Minzerland II wrote:Western Vale Confederacy wrote:
>implying that homosexuals cannot be pious or Christian
Well that’s a big bruh moment right there..
>implying Christianity condones Lust or homoeroticism
It is impossible to justify, in the Christian religion, an inclination for homoeroticism. It has nothing to do with pious, gay Christians; pious, gay Christians, if they’re honest, would assent to the teachings of the Church on homoeroticism and condemn it.
EDIT: An amendment.
I do think Christianity (or at least it's Bible) does occasionally present a (non-homo-)erotic aesthetics or imagery in it's story