NATION

PASSWORD

US Government Shutdown- It's Over!... For Now

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Will the government shutdown in three weeks?

Yes
103
77%
No
31
23%
 
Total votes : 134

User avatar
Greater vakolicci haven
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18661
Founded: May 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater vakolicci haven » Sat Jan 19, 2019 5:03 pm

Lockdownn wrote:
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:I don't think either side is actually to blame here. I just think that both have campaigned on opposite issues, it's come to the point where they must engage in a standoff and the question is who blinks first. Neither the man who low-income americans voted for last time around or the party they usually vote for seems to care a lot about them though.

Ah, yes. I do remember how absolutely no bill was passed with bipartisan support and then vetoed by the president which in turn didn't cause the senate majority leader to turn around and block any bill from entering the senate floor that wouldn't get the express approval of the president because he's up for reelection.

Tell me again how it's not the fault of one side in particular?
Let me be clear, compromise at this point is in the hands of both controlling parties and both can and should be blamed for parts in this situation, but let's not forget who explicitly stated that he would take blame and "the mantle" in its entirety for causing the government to shut down.

Are you aware that the 3 pillars of government are supposed to be equal?
Join the rejected realms and never fear rejection again
NSG virtual happy hour this Saturday: join us on zoom, what could possibly go wrong?
“I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.” - Thomas Jefferson
“Silent acquiescence in the face of tyranny is no better than outright agreement." - C.J. Redwine
“The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles." - Jeff Cooper

User avatar
Greater vakolicci haven
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18661
Founded: May 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater vakolicci haven » Sat Jan 19, 2019 5:04 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Lockdownn wrote:Ah, yes. I do remember how absolutely no bill was passed with bipartisan support and then vetoed by the president which in turn didn't cause the senate majority leader to turn around and block any bill from entering the senate floor that wouldn't get the express approval of the president because he's up for reelection.

Tell me again how it's not the fault of one side in particular?
Let me be clear, compromise at this point is in the hands of both controlling parties and both can and should be blamed for parts in this situation, but let's not forget who explicitly stated that he would take blame and "the mantle" in its entirety for causing the government to shut down.

So he alone should end it.

I assume that means 'so he should backtrack on his election promise and cave into everything the democrats demand?'
Join the rejected realms and never fear rejection again
NSG virtual happy hour this Saturday: join us on zoom, what could possibly go wrong?
“I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.” - Thomas Jefferson
“Silent acquiescence in the face of tyranny is no better than outright agreement." - C.J. Redwine
“The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles." - Jeff Cooper

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87247
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Sat Jan 19, 2019 5:05 pm

Greater vakolicci haven wrote:
San Lumen wrote:So he alone should end it.

I assume that means 'so he should backtrack on his election promise and cave into everything the democrats demand?'

Yes because Pelosi isnt giving him his stupid wall
Last edited by San Lumen on Sat Jan 19, 2019 5:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Lockdownn
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1701
Founded: Jul 23, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Lockdownn » Sat Jan 19, 2019 5:06 pm

Greater vakolicci haven wrote:
Lockdownn wrote:Ah, yes. I do remember how absolutely no bill was passed with bipartisan support and then vetoed by the president which in turn didn't cause the senate majority leader to turn around and block any bill from entering the senate floor that wouldn't get the express approval of the president because he's up for reelection.

Tell me again how it's not the fault of one side in particular?
Let me be clear, compromise at this point is in the hands of both controlling parties and both can and should be blamed for parts in this situation, but let's not forget who explicitly stated that he would take blame and "the mantle" in its entirety for causing the government to shut down.

Are you aware that the 3 pillars of government are supposed to be equal?

This has to do with my statement because?

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32801
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Des-Bal » Sat Jan 19, 2019 5:06 pm

Greater vakolicci haven wrote:I assume that means 'so he should backtrack on his election promise and cave into everything the democrats demand?'


The entire standoff is because he's backtracking on his election promise- he wants congress to budget for the wall because Mexico isn't going to pay for it.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 73175
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Sat Jan 19, 2019 5:07 pm

Neutraligon wrote:Look at Trump "compromising"
https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpos ... 5a7b656908
He offered three years of "protection" for some immigrants in turn for that $5.7 billion.

Hope they tell him to stuff it.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Lockdownn
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1701
Founded: Jul 23, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Lockdownn » Sat Jan 19, 2019 5:07 pm

Greater vakolicci haven wrote:
San Lumen wrote:So he alone should end it.

I assume that means 'so he should backtrack on his election promise and cave into everything the democrats demand?'

He can continue his petty arguing without forcing 800,000 Americans to live without pay you know.

User avatar
Northern Davincia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16960
Founded: Jun 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Davincia » Sat Jan 19, 2019 5:15 pm

Lockdownn wrote:
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:I assume that means 'so he should backtrack on his election promise and cave into everything the democrats demand?'

He can continue his petty arguing without forcing 800,000 Americans to live without pay you know.

We should just fire them.
Hoppean Libertarian, Acolyte of von Mises, Protector of Our Sacred Liberties
Economic Left/Right: 9.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.05
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87247
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Sat Jan 19, 2019 5:17 pm

Galloism wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:Look at Trump "compromising"
https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpos ... 5a7b656908
He offered three years of "protection" for some immigrants in turn for that $5.7 billion.

Hope they tell him to stuff it.

Pelosi already did

User avatar
Greater vakolicci haven
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18661
Founded: May 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater vakolicci haven » Sat Jan 19, 2019 5:17 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:I assume that means 'so he should backtrack on his election promise and cave into everything the democrats demand?'

Yes because Pelosi isnt giving him his stupid wall

Translation: Yes because that would mean my side wins by default
Join the rejected realms and never fear rejection again
NSG virtual happy hour this Saturday: join us on zoom, what could possibly go wrong?
“I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.” - Thomas Jefferson
“Silent acquiescence in the face of tyranny is no better than outright agreement." - C.J. Redwine
“The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles." - Jeff Cooper

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87247
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Sat Jan 19, 2019 5:18 pm

Greater vakolicci haven wrote:
San Lumen wrote:Yes because Pelosi isnt giving him his stupid wall

Translation: Yes because that would mean my side wins by default

The wall doesnt have the votes to pass either chamber

User avatar
Loben
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1996
Founded: Sep 27, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Loben » Sat Jan 19, 2019 5:18 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Galloism wrote:Hope they tell him to stuff it.

Pelosi already did


not gonna lie pelosi telling me to stuff it would seem like a complement.

if she fucking hates it, chances are its probably a decent idea.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Sat Jan 19, 2019 5:19 pm

Loben wrote:
San Lumen wrote:Pelosi already did


not gonna lie pelosi telling me to stuff it would seem like a complement.

if she fucking hates it, chances are its probably a decent idea.


So what actually makes it a good idea outside of the "OWN TEH LIBZ" factor?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87247
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Sat Jan 19, 2019 5:20 pm

Loben wrote:
San Lumen wrote:Pelosi already did


not gonna lie pelosi telling me to stuff it would seem like a complement.

if she fucking hates it, chances are its probably a decent idea.

So do you support endangering migration patterns of hundreds of species and bulldozing the National Butterfly Sanctuary to build a stupid unneeded wall? Go ask China how well building a border wall worked out.

There are also these things called planes, ships, shovels and ladders perhaps you've heard of them?

User avatar
Loben
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1996
Founded: Sep 27, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Loben » Sat Jan 19, 2019 5:20 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Loben wrote:
not gonna lie pelosi telling me to stuff it would seem like a complement.

if she fucking hates it, chances are its probably a decent idea.


So what actually makes it a good idea outside of the "OWN TEH LIBZ" factor?


pelosi hates it and probably makes chuck shit his drawers.

User avatar
Loben
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1996
Founded: Sep 27, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Loben » Sat Jan 19, 2019 5:21 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Loben wrote:
not gonna lie pelosi telling me to stuff it would seem like a complement.

if she fucking hates it, chances are its probably a decent idea.

So do you support endangering migration patterns of hundreds of species and bulldozing the National Butterfly Sanctuary to build a stupid unneeded wall? Go ask China how well building a border wall worked out.

There are also these things called planes, ships, shovels and ladders perhaps you've heard of them?


*a fucking butterfly sanctuary*.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87247
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Sat Jan 19, 2019 5:21 pm

Loben wrote:
San Lumen wrote:So do you support endangering migration patterns of hundreds of species and bulldozing the National Butterfly Sanctuary to build a stupid unneeded wall? Go ask China how well building a border wall worked out.

There are also these things called planes, ships, shovels and ladders perhaps you've heard of them?


*a fucking butterfly sanctuary*.

Butterflies are the reason you have flowers in your yard or neighborhood park.

User avatar
Lockdownn
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1701
Founded: Jul 23, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Lockdownn » Sat Jan 19, 2019 5:22 pm

Loben wrote:
San Lumen wrote:Pelosi already did


not gonna lie pelosi telling me to stuff it would seem like a complement.

if she fucking hates it, chances are its probably a decent idea.

The thing is, it kind of is a decent idea. Not to stop drugs, the majority pass through ports of entry, but it would prevent some people from crossing over the southern border unchecked.

On the other side, you still have people over staying their visas while in the US and the environmental and land ownership issues are certainly something that needs to be addressed before it is continued.

User avatar
Loben
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1996
Founded: Sep 27, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Loben » Sat Jan 19, 2019 5:22 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Loben wrote:
*a fucking butterfly sanctuary*.

Butterflies are the reason you have flowers in your yard or neighborhood park.


a fucking sanctuary.

User avatar
Greater vakolicci haven
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18661
Founded: May 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater vakolicci haven » Sat Jan 19, 2019 5:22 pm

Loben wrote:
San Lumen wrote:So do you support endangering migration patterns of hundreds of species and bulldozing the National Butterfly Sanctuary to build a stupid unneeded wall? Go ask China how well building a border wall worked out.

There are also these things called planes, ships, shovels and ladders perhaps you've heard of them?


*a fucking butterfly sanctuary*.

You are talking to the person who started the 'should we ban fishing' thread
Join the rejected realms and never fear rejection again
NSG virtual happy hour this Saturday: join us on zoom, what could possibly go wrong?
“I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.” - Thomas Jefferson
“Silent acquiescence in the face of tyranny is no better than outright agreement." - C.J. Redwine
“The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles." - Jeff Cooper

User avatar
Western Vale Confederacy
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9211
Founded: Nov 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Western Vale Confederacy » Sat Jan 19, 2019 5:22 pm

Loben wrote:
San Lumen wrote:So do you support endangering migration patterns of hundreds of species and bulldozing the National Butterfly Sanctuary to build a stupid unneeded wall? Go ask China how well building a border wall worked out.

There are also these things called planes, ships, shovels and ladders perhaps you've heard of them?


*a fucking butterfly sanctuary*.


Butterflies, the one argument that will make ol' Don throw himself on the ground and plead for mercy about his mistakes.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87247
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Sat Jan 19, 2019 5:23 pm

Greater vakolicci haven wrote:
Loben wrote:
*a fucking butterfly sanctuary*.

You are talking to the person who started the 'should we ban fishing' thread

without butterflies you have no flowers in your garden or neighborhood park

User avatar
Loben
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1996
Founded: Sep 27, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Loben » Sat Jan 19, 2019 5:23 pm

Greater vakolicci haven wrote:
Loben wrote:
*a fucking butterfly sanctuary*.

You are talking to the person who started the 'should we ban fishing' thread

ah yes, ban fishing.

might as well ban hunting and farming too.

User avatar
Loben
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1996
Founded: Sep 27, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Loben » Sat Jan 19, 2019 5:24 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:You are talking to the person who started the 'should we ban fishing' thread

without butterflies you have no flowers in your garden or neighborhood park


Bees.

User avatar
Lockdownn
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1701
Founded: Jul 23, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Lockdownn » Sat Jan 19, 2019 5:25 pm

Loben wrote:
San Lumen wrote:So do you support endangering migration patterns of hundreds of species and bulldozing the National Butterfly Sanctuary to build a stupid unneeded wall? Go ask China how well building a border wall worked out.

There are also these things called planes, ships, shovels and ladders perhaps you've heard of them?


*a fucking butterfly sanctuary*.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPjUH6abrX0

I think this should be reason enough for Trump to push planners to reconsider their route across the border. :rofl:

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bienenhalde, Forsher, Godular, Ineva, Keltionialang, Kostane, Neu California, Prion-Cirus Imperium, Shrillland, Skiva, Tungstan

Advertisement

Remove ads