Maybe when my great-grandfather was still alive (he had employees), but otherwise, they were effectively proletariat.
Advertisement
by Western Vale Confederacy » Fri Jan 18, 2019 7:03 pm
by Diopolis » Fri Jan 18, 2019 7:10 pm
Nea Byzantia wrote:So, on a more serious note, what would be the best political system to promote and protect Right-Wing Conservative values? I'm just curious as to what everybody else thinks. Personally, I'd say Monarchy, entwined with a strong Church ( an Absolute Monarchy that is a Confessional State), but what does everyone else think? I've only recently come onto this forum, so I'm curious as to where people stand.
by Northern Davincia » Fri Jan 18, 2019 7:13 pm
Diopolis wrote:Nea Byzantia wrote:So, on a more serious note, what would be the best political system to promote and protect Right-Wing Conservative values? I'm just curious as to what everybody else thinks. Personally, I'd say Monarchy, entwined with a strong Church ( an Absolute Monarchy that is a Confessional State), but what does everyone else think? I've only recently come onto this forum, so I'm curious as to where people stand.
A highly stratified society with severely limited suffrage, a powerful church, a strong monarchy, and limits on the Bourgeoisie, especially the Jews.
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by Western Vale Confederacy » Fri Jan 18, 2019 7:15 pm
Diopolis wrote:Nea Byzantia wrote:So, on a more serious note, what would be the best political system to promote and protect Right-Wing Conservative values? I'm just curious as to what everybody else thinks. Personally, I'd say Monarchy, entwined with a strong Church ( an Absolute Monarchy that is a Confessional State), but what does everyone else think? I've only recently come onto this forum, so I'm curious as to where people stand.
A highly stratified society with severely limited suffrage, a powerful church, a strong monarchy, and limits on the Bourgeoisie, especially the Jews.
by Diopolis » Fri Jan 18, 2019 7:15 pm
Torrocca wrote:Hrythingland wrote:Your anarchism relies on violence for its establishment though. It will rely on someone having a monopoly of force to prevent those who would prevent anarchism. It is such a flawed and naïve outlook. Especially any sort of communal anarchism where everything is shared out and distributed. I can tell you now, whenever the poor sod tasked with relieving me of my house, land, surplus wealth comes onto my drive, I will take my side-by-side barrel and blow his sorry head open. Quite right too. But now I need to be punished do I not?
Y'know, I'm really not gonna bother taking this seriously if you keep saying shit like, "oh those dirty little Anarkiddies are gonna steal my house!!1!" as if it's actually something relevant to Anarchism.
by The South Falls » Fri Jan 18, 2019 7:16 pm
Diopolis wrote:Nea Byzantia wrote:So, on a more serious note, what would be the best political system to promote and protect Right-Wing Conservative values? I'm just curious as to what everybody else thinks. Personally, I'd say Monarchy, entwined with a strong Church ( an Absolute Monarchy that is a Confessional State), but what does everyone else think? I've only recently come onto this forum, so I'm curious as to where people stand.
A highly stratified society with severely limited suffrage, a powerful church, a strong monarchy, and limits on the Bourgeoisie, especially the Jews.
by Diopolis » Fri Jan 18, 2019 7:20 pm
by The South Falls » Fri Jan 18, 2019 7:23 pm
Diopolis wrote:The South Falls wrote:Why are the Jews bad?
Jewish influence is usually far worse than the native bourgeousie; Jews have historically been at or towards the forefront of social liberalism, often constituted a fifth column in the societies which host them, and tend disproportionately to predominate in media and suchlike. The presence of a parallel nation with little investment in the common culture because they are separate from it is bad news.
by Western Vale Confederacy » Fri Jan 18, 2019 8:07 pm
Diopolis wrote:The South Falls wrote:Why are the Jews bad?
Jewish influence is usually far worse than the native bourgeousie; Jews have historically been at or towards the forefront of social liberalism, often constituted a fifth column in the societies which host them, and tend disproportionately to predominate in media and suchlike. The presence of a parallel nation with little investment in the common culture because they are separate from it is bad news.
by Confederate States of German America » Fri Jan 18, 2019 8:16 pm
Western Vale Confederacy wrote:Diopolis wrote:Jewish influence is usually far worse than the native bourgeousie; Jews have historically been at or towards the forefront of social liberalism, often constituted a fifth column in the societies which host them, and tend disproportionately to predominate in media and suchlike. The presence of a parallel nation with little investment in the common culture because they are separate from it is bad news.
>MFW Strasserism-levels of anti-Semitism
You're not exactly wrong that Jewish people hold a disproportionate amount of influence in relation to their numbers in the Western World, but I don't think persecuting them is gonna solve anything
by El-Amin Caliphate » Fri Jan 18, 2019 8:17 pm
Confederate States of German America wrote:Western Vale Confederacy wrote:
>MFW Strasserism-levels of anti-Semitism
You're not exactly wrong that Jewish people hold a disproportionate amount of influence in relation to their numbers in the Western World, but I don't think persecuting them is gonna solve anything
If the intermarriage and fertility statistics are right, they may be removing themselves.
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)
by Western Vale Confederacy » Fri Jan 18, 2019 8:21 pm
Confederate States of German America wrote:Western Vale Confederacy wrote:
>MFW Strasserism-levels of anti-Semitism
You're not exactly wrong that Jewish people hold a disproportionate amount of influence in relation to their numbers in the Western World, but I don't think persecuting them is gonna solve anything
If the intermarriage and fertility statistics are right, they may be removing themselves.
by Confederate States of German America » Fri Jan 18, 2019 8:34 pm
by Western Vale Confederacy » Fri Jan 18, 2019 8:36 pm
by Confederate States of German America » Fri Jan 18, 2019 8:37 pm
by Western Vale Confederacy » Fri Jan 18, 2019 8:40 pm
by Confederate States of German America » Fri Jan 18, 2019 8:48 pm
Western Vale Confederacy wrote:Confederate States of German America wrote:
We're Rightist, that's just a part of the game. Hell, the Chinese openly use White Supremacy claims against the Canadians.
You do present a fair point, and that is that both the left and the right will repeatedly fling almost apocryphal accusations of racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, anti-Semitism, fascism, etc... at eachother in an ungodly amount of forms and interpretations.
by The Greater Ohio Valley » Fri Jan 18, 2019 8:52 pm
by Western Vale Confederacy » Fri Jan 18, 2019 8:54 pm
Confederate States of German America wrote:Western Vale Confederacy wrote:
You do present a fair point, and that is that both the left and the right will repeatedly fling almost apocryphal accusations of racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, anti-Semitism, fascism, etc... at eachother in an ungodly amount of forms and interpretations.
One obvious move: require private institutions (Looking at you, Ivy Leagues) that accept federal funds to have at least a third of their student body be Pell-eligible.
by Northern Davincia » Fri Jan 18, 2019 8:56 pm
Diopolis wrote:The South Falls wrote:Why are the Jews bad?
Jewish influence is usually far worse than the native bourgeousie; Jews have historically been at or towards the forefront of social liberalism, often constituted a fifth column in the societies which host them, and tend disproportionately to predominate in media and suchlike. The presence of a parallel nation with little investment in the common culture because they are separate from it is bad news.
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by Confederate States of German America » Fri Jan 18, 2019 8:57 pm
Western Vale Confederacy wrote:"Pell-eligible"?
by Western Vale Confederacy » Fri Jan 18, 2019 9:00 pm
Northern Davincia wrote:Diopolis wrote:Jewish influence is usually far worse than the native bourgeousie; Jews have historically been at or towards the forefront of social liberalism, often constituted a fifth column in the societies which host them, and tend disproportionately to predominate in media and suchlike. The presence of a parallel nation with little investment in the common culture because they are separate from it is bad news.
I applaud the Jewish community for their success despite the vitriol directed at them. The rest of us should learn to be as clever and hardworking.
by Northern Davincia » Fri Jan 18, 2019 9:04 pm
Western Vale Confederacy wrote:Northern Davincia wrote:I applaud the Jewish community for their success despite the vitriol directed at them. The rest of us should learn to be as clever and hardworking.
Their seeds of success was ironically planted during a time where they were persecuted and excluded from just about everything...except money lending, which Christians could not do.
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by Western Vale Confederacy » Fri Jan 18, 2019 9:09 pm
Northern Davincia wrote:Western Vale Confederacy wrote:
Their seeds of success was ironically planted during a time where they were persecuted and excluded from just about everything...except money lending, which Christians could not do.
I'm tempted to call it a generational talent, but us Christians have reaped what we've sown.
by Kowani » Fri Jan 18, 2019 10:37 pm
Diopolis wrote:Nea Byzantia wrote:So, on a more serious note, what would be the best political system to promote and protect Right-Wing Conservative values? I'm just curious as to what everybody else thinks. Personally, I'd say Monarchy, entwined with a strong Church ( an Absolute Monarchy that is a Confessional State), but what does everyone else think? I've only recently come onto this forum, so I'm curious as to where people stand.
A highly stratified society with severely limited suffrage, a powerful church, a strong monarchy, and limits on the Bourgeoisie, especially the Jews.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Almighty Biden, Burnt Calculators, Changjo, Corporate Collective Salvation, Ifreann, North American Imperial State, Nyoskova, Tarsonis, The Holy Therns, Tur Monkadzii, Untecna, Valrifall, Xind
Advertisement