ANTIFA Mob Vandalizes Tucker Carlson’s Home

[Petrasylvania]

Threatening to come back and protest some more. Clearly endangering Tucker's life by depriving him of sleep.

"Doxxing isn't dangerous." - Gauthier

Can't doxx what's already public knowledge.

[Kaggeceria]

"Doxxing isn't dangerous." - Gauthier

Can't doxx what's already public knowledge.

Is it, now?

How do you know this?

[Petrasylvania]

Can't doxx what's already public knowledge.

Is it, now?

How do you know this?

Remember Ifreann trying to prove it's listed on White Pages but the mods wouldn't allow it on the forum?

[Kaggeceria]

Is it, now?

How do you know this?

Remember Ifreann trying to prove it's listed on White Pages but the mods wouldn't allow it on the forum?

Yes, the mods considered it doxxing.

Crazy, right?

And I checked Whitepages myself. His name and the city he lives in are listed there, but his exact address is not.

Try harder.

[Tobleste]

This is what violence against journalists looks like.

1. It's safe to say Carlson has contributed to the hatred of journalists among republican voters so forgive my indifference.
2. No it isn't. There's been one assasinated while many others were the victims of attempted bombings. That's more what violence looks like.
3. Carlson is as much a journalist as he is a cartoon character. He's more of an actor or a columnist than a journalist.

[Tobleste]

If a Cesar Sayoc actually killed someone he constantly demonized, say Hillary Clinton, the last thing Donnie would do is connect it to his tirades, much less punish himself for it.

As he would be well within common sense to do, given that someone else committed a violent act which he did not incite at all. If someone went and killed Trump, do you think that Clinton should feel some of the responsibility?

Not really. The descriptions Trump receives that cause people to hate him (e.g. racist, authoritarian, corrupt) are mostly accurate. When it comes to Trump, he demonizes everyone he dislikes by just making stuff up. It matters that Trumps actions deserve more anger than the actions of the people Trump hates because it means that when people call him out on it, they're not hatemongering, they're telling the truth.

Also, he praises violence much more often than any other major politician in the US.

[Kassaran]

Not really. The descriptions Trump receives

By the Mainstrem Media (MSM)

that cause people to hate him

Because he works against the propaganda machine of Corporate elites that have long held power in the US, and has received on average 50-60% negative media coverage

(e.g. racist, authoritarian, corrupt) are mostly accurate.

Cite your sources on each of these claims in the future, because he has yet to be proven a racist, he's most definitely not authoritarian, and while he could be corrupt - so are all of the old folks sitting on Capitol Hill, perhaps with a few exceptions amongst the Representatives. Doesn't make it right, but it does make it the norm and hardly notable here.

When it comes to Trump, he demonizes everyone he dislikes by just making stuff up.

You mean, he dishes out what he gets, because he comes from a pretty rough line of work and is capable of developing a thick skin unlike many who have sat in their glass castles for last couple decades?

It matters that Trumps actions deserve more anger than the actions of the people Trump hates

Can I evoke Godwin this early in the conversation? Regardless, the use of the word hate is strong, as he definitely dislikes many who make life rough for him as the POTUS, but he has yet to go out of his way and arrest any of them outright. He simply criticizes them vocally and from a platform not many turn a deaf ear to.

because it means that when people call him out on it, they're not hatemongering, they're telling the truth.

Or maybe they're all just screaming nonsense at each other because they really can't get along. We see daily that the current POTUS is blamed for everything that could be going wrong, and as the MSM slips into more partisan territory, there's such a divisive line being cast in the country that can only be described as self-sustaining. Do you know what you do when you don't want someone's ideas to propagate successfully? You censor them, unless of course you have an interest in making an exclusive profit off of their actions. Then you censor them selectively. That is the strategy the current MSM companies have elected to go with. It's not hatemongering, it's political partisanship that has devolved into childish quarreling because the majority of the puppets that exist on the screens we watch have previously held a falsely unassailable position.

Also, he praises violence much more often than any other major politician in the US.

That's subjectively true. Undue or unjust violence? I'd disagree. He's yet to start praising when journalists get shot up, or major political opponents of his receive bomb threats. He instead has denounced the actions taken and always sued for justice. When it comes to praising those who work in government under the jurisdiction of the Executive Branch to include the Armed Forces, he's greatly supported and encouraged those actions which are needed to protect America's global interests.

[Vassenor]

Not really. The descriptions Trump receives

By the Mainstrem Media (MSM)

that cause people to hate him

Because he works against the propaganda machine of Corporate elites that have long held power in the US, and has received on average 50-60% negative media coverage

(e.g. racist, authoritarian, corrupt) are mostly accurate.

Cite your sources on each of these claims in the future, because he has yet to be proven a racist, he's most definitely not authoritarian, and while he could be corrupt - so are all of the old folks sitting on Capitol Hill, perhaps with a few exceptions amongst the Representatives. Doesn't make it right, but it does make it the norm and hardly notable here.

When it comes to Trump, he demonizes everyone he dislikes by just making stuff up.

You mean, he dishes out what he gets, because he comes from a pretty rough line of work and is capable of developing a thick skin unlike many who have sat in their glass castles for last couple decades?

It matters that Trumps actions deserve more anger than the actions of the people Trump hates

Can I evoke Godwin this early in the conversation? Regardless, the use of the word hate is strong, as he definitely dislikes many who make life rough for him as the POTUS, but he has yet to go out of his way and arrest any of them outright. He simply criticizes them vocally and from a platform not many turn a deaf ear to.

because it means that when people call him out on it, they're not hatemongering, they're telling the truth.

Or maybe they're all just screaming nonsense at each other because they really can't get along. We see daily that the current POTUS is blamed for everything that could be going wrong, and as the MSM slips into more partisan territory, there's such a divisive line being cast in the country that can only be described as self-sustaining. Do you know what you do when you don't want someone's ideas to propagate successfully? You censor them, unless of course you have an interest in making an exclusive profit off of their actions. Then you censor them selectively. That is the strategy the current MSM companies have elected to go with. It's not hatemongering, it's political partisanship that has devolved into childish quarreling because the majority of the puppets that exist on the screens we watch have previously held a falsely unassailable position.

Also, he praises violence much more often than any other major politician in the US.

That's subjectively true. Undue or unjust violence? I'd disagree. He's yet to start praising when journalists get shot up, or major political opponents of his receive bomb threats. He instead has denounced the actions taken and always sued for justice. When it comes to praising those who work in government under the jurisdiction of the Executive Branch to include the Armed Forces, he's greatly supported and encouraged those actions which are needed to protect America's global interests.

>Trump

>Thick Skinned

[Chesmo]

By the Mainstrem Media (MSM)

Because he works against the propaganda machine of Corporate elites that have long held power in the US, and has received on average 50-60% negative media coverage


Cite your sources on each of these claims in the future, because he has yet to be proven a racist, he's most definitely not authoritarian, and while he could be corrupt - so are all of the old folks sitting on Capitol Hill, perhaps with a few exceptions amongst the Representatives. Doesn't make it right, but it does make it the norm and hardly notable here.



You mean, he dishes out what he gets, because he comes from a pretty rough line of work and is capable of developing a thick skin unlike many who have sat in their glass castles for last couple decades?



Can I evoke Godwin this early in the conversation? Regardless, the use of the word hate is strong, as he definitely dislikes many who make life rough for him as the POTUS, but he has yet to go out of his way and arrest any of them outright. He simply criticizes them vocally and from a platform not many turn a deaf ear to.



Or maybe they're all just screaming nonsense at each other because they really can't get along. We see daily that the current POTUS is blamed for everything that could be going wrong, and as the MSM slips into more partisan territory, there's such a divisive line being cast in the country that can only be described as self-sustaining. Do you know what you do when you don't want someone's ideas to propagate successfully? You censor them, unless of course you have an interest in making an exclusive profit off of their actions. Then you censor them selectively. That is the strategy the current MSM companies have elected to go with. It's not hatemongering, it's political partisanship that has devolved into childish quarreling because the majority of the puppets that exist on the screens we watch have previously held a falsely unassailable position.



That's subjectively true. Undue or unjust violence? I'd disagree. He's yet to start praising when journalists get shot up, or major political opponents of his receive bomb threats. He instead has denounced the actions taken and always sued for justice. When it comes to praising those who work in government under the jurisdiction of the Executive Branch to include the Armed Forces, he's greatly supported and encouraged those actions which are needed to protect America's global interests.

>Trump

>Thick Skinned

I honestly think you could have elaborated more Vassenor.
Replying to an essay worth of text with a short comment just seems a little lazy.

[Farnhamia]

>Trump

>Thick Skinned

I honestly think you could have elaborated more Vassenor.
Replying to an essay worth of text with a short comment just seems a little lazy.

Threads in General that have not had a new post in more than four (4) weeks are dead. Do not post in them.