Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 9:38 pm
Can somebody give me a basic handle on this thread, because it's my first time posting in it.
Because sometimes even national leaders just want to hang out
https://forum.nationstates.net/
Sirocca wrote:Can somebody give me a basic handle on this thread, because it's my first time posting in it.
Western Vale Confederacy wrote:Joohan wrote:
I mean, this is just a guess at what they meant, but:
Both pretending to be something their not.
Here is the thing, though...
The hypermajority of furries know very well that they are not animals nor are they actively seeking to become one.
The "fursuit-type" furries can effectively be considered an equivalent to drags or crossdressers, not transgenders!
Joohan wrote:Sirocca wrote:Can somebody give me a basic handle on this thread, because it's my first time posting in it.
Sure, just watch this and it'll teach you everything you need to know
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Alex+Jones
Sirocca wrote:Joohan wrote:
Sure, just watch this and it'll teach you everything you need to know
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Alex+Jones
Wow. Are you kidding? Alex Jones?
Joohan wrote:LiberNovusAmericae wrote:All are incredibly authoritarian, believe in a natural hierarchy, are intolerant of criticism, incredibly nationalistic, and autocratic. Those seem to be the core tenets of fascism whether officially or unofficially.
That's like saying the core tenants of communism are gulags, starvation, terrible climates, and pimping uniforms.
Or that the core tenants of liberal democracy are waste, corruption, ignorance, and mass surveillance.
There is a lot more to the matter. Fascism is built from a place of patriotic love.
Zex wrote:Western Vale Confederacy wrote:
Here is the thing, though...
The hypermajority of furries know very well that they are not animals nor are they actively seeking to become one.
The "fursuit-type" furries can effectively be considered an equivalent to drags or crossdressers, not transgenders!
Guess I wasn't clear; I actually meant that calling conservatives retarded for religion in the RWT while also looking like your a furry (one of the most hated groups online), makes me think that I'd be much better for disregarding any advice you have on that matter.
Joohan wrote:Joohan wrote:
Nah just kidding.
Pretty much, no matter what your political leanings or ideology, you are free to post any political/ideological idea or news story hear you want and send it up for impromptu debates.
We have a wide variety of right wingers here ( to say nothing of the lefties ): we got fascists, Asiaphile conservatives, Catholic monarchists, confused libertarians, confused but ardent libertarians, Orthocucks ( though we lost three of our number recently ), national syndicalists, and so so much more!
Very few actual just straight up conservatives though.
Western Vale Confederacy wrote:Joohan wrote:
Nah just kidding.
Pretty much, no matter what your political leanings or ideology, you are free to post any political/ideological idea or news story hear you want and send it up for impromptu debates.
We have a wide variety of right wingers here ( to say nothing of the lefties ): we got fascists, Asiaphile conservatives, Catholic monarchists, confused libertarians, confused but ardent libertarians, Orthocucks ( though we lost three of our number recently ), national syndicalists, and so so much more!
Very few actual just straight up conservatives though.
There is always something to be learned from all those ideologies, however.
Zex wrote:Dumb Ideologies wrote:We all know that there are certain left-wing posters here who do little else than constantly post-and-run with ridiculous strawbait with the direct intention of winding up anyone and everyone on the other side, but who nevertheless have relatively "clean" records. We also know that it often takes only the very slightest of hostility in return for them to then make a report to moderation.
Ya, we know, it's call "Mods as Weapon". It used to happen so much that several people organized and started counter-reporting.
It seems that mods have already forgotten how bad things got last time, it seems mods need to be reminded once again.
It's actually quite easy, just defend Nazis. Then someone will call you an Nazi (which IS against the rules because such an accusation WILL have real consequences) and they get warned/banned.
Actually, several leftists who posted in this topic are report-able on just the grounds I've stated above. Lucky for them, I don't much care.
Normally I just target people from the gender illness thread because they are my preferred prey.
Honestly, if mods keep this up the old gang might just get back together again.
Good times, regardless, just don't take NS debates seriously while thinking logically and know that people are openly being facetious in the manner they debate solely to banned you.
If you keep this simple bit of advice while on this site, you will remain unban.
Western Vale Confederacy wrote:
Proof that conservative ideals ain't dead yet!
I ascribe vehemently to family values...they were carved into my brain from Day 1, and I shall teach and preach it to my future children and the populace!
Sirocca wrote:Western Vale Confederacy wrote:
Proof that conservative ideals ain't dead yet!
I ascribe vehemently to family values...they were carved into my brain from Day 1, and I shall teach and preach it to my future children and the populace!
Not if the progressive left elitists in the education and media positions have anything to say about it.
Really, I believe we are heading for some kind of major shock. It seems inevitable.
Sirocca wrote:Western Vale Confederacy wrote:
Proof that conservative ideals ain't dead yet!
I ascribe vehemently to family values...they were carved into my brain from Day 1, and I shall teach and preach it to my future children and the populace!
Not if the progressive left elitists in the education and media positions have anything to say about it.
Really, I believe we are heading for some kind of major shock. It seems inevitable.
LiberNovusAmericae wrote:Sirocca wrote:
Not if the progressive left elitists in the education and media positions have anything to say about it.
Really, I believe we are heading for some kind of major shock. It seems inevitable.
It's only a matter of time before even saying the word gender becomes offensive. We've already got leftists advocating for "genderless theybies".
Western Vale Confederacy wrote:LiberNovusAmericae wrote:It's only a matter of time before even saying the word gender becomes offensive. We've already got leftists advocating for "genderless theybies".
..."Theybies"?
Last time I checked, the "ba-" in "baby" does not imply sex nor gender, it is a part of the word, a word that is GENDER-NEUTRAL mind you (you refer to a girl or a boy as a baby, no distinctions needed).