Page 118 of 500

PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2018 11:29 pm
by Mardla
Herskerstad wrote:
Mardla wrote:Do they get a warrant?


A warrant to counter sodomy by . . .inserting things into their asses?

Don't know. Don't really care.

You don't care about due process? The leftist thread is up

PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2018 11:41 pm
by Herskerstad
Mardla wrote:
Herskerstad wrote:
A warrant to counter sodomy by . . .inserting things into their asses?

Don't know. Don't really care.

You don't care about due process? The leftist thread is up


I mean you're very welcome to describe due process in regards to invading peoples asses for cultural reasons, but it's going to be a problem of the basic utilisation of the law rather than how they go about it.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2018 11:42 pm
by El-Amin Caliphate

PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2018 11:47 pm
by Herskerstad


Yeah no, those are years back. The recent reports HRW says the practices is still ongoing.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2018 11:48 pm
by Mardla
Herskerstad wrote:
Mardla wrote:You don't care about due process? The leftist thread is up


I mean you're very welcome to describe due process in regards to invading peoples asses for cultural reasons, but it's going to be a problem of the basic utilisation of the law rather than how they go about it.

I don't care to describe it. Not to be Islamophobic, of course, anal penetration is the basis of legislation in the California Republic as well.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2018 11:50 pm
by El-Amin Caliphate
Herskerstad wrote:
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:


Yeah no, those are years back.

They're from last year.
Herskerstad wrote:The recent reports HRW says the practices is still ongoing.

Could you show me pls?

PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2018 11:50 pm
by El-Amin Caliphate
Mardla wrote:
Herskerstad wrote:
I mean you're very welcome to describe due process in regards to invading peoples asses for cultural reasons, but it's going to be a problem of the basic utilisation of the law rather than how they go about it.

I don't care to describe it. Not to be Islamophobic, of course, anal penetration is the basis of legislation in the California Republic as well.

What are you talking about?

PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2018 11:52 pm
by Mardla
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:
Mardla wrote:I don't care to describe it. Not to be Islamophobic, of course, anal penetration is the basis of legislation in the California Republic as well.

What are you talking about?
Anal penetration

PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2018 11:52 pm
by El-Amin Caliphate
I found the hrw links. They are either from last year or 2 years ago. And the ones from last year are earlier than the links saying that Tunisia will ban this torture.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2018 11:53 pm
by El-Amin Caliphate
Mardla wrote:
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:What are you talking about?
Anal penetration

I'm talking about you talking about not being islamophobic and talking about the California republic. What does that have to do with the topic?

PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2018 11:56 pm
by Conserative Morality

PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2018 12:09 am
by Herskerstad
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:
Herskerstad wrote:
Yeah no, those are years back.

They're from last year.
Herskerstad wrote:The recent reports HRW says the practices is still ongoing.

Could you show me pls?


I got a link but it is in Norwegian, I imagine searching for HRW report, Tunisia, and some other words would get the same thing. As long as it is the november report it should be right.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2018 8:43 am
by Reikoku
Mattopilos II wrote:
Reikoku wrote:
Well, at least he didn't pussyfoot around when he wrote about nihilism, unlike a lot of self-proclaimed 'nihilists' today.


Do you mind elaborating on this point? I am interested on what point you are making.


Most self-proclaimed 'nihilists' nowadays (such as LaVeyan Satanism in the US) are simply comfortable middle class people who dislike a few of the more arbitrary Christian rules of their culture, and who adopt a dark and edgy aesthetic while wanting to be warm and fuzzy at the same time (some insisting they're more moral than most Christians). Their ideal hero is Milton's Satan, who Goethe appropriately characterizes as "brav genug." an actual nihilist was someone like Fumiko Kaneko, who's utterly self-destructive and nihilistic attitude lead her down the path of terrorism.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2018 8:57 am
by Herskerstad
Reikoku wrote:
Mattopilos II wrote:
Do you mind elaborating on this point? I am interested on what point you are making.


Most self-proclaimed 'nihilists' nowadays (such as LaVeyan Satanism in the US) are simply comfortable middle class people who dislike a few of the more arbitrary Christian rules of their culture, and who adopt a dark and edgy aesthetic while wanting to be warm and fuzzy at the same time (some insisting they're more moral than most Christians). Their ideal hero is Milton's Satan, who Goethe appropriately characterizes as "brav genug." an actual nihilist was someone like Fumiko Kaneko, who's utterly self-destructive and nihilistic attitude lead her down the path of terrorism.


Reading Milton's Satan and essentially seeing how they turned him into the equivalent of a hero of antiquity. (Albeit one that crossed the philosophical barrier squarely into the realm of the sophists and as a result spewed a lot of empty promises and hot air) is actually kind of interesting. It is, even with such, a thoroughly fascinating figure just from the position of a charactiture, and a brilliantly made one at that since it was controversial to put it mildly.

That being said, as far as heroes that produce ontology goes, he's an utter wretch.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2018 9:21 am
by Herskerstad
Image

PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2018 9:30 am
by The Eternal Aulus
Looking into people's asses to see if someone's homosexual or not? Well, I guess you learn something new every day lol

PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2018 9:35 am
by Kubumba Tribe
The Eternal Aulus wrote:Looking into people's butts to see if someone's homosexual or not? Well, I guess you learn something new every day lol

They don't do that anymore, AlHamdulillah.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2018 9:42 am
by Reikoku
Fahran wrote:
Reikoku wrote:My knowledge on medieval Italy is sorely lacking, besides a weird fondness for Savonarola and condottieri.

>Savonarola
No.


You're not doing a good job of destroying stereotypes by preferring the corrupt and luxurious Medici. :p

PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2018 10:04 am
by Conserative Morality
Herskerstad wrote:

I hate it.

[fucking saved]

PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2018 10:06 am
by Herskerstad
Conserative Morality wrote:
Herskerstad wrote:

I hate it.

[fucking saved]


There have been too few memes. That needs to be fixed.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2018 10:06 am
by Genivaria
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:
Mardla wrote:Anal penetration

I'm talking about you talking about not being islamophobic and talking about the California republic. What does that have to do with the topic?

In fairness Amin your idea of 'Islamaphobia' is pretty broad.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2018 10:09 am
by Genivaria
Bienenhalde wrote:
Vince Vaughn wrote:
Tbh I think the world would've been better off if John D. Rockefeller, J.P. Morgan, Cornelius Vanderbilt, Henry Dow, and Andrew Carnegie overthrew the U.S. government and ruled it as a corporate dictatorship.


I think the world would have been better off if Britain had won the revolutionary war and America had retained the monarchy.

I'm an American and I kind've agree with this, with the caveat that the Imperial Federation happened somewhere down the line.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2018 10:12 am
by Genivaria
Herskerstad wrote:
Conserative Morality wrote:I hate it.

[fucking saved]


There have been too few memes. That needs to be fixed.

I think my favorite RWDT meme I've seen is that one graph which includes "This way fellow Latin I know a fucking shortcut." :D

PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2018 10:14 am
by Reikoku
Bienenhalde wrote:
Vince Vaughn wrote:
Tbh I think the world would've been better off if John D. Rockefeller, J.P. Morgan, Cornelius Vanderbilt, Henry Dow, and Andrew Carnegie overthrew the U.S. government and ruled it as a corporate dictatorship.


I think the world would have been better off if Britain had won the revolutionary war and America had retained the monarchy.


Nah, America is pretty great and doesn't deserve to be ruled over by the Windsor's. It has its own great institution (the presidency) with its own line of great leaders starting with the heroic George Washington, even if a certain reality tv star is trying to destroy everything America is right now.
Genivaria wrote:
Bienenhalde wrote:
I think the world would have been better off if Britain had won the revolutionary war and America had retained the monarchy.

I'm an American and I kind've agree with this, with the caveat that the Imperial Federation happened somewhere down the line.


Washington would be appalled.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2018 10:15 am
by Herskerstad
Genivaria wrote:
Herskerstad wrote:
There have been too few memes. That needs to be fixed.

I think my favorite RWDT meme I've seen is that one graph which includes "This way fellow Latin I know a fucking shortcut." :D


RIP Saint TEM, you shall be missed.