Denmark Passes Law Requiring New Citizens Shake Hands

[Jewish Aukreyna]

Good Job Denmark!

[Vassenor]

Good Job Denmark!

For what? What does this law actually do, apart from make the far rightists feel all gooey inside?

[The South Falls]

Good Job Denmark!

For what? What does this law actually do, apart from make the far rightists feel all gooey inside?

Only ISIS adheres to the religion, I see.

[Washington Resistance Army]

Good Job Denmark!

For what? What does this law actually do, apart from make the far rightists feel all gooey inside?

It is a, admittedly small, step in the right direction when it comes to dealing with Islamic immigrants and refugees.

[Vassenor]

For what? What does this law actually do, apart from make the far rightists feel all gooey inside?

Only ISIS adheres to the religion, I see.

I'm not following your logic.

[Thyrgga]

Good Job Denmark!

For what? What does this law actually do, apart from make the far rightists feel all gooey inside?

Some of us see ethnic diversity as something worth preserving.

[El-Amin Caliphate]

Good Job Denmark!

Shaking hands is a problem in Judaism as well:
https://www.chabad.org/library/article_ ... dshake.htm
https://jewishweek.timesofisrael.com/no ... ersonally/
https://jewinthecity.com/2018/06/why-do ... ake-hands/
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.myjewi ... egiah/amp/
Well, I'm assuming you're Jewish because of your nation name. If you just have that for your nation and aren't actually religiously Jewish, my apologies for making assumptions.

[The South Falls]

For what? What does this law actually do, apart from make the far rightists feel all gooey inside?

It is a, admittedly small, step in the right direction when it comes to dealing with Islamic immigrants and refugees.

I don't think trying to stamp out people who adhere to the religion makes much sense. And doesn't this apply to just the opposite sex? Are they going to have legions of women to shake these dudes' hands?

[Vassenor]

For what? What does this law actually do, apart from make the far rightists feel all gooey inside?

Some of us see ethnic diversity as something worth preserving.

So how would allowing people who have earned citizenship to not shake a given person's hand have ended ethnic diversity?

[El-Amin Caliphate]

For what? What does this law actually do, apart from make the far rightists feel all gooey inside?

Some of us see ethnic diversity as something worth preserving.

This has nothing to do with ethnic diversity.

[Washington Resistance Army]

It is a, admittedly small, step in the right direction when it comes to dealing with Islamic immigrants and refugees.

I don't think trying to stamp out people who adhere to the religion makes much sense. And doesn't this apply to just the opposite sex? Are they going to have legions of women to shake these dudes' hands?

Hopefully, yes. If they have a problem with it and refuse they can leave the country and not become citizens.

[Thyrgga]

Some of us see ethnic diversity as something worth preserving.

So how would allowing people who have earned citizenship to not shake a given person's hand have ended ethnic diversity?

Preserving the ethnic Danishness of Denmark is the point. This has hardly anything to do with shaking hands or religious mores.

[Vassenor]

I don't think trying to stamp out people who adhere to the religion makes much sense. And doesn't this apply to just the opposite sex? Are they going to have legions of women to shake these dudes' hands?

Hopefully, yes. If they have a problem with it and refuse they can leave the country and not become citizens.

And this needs to happen why?

[The South Falls]

Only ISIS adheres to the religion, I see.

I'm not following your logic.

I'm being sarcastic. It's supposed to stamp out a certain kind of muslim, as some people have been trying to claim. It's just stamping out adherents to the religion, not necessarily terrorists. It's stamping on people's religious freedoms.

[Washington Resistance Army]

Hopefully, yes. If they have a problem with it and refuse they can leave the country and not become citizens.

And this needs to happen why?

Because Islam has no place in the west whether you want to accept that or not. It is not compatible with western values and civilization.

[Vassenor]

I'm not following your logic.

I'm being sarcastic. It's supposed to stamp out a certain kind of muslim, as some people have been trying to claim. It's just stamping out adherents to the religion, not necessarily terrorists. It's stamping on people's religious freedoms.

Fair enough. It's been a long day.

[El-Amin Caliphate]

So how would allowing people who have earned citizenship to not shake a given person's hand have ended ethnic diversity?

Preserving the ethnic Danishness of Denmark is the point. This has hardly anything to do with shaking hands or religious mores.

Actually it does, becaus Denmark hasn't banned non-Danes from their country.

[Thyrgga]

Preserving the ethnic Danishness of Denmark is the point. This has hardly anything to do with shaking hands or religious mores.

Actually it does, becaus Denmark hasn't banned non-Danes from their country.

They use such a roundabout method to do this since acknowledging ethnic/racial diversity is taboo.

[The South Falls]

So how would allowing people who have earned citizenship to not shake a given person's hand have ended ethnic diversity?

Preserving the ethnic Danishness of Denmark is the point. This has hardly anything to do with shaking hands or religious mores.

There's no problem with muslims in Denmark. And no, your example of "what if a bunch of europeans moved into a muslim country" is moot. Not only would people still defend their right to do that, as people have a right to live wherever, no one would form an uprising government.

[El-Amin Caliphate]

Actually it does, becaus Denmark hasn't banned non-Danes from their country.

They use such a roundabout method to do this since acknowledging ethnic/racial diversity is taboo.

No it's not.

[El-Amin Caliphate]

Preserving the ethnic Danishness of Denmark is the point. This has hardly anything to do with shaking hands or religious mores.

There's no problem with muslims in Denmark. And no, your example of "what if a bunch of europeans moved into a muslim country" is moot. Not only would people still defend their right to do that, as people have a right to live wherever, no one would form an uprising government.

^This

[Thyrgga]

Preserving the ethnic Danishness of Denmark is the point. This has hardly anything to do with shaking hands or religious mores.

There's no problem with muslims in Denmark. And no, your example of "what if a bunch of europeans moved into a muslim country" is moot. Not only would people still defend their right to do that, as people have a right to live wherever, no one would form an uprising government.

The examples of the Ostsiedlung and the Anglo-Saxons in Texas say otherwise. I'm sure there are plenty of other examples from history.

[The South Falls]

There's no problem with muslims in Denmark. And no, your example of "what if a bunch of europeans moved into a muslim country" is moot. Not only would people still defend their right to do that, as people have a right to live wherever, no one would form an uprising government.

The examples of the Ostsiedlung and the Anglo-Saxons in Texas say otherwise. I'm sure there are plenty of other examples from history.

Those guys just trounced the border. They also had more firepower, and limited US support. You trying to tell me that Saudi Arabia or some other nation is going to send an army for an uprising?

[Thyrgga]

Preserving the ethnic Danishness of Denmark is the point. This has hardly anything to do with shaking hands or religious mores.

There's no problem with muslims in Denmark. And no, your example of "what if a bunch of europeans moved into a muslim country" is moot. Not only would people still defend their right to do that, as people have a right to live wherever, no one would form an uprising government.

Why do people have a right to live anywhere they want? If some random person wants to live in my house, do I have to admit him?

[Washington Resistance Army]

The examples of the Ostsiedlung and the Anglo-Saxons in Texas say otherwise. I'm sure there are plenty of other examples from history.

Those guys just trounced the border. They also had more firepower, and limited US support. You trying to tell me that Saudi Arabia or some other nation is going to send an army for an uprising?

They don't need to send an army, they've already infected the entire Sunni world with their interpretation of Islam so immigrants will do the work for them.