MAGAThread XV: Because Another

[Neutraligon]

There was already a bill that could have passed both the house and the senate. Trump said no.

Yes, that's how vetos work.

Congress could just as easily give Trump what he wants as Trump give them what they want...

Trump had his chance to get more last January.

[Vassenor]

There was already a bill that could have passed both the house and the senate. Trump said no.

Yes, that's how vetos work.

Congress could just as easily give Trump what he wants as Trump give them what they want...

Why should they? The people don't want a wall.

[Telconi]

Yes, that's how vetos work.

Congress could just as easily give Trump what he wants as Trump give them what they want...

Why should they? The people don't want a wall.

So all those poor furloughed workers that Democrats allegedly care about cam go back to work?

[Vassenor]

Why should they? The people don't want a wall.

So all those poor furloughed workers that Democrats allegedly care about cam go back to work?

So the PARTY OF FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY can blow billions of taxpayer dollars on something that won't actually work?

[Telconi]

So all those poor furloughed workers that Democrats allegedly care about cam go back to work?

So the PARTY OF FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY can blow billions of taxpayer dollars on something that won't actually work?

That seems to be the issue, yes.

[San Lumen]

So the PARTY OF FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY can blow billions of taxpayer dollars on something that won't actually work?

That seems to be the issue, yes.

we dont need the stupid wall. Trump caused this he can end it. The votes are not there to give him his racist wall

[Vassenor]

So the PARTY OF FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY can blow billions of taxpayer dollars on something that won't actually work?

That seems to be the issue, yes.

So you agree that the Republicans are being hypocritical by preaching Fiscal Responsibility then demanding a white elephant be funded?

[Telconi]

That seems to be the issue, yes.

So you agree that the Republicans are being hypocritical by preaching Fiscal Responsibility then demanding a white elephant be funded?

No more than the Democrats who claim to care about the little guy and are instead keeping thousands of little guys out of work with their refusal to cave.

[Telconi]

That seems to be the issue, yes.

we dont need the stupid wall. Trump caused this he can end it. The votes are not there to give him his racist wall

-shrug- The things our government does that we don't need would fill volumes...

[Vassenor]

So you agree that the Republicans are being hypocritical by preaching Fiscal Responsibility then demanding a white elephant be funded?

No more than the Democrats who claim to care about the little guy and are instead keeping thousands of little guys out of work with their refusal to cave.

"You're the villains for not doing whatever we want".

Really sound logic right there.

[Maineiacs]

So you agree that the Republicans are being hypocritical by preaching Fiscal Responsibility then demanding a white elephant be funded?

No more than the Democrats who claim to care about the little guy and are instead keeping thousands of little guys out of work with their refusal to cave.

Do you agree that the wall will likely be ineffective?

[Thermodolia]

Make it stop!! Make it stop!!

[Telconi]

No more than the Democrats who claim to care about the little guy and are instead keeping thousands of little guys out of work with their refusal to cave.

"You're the villains for not doing whatever we want".

Really sound logic right there.

Surprising you disapprove of your own MO...

No more than the Democrats who claim to care about the little guy and are instead keeping thousands of little guys out of work with their refusal to cave.

Do you agree that the wall will likely be ineffective?

Yes.

[The South Falls]

So you agree that the Republicans are being hypocritical by preaching Fiscal Responsibility then demanding a white elephant be funded?

No more than the Democrats who claim to care about the little guy and are instead keeping thousands of little guys out of work with their refusal to cave.

I mean that goes the other way around. Republicans are screaming the little guy by trying to build a wall that benefits no one.

[Telconi]

No more than the Democrats who claim to care about the little guy and are instead keeping thousands of little guys out of work with their refusal to cave.

I mean that goes the other way around. Republicans are screaming the little guy by trying to build a wall that benefits no one.

Sure.

[Maineiacs]

"You're the villains for not doing whatever we want".

Really sound logic right there.

Surprising you disapprove of your own MO...

Do you agree that the wall will likely be ineffective?

Yes.

If you agree that it will be ineffective, why spend money on it?

[San Lumen]

we dont need the stupid wall. Trump caused this he can end it. The votes are not there to give him his racist wall

-shrug- The things our government does that we don't need would fill volumes...

I would agree there is plenty of things we dont need but to shut it down for something that will not work is asinine.

[Vassenor]

"You're the villains for not doing whatever we want".

Really sound logic right there.

Surprising you disapprove of your own MO...

Do you agree that the wall will likely be ineffective?

Yes.

And so you jump straight to the NO U again.

[Telconi]

Surprising you disapprove of your own MO...



Yes.

If you agree that it will be ineffective, why spend money on it?

Because the guy with veto power insists on it...

[San Lumen]

If you agree that it will be ineffective, why spend money on it?

Because the guy with veto power insists on it...

Then let him insist on it. Hes not getting it.

[Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States]

If you agree that it will be ineffective, why spend money on it?

Because the guy with veto power insists on it...

Any standard we wanna keep that guy to? At all? Like, perhaps use his power for the common good like he was elected to do?

[Telconi]

Because the guy with veto power insists on it...

Then let him insist on it. Hes not getting it.

Then those workers stay furloughed forever.

[Telconi]

Because the guy with veto power insists on it...

Any standard we wanna keep that guy to? At all? Like, perhaps use his power for the common good like he was elected to do?

I don't know if a 'common good' exists...

[Ifreann]

Then let him insist on it. Hes not getting it.

Then those workers stay furloughed forever.

Or Congress passes a veto proof bill.

[The South Falls]

Then let him insist on it. Hes not getting it.

Then those workers stay furloughed forever.

It's not abouDemocrats. There was already a bill to be passed. Saying that the Democrats are bad for not caving into the president's every demand controverts democracy.