Denmark Passes Law Requiring New Citizens Shake Hands

[El-Amin Caliphate]

Hal ta3lamu 3araby? (Sorry for so many questions I'm just curious)

While I don't know Arabic to that extent, I'm taking an educated guess that you're asking me "Are you arab?" I'm not actually, I'm bengali

Oh, that's cool. I'm African-American. And I don't speak Arabic either, I'm trying to learn it. I asked you "do you know Arabic?" "Are you Arab?" is "Hal anta/anti 3araby?"

[Rhonom]

While I don't know Arabic to that extent, I'm taking an educated guess that you're asking me "Are you arab?" I'm not actually, I'm bengali

Oh, that's cool. I'm African-American. And I don't speak Arabic either, I'm trying to learn it. I asked you "do you know Arabic?" "Are you Arab?" is "Hal anta/anti 3araby?"

Aaahhh I had that in the back of my head, I know "ta3allem" means learn or something. I've tried learning some arabic too, don't have the time for it unfortunately. I can read it, tho.

[Thyrgga]

>Drawing analogy with history isn't good enough.
>It's not valid unless some professor somewhere says it explicitly

And I'm wondering what historical facts you are basing this assumption on.

I don't know if you were here when we discussed them, but we talked about the colonization of Polish land by Germans during the medieval Ostsiedlung and how that lead to Pomerania, Pomerelia, Prussia, and Silesia becoming ethnic German and later getting annexed by German states. We also discussed the Anglo-Saxons in Texas and how their presence lead to the territory becoming independent of Mexico and later part of the United States. These events show how large enclaves of foreign ethnicities inside of a country can lead to those lands separating from that country.

To add to this, I'd like to highlight the reason why the Chinese government, to prevent dissent in Tibet, would send ethnic Chinese settlers.

[The South Falls]

And I'm wondering what historical facts you are basing this assumption on.

I don't know if you were here when we discussed them, but we talked about the colonization of Polish land by Germans during the medieval Ostsiedlung and how that lead to Pomerania, Pomerelia, Prussia, and Silesia becoming ethnic German and later getting annexed by German states. We also discussed the Anglo-Saxons in Texas and how their presence lead to the territory becoming independent of Mexico and later part of the United States. These events show how large enclaves of foreign ethnicities inside of a country can lead to those lands separating from that country.

To add to this, I'd like to highlight the reason why the Chinese government, to prevent dissent in Tibet, would send ethnic Chinese settlers.

That was before modern times. There are no modern examples.

[Rhonom]

The hell are you on about? Muslims make up a grand total of six per cent of Europe's population. And much of that, mind you, are native Muslims. muh land getting robbed

[Western Vale Confederacy]

I don't know if you were here when we discussed them, but we talked about the colonization of Polish land by Germans during the medieval Ostsiedlung and how that lead to Pomerania, Pomerelia, Prussia, and Silesia becoming ethnic German and later getting annexed by German states. We also discussed the Anglo-Saxons in Texas and how their presence lead to the territory becoming independent of Mexico and later part of the United States. These events show how large enclaves of foreign ethnicities inside of a country can lead to those lands separating from that country.

To add to this, I'd like to highlight the reason why the Chinese government, to prevent dissent in Tibet, would send ethnic Chinese settlers.

That was before modern times. There are no modern examples.

The Texas example was from the 19th century, and the Tibet example is from modern times.

It is very much real and still existing.

[Vassenor]

And I'm wondering what historical facts you are basing this assumption on.

I don't know if you were here when we discussed them, but we talked about the colonization of Polish land by Germans during the medieval Ostsiedlung and how that lead to Pomerania, Pomerelia, Prussia, and Silesia becoming ethnic German and later getting annexed by German states. We also discussed the Anglo-Saxons in Texas and how their presence lead to the territory becoming independent of Mexico and later part of the United States. These events show how large enclaves of foreign ethnicities inside of a country can lead to those lands separating from that country.

To add to this, I'd like to highlight the reason why the Chinese government, to prevent dissent in Tibet, would send ethnic Chinese settlers.

So we've moved from "will happen" to "can happen".

[Aellex]

That was before modern times. There are no modern examples.

It almost happened in Constantine and Algier until the Algerian went on an ethnic cleansing spree.
Same goes with most of Eastern Anatolia that was firmly Armenian until the Turks decided that genocide was the best course of action to the existence of Christian people.

[Thyrgga]

I don't know if you were here when we discussed them, but we talked about the colonization of Polish land by Germans during the medieval Ostsiedlung and how that lead to Pomerania, Pomerelia, Prussia, and Silesia becoming ethnic German and later getting annexed by German states. We also discussed the Anglo-Saxons in Texas and how their presence lead to the territory becoming independent of Mexico and later part of the United States. These events show how large enclaves of foreign ethnicities inside of a country can lead to those lands separating from that country.

To add to this, I'd like to highlight the reason why the Chinese government, to prevent dissent in Tibet, would send ethnic Chinese settlers.

So we've moved from "will happen" to "can happen".

Don't play this game with me. Nothing about the future is absolutely certain. The likelihood of foreign enclaves creating problems is just very high.

[Olthar]

"if a large amount of something is haram, then even a small part is haram."

Well that's just absurd. Should I avoid puddles for fear of drowning? Or refrigerators for fear of hypothermia? Shaking a hand won't lead you to sexual debauchery.

[Vassenor]

"if a large amount of something is haram, then even a small part is haram."

Well that's just absurd. Should I avoid puddles for fear of drowning? Or refrigerators for fear of hypothermia? Shaking a hand won't lead you to sexual debauchery.

And not shaking a hand is not a sign that someone is a latent terrorist.

[Rhonom]

^imo both are true

[Aellex]

And not shaking a hand is not a sign that someone is a latent terrorist.

No. But a good sign he's a dick head.

[Western Vale Confederacy]

And not shaking a hand is not a sign that someone is a latent terrorist.

No. But a good sign he's a dick head.

Not shaking somebody's hand is a grave insult to etiquette.

[Rhonom]

And not shaking a hand is not a sign that someone is a latent terrorist.

No. But a good sign he's a dick head.

Being faithful to your religion (even if your conception of it is wrong) =/= being a dickhead

[Rhonom]

No. But a good sign he's a dick head.

Not shaking somebody's hand is a grave insult to etiquette.

Oh the humanity!

[El-Amin Caliphate]

So we've moved from "will happen" to "can happen".

Don't play this game with me. Nothing about the future is absolutely certain. The likelihood of foreign enclaves creating problems is just very high.

Says who?

[El-Amin Caliphate]

"if a large amount of something is haram, then even a small part is haram."

Well that's just absurd. Should I avoid puddles for fear of drowning? Or refrigerators for fear of hypothermia? Shaking a hand won't lead you to sexual debauchery.

No one said that.

[Jolthig]

Don't play this game with me. Nothing about the future is absolutely certain. The likelihood of foreign enclaves creating problems is just very high.

Says who?

Poor inductive reasoning on his part.

[Thyrgga]

Don't play this game with me. Nothing about the future is absolutely certain. The likelihood of foreign enclaves creating problems is just very high.

Says who?

Say the historical examples.

[El-Amin Caliphate]

Oh, that's cool. I'm African-American. And I don't speak Arabic either, I'm trying to learn it. I asked you "do you know Arabic?" "Are you Arab?" is "Hal anta/anti 3araby?"

Aaahhh I had that in the back of my head, I know "ta3allem" means learn or something. I've tried learning some arabic too, don't have the time for it unfortunately. I can read it, tho.

Same here, but only with the vowel symbols.

And I'm wondering what historical facts you are basing this assumption on.

I don't know if you were here when we discussed them, but we talked about the colonization of Polish land by Germans during the medieval Ostsiedlung and how that lead to Pomerania, Pomerelia, Prussia, and Silesia becoming ethnic German

That is immigration...

and later getting annexed by German states.

...and that is invasion and colonization.

We also discussed the Anglo-Saxons in Texas and how their presence

That is (illegal) immigration...

lead to the territory becoming independent of Mexico and later part of the United States.

...and that is invasion and colonization.

These events show how large enclaves of foreign ethnicities inside of a country can lead to those lands separating from that country.

No they don't.

To add to this, I'd like to highlight the reason why the Chinese government, to prevent dissent in Tibet, would send ethnic Chinese settlers.

That's population transfer.

[Jolthig]

Says who?

Say the historical examples.

Okay, so what do they have to do with the Muslim enclaves living in Denmark? Do we know that they have been known for extremism or jihadism of any sort?

[The South Falls]

That was before modern times. There are no modern examples.

The Texas example was from the 19th century, and the Tibet example is from modern times.

It is very much real and still existing.

Another issue. That was more colonization than immigration. In all except the Texas example, a stronger power settled it's people to push out others.

[El-Amin Caliphate]

Says who?

Say the historical examples.

And I'm wondering what historical facts you are basing this assumption on.

It wouldn't really matter. Geopolitical history has changed vastly over the past centuries.

I don't know if you were here when we discussed them, but we talked about the colonization of Polish land by Germans during the medieval Ostsiedlung and how that lead to Pomerania, Pomerelia, Prussia, and Silesia becoming ethnic German and later getting annexed by German states. We also discussed the Anglo-Saxons in Texas and how their presence lead to the territory becoming independent of Mexico and later part of the United States. These events show how large enclaves of foreign ethnicities inside of a country can lead to those lands separating from that country.

To add to this, I'd like to highlight the reason why the Chinese government, to prevent dissent in Tibet, would send ethnic Chinese settlers.

That was before modern times. There are no modern examples.

[El-Amin Caliphate]

Say the historical examples.

Okay, so what do they have to do with the Muslim enclaves living in Denmark? Do we know that they have been known for extremism or jihadism of any sort?

They'll be jihading even more with this stupid law.