MAGAThread XV: Because Another

[Ifreann]

You seem to be doing a lot of extrapolation from that sentence.

Just seeing where this will inevitably go.

Just speculating, wildly, based on...did Maxine Waters even say that?

[Gormwood]

Just seeing where this will inevitably go.

Just speculating, wildly, based on...did Maxine Waters even say that?

The Internet seems to be obsessed with the meme that Democrats will fail spectacularly at anything they try even as simple as pouring milk over cereal.

[Tarsonis]

Just seeing where this will inevitably go.

Just speculating, wildly, based on...did Maxine Waters even say that?

Yes it is speculation. I'm predicting what will happen. We'll see if I'm right or not.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video ... thing.html

[Zapato]

Trump nominates man, who doesn't know how the Fed operates or makes decisions, to role at U.S. Federal Reserve which he doesn't understand, on basis of flattering words he once wrote about Trump

Not The Onion.

[Zapato]

Maxine Waters doubling down, "This isn't the end of anything." So unsatisfied with the 2 year long investigation run by Mueller, Democrats are going to launch their own, no doubt completely objective and non-partisan, investigation into Trump.


Surrendering 2020 early it seems.

Wait, did the Bengazi hearings lead to Republicans surrendering 2016?

[Vassenor]

Just speculating, wildly, based on...did Maxine Waters even say that?

The Internet seems to be obsessed with the meme that Democrats will fail spectacularly at anything they try even as simple as pouring milk over cereal.

The Democratic Party just existing has supposedly guaranteed Trump's 2020 victory.

[Telconi]

Just speculating, wildly, based on...did Maxine Waters even say that?

The Internet seems to be obsessed with the meme that Democrats will fail spectacularly at anything they try even as simple as pouring milk over cereal.

Everyone engages in wishful thinking.

[Tarsonis]

quote="Gormwood";p="35484087"]

Maxine Waters doubling down, "This isn't the end of anything." So unsatisfied with the 2 year long investigation run by Mueller, Democrats are going to launch their own, no doubt completely objective and non-partisan, investigation into Trump.


Surrendering 2020 early it seems.

You seem to be doing a lot of extrapolation from that sentence.

It's not like an AG picked by Trump with a written history of denouncing the special counsel as well as burying a previous scandal in the watch of a Republican President would have any reason to try and muffle the resulting report, right?[/quote]

I love the smell of desperation in the morning

[Gormwood]

It's not like an AG picked by Trump with a written history of denouncing the special counsel as well as burying a previous scandal in the watch of a Republican President would have any reason to try and muffle the resulting report, right?

I love the smell of desperation in the morning

Lot more desperate than impeaching a President over lying about an affair after a special counsel investigation into a real estate deal turned up nothing as well as multiple hearings on a consulate attack that turned up nothing also I take it?

[Tarsonis]

I love the smell of desperation in the morning

Lot more desperate than impeaching a President over lying about an affair after a special counsel investigation into a real estate deal turned up nothing as well as multiple hearings on a consulate attack that turned up nothing also I take it?

It is. Spent two years on this, staking a considerable part of the platform on it, and now that it didn’t go their favor, Democrats are desperate to spin this anyway they can. There’s no evidence that Barr is lying, and considering the report will inevitably go public, it’d be quite ill advised for him to lie.

Occupy Democrats is desperately trying to spin this as “fixed,” and I’m seeing that narrative parroted on far left social media,but the reality it the investigation flopped.

[Valrifell]

Trump nominates man, who doesn't know how the Fed operates or makes decisions, to role at U.S. Federal Reserve which he doesn't understand, on basis of flattering words he once wrote about Trump

Not The Onion.

So, uh, just a reminder that Trump's a shitty president and no amount of investigations will help his re-election chances.

[Tarsonis]

Trump nominates man, who doesn't know how the Fed operates or makes decisions, to role at U.S. Federal Reserve which he doesn't understand, on basis of flattering words he once wrote about Trump

Not The Onion.

So, uh, just a reminder that Trump's a shitty president and no amount of investigations will help his re-election chances.

I imagine that’s what y’all thought this time in 2015

[Ifreann]

Lot more desperate than impeaching a President over lying about an affair after a special counsel investigation into a real estate deal turned up nothing as well as multiple hearings on a consulate attack that turned up nothing also I take it?

It is. Spent two years on this, staking a considerable part of the platform on it, and now that it didn’t go their favor, Democrats are desperate to spin this anyway they can. There’s no evidence that Barr is lying, and considering the report will inevitably go public, it’d be quite ill advised for him to lie.

Occupy Democrats is desperately trying to spin this as “fixed,” and I’m seeing that narrative parroted on far left social media,but the reality it the investigation flopped.

Apart from all the people sent to prison for their crimes, of course.

[Tarsonis]

typical leftwinger : anti freespeech.

There is no free speech on NationStates.

There’s plenty, the general rule of thumb is don’t attack players. Keep to that rule and you can get away with saying quite a lot.

[Tarsonis]

It is. Spent two years on this, staking a considerable part of the platform on it, and now that it didn’t go their favor, Democrats are desperate to spin this anyway they can. There’s no evidence that Barr is lying, and considering the report will inevitably go public, it’d be quite ill advised for him to lie.

Occupy Democrats is desperately trying to spin this as “fixed,” and I’m seeing that narrative parroted on far left social media,but the reality it the investigation flopped.

Apart from all the people sent to prison for their crimes, of course.

Small consolidation I guess.

[Ism]

It is. Spent two years on this, staking a considerable part of the platform on it, and now that it didn’t go their favor, Democrats are desperate to spin this anyway they can. There’s no evidence that Barr is lying, and considering the report will inevitably go public, it’d be quite ill advised for him to lie.

Occupy Democrats is desperately trying to spin this as “fixed,” and I’m seeing that narrative parroted on far left social media,but the reality it the investigation flopped.

Apart from all the people sent to prison for their crimes, of course.

Only the Trump administration/campaign could be investigated, have that investigation result in multiple felony convictions and then have said investigation unironically dismissed as a flop.

[Tarsonis]

Apart from all the people sent to prison for their crimes, of course.

Only the Trump administration/campaign could be investigated, have that investigation result in multiple felony convictions and then have said investigation unironically dismissed as a flop.

Considering
A. They went to prison for crimes not related to the election.
B. The left would likely be willing to trade all those convictions for something on Trump.
C. Trump gets to solidify his base and act like he’s completely exonerated.

Yeah it’s a political flop.

[Tarsonis]

The Internet seems to be obsessed with the meme that Democrats will fail spectacularly at anything they try even as simple as pouring milk over cereal.

The Democratic Party just existing has supposedly guaranteed Trump's 2020 victory.

I think you underestimate how colossally this is a fail for the democrats

[Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States]

Only the Trump administration/campaign could be investigated, have that investigation result in multiple felony convictions and then have said investigation unironically dismissed as a flop.

Considering
A. They went to prison for crimes not related to the election.
B. The left would likely be willing to trade all those convictions for something on Trump.
C. Trump gets to solidify his base and act like he’s completely exonerated.

Yeah it’s a political flop.

Convicting actual criminals for actual crimes is a partisan issue now.

[Tarsonis]

Maxine Waters doubling down, "This isn't the end of anything." So unsatisfied with the 2 year long investigation run by Mueller, Democrats are going to launch their own, no doubt completely objective and non-partisan, investigation into Trump.


Surrendering 2020 early it seems.

Wait, did the Bengazi hearings lead to Republicans surrendering 2016?

That’s a fair point but I’d argue the conditions are different

[Gormwood]

Apart from all the people sent to prison for their crimes, of course.

Only the Trump administration/campaign could be investigated, have that investigation result in multiple felony convictions and then have said investigation unironically dismissed as a flop.

Multiple associates convicted or pleaded over lying about contact with Russia despite no evidence of collusion as well as various financial crimes while Trump himself is not directly implicated. Little wonder there's rumors that SDNY might be treating the Trump Organization as a RICO investigation.

[The Greater Ohio Valley]

Trump nominates man, who doesn't know how the Fed operates or makes decisions, to role at U.S. Federal Reserve which he doesn't understand, on basis of flattering words he once wrote about Trump

Not The Onion.

Not surprising Trump would nominate someone to a position they’re entirely unqualified for.

[Valrifell]

So, uh, just a reminder that Trump's a shitty president and no amount of investigations will help his re-election chances.

I imagine that’s what y’all thought this time in 2015

Previous electoral evidence also indicates he's a weaker incumbent than most and than as your presenting.

[Valrifell]

Wait, did the Bengazi hearings lead to Republicans surrendering 2016?

That’s a fair point but I’d argue the conditions are different

You're right, we might find something on Trump.

[Gormwood]

Trump nominates man, who doesn't know how the Fed operates or makes decisions, to role at U.S. Federal Reserve which he doesn't understand, on basis of flattering words he once wrote about Trump

Not The Onion.

Not surprising Trump would nominate someone to a position they’re entirely unqualified for.

There was a SNL skit about that.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=u-w5wbu7GBE