Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 9:02 pm
The South Falls wrote:The guy is shit. He might not have done this, but he is still shit.
Agreed.
I wouldn't be surprised if he did it, though.
Because sometimes even national leaders just want to hang out
https://forum.nationstates.net/
The South Falls wrote:The guy is shit. He might not have done this, but he is still shit.
Torrocca wrote:Kustonia wrote:
There is a difference. José Antonio Primo de Rivera was not Adolf Hitler. I think you're a little rusty with your political understanding. Brush up on it and then get back to me.
If that's who you look up to, then it's even funnier that you're trying to distance yourself from the blatant Fascism that you espouse.
Torrocca wrote:Kustonia wrote:
There is a difference. José Antonio Primo de Rivera was not Adolf Hitler. I think you're a little rusty with your political understanding. Brush up on it and then get back to me.
If that's who you look up to, then it's even funnier that you're trying to distance yourself from the blatant Fascism that you espouse.
Kustonia wrote:Torrocca wrote:
If that's who you look up to, then it's even funnier that you're trying to distance yourself from the blatant Fascism that you espouse.
It's not funny because there is so much bias against the political Right.
What's ironic is that you are an anarchist who has ruled the Forums for so long that political opponents of yours are afraid to stand up to you, thankfully, I'm not.
What's ironic is that you are an anarchist who has ruled the Forums for so long that political opponents of yours are afraid to stand up to you, thankfully, I'm not.
Torrocca wrote:As I am Her Majesty, Queen Torra I, of House Anarkittismo, reigning monarch of the dominant Anarcho-Monarchist queendom on NS, I most humbly and regally declare this fraught and vulgar accusation against my most noble, chivalrous, and graceful name to be punishable by heavy-handed snark, spoken entirely on my fabulous behalf.
Prydania wrote:Torrocca wrote:As I am Her Majesty, Queen Torra I, of House Anarkittismo, reigning monarch of the dominant Anarcho-Monarchist queendom on NS, I most humbly and regally declare this fraught and vulgar accusation against my most noble, chivalrous, and graceful name to be punishable by heavy-handed snark, spoken entirely on my fabulous behalf.
*plays trumpets*
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:If the allegation is true, that makes Richard Spencer scum.
Abuse of anyone is the worst act anyone can do.
Len Hyet wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:Have you proof to the contrary? I am sure the scholarly debate over functionalism vs. intentionalism would love to hear this new evidence you have that could clear this whole thing up!
Fact is, though few people have any doubt of Hitler's guilt regarding the Holocaust, and rightly so, it likely wouldn't stand up in a fair court of law. Hell, in the Nuremburg trials, about as far from fair as you can get, plenty of high-ranking Nazis managed to bullshit their way out of "beyond a reasonable doubt" and avoid the noose they so rightly deserved.
"Beyond a reasonable doubt" is a legal function to prevent innocents from being punished, not a moral precept.
You know I actually didn't know about the 'no written order' thing. That's pretty damn interesting.
Cedoria wrote:Len Hyet wrote:You know I actually didn't know about the 'no written order' thing. That's pretty damn interesting.
It's technically true, but there's enough written documentation of euphemisms at places like Wannasee and others that's its indisputable that he was fully aware and responsible.
Len Hyet wrote:Cedoria wrote:It's technically true, but there's enough written documentation of euphemisms at places like Wannasee and others that's its indisputable that he was fully aware and responsible.
Oh sure he was absolutely aware and responsible, I just found it a kinda neat historical tidbit.
Torrocca wrote:Should anyone really be surprised? Really?