Strasbourg terrorist incident

[Hatterleigh]

Thank you for intentionally misinterpreting my post. I'm saying that it is more of a problem now, not that the terrorism itself is new.

Not really.

https://www.datagraver.com/thumbs/1300x ... 5final.png

Well obviously terrorism was quite high in the 80s and 90s. There was some major political shifts going on during that time. The terrorism rate of that period would likely lower drastically if you focused on Western Europe and nations that weren't part of the 2nd world

[Thermodolia]

Mixing fabrics isn't a moral law and is most likely a holdover of ancient Israelite cultural markers and iirc a prohibition on something reserved for the priests. You have a very, very poor grasp on religion.

So God gives us a pass? And why didn't God removed those laws then? Maybe because... he's not a God?
But oh yes of course: "ou have a very, very poor grasp on religion."

Sorry mate, forgot i was speaking to the Pope here.

Because Leviticus is for us Jews and not Christians.

[The South Falls]

I love how we'll fight for 30 pages, then come around to peace.

If only the mods could be so kind

Hide the bong, man. Hide it.

Just run away as fast as possible.

[Freezic Vast]

I love how we'll fight for 30 pages, then come around to peace.

If only the mods could be so kind

The Mods need a mod-sanctioned thread like what happened with the Pittsburgh thread.

[Right wing humour squad]

The terrorist is still at large. They think they know his location, but evidently, they're not sure.

Did they say where?

France is my guess.

[Sukberia]

Mixing fabrics isn't a moral law and is most likely a holdover of ancient Israelite cultural markers and iirc a prohibition on something reserved for the priests. You have a very, very poor grasp on religion.

The problem here is he keeps interpreting everything in the Bible literally.

Thus, he's reading it wrong - just like fundies do.

Yeah we all know that we need a specialised Priest to understand the Bible.

God couldn't predict that in 2.000 years the bible would be harder to understand, he couldn't just put it on better terms.

No. He was too busy worrying about his choosen people losing yet another war against Rome, or something.

[Trollzyn the Infinite]

I've not mentioned this entire thread that I believe Islam is a pro-LGBT religion. I've simply stated that I cannot hate all Muslims because religion is a complex thing that leaves room for interpretation and different beliefs to be believed underneath it. Take any Bible verse and there can be as many interpretations as there are people to read it, same goes for the religious texts of Judaism and Islam.

viewtopic.php?f=20&t=441628&p=35035768#p35035768

You and the other British one then, I honestly can't differentiate between you all.

Wallahi I know you do.

No I don't. I have no idea what you mean by calling me a can of intentional ignorance. Also, you shouldn't be using "Wallahi" if you don't mean it. You don't even believe in Allah SWT iirc, so there's no point for you to use it.

I'm defending Christianity, not Islam.



You are, and it's becoming spammy.

Preventing threadjacks isn't spam.

You aren't preventing threadjacks, you're whining about it by spamming the same link over and over again.

Got interrupted by my cat.
Are people still defending Islam, diversity, and democracies failure to provide adequate migration policy?

It's not democracy that is the problem.

[Thermodolia]

I love how we'll fight for 30 pages, then come around to peace.

If only the mods could be so kind

The Mods need a mod-sanctioned thread like what happened with the Pittsburgh thread.

I think this was the mod sanctioned thread. The OP is a mod.

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

Did they say where?

France is my guess.

IIRC, in or around his neighborhood, but I could be misremembering.

[Right wing humour squad]

viewtopic.php?f=20&t=441628&p=35035768#p35035768

No I don't. I have no idea what you mean by calling me a can of intentional ignorance. Also, you shouldn't be using "Wallahi" if you don't mean it. You don't even believe in Allah SWT iirc, so there's no point for you to use it.

Preventing threadjacks isn't spam.

You aren't preventing threadjacks, you're whining about it by spamming the same link over and over again.

Got interrupted by my cat.
Are people still defending Islam, diversity, and democracies failure to provide adequate migration policy?

It's not democracy that is the problem.

Democracy is a problem though.

[Sukberia]

So God gives us a pass? And why didn't God removed those laws then? Maybe because... he's not a God?
But oh yes of course: "ou have a very, very poor grasp on religion."

Sorry mate, forgot i was speaking to the Pope here.

Because Leviticus is for us Jews and not Christians.

Ah yes. God's choosen people. I thought they had the Torah? This is all very confusing! I need to pray that God enlights my heathen ways!

[Hatterleigh]

So God gives us a pass? And why didn't God removed those laws then? Maybe because... he's not a God?
But oh yes of course: "ou have a very, very poor grasp on religion."

Sorry mate, forgot i was speaking to the Pope here.

Because Leviticus is for us Jews and not Christians.

You're a jew?

[Kannap]

Mixing fabrics isn't a moral law and is most likely a holdover of ancient Israelite cultural markers and iirc a prohibition on something reserved for the priests. You have a very, very poor grasp on religion.

So God gives us a pass? And why didn't God removed those laws then? Maybe because... he's not a God?
But oh yes of course: "ou have a very, very poor grasp on religion."

Sorry mate, forgot i was speaking to the Pope here.

I'll give you a rebuttal, but only if you bring your questions in this post to the Christian Discussion Thread, where you can have all your questions answered by yours truly, the fabulous Kannap.

This isn't the thread for them.

[Olerand]

Almost none of that poster's posts are worthy of responding to. However, denying the rampant illiberal and radical attitudes and beliefs amongst Muslims, in Europe and elsewhere, is pure (and see through) deflection.

If you think I've defended the entirety of Islam as a religion and its beliefs, then I've not communicated myself clearly and I apologize. My only point I've been repeating is that I can't hate all Muslims just because the majority are anti-LGBT or anti-woman or whatever else.

No, I haven't. I should really add more caveats to my post that clarify that I am not specifically saying so and so poster specficially engaged in this. I have addressed this in another post as well:

That was me. My family lost a very good friend last year in the Barcelona terrorist incident.

I know, and I am sorry for your loss.

I like your flag, by the by.

I've not mentioned this entire thread that I believe Islam is a pro-LGBT religion. I've simply stated that I cannot hate all Muslims because religion is a complex thing that leaves room for interpretation and different beliefs to be believed underneath it. Take any Bible verse and there can be as many interpretations as there are people to read it, same goes for the religious texts of Judaism and Islam.

Right. The issue, which is out of your hand but worth acknowledging, is that many Muslims, most, are very much anti-LGBT. Very much. This doesn't mean that one needs to draw some Manichean conflict; but there is an issue. And one would do well to acknowledge it, if only to take this bludgeon away from the Anglo-Saxon right.

I know, and I am sorry for your loss.

I like your flag, by the by.


Right. The issue, which is out of your hand but worth acknowledging, is that many Muslims, most, are very much anti-LGBT. Very much. This doesn't mean that one needs to draw some Manichean conflict; but there is an issue. And one would do well to acknowledge it, if only to take this bludgeon away from the Anglo-Saxon right.

Everything is Cat-astrophic you know.

Thanks, though.

Some people believe it is the End Times, and I desperately wish they are right. If this isn't it, I shudder to think of what's coming. This isn't about terrorism, but more radicalness, religious and political (but mostly religious), economic and environmental crises.

[New haven america]

So God gives us a pass? And why didn't God removed those laws then? Maybe because... he's not a God?
But oh yes of course: "ou have a very, very poor grasp on religion."

Sorry mate, forgot i was speaking to the Pope here.

Because Leviticus is for us Jews and not Christians.

Shhh... Then how will Christians excuse the people holding "God hates Fags" signs?

[Kubumba Tribe]

What does Islamo-lite? And do you know the serious danger of nukes?

A single nuke would be enough to kill Millions of innocents and devastate the entire are for years to come.
The repercussions would inevetably reach Europe.

Of course i know. Nukes are weapons of total destruction.

Then why use them, considering that you said you oppose killing innocents?

Islamo-Lite because they are not as extremist as their neighboors.

Hm.

[Sukberia]

So God gives us a pass? And why didn't God removed those laws then? Maybe because... he's not a God?
But oh yes of course: "ou have a very, very poor grasp on religion."

Sorry mate, forgot i was speaking to the Pope here.

I'll give you a rebuttal, but only if you bring your questions in this post to the Christian Discussion Thread, where you can have all your questions answered by yours truly, the fabulous Kannap.

This isn't the thread for them.

OH! I was thinking about catching some Z's as soon as this thread was locked up. I've had nothing but studying today! I suppose a few more posts couldn't hurt

[Trollzyn the Infinite]

Did they say where?

France is my guess.

What!? He jumped the border!?

/s

The problem here is he keeps interpreting everything in the Bible literally.

Thus, he's reading it wrong - just like fundies do.

Yeah we all know that we need a specialised Priest to understand the Bible.

God couldn't predict that in 2.000 years the bible would be harder to understand, he couldn't just put it on better terms.

No. He was too busy worrying about his choosen people losing yet another war against Rome, or something.

No, you don't need a priest to understand - you just need to not be a smug, know-it-all who thinks he has all the answers when in reality he doesn't know jack shit.

Probably why you can't understand it.

[Napkiraly]

Mixing fabrics isn't a moral law and is most likely a holdover of ancient Israelite cultural markers and iirc a prohibition on something reserved for the priests. You have a very, very poor grasp on religion.

So God gives us a pass? And why didn't God removed those laws then? Maybe because... he's not a God?
But oh yes of course: "ou have a very, very poor grasp on religion."

Sorry mate, forgot i was speaking to the Pope here.

No, the Bible is a collection of various writings and teachers. A lot of it is historical documentation while others are priestly interpretations and others are commands by God. Also a lot of the OT (though not all) was placed on the back burner with the establishment of the NT.

You do, you have shown a very poor grasp of the Bible and read it in a very literal manner.

[New haven america]

Because Leviticus is for us Jews and not Christians.

Ah yes. God's choosen people. I thought they had the Torah? This is all very confusing! I need to pray that God enlights my heathen ways!

The Torah is the OT in the Bible, and doesn't apply to Christians. The NT is for Christians, but most either don't know or don't care about that fact.

Also, most don't even understand why Christ's crucifixion was important.

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

If you think I've defended the entirety of Islam as a religion and its beliefs, then I've not communicated myself clearly and I apologize. My only point I've been repeating is that I can't hate all Muslims just because the majority are anti-LGBT or anti-woman or whatever else.

No, I haven't. I should really add more caveats to my post that clarify that I am not specifically saying so and so poster specficially engaged in this. I have addressed this in another post as well:

I know, and I am sorry for your loss.

I like your flag, by the by.


Right. The issue, which is out of your hand but worth acknowledging, is that many Muslims, most, are very much anti-LGBT. Very much. This doesn't mean that one needs to draw some Manichean conflict; but there is an issue. And one would do well to acknowledge it, if only to take this bludgeon away from the Anglo-Saxon right.

Everything is Cat-astrophic you know.

Thanks, though.

Some people believe it is the End Times, and I desperately wish they are right. If this isn't it, I shudder to think of what's coming. This isn't about terrorism, but more radicalness, religious and political (but mostly religious), economic and environmental crises.

I frankly don't know what to say. I also heard reports of Jehovah's Witnesses kingdom halls being fire bombed in Washington state. No idea who is behind it or why.

[Kannap]

I've not mentioned this entire thread that I believe Islam is a pro-LGBT religion. I've simply stated that I cannot hate all Muslims because religion is a complex thing that leaves room for interpretation and different beliefs to be believed underneath it. Take any Bible verse and there can be as many interpretations as there are people to read it, same goes for the religious texts of Judaism and Islam.

viewtopic.php?f=20&t=441628&p=35035768#p35035768

You're simultaneously spamming two threads: Spamming this thread with links to the Islam Discussion Thread and spamming the Islam thread with responses to posts in this thread. Please stop, for our sake here and for the sake of users who frequent the Islam thread.

[Olerand]

I don't think he lost anybody.

I didn’t.

I did get close to losing family members back during the temple shooting in Pittsburgh a few months back.

Oh, that's crazy. Are they OK?

The terrorist is still at large. They think they know his location, but evidently, they're not sure.

Damn. I hope they catch him alive

Probably not; and I hope not.

I've not mentioned this entire thread that I believe Islam is a pro-LGBT religion. I've simply stated that I cannot hate all Muslims because religion is a complex thing that leaves room for interpretation and different beliefs to be believed underneath it. Take any Bible verse and there can be as many interpretations as there are people to read it, same goes for the religious texts of Judaism and Islam.

viewtopic.php?f=20&t=441628&p=35035768#p35035768

You and the other British one then, I honestly can't differentiate between you all.

Wallahi I know you do.

No I don't. I have no idea what you mean by calling me a can of intentional ignorance. Also, you shouldn't be using "Wallahi" if you don't mean it. You don't even believe in Allah SWT iirc, so there's no point for you to use it.

I'm defending Christianity, not Islam.



You are, and it's becoming spammy.

Preventing threadjacks isn't spam.

Wallahi is, very, excessively, commonly used in Arabic. If I use it in vain, trust that Allah will deal with me when the time comes, you don't have to worry.

[Olerand]

The terrorist is still at large. They think they know his location, but evidently, they're not sure.

Did they say where?

Only Neudorf is still under lockdown.

[Sukberia]

A single nuke would be enough to kill Millions of innocents and devastate the entire are for years to come.
The repercussions would inevetably reach Europe.

Of course i know. Nukes are weapons of total destruction.

Then why use them, considering that you said you oppose killing innocents?

Islamo-Lite because they are not as extremist as their neighboors.

Hm.

I said that IN THE EVENT of a nuke. Not that i want nukes to be deployed.

People might think i want innocents to die just because i disagree with them. But that's false. I just want them to stop bringing their shit here, and to best do that it's to stop at it's core. But nukes harm innoccents most and all, and destroy the environnement around.

(Although i still believe they were justified in Japan.)