Advertisement
by Gospel Power » Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:59 am
by Vassenor » Mon Dec 17, 2018 11:15 am
Gospel Power wrote:Great speaker for conservatism and all who follows it, mostly I agree with what he have to say, especially his debates on the LGBT topics.
by Gospel Power » Mon Dec 17, 2018 11:35 am
by Vassenor » Mon Dec 17, 2018 11:37 am
by Dumb Ideologies » Mon Dec 17, 2018 11:37 am
by Evil Dictators Happyland » Mon Dec 17, 2018 11:40 am
by Scomagia » Mon Dec 17, 2018 11:46 am
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:Ifreann wrote:Calmly misgendering trans people until they get annoyed is not godlike charisma, it's just being a shit.
Is he doing it to intentionally piss them off or is he just uncompromising in his beliefs that he refuses to cater to people he views as mentally ill? And yes, there is a difference. Both are dick-moves, certainly, but one is less so than the other.
by Evil Dictators Happyland » Mon Dec 17, 2018 11:49 am
by Juristonia » Mon Dec 17, 2018 11:50 am
Ifreann wrote:Indeed, as far as I can recall only one poster has ever supported legalising bestiality, and he was fucking his cat and isn't welcome here any more, in no small part, I imagine, because he kept going on about how he was fucking his cat.
by Gospel Power » Mon Dec 17, 2018 11:50 am
by Evil Dictators Happyland » Mon Dec 17, 2018 11:51 am
by Grenartia » Mon Dec 17, 2018 11:52 am
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Grenartia wrote:Shit, another trans person just totally DESTROYED him with FACTS and LOGIC. Do I get a medal?
Rather than a trans person using facts and logic, in this post I saw a non-binary person rant incoherently and post some YouTube links. As a "by exemplar" metacriticism of the Shapiro meme model of misleading hype this was very good and I congratulate you for that.
Duvniask wrote:Western Vale Confederacy wrote:
Strasserism, a branch of Nazism (the other being Hitlerism) was very much of far-left taste, but I don't think Shapiro is referring to Strasserism (which ironically got purged by the Hitlerists in the mid-30s).
Even Gregor Strasser said this:
"The spirit of our National Socialist idea has to overpower the spirit of liberalism and false democracy if there is to be a third Reich at all! Deeply rooted in organic life, we have realized that the false belief in the equality of man is the deadly threat with which liberalism destroys people and nation, culture and morals. violating the deepest levels of our being! We have to reject with fanatical zeal the frequent lie that people are basically equal and equal in regard to their influence in the state and their share of power! People are unequal, they are unequal from birth, become more unequal in life and are therefore to be valued unequally in their positions in society and in the state!"
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Strasserism is [...] nationalist, conservative [...]
He does tons of research to formulate his opinion
and then debates it with the charisma of a god.
saying he is dumb is a far stretch.
Vassenor wrote:South Ccanda wrote:I'm sorry, are you saying that Ben Sharpiro is dumb? I don't agree with his politics, but to say he is dumb is very naive. He does tons of research to formulate his opinion and then debates it with the charisma of a god. saying he is dumb is a far stretch.
Browbeating someone until they give up and then bragging about destroying them isn't really debating. Or really all that charismatic.
Imperializt Russia wrote:South Ccanda wrote:Browbeating? lol. He talks calmly in every debate. Plus, generally when you don't have the information to back you up, Ben Sharpiro is going to be intimidating. Because he does have the information to back him up.
On some topics, he has none. Except the dogged assertion that he is correct, amid appeals to traditionalism.
Most notably in his opinion on trans women. Which seems to be focused on trans women specifically, as opposed to just trans people. Not only is he wrong in his arguments (they are basically flawed until broken down to the basic level of 'well, this is how it is now, and we shouldn't change that'), he is clearly being an edgelord and intentionally demeaning to "trigger" his opponents. The Zoe Tur incident springs to mind - you keep calling a trans woman "sir" because you know it'll piss her the fuck off, and then use any reaction they (rightfully) have to dismiss anything else about their position.
Grenartia wrote:Zoey did nothing wrong
South Ccanda wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:On some topics, he has none. Except the dogged assertion that he is correct, amid appeals to traditionalism.
Most notably in his opinion on trans women. Which seems to be focused on trans women specifically, as opposed to just trans people. Not only is he wrong in his arguments (they are basically flawed until broken down to the basic level of 'well, this is how it is now, and we shouldn't change that'), he is clearly being an edgelord and intentionally demeaning to "trigger" his opponents. The Zoe Tur incident springs to mind - you keep calling a trans woman "sir" because you know it'll piss her the fuck off, and then use any reaction they (rightfully) have to dismiss anything else about their position.
Yes, but that doesn't excuse the fact that he stayed calm and cool during the Zoe Tur incident.
He wasn't browbeating.
And from the likes of it, he sincerely believes she is delusional
and no-one was able to counter debate that.
In fact, her reaction was the complete opposite of calm and cool. I've never heard anyone counter argue him without getting heated.
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:Ifreann wrote:He's doing it to piss them off. When he appeared with transwoman Zoey Tur he called her "sir" until she got mad and threatened to deck him. When he appeared with transwoman Blair White he managed to actually be polite and civil.
Sounds more like he was specifically trying to piss her off to me.
Tobleste wrote:This article is a pretty good criticism of what he does: https://static.currentaffairs.org/2017/ ... hilosopher
I especially like this part which is basically the conclusion of the whole article:Let me tell you why Ben Shapiro actually aggravates me. It is not his voice or demeanor, though I understand why others find these characteristics grating. Nor is it the way he inserts references to first-year law school doctrines even when they aren’t actually relevant. It is, rather, that Ben Shapiro is lying to his audience, by telling them that he is just a person concerned with the Truth, when the only thing he actually cares about is destroying the left. “Facts don’t care about your feelings” is a fine mantra, albeit kind of a dickish one. But it’s worthless if you’re going to interpret every last fact in the way most favorable to your own preconceptions, if you’re going to ignore evidence contrary to your position, and refuse to try to understand what your opponents actually believe. The New York Times actually quoted a sensible-sounding ex-Shapiro fan, who said he realized over time that Shapiro was just concerned with convincing other people he was right, rather than actually being right. Shapiro is annoying because he claims to love speech and discourse, to believe you should “get to know people… get to know their views…discuss,” but if you’re an Arab he’s already convinced you’re a secret anti-Semite, and if you’re a poor black person he doesn’t need to know you to know that you’re culturally dysfunctional.
The encouraging news is that if Ben Shapiro is the sharpest thinker among millennial conservatives, millennial leftists don’t have too much to worry about. You may feel as if Shapiro is a Vaporizer of Poor Logic, the Aristotle of our time. You may feel as if he has brutally torn apart every person who has crossed him in public, through his tried and tested technique of speaking extremely quickly until they give up. You may feel that he is brilliant and thoughtful and sincere.
But before you treat these feelings as real, remember that annoying little fact about facts: They don’t really care how you feel.
by Evil Dictators Happyland » Mon Dec 17, 2018 11:52 am
by The Tomerlands » Mon Dec 17, 2018 11:56 am
by The Tomerlands » Mon Dec 17, 2018 11:58 am
Page wrote:Ben Shapiro is a hack who would be irrelevant by now, if not for the fact that he jumped aboard the anti-SJW, anti-PC, reactionary bandwagon at a time when it's popular to do so.
by Maineiacs » Mon Dec 17, 2018 12:00 pm
by The Tomerlands » Mon Dec 17, 2018 12:01 pm
by The Tomerlands » Mon Dec 17, 2018 12:02 pm
by The Tomerlands » Mon Dec 17, 2018 12:02 pm
Maineiacs wrote:I've never heard of this guy, but from what I can gather, he sounds like an arrogant asshole who viciously attacks cherry-picked weaker opponents in debates to make himself look smart and hip.
by The Batavia » Mon Dec 17, 2018 12:04 pm
by Gospel Power » Mon Dec 17, 2018 12:04 pm
Maineiacs wrote:I've never heard of this guy, but from what I can gather, he sounds like an arrogant asshole who viciously attacks cherry-picked weaker opponents in debates to make himself look smart and hip.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Atrito, Benuty, Eahland, Federation Of Ochima, Greater Sus, Ifreann, Juristonia, Lycom, Lysset, Pale Dawn, Southland, StrayaRoos, Tarsonis, Valrifall, Vive Salem, X3-U, Zancostan, Zurkerx
Advertisement