Oh.
Advertisement

by Nea Byzantia » Wed May 29, 2019 9:32 am

by Liriena » Wed May 29, 2019 10:15 am
Zurkerx wrote:Galloism wrote:I always get worried when I unironically agree with you.
I don't think we have to worry about that. Oh, not the title but this passage should be important:
Charging Trump was "not an option" because Justice Department regulations prohibit charging a sitting president with a crime, Mueller said. His office was "bound by that policy."
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Liriena » Wed May 29, 2019 10:15 am
Tarsonis wrote:Ifreann wrote:The two are inseparable. Recall on what ideals the cornerstone of the Confederacy rests. Without their "peculiar institution" it wouldn't be the Confederacy. You may as well talk about restoring the Holy Roman Empire but without Christianity, or reviving the Soviet Union but with laissez faire capitalism.
But dear me, I'm talking about the Confederacy in the Trump thread. How positively irrelevant. Has the President been tweeting anything exciting today?
The CSA could absolutely be restored without slavery. While yes the original CSA had a slavery fetish, the CSA itself was a loose confederation of States operating independently from the United States of America, for about five minutes before they seized fort Sumpter and started a war.
The Modern Southern Hick Bro, is more enamored with that aspect, not the slavery aspect.
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Gormwood » Wed May 29, 2019 10:17 am
Liriena wrote:Zurkerx wrote:
I don't think we have to worry about that. Oh, not the title but this passage should be important:
Charging Trump was "not an option" because Justice Department regulations prohibit charging a sitting president with a crime, Mueller said. His office was "bound by that policy."
This is as close as it gets to "impeach him".

by Tarsonis » Wed May 29, 2019 10:19 am

by Gormwood » Wed May 29, 2019 10:20 am
Tarsonis wrote:Gormwood wrote:Which will be drowned in the chorus shriek of "NOCOLLUSIONNOOBSTRUCTIONCOMPLETEANDTOTALEXONERATIONCASECLOSEDMOVEONPRESIDENTIALHARASSMENTDEMOCRATICREVENGE" and so on.
Ultimately I say impeach him, throw down the Gauntlet Dems. I mean, you'll lose, but depending how you lose might actually help you.

by Farnhamia » Wed May 29, 2019 10:21 am

by Gormwood » Wed May 29, 2019 10:24 am

by The Greater Ohio Valley » Wed May 29, 2019 10:30 am
Liriena wrote:Zurkerx wrote:
I don't think we have to worry about that. Oh, not the title but this passage should be important:
Charging Trump was "not an option" because Justice Department regulations prohibit charging a sitting president with a crime, Mueller said. His office was "bound by that policy."
This is as close as it gets to "impeach him".

by Farnhamia » Wed May 29, 2019 10:31 am

by Tarsonis » Wed May 29, 2019 11:24 am

by WhatsamattaU » Wed May 29, 2019 11:27 am

by Nakena » Wed May 29, 2019 11:32 am
by Cannot think of a name » Wed May 29, 2019 11:33 am
Tarsonis wrote:Gormwood wrote:Which will be drowned in the chorus shriek of "NOCOLLUSIONNOOBSTRUCTIONCOMPLETEANDTOTALEXONERATIONCASECLOSEDMOVEONPRESIDENTIALHARASSMENTDEMOCRATICREVENGE" and so on.
Ultimately I say impeach him, throw down the Gauntlet Dems. I mean, you'll lose, but depending how you lose might actually help you.

by The Black Forrest » Wed May 29, 2019 12:45 pm
WhatsamattaU wrote:Ultimately, however brave Bob Mueller may have been in the past, today's action was quite cowardly. While DOJ OLC suggests that a sitting President shouldn't be indicted, he might have flatly recommended impeachment to Congress. He didn't. IMHO, Mueller is a partisan hack.
Cannot think of a name wrote:Tarsonis wrote:
Ultimately I say impeach him, throw down the Gauntlet Dems. I mean, you'll lose, but depending how you lose might actually help you.
Pelosi knows what she's doing. Stay the course. She's said over and over again she's not going to impeach and she won't. Meanwhile the specter of impeachment keeps that insecure child in a septuagenarian body flipping out and scoring own goals and the Democratic voters focused on an impeachment they can win, voting in 2020.
It's working. No need to fix what isn't broken.

by Tarsonis » Wed May 29, 2019 12:52 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:Tarsonis wrote:
Ultimately I say impeach him, throw down the Gauntlet Dems. I mean, you'll lose, but depending how you lose might actually help you.
Pelosi knows what she's doing. Stay the course. She's said over and over again she's not going to impeach and she won't. Meanwhile the specter of impeachment keeps that insecure child in a septuagenarian body flipping out and scoring own goals and the Democratic voters focused on an impeachment they can win, voting in 2020.
It's working. No need to fix what isn't broken.

by Zurkerx » Wed May 29, 2019 12:54 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:Tarsonis wrote:
Ultimately I say impeach him, throw down the Gauntlet Dems. I mean, you'll lose, but depending how you lose might actually help you.
Pelosi knows what she's doing. Stay the course. She's said over and over again she's not going to impeach and she won't. Meanwhile the specter of impeachment keeps that insecure child in a septuagenarian body flipping out and scoring own goals and the Democratic voters focused on an impeachment they can win, voting in 2020.
It's working. No need to fix what isn't broken.

by Gormwood » Wed May 29, 2019 1:10 pm
by Cannot think of a name » Wed May 29, 2019 1:15 pm
Zurkerx wrote:Cannot think of a name wrote:Pelosi knows what she's doing. Stay the course. She's said over and over again she's not going to impeach and she won't. Meanwhile the specter of impeachment keeps that insecure child in a septuagenarian body flipping out and scoring own goals and the Democratic voters focused on an impeachment they can win, voting in 2020.
It's working. No need to fix what isn't broken.
It seems the Progressive part of the base doesn't see that though. Then again, they did call for his impeachment well before the investigation so...
But if they do try, I would imagine she'll squash it.
by Cannot think of a name » Wed May 29, 2019 1:17 pm
Gormwood wrote:Pelosi is a tactician. If a smoking gun on Donnie comes out she'll flip to Impeach Mode in a heartbeat.

by Gormwood » Wed May 29, 2019 1:22 pm

by The Lone Alliance » Wed May 29, 2019 1:33 pm
by Cannot think of a name » Wed May 29, 2019 1:33 pm
Gormwood wrote:After 8 years of W. Bush the country was so fed up they actually made a black man President. They could make a woman or even a Muslim President after 4 or even 8 years of Donnie's Midas Shit Touch assuming he hasn't reduced the country to a doomsday prepper's wet dream by then.

by Vassenor » Wed May 29, 2019 1:36 pm

by Ifreann » Wed May 29, 2019 1:36 pm
The Lone Alliance wrote:I question Mueller's speech simply because just because he might believe they couldn't go after Trump it's like he's saying saying they couldn't indict ANYONE ELSE?
I question that mindset and it sounds like a cop out cause he's a broken man.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dakran, Drew Durrnil, Necroghastia, Saiwana, The Orson Empire, Umeria
Advertisement