Napkiraly wrote:No regrets for this sig btw lads. None at all.
Not my sig, but I feel proud knowing that others are against such acts.
Advertisement
by Germanic Templars » Tue Jan 08, 2019 3:58 pm
Napkiraly wrote:No regrets for this sig btw lads. None at all.
by Reikoku » Tue Jan 08, 2019 3:58 pm
Benuty wrote:In regards to whether or not children are “up in the air” about their gender any attempts at surgery should wait until much later. I would rather have a teenager or someone close to legal adulthood decide. It’s their decision to sterilize themselves if they pursue surgery after all. Yet with children...I would rather avoid lawsuits in the making especially when someone grows up, and realizes they (most likely their parents) made the wrong decision.
by El-Amin Caliphate » Tue Jan 08, 2019 3:59 pm
Benuty wrote:El-Amin Caliphate wrote:>Looks up
Please give me someone else, PLEAAAAASSEEEE!!!!!
As for what happened in that thread, I think there was a bunch of misunderstanding on both sides.
1: Desmond shouldn't be in a bar. He a minor. And even if he was a major he still shouldn't've been in that bar or any bars.
2: I can understand the sentiment of him "stripping", considering he wear skimpy clothing, had a bunch of make-up on, was dancing and had money thrown at him. What I have not found is the claim by certain nations up here that he was dancing in a sexual manner. If he was dancing in a sexual manner it'd be pedophilia and would be more messed up than it is now. But if not, then he's just dancing in women's clothing in a bar in money being thrown at him, which makes this kinda weird. Also, according to wiki, the kid some kind of autism so the parents really shouldn't be pressuring him to do a certain career.
In regards to drag shows people will often hand them money in a similar manner to strip shows. Given drag shows are grotesque mockeries of women for the sake of humor it can still have certain elements that don’t hide what they are.
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)
by Benuty » Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:00 pm
Diopolis wrote:Benuty wrote:In regards to whether or not children are “up in the air” about their gender any attempts at surgery should wait until much later. I would rather have a teenager or someone close to legal adulthood decide. It’s their decision to sterilize themselves if they pursue surgery after all. Yet with children...I would rather avoid lawsuits in the making especially when someone grows up, and realizes they (most likely their parents) made the wrong decision.
If you can't get a tattoo, you can't get your dick lopped off sounds like a highly reasonable rule.
by Telconi » Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:00 pm
Diopolis wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:I think most kids have some understanding of their gender and sexual orientation. Studies show a high correlation between trans individuals and realizing that something's "off" about their situation when young. I certainly had some understanding of my sexuality as far back as I can remember, even if I wouldn't have expressed it in such explicit terms.
I remember not understanding attraction very well but thinking certain girls were nice to look at, although not in so many words. I do remember an understanding that I would eventually be expected to find them attractive, but actually wanting to spend time around them didn't make a whole lot of sense.
It didn't even cross my mind that I might be bi until puberty though.
I'm cis as hell, so it's not likely that I would have any idea what trans kids/being off would have to do with it. No two cents there.
by Benuty » Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:02 pm
by Hrythingland » Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:05 pm
Benuty wrote:Diopolis wrote:If you can't get a tattoo, you can't get your dick lopped off sounds like a highly reasonable rule.
Tattoos are honestly overrated trash...nearly everyone I see in the streets has some form of then. You aren’t being unique by getting one unless you go all out by practically wearing them.
by Reikoku » Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:05 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Diopolis wrote:I remember not understanding attraction very well but thinking certain girls were nice to look at, although not in so many words. I do remember an understanding that I would eventually be expected to find them attractive, but actually wanting to spend time around them didn't make a whole lot of sense.
It didn't even cross my mind that I might be bi until puberty though.
I was always very fond of girls as friends in addition to finding older girls nice to look at. I wouldn't have considered myself having some bi tendencies until much later in life but that was due to a general understanding that it was 'wrong' rather than a lack of attraction. Ignore it and it will go away sort of thing.
by Agarntrop » Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:09 pm
Telconi wrote:Diopolis wrote:I remember not understanding attraction very well but thinking certain girls were nice to look at, although not in so many words. I do remember an understanding that I would eventually be expected to find them attractive, but actually wanting to spend time around them didn't make a whole lot of sense.
It didn't even cross my mind that I might be bi until puberty though.
I'm cis as hell, so it's not likely that I would have any idea what trans kids/being off would have to do with it. No two cents there.
It really depends on the person, I was very much aware that I was attracted to girls. and very much aware of the nature of that attraction, by the time I was six or seven.
by Conserative Morality » Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:09 pm
Reikoku wrote:As awkward as it is to say, God I missed you.
by Benuty » Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:10 pm
by Hrythingland » Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:12 pm
by Conserative Morality » Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:12 pm
Benuty wrote:Given the disgruntlement with the system I am honestly not surprised.
by Telconi » Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:14 pm
by Germanic Templars » Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:14 pm
by Hrythingland » Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:16 pm
by NERVUN » Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:52 pm
by The New California Republic » Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:55 pm
by Mardla » Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:56 pm
Dumb Ideologies wrote:It's absolutely the case that paedophiles were openly involved in the gay liberation movement from the 60s up to the 80s. A common enemy in the criminalising establishment and the emergence of wacky deconstructive philosophy created a moment where people stupidly thought that liberation could be achieved by total freedom for every individual to do what they wanted sexually with drastically unbalanced power dynamics through age just being another form of kink to be enabled for m a x i m u m f r e e d o m.
The ever-wonderful phenomenon of respectability politics meant that they were soon kicked out once the establishment showed a willingness to play nice with the moderates. But it is an instructive lesson. Wherever there's a big conversation about sexuality, gender and age they will try to insert themselves into it.
We're very aware of how difficult it is for queer people growing up. Well-meaning but naive middle class parents overcompensate? The nonces pop up to try to pull it into spectacles like that disgusting drag show. Queer advocacy online? Hello nomaps, the "inoffensive" version where surely the poor innocent people who don't act on their urges should be sympathised wit- oh look a large portion of them are ex-offenders or still active.
It's not an inevitable slippery slope from gay marriage to normalising paedophilia but they are an insidious menace (look how they've historically wormed their way into politics, religious institutions, and the entertainment industry). It stands to reason that they'd try particularly to worm their way into movements with grievances against the sex/sexuality/gender status quo.
Although the "Pride" movement has partly been sanitised into a marginally preferable lifestyle choice to sell branded shit to, the hardcore liberationists with sympathies to this sort of thing are still a factor. And the recent rise of queer theory, drawing on the methodology and arguments of the postmodernists who were originally sympathetic to or active participants in the paedophile movements, is definitely an issue.
But they've got further with it before and were kicked into touch enough for some people to think this is a new thing. So there's nothing inevitable about them being successful in normalising this or the wider community not kicking them out again when they wake up to it.
by Salus Maior » Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:57 pm
The New California Republic wrote:Salus Maior wrote:
Because it is the norm. Transsexuality and homosexuality are both very small minorities. Odds are most people's kids won't be homosexual or transexual.
And the thing is, kids won't really know if they're outside that norm until they're pubescent anyway.
Wrong. Children can and have been able to identify that they are homosexual or transsexual at ages preceding puberty. I knew I was well before puberty.
by Mardla » Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:58 pm
by Thermodolia » Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:59 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: DOLYKA, Eahland, Forsher, Greater Arab State, Heldervin, Likhinia, Pale stine, Pasong Tirad, Shazbotdom, Shrillland, The Apollonian Systems, Turenia, Veridys
Advertisement