San Lumen wrote:A republican candidate assaulting a reporter is ok to you? But if a Democratic did it would it also be ok?
Apparently the body-slam wasn't political violence, it was a friendly wrestling match gone wrong.
Advertisement

by RiderSyl » Thu Oct 25, 2018 10:12 am
San Lumen wrote:A republican candidate assaulting a reporter is ok to you? But if a Democratic did it would it also be ok?

by The Black Forrest » Thu Oct 25, 2018 10:13 am
Painisia wrote:My goodness. It seems that Democrats have always been the target of false-flag accusations, particularly from a (censored)-wing community.
But George Bush, a Republican, was also the piñata doll when it came to false flag accusations.

by Xmara » Thu Oct 25, 2018 10:13 am
RiderSyl wrote:Free Tristania wrote:Guess what: it wouldn't even surprise me if this was the case. It remains funny that the nr.1 military force in the world, couldn't get a single plane up in the air on that date. But I digress.
The logic you use to question 9/11 is the same logic that defeats your conspiracy about the Democrats.
Why would a group powerful enough to do all you accuse them of not be able to win a single election cycle?

by RiderSyl » Thu Oct 25, 2018 10:13 am
Free Tristania wrote:San Lumen wrote:
And yet it was a Republican candidate now House member who assaulted the reporter. But if a democrat did it you'd be calling for the their withdrawal.
Dont become a police officer or a investigator. Your lack of objectivity would get you fired.
Hey. I am merely using the Left's own standards. It worked well within the ranks of the Soviet secret police or their other commie counterparts - or with the likes of CNN, Huff Post, Salon etc.

by San Lumen » Thu Oct 25, 2018 10:14 am
Free Tristania wrote:San Lumen wrote:
And yet it was a Republican candidate now House member who assaulted the reporter. But if a democrat did it you'd be calling for the their withdrawal.
Dont become a police officer or a investigator. Your lack of objectivity would get you fired.
Hey. I am merely using the Left's own standards. It worked well within the ranks of the Soviet secret police or their other commie counterparts - or with the likes of CNN, Huff Post, Salon etc.

by Andsed » Thu Oct 25, 2018 10:15 am
Free Tristania wrote:San Lumen wrote:
And yet it was a Republican candidate now House member who assaulted the reporter. But if a democrat did it you'd be calling for the their withdrawal.
Dont become a police officer or a investigator. Your lack of objectivity would get you fired.
Hey. I am merely using the Left's own standards. It worked well within the ranks of the Soviet secret police or their other commie counterparts - or with the likes of CNN, Huff Post, Salon etc.

by Free Tristania » Thu Oct 25, 2018 10:15 am

by RiderSyl » Thu Oct 25, 2018 10:16 am
Free Tristania wrote:San Lumen wrote:
We don't know who did it! But there is no evidence of a false flag. A republican candidate assaulting a reporter is ok to you? But if a Democratic did it would it also be ok?
Of course we know who did it: even when they did't: the Democrats did it. Just like Kavanaugh is a rapist even when he isn't. We wouldn't want to be using double standards now, would we ? That wouldn't be o.k. As for the bombs: I don't feel, particularly, sorry for those who got them. Wasn't it Clinton that bombed Libya into burning ash and then unleashed a tidal wave on Europe ? Wasn't it Obama that was meddling in Ukraine and Syria, bringing us closer to WWIII ? That's right.
by Cannot think of a name » Thu Oct 25, 2018 10:16 am
Free Tristania wrote:San Lumen wrote:
And yet it was a Republican candidate now House member who assaulted the reporter. But if a democrat did it you'd be calling for the their withdrawal.
Dont become a police officer or a investigator. Your lack of objectivity would get you fired.
Hey. I am merely using the Left's own standards. It worked well within the ranks of the Soviet secret police or their other commie counterparts - or with the likes of CNN, Huff Post, Salon etc.

by Painisia » Thu Oct 25, 2018 10:16 am
Free Tristania wrote:San Lumen wrote:
And yet it was a Republican candidate now House member who assaulted the reporter. But if a democrat did it you'd be calling for the their withdrawal.
Dont become a police officer or a investigator. Your lack of objectivity would get you fired.
Hey. I am merely using the Left's own standards. It worked well within the ranks of the Soviet secret police or their other commie counterparts - or with the likes of CNN, Huff Post, Salon etc.
-Christian DemocratFormerly, the nation of Painisia November 2017 - August 2019
-Syncretic
-Distributist
-Personalist
-Ecologism
-Popolarismo
-Corporatist

by Free Tristania » Thu Oct 25, 2018 10:16 am
San Lumen wrote:Free Tristania wrote:Hey. I am merely using the Left's own standards. It worked well within the ranks of the Soviet secret police or their other commie counterparts - or with the likes of CNN, Huff Post, Salon etc.
That's a dumb response. There is absolutely zero evidence to suggest what you are insinuating.

by Free Tristania » Thu Oct 25, 2018 10:17 am
RiderSyl wrote:Free Tristania wrote:Of course we know who did it: even when they did't: the Democrats did it. Just like Kavanaugh is a rapist even when he isn't. We wouldn't want to be using double standards now, would we ? That wouldn't be o.k. As for the bombs: I don't feel, particularly, sorry for those who got them. Wasn't it Clinton that bombed Libya into burning ash and then unleashed a tidal wave on Europe ? Wasn't it Obama that was meddling in Ukraine and Syria, bringing us closer to WWIII ? That's right.
Okay dude now you're really blatantly trying to steer the conversation to ANYTHING but these mail bombs.

by San Lumen » Thu Oct 25, 2018 10:18 am
Free Tristania wrote:San Lumen wrote:
We don't know who did it! But there is no evidence of a false flag. A republican candidate assaulting a reporter is ok to you? But if a Democratic did it would it also be ok?
Of course we know who did it: even when they did't: the Democrats did it. Just like Kavanaugh is a rapist even when he isn't. We wouldn't want to be using double standards now, would we ? That wouldn't be o.k. As for the bombs: I don't feel, particularly, sorry for those who got them. Wasn't it Clinton that bombed Libya into burning ash and then unleashed a tidal wave on Europe ? Wasn't it Obama that was meddling in Ukraine and Syria, bringing us closer to WWIII ? That's right.

by Andsed » Thu Oct 25, 2018 10:18 am

by RiderSyl » Thu Oct 25, 2018 10:18 am
Free Tristania wrote:RiderSyl wrote:
Okay dude now you're really blatantly trying to steer the conversation to ANYTHING but these mail bombs.
No. I am suggesting that maybe, just maybe - those people who had bombed entire countries to bits, just wouldn't be so worried about having duds sent to them in order to score a political point.

by Tarsonis » Thu Oct 25, 2018 10:19 am
US-SSR wrote:Brought to you by the people who whine about "civility" when their dinner is interrupted. Now hear this: no amount of ignorance, fear, hatred, racism, mobs or bombs will ever silence or intimidate us. Bring it on.

by Republic of Turbin » Thu Oct 25, 2018 10:19 am

by Free Tristania » Thu Oct 25, 2018 10:19 am
None of the devices harmed anyone, and it was not immediately clear whether any of them could have. One law enforcement official said investigators were examining the possibility that they were hoax devices that were constructed to look like bombs but would not have exploded.

by RiderSyl » Thu Oct 25, 2018 10:19 am
Tarsonis wrote:US-SSR wrote:Brought to you by the people who whine about "civility" when their dinner is interrupted. Now hear this: no amount of ignorance, fear, hatred, racism, mobs or bombs will ever silence or intimidate us. Bring it on.
Those same people denounced this too. Funny how you have nothing to stand on here.

by Free Tristania » Thu Oct 25, 2018 10:20 am

by San Lumen » Thu Oct 25, 2018 10:21 am
Republic of Turbin wrote:San Lumen wrote:
It doesn't make it right. A false flag is a very serious accusation and it makes you sound like a crazy person.
Also what is a false flag is that a political term or a fourm term also I did not word my opinion the right way and I’m sorry for sounding ignorant.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Central Slavia, El Lazaro, Emotional Support Crocodile, EretzIsrael, Ifreann, Imperial Pravus, Kirav, Necroghastia, Pilipinas and Malaya, Senkaku, Shrillland, The Crimson Isles, Thermodolia, Theyra
Advertisement