NATION

PASSWORD

Thousands of Hondurans heading toward the US

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What should be done when it comes to the Hondurans heading toward the US

Let them into the US
188
30%
Do not let any of them into the US
263
42%
Its Mexico's problem so let them handle it
65
11%
US needs to liberate Honduras
71
11%
Not Sure
32
5%
 
Total votes : 619

User avatar
Kubumba Tribe
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9444
Founded: Apr 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Kubumba Tribe » Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:32 pm

Grand Britannia wrote:
Kubumba Tribe wrote:For those that don't get processed in México, why not buy them a plane ticket into America so they can immigrate?


Buy them a plane ticket to Europe, I hear people have no trouble with people barging in all of a sudden over there.

They want to go to America though.
Pro: (Pan-)Islamism--Palestine--RBG--Choice to an extent--Giving land back to Native Americans--East--Afrika--etc.
Anti: US gov--West gov--Capitalism--Imperialism/Colonialism--Racism/White Supremacy--Secularism getting into everything--Western 'intervention' in the East--Zionism--etc.
I'm a New Afrikan Muslim :) https://www.16personalities.com/isfj-personality Sister nation of El-Amin Caliphate
Farnhamia wrote:A word of advice from your friendly neighborhood Mod, be careful how you use "kafir." It's derogatory usage by some people can get you in trouble unless you are very careful in setting the context for it's use.

This means we can use the word, just not in a bad way. So don't punish anyone who uses kafir.

User avatar
Balnik
Envoy
 
Posts: 247
Founded: Mar 10, 2015
Father Knows Best State

Postby Balnik » Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:34 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Balnik wrote:And so far the facts say that they will not be complicit at being held by the border, as we have seen.


A few of them. The majority behaved.

And I am still waiting for you to explain what the people taking matters into their own hands entails.

So a few of them are still going to try and vault the US border? That is still unacceptable behavior.

Use your imagination. You sorts seem to be pretty good at doing that.
Last edited by Balnik on Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Literal Nationalist

Oilworker & Albertan Proud

User avatar
Grand Britannia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14615
Founded: Apr 15, 2012
Capitalizt

Postby Grand Britannia » Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:34 pm

Kubumba Tribe wrote:
Grand Britannia wrote:
Buy them a plane ticket to Europe, I hear people have no trouble with people barging in all of a sudden over there.

They want to go to America though.


Europe has free healthcare and education so they can clearly take better care of them than we can.
Last edited by Grand Britannia on Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ଘ( ˘ ᵕ˘)つ----x .*・。゚・ᵕ

User avatar
Renolia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 126
Founded: Sep 15, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Renolia » Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:34 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Renolia wrote:
I am genuinely confused about what you are trying to argue here.

My argument is as follows: "The migrants should obey the laws of the country they are trying to enter, and go through proper legal processing to enter".
We have seen numerous instances of people getting on rafts, or straight-out breaking down barricades in order to illegally enter countries. This is what I am arguing against, I believe it is wrong for people to illegally enter countries.

I want to know what your argument is.


That the vast majority of these people are going to attempt to cross the border legally, and do not represent the vague threat Trump wants us all to think they are.


So you have two arguments.

One is simply that Trump is misrepresenting the threat of these people. In that case you and I agree 100%.

The other is that the majority of the people are trying to cross legally. That I have difficulty agreeing or disagreeing with given the sheer chaotic nature of the situation. Mod mentality is a dangerous thing and the actions of a few may or may not represent that of the group. Others will tend to do as the others do, which has led to violence between the migrants and the police force. With so many people the intentions and actions of them all cannot be well represented by what some say they are trying to accomplish, nor with what some are actually doing.

User avatar
Petrasylvania
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10647
Founded: Oct 20, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Petrasylvania » Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:34 pm

Balnik wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
A few of them. The majority behaved.

And I am still waiting for you to explain what the people taking matters into their own hands entails.

So a few of them are still going to try and vault the US border? That is still unacceptable behavior.

Use your imagination. You sorts seem to be pretty good at doing that.

Nice cop out.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be proof of a pan-Islamic plot and Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand, crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of mentally ill lone wolves who do not represent their professed belief system at all.
The probability of someone secretly participating in homosexual acts is directly proportional to the frequency and loudness of their publicly professed disapproval and/or disgust for homosexuality.
If Donald Trump accuses an individual of malfeasance without evidence, it is almost a certainty either he or someone associated with him has in fact committed that very same malfeasance to a greater degree.

New Flag Courtesy of The Realist Polities

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:35 pm

Balnik wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
A few of them. The majority behaved.

And I am still waiting for you to explain what the people taking matters into their own hands entails.

So a few of them are still going to try and vault the US border? That is still unacceptable behavior.

Use your imagination.


And we're back to tarring a massive group based on what a few people do.

I'm interested in what you were thinking. Not for you to just deflect.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Renolia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 126
Founded: Sep 15, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Renolia » Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:35 pm

Grand Britannia wrote:
Kubumba Tribe wrote:They want to go to America though.


Europe has free healthcare and education so they can clearly take better care of them than we can.


Even the desperate know that socialism sucks.

User avatar
Balnik
Envoy
 
Posts: 247
Founded: Mar 10, 2015
Father Knows Best State

Postby Balnik » Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:35 pm

Petrasylvania wrote:
Balnik wrote:So a few of them are still going to try and vault the US border? That is still unacceptable behavior.

Use your imagination. You sorts seem to be pretty good at doing that.

Nice cop out.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Literal Nationalist

Oilworker & Albertan Proud

User avatar
Kubumba Tribe
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9444
Founded: Apr 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Kubumba Tribe » Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:35 pm

Balnik wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
A few of them. The majority behaved.

And I am still waiting for you to explain what the people taking matters into their own hands entails.

So a few of them are still going to try and vault the US border? That is still unacceptable behavior.

Well then penalize the ones that do it, leave alone the ones that don't
Balnik wrote:You sorts

:eyebrow:
Pro: (Pan-)Islamism--Palestine--RBG--Choice to an extent--Giving land back to Native Americans--East--Afrika--etc.
Anti: US gov--West gov--Capitalism--Imperialism/Colonialism--Racism/White Supremacy--Secularism getting into everything--Western 'intervention' in the East--Zionism--etc.
I'm a New Afrikan Muslim :) https://www.16personalities.com/isfj-personality Sister nation of El-Amin Caliphate
Farnhamia wrote:A word of advice from your friendly neighborhood Mod, be careful how you use "kafir." It's derogatory usage by some people can get you in trouble unless you are very careful in setting the context for it's use.

This means we can use the word, just not in a bad way. So don't punish anyone who uses kafir.

User avatar
Balnik
Envoy
 
Posts: 247
Founded: Mar 10, 2015
Father Knows Best State

Postby Balnik » Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:36 pm

Kubumba Tribe wrote:
Balnik wrote:So a few of them are still going to try and vault the US border? That is still unacceptable behavior.

Well then penalize the ones that do it, leave alone the ones that don't
Balnik wrote:You sorts

:eyebrow:

And still have the risk? No, That will not do.

What did he mean by this?
Last edited by Balnik on Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Literal Nationalist

Oilworker & Albertan Proud

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:36 pm

Renolia wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
That the vast majority of these people are going to attempt to cross the border legally, and do not represent the vague threat Trump wants us all to think they are.


So you have two arguments.

One is simply that Trump is misrepresenting the threat of these people. In that case you and I agree 100%.

The other is that the majority of the people are trying to cross legally. That I have difficulty agreeing or disagreeing with given the sheer chaotic nature of the situation. Mod mentality is a dangerous thing and the actions of a few may or may not represent that of the group. Others will tend to do as the others do, which has led to violence between the migrants and the police force. With so many people the intentions and actions of them all cannot be well represented by what some say they are trying to accomplish, nor with what some are actually doing.


And yet we seem to be being forced to labour under the assumption that they will all violently rush the US - Mexico border because a few people did it at the Guatemala border.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Chernoslavia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9890
Founded: Jun 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Chernoslavia » Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:36 pm

Grand Britannia wrote:
Kubumba Tribe wrote:They want to go to America though.


Europe has free healthcare and education so they can clearly take better care of them than we can.


You'd do this for us, Britannia?
What would things have been like if every security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive? Or if during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? The Organs would quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!

- Alexander Solzhenitsyn

User avatar
Renolia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 126
Founded: Sep 15, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Renolia » Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:36 pm

Balnik wrote:
Kubumba Tribe wrote:Well then penalize the ones that do it, leave alone the ones that don't

:eyebrow:

What did he mean by this?


Maybe thinking you are stereotyping a group of people together... "you sorts".

User avatar
Grand Britannia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14615
Founded: Apr 15, 2012
Capitalizt

Postby Grand Britannia » Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:37 pm

Chernoslavia wrote:
Grand Britannia wrote:
Europe has free healthcare and education so they can clearly take better care of them than we can.


You'd do this for us, Britannia?


I wish I was rich enough.
ଘ( ˘ ᵕ˘)つ----x .*・。゚・ᵕ

User avatar
Kubumba Tribe
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9444
Founded: Apr 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Kubumba Tribe » Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:37 pm

Balnik wrote:
Kubumba Tribe wrote:Well then penalize the ones that do it, leave alone the ones that don't

:eyebrow:

And still have the risk? No, That will not do.

Lol what risk does someone who obeys the law pose?
Pro: (Pan-)Islamism--Palestine--RBG--Choice to an extent--Giving land back to Native Americans--East--Afrika--etc.
Anti: US gov--West gov--Capitalism--Imperialism/Colonialism--Racism/White Supremacy--Secularism getting into everything--Western 'intervention' in the East--Zionism--etc.
I'm a New Afrikan Muslim :) https://www.16personalities.com/isfj-personality Sister nation of El-Amin Caliphate
Farnhamia wrote:A word of advice from your friendly neighborhood Mod, be careful how you use "kafir." It's derogatory usage by some people can get you in trouble unless you are very careful in setting the context for it's use.

This means we can use the word, just not in a bad way. So don't punish anyone who uses kafir.

User avatar
Balnik
Envoy
 
Posts: 247
Founded: Mar 10, 2015
Father Knows Best State

Postby Balnik » Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:38 pm

Renolia wrote:
Balnik wrote:What did he mean by this?


Maybe thinking you are stereotyping a group of people together... "you sorts".

Socdems/Liberals are quite the people, I know.
Last edited by Balnik on Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Literal Nationalist

Oilworker & Albertan Proud

User avatar
Petrasylvania
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10647
Founded: Oct 20, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Petrasylvania » Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:38 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Renolia wrote:
So you have two arguments.

One is simply that Trump is misrepresenting the threat of these people. In that case you and I agree 100%.

The other is that the majority of the people are trying to cross legally. That I have difficulty agreeing or disagreeing with given the sheer chaotic nature of the situation. Mod mentality is a dangerous thing and the actions of a few may or may not represent that of the group. Others will tend to do as the others do, which has led to violence between the migrants and the police force. With so many people the intentions and actions of them all cannot be well represented by what some say they are trying to accomplish, nor with what some are actually doing.


And yet we seem to be being forced to labour under the assumption that they will all violently rush the US - Mexico border because a few people did it at the Guatemala border.

Actual Footage
Crimes committed by Muslims will be proof of a pan-Islamic plot and Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand, crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of mentally ill lone wolves who do not represent their professed belief system at all.
The probability of someone secretly participating in homosexual acts is directly proportional to the frequency and loudness of their publicly professed disapproval and/or disgust for homosexuality.
If Donald Trump accuses an individual of malfeasance without evidence, it is almost a certainty either he or someone associated with him has in fact committed that very same malfeasance to a greater degree.

New Flag Courtesy of The Realist Polities

User avatar
Kubumba Tribe
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9444
Founded: Apr 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Kubumba Tribe » Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:39 pm

Grand Britannia wrote:
Chernoslavia wrote:
You'd do this for us, Britannia?


I wish I was rich enough.

Same. I remember reading an article about a European risking his chances of going to prison by helping refugees into Europe. That man is a hero.
Pro: (Pan-)Islamism--Palestine--RBG--Choice to an extent--Giving land back to Native Americans--East--Afrika--etc.
Anti: US gov--West gov--Capitalism--Imperialism/Colonialism--Racism/White Supremacy--Secularism getting into everything--Western 'intervention' in the East--Zionism--etc.
I'm a New Afrikan Muslim :) https://www.16personalities.com/isfj-personality Sister nation of El-Amin Caliphate
Farnhamia wrote:A word of advice from your friendly neighborhood Mod, be careful how you use "kafir." It's derogatory usage by some people can get you in trouble unless you are very careful in setting the context for it's use.

This means we can use the word, just not in a bad way. So don't punish anyone who uses kafir.

User avatar
Balnik
Envoy
 
Posts: 247
Founded: Mar 10, 2015
Father Knows Best State

Postby Balnik » Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:39 pm

Kubumba Tribe wrote:
Balnik wrote:And still have the risk? No, That will not do.

Lol what risk does someone who obeys the law pose?

At that point the intentions of the group must be considered rather than the individual if they are to devolve to the point of border jumping.
Literal Nationalist

Oilworker & Albertan Proud

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:39 pm

Balnik wrote:
Kubumba Tribe wrote:Lol what risk does someone who obeys the law pose?

At that point the intentions of the group must be considered rather than the individual if they are to devolve to the point of border jumping.


Says the person using the actions of individuals to demonise the group.

The intention of the group is to legally cross the border.
Last edited by Vassenor on Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Kubumba Tribe
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9444
Founded: Apr 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Kubumba Tribe » Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:39 pm

Balnik wrote:
Renolia wrote:
Maybe thinking you are stereotyping a group of people together... "you sorts".

Socdems/Liberals are quite the people I know.

Do you have a reason for stereotyping people?
Pro: (Pan-)Islamism--Palestine--RBG--Choice to an extent--Giving land back to Native Americans--East--Afrika--etc.
Anti: US gov--West gov--Capitalism--Imperialism/Colonialism--Racism/White Supremacy--Secularism getting into everything--Western 'intervention' in the East--Zionism--etc.
I'm a New Afrikan Muslim :) https://www.16personalities.com/isfj-personality Sister nation of El-Amin Caliphate
Farnhamia wrote:A word of advice from your friendly neighborhood Mod, be careful how you use "kafir." It's derogatory usage by some people can get you in trouble unless you are very careful in setting the context for it's use.

This means we can use the word, just not in a bad way. So don't punish anyone who uses kafir.

User avatar
Renolia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 126
Founded: Sep 15, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Renolia » Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:40 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Renolia wrote:
So you have two arguments.

One is simply that Trump is misrepresenting the threat of these people. In that case you and I agree 100%.

The other is that the majority of the people are trying to cross legally. That I have difficulty agreeing or disagreeing with given the sheer chaotic nature of the situation. Mod mentality is a dangerous thing and the actions of a few may or may not represent that of the group. Others will tend to do as the others do, which has led to violence between the migrants and the police force. With so many people the intentions and actions of them all cannot be well represented by what some say they are trying to accomplish, nor with what some are actually doing.


And yet we seem to be being forced to labour under the assumption that they will all violently rush the US - Mexico border because a few people did it at the Guatemala border.


My opinion is that any amount of violence at the border is bad. Even if it is the minority, such a thing a wrong and will only serve to escalate the situation. If they truly wanted to enter as refugees, they would go through the legal process. I am not assuming everyone there is violent, however there is clearly at the very least a decently sized element of this group that is violent and willing to break laws to get what they want. People getting on rafts to circumvent checkpoints, people rushing checkpoints to topple barricades and get by, these are all people that are causing many people to have bad impressions on this group, and there is no reason for us to assume that these same people will not attempt such action at the U.S. border.

User avatar
Balnik
Envoy
 
Posts: 247
Founded: Mar 10, 2015
Father Knows Best State

Postby Balnik » Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:40 pm

Kubumba Tribe wrote:
Balnik wrote:Socdems/Liberals are quite the people I know.

Do you have a reason for stereotyping people?

Everyone has a reason for their actions.
Literal Nationalist

Oilworker & Albertan Proud

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:41 pm

Renolia wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
And yet we seem to be being forced to labour under the assumption that they will all violently rush the US - Mexico border because a few people did it at the Guatemala border.


My opinion is that any amount of violence at the border is bad. Even if it is the minority, such a thing a wrong and will only serve to escalate the situation. If they truly wanted to enter as refugees, they would go through the legal process. I am not assuming everyone there is violent, however there is clearly at the very least a decently sized element of this group that is violent and willing to break laws to get what they want. People getting on rafts to circumvent checkpoints, people rushing checkpoints to topple barricades and get by, these are all people that are causing many people to have bad impressions on this group, and there is no reason for us to assume that these same people will not attempt such action at the U.S. border.


So at what point does that make it logical to turn them all away?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Kubumba Tribe
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9444
Founded: Apr 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Kubumba Tribe » Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:41 pm

Balnik wrote:
Kubumba Tribe wrote:Lol what risk does someone who obeys the law pose?

At that point the intentions of the group must be considered rather than the individual if they are to devolve to the point of border jumping.

And that's a nonsensical statement. Obtaining asylum goes by the judgement of 1 individual's background, not by what group they're in. Regardless, what risk do people who jump a border pose?
Pro: (Pan-)Islamism--Palestine--RBG--Choice to an extent--Giving land back to Native Americans--East--Afrika--etc.
Anti: US gov--West gov--Capitalism--Imperialism/Colonialism--Racism/White Supremacy--Secularism getting into everything--Western 'intervention' in the East--Zionism--etc.
I'm a New Afrikan Muslim :) https://www.16personalities.com/isfj-personality Sister nation of El-Amin Caliphate
Farnhamia wrote:A word of advice from your friendly neighborhood Mod, be careful how you use "kafir." It's derogatory usage by some people can get you in trouble unless you are very careful in setting the context for it's use.

This means we can use the word, just not in a bad way. So don't punish anyone who uses kafir.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Greater Cesnica, ImperialRussia, Ineva, Kastopoli Salegliari, Kostane, Neanderthaland

Advertisement

Remove ads