

User avatar
The World Capitalist Confederation
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12838
Founded: Dec 07, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby The World Capitalist Confederation » Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:20 am

Kowani wrote:
Telconi wrote:
The right which is more integral takes precedence.

And who decides which is more integral?

The one which provides the most utility to society. The philosophy of utilitarianism is the foundation of a democracy.
Please Watch
“We could manage to survive without the money changers and stockbrokers, but we would rather find it difficult to survive without miners, steel workers and those who cultivate the land.” - Nye Bevan, Minister of Health under Clement Attlee

“The mutual-aid tendency in man has so remote an origin, and is so deeply interwoven with all the past evolution of the human race, that is has been maintained by mankind up to the present time, notwithstanding all vicissitudes of history.” - Peter Krotopkin, evolutionary biologist and political writer.

User avatar
Northern Davincia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16960
Founded: Jun 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Davincia » Mon Jan 07, 2019 6:01 pm

The World Capitalist Confederation wrote:
Kowani wrote:And who decides which is more integral?

The one which provides the most utility to society. The philosophy of utilitarianism is the foundation of a democracy.

Until you hit the utility monster.
Hoppean Libertarian, Acolyte of von Mises, Protector of Our Sacred Liberties
Economic Left/Right: 9.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.05
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."

User avatar
Valrifell
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31063
Founded: Aug 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Valrifell » Mon Jan 07, 2019 6:10 pm

The World Capitalist Confederation wrote:
Kowani wrote:And who decides which is more integral?

The one which provides the most utility to society. The philosophy of utilitarianism is the foundation of a democracy.


Except utilitarianism as a philosophy is younger than the concept of democracy.

Much younger.
Last edited by Valrifell on Mon Jan 07, 2019 6:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
HAVING AN ALL CAPS SIG MAKES ME FEEL SMART

User avatar
Hediacrana
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1225
Founded: Nov 20, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Hediacrana » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:04 pm

Valrifell wrote:
Hediacrana wrote:Bit of a shame Beto is not in the options -- I mean, he would not be my favoured candidate, and I get that he doesn't meet the criteria of this poll, but for better or worse, chances of him not running frankly seem pretty low to me at this point, and I bet results would look look quite different if he was in there.


He's been pretty adamant about not running in every single interview he's been asked and hasn't taken any steps to prepare for such a campaign. Unlike, say, Warren or Booker who have essentially declared their intention months ago and just didn't voice it yet.


According to the WSJ, Beto "doesn’t plan to make a final decision on a presidential bid until at least February." And while he's weighing his options, he's going on a speaking tour to meet voters outside Texas.

So yeah, not all that adamant at all. I think it's almost certain he's going to run, and not unlikely that he'll actually get through the primaries.
'If you're not anti-war, then you're not fiscally conservative, and you're certainly not pro-life.'
Parent, spouse, leftist Christian and suspected witch.
She/her.

User avatar
Valrifell
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31063
Founded: Aug 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Valrifell » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:07 pm

Hediacrana wrote:
Valrifell wrote:
He's been pretty adamant about not running in every single interview he's been asked and hasn't taken any steps to prepare for such a campaign. Unlike, say, Warren or Booker who have essentially declared their intention months ago and just didn't voice it yet.


According to the WSJ, Beto "doesn’t plan to make a final decision on a presidential bid until at least February." And while he's weighing his options, he's going on a speaking tour to meet voters outside Texas.

So yeah, not all that adamant at all. I think it's almost certain he's going to run, and not unlikely that he'll actually get through the primaries.


Since making that post (and because of it) I've actually discovered he's somewhat walked back on his claims about not wanting to run for president.

I welcome it, he has a kind of appeal that I don't think very many other candidates can replicate and with him being so new on the national stage the only scandal he has are his political positions that we know of.
HAVING AN ALL CAPS SIG MAKES ME FEEL SMART

User avatar
Hediacrana
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1225
Founded: Nov 20, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Hediacrana » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:11 pm

Valrifell wrote:Since making that post (and because of it) I've actually discovered he's somewhat walked back on his claims about not wanting to run for president.

I welcome it, he has a kind of appeal that I don't think very many other candidates can replicate and with him being so new on the national stage the only scandal he has are his political positions that we know of.

Ah, okay. Yeah, I have mixed feelings about it myself. Winning from an incumbent is hard, and he seems like a candidate who could pull that off. Which would be great. On the other hand, his positions are not nearly as progressive as I would like.
'If you're not anti-war, then you're not fiscally conservative, and you're certainly not pro-life.'
Parent, spouse, leftist Christian and suspected witch.
She/her.

User avatar
Bombadil
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17486
Founded: Oct 13, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Bombadil » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:25 pm

Trump will call him Beaten Beto, it will get annoying.
Eldest, that's what I am...Tom remembers the first raindrop and the first acorn...he knew the dark under the stars when it was fearless — before the Dark Lord came from Outside..

十年

User avatar
Valrifell
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31063
Founded: Aug 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Valrifell » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:27 pm

Hediacrana wrote:
Valrifell wrote:Since making that post (and because of it) I've actually discovered he's somewhat walked back on his claims about not wanting to run for president.

I welcome it, he has a kind of appeal that I don't think very many other candidates can replicate and with him being so new on the national stage the only scandal he has are his political positions that we know of.

Ah, okay. Yeah, I have mixed feelings about it myself. Winning from an incumbent is hard, and he seems like a candidate who could pull that off. Which would be great. On the other hand, his positions are not nearly as progressive as I would like.


I'll take him as the farthest left I can realistically get. He's also most likely going to try and attack from the left while also presenting as the most likely candidate to win through his fundraising escapades.

Bombadil wrote:Trump will call him Beaten Beto, it will get annoying.


Too many syllables, "Bad Beto" is more likely. Though O'Rourke might just own it.
HAVING AN ALL CAPS SIG MAKES ME FEEL SMART

User avatar
Bombadil
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17486
Founded: Oct 13, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Bombadil » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:35 pm

Valrifell wrote:
Hediacrana wrote:Ah, okay. Yeah, I have mixed feelings about it myself. Winning from an incumbent is hard, and he seems like a candidate who could pull that off. Which would be great. On the other hand, his positions are not nearly as progressive as I would like.


I'll take him as the farthest left I can realistically get. He's also most likely going to try and attack from the left while also presenting as the most likely candidate to win through his fundraising escapades.

Bombadil wrote:Trump will call him Beaten Beto, it will get annoying.


Too many syllables, "Bad Beto" is more likely. Though O'Rourke might just own it.


I'm telling you it will be 'Beaten Beto', I am sure of this. He'll go on and on about how he was beaten by Ted Cruz, how he'll be beaten by Trump, on and on until you want to throw up.
Eldest, that's what I am...Tom remembers the first raindrop and the first acorn...he knew the dark under the stars when it was fearless — before the Dark Lord came from Outside..

十年

User avatar
Valrifell
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31063
Founded: Aug 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Valrifell » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:48 pm

Bombadil wrote:
Valrifell wrote:
I'll take him as the farthest left I can realistically get. He's also most likely going to try and attack from the left while also presenting as the most likely candidate to win through his fundraising escapades.



Too many syllables, "Bad Beto" is more likely. Though O'Rourke might just own it.


I'm telling you it will be 'Beaten Beto', I am sure of this. He'll go on and on about how he was beaten by Ted Cruz, how he'll be beaten by Trump, on and on until you want to throw up.


Oh fuck, you're right.

Are you Trump?
HAVING AN ALL CAPS SIG MAKES ME FEEL SMART

User avatar
Kowani
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44696
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:50 pm

Valrifell wrote:
Bombadil wrote:
I'm telling you it will be 'Beaten Beto', I am sure of this. He'll go on and on about how he was beaten by Ted Cruz, how he'll be beaten by Trump, on and on until you want to throw up.


Oh fuck, you're right.

Are you Trump?

His vocab's too big, they can't be. Might be his therapist...
Abolitionism in the North has leagued itself with Radical Democracy, and so the Slave Power was forced to ally itself with the Money Power; that is the great fact of the age.




The triumph of the Democracy is essential to the struggle of popular liberty


Currently Rehabilitating: Martin Van Buren, Benjamin Harrison, and Woodrow Wilson
Currently Vilifying: George Washington, Theodore Roosevelt, and Jimmy Carter

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41705
Founded: Antiquity
New York Times Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:50 pm

Bombadil wrote:
Valrifell wrote:
I'll take him as the farthest left I can realistically get. He's also most likely going to try and attack from the left while also presenting as the most likely candidate to win through his fundraising escapades.



Too many syllables, "Bad Beto" is more likely. Though O'Rourke might just own it.


I'm telling you it will be 'Beaten Beto', I am sure of this. He'll go on and on about how he was beaten by Ted Cruz, how he'll be beaten by Trump, on and on until you want to throw up.

I would not bet against this because I can't afford the loss.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Bombadil
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17486
Founded: Oct 13, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Bombadil » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:56 pm

Cannot think of a name wrote:
Bombadil wrote:
I'm telling you it will be 'Beaten Beto', I am sure of this. He'll go on and on about how he was beaten by Ted Cruz, how he'll be beaten by Trump, on and on until you want to throw up.

I would not bet against this because I can't afford the loss.


I'd be too depressed to collect on it.
Eldest, that's what I am...Tom remembers the first raindrop and the first acorn...he knew the dark under the stars when it was fearless — before the Dark Lord came from Outside..

十年

User avatar
Puldania
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1505
Founded: Sep 28, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Puldania » Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:16 pm

United States of Natan wrote:
Great Minarchistan wrote:so basically warren but the whole training is already done

Too far, dude.

Unified Republics wrote:What do you all think of Larry Hogan? He seems like a pretty moderate moderate and enjoys wide support among dems and republicans. The idea of him running has been floated around a bit.

Not a fan. I'm only voting for a Democrat, and no, I will not be voting for Bernie, because he's not a Democrat. #KamalaBeto2020 or #HillaryKamala2020
Paddy O Fernature wrote:Welp, looks like 2020 is shaping up to be another election of "who sucks less" for President.

Seriously, with a nation as large as the US, how can we NOT find better people to run for POTUS?

We've got plenty of great democrats. Its a shame the far left is often too blinded by Bernie to realize it; he's trained them to instantly hate any Democrat who doesn't embrace him.

God you really are an idiot.
I'd rather vote Republican than Kamala Harris.
Learn Puldanian: https://www.memrise.com/course/1603336/puldanian/
Instrumental Art Rock Album: https://soundcloud.com/enrique-poveda-8 ... l-releases
Join the International Northwestern Union, the largest Sh!tpost based economy on NS.

User avatar
The of Japan
Minister
 
Posts: 2781
Founded: Jul 30, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The of Japan » Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:22 pm

trump needs a miracle to get re-elected
Texan Communist and Internationalist

User avatar
Major-Tom
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15691
Founded: Mar 09, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Major-Tom » Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:22 pm

Eternal Lotharia wrote:Ojeda! Ojeda!


I'll never fully understand the appeal behind Ojeda. I mean, I agree with him on a good number of issues, but I'm doubtful that the Democratic Party's frontrunner should be a one term WV State Senator who voted for Trump.

I harbor no hatred or even dislike towards the guy, hell, I want him to continue a path in WV. But for President? That's the last thing the Democratic Party needs.

User avatar
Pasong Tirad
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11656
Founded: May 31, 2007
Democratic Socialists

Postby Pasong Tirad » Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:25 pm

The of Japan wrote:trump needs a miracle to get re-elected

The Democratic Party's working on it.

User avatar
The of Japan
Minister
 
Posts: 2781
Founded: Jul 30, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The of Japan » Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:30 pm

Eternal Lotharia wrote:
Major-Tom wrote:
I'll never fully understand the appeal behind Ojeda. I mean, I agree with him on a good number of issues, but I'm doubtful that the Democratic Party's frontrunner should be a one term WV State Senator who voted for Trump.

I harbor no hatred or even dislike towards the guy, hell, I want him to continue a path in WV. But for President? That's the last thing the Democratic Party needs.

I strongly disagree, I like his appeal, his outsider nature, his fighting nature, his ads, his populism, and he feels much less divisive and controversial than Warren, O Rourke, Harris, Clinton, Bernie, or Biden.

He'll be able to win over Trump supporters, if his West Virginia Race is anything to go by. Sure he lost in West Virginia, but he was able to close a gap of 30+ points. If O Rourke is seen as successful for closing a 6.4% Statewide gap, Ojeda should be considered successful for closing a 30+ District gap in one of the reddest districts and states in the country.

Trump beat him in this race, but he likely couldn't in a Presidential race if Ojeda gained fame.

Will Ojeda be acceptable to progressive democrats though?
Texan Communist and Internationalist

User avatar
Major-Tom
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15691
Founded: Mar 09, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Major-Tom » Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:30 pm

The of Japan wrote:trump needs a miracle to get re-elected


Honestly, I loathe the guy, but he has several paths to re-election;

(1. The Dems nominate a shit-sandwich of a candidate, which is sadly likely....
(2. The base stays as intact as it was in 2016, because, fuck it, it's Trump base, it moves less than an obese man in a marathon.
(3. The economy somehow continues it's bullish path, defying economic predictions and keeps moving full pace.

I find the first and second option most likely, so let's hope the Dems don't nominate a Harris, Castro or Gillibrand. I don't hate any of those names mentioned, but I recognize that electorally, they are weak candidates for a General Election.

User avatar
The of Japan
Minister
 
Posts: 2781
Founded: Jul 30, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The of Japan » Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:30 pm

Pasong Tirad wrote:
The of Japan wrote:trump needs a miracle to get re-elected

The Democratic Party's working on it.

It will be a lot of work, but they may do it
Texan Communist and Internationalist

User avatar
Pasong Tirad
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11656
Founded: May 31, 2007
Democratic Socialists

Postby Pasong Tirad » Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:32 pm

Major-Tom wrote:
The of Japan wrote:trump needs a miracle to get re-elected


Honestly, I loathe the guy, but he has several paths to re-election;

(1. The Dems nominate a shit-sandwich of a candidate, which is sadly likely....
(2. The base stays as intact as it was in 2016, because, fuck it, it's Trump base, it moves less than an obese man in a marathon.
(3. The economy somehow continues it's bullish path, defying economic predictions and keeps moving full pace.

I find the first and second option most likely, so let's hope the Dems don't nominate a Harris, Castro or Gillibrand. I don't hate any of those names mentioned, but I recognize that electorally, they are weak candidates for a General Election.

*chanting* bernie bernie bernie

User avatar
The of Japan
Minister
 
Posts: 2781
Founded: Jul 30, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The of Japan » Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:32 pm

Major-Tom wrote:
The of Japan wrote:trump needs a miracle to get re-elected


Honestly, I loathe the guy, but he has several paths to re-election;

(1. The Dems nominate a shit-sandwich of a candidate, which is sadly likely....
(2. The base stays as intact as it was in 2016, because, fuck it, it's Trump base, it moves less than an obese man in a marathon.
(3. The economy somehow continues it's bullish path, defying economic predictions and keeps moving full pace.

I find the first and second option most likely, so let's hope the Dems don't nominate a Harris, Castro or Gillibrand. I don't hate any of those names mentioned, but I recognize that electorally, they are weak candidates for a General Election.

Sanders or Biden most likely will win the primaries, though if someone like Elizabeth warren wins trump will have a good chance.
Texan Communist and Internationalist

User avatar
Major-Tom
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15691
Founded: Mar 09, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Major-Tom » Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:32 pm

Eternal Lotharia wrote:
Major-Tom wrote:
I'll never fully understand the appeal behind Ojeda. I mean, I agree with him on a good number of issues, but I'm doubtful that the Democratic Party's frontrunner should be a one term WV State Senator who voted for Trump.

I harbor no hatred or even dislike towards the guy, hell, I want him to continue a path in WV. But for President? That's the last thing the Democratic Party needs.

I strongly disagree, I like his appeal, his outsider nature, his fighting nature, his ads, his populism, and he feels much less divisive and controversial than Warren, O Rourke, Harris, Clinton, Bernie, or Biden.

He'll be able to win over Trump supporters, if his West Virginia Race is anything to go by. Sure he lost in West Virginia, but he was able to close a gap of 30+ points. If O Rourke is seen as successful for closing a 6.4% Statewide gap, Ojeda should be considered successful for closing a 30+ District gap in one of the reddest districts and states in the country.

Trump beat him in this race, but he likely couldn't in a Presidential race if Ojeda gained fame.


I'm a populist as well. In fact, I saw your signature mentioned Sherrod Brown, and I myself am a huge fan of Mr. Brown. The issue I have is Ojeda's lack of experience. We have an inexperienced man in office right now, and we can see how great that's going down.

As for Beto? I don't think of him that much.

My main point is that I don't see either the Establishment Brand Dems or the Progressive Dems embracing Ojeda. So if by some amazing, astonishing and near impossible miracle, he won the primary, he'd have already dissatisfied those two respective bases. And I consider that a liability. Ojeda seems to be a decent enough guy, he should've tried his hand for the 2020 WV Governor's Election instead.
Last edited by Major-Tom on Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The of Japan
Minister
 
Posts: 2781
Founded: Jul 30, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The of Japan » Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:33 pm

Pasong Tirad wrote:
Major-Tom wrote:
Honestly, I loathe the guy, but he has several paths to re-election;

(1. The Dems nominate a shit-sandwich of a candidate, which is sadly likely....
(2. The base stays as intact as it was in 2016, because, fuck it, it's Trump base, it moves less than an obese man in a marathon.
(3. The economy somehow continues it's bullish path, defying economic predictions and keeps moving full pace.

I find the first and second option most likely, so let's hope the Dems don't nominate a Harris, Castro or Gillibrand. I don't hate any of those names mentioned, but I recognize that electorally, they are weak candidates for a General Election.

*chanting* bernie bernie bernie

Imagine if Bernie somehow manages to bungle the election (yes I know it is a 1/10000 chance)
Texan Communist and Internationalist

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Anti-void, Commonwealth of Adirondack, Corporate Collective Salvation, Cuba 2022 RP, Dimetrodon Empire, Duvniask, Gran Cordoba, Heavenly Assault, Isomedia, Kerwa, Mutualist Chaos, New Texas Republic, The Rio Grande River Basin, Tinhampton, Valrifall

Advertisement

Remove ads