Right Wing Discussion Thread XIV: Join the Friendkorps

[Western Vale Confederacy]

In that case, it would be called polyamory, which is practiced in the Western World.

And how does acceptance to polyamory excludes acceptance to polygyny?

The negative connotations of it, I'd say.

That said, if you want multiple partners, who the fuck am I to hold you back and pretend I'm somehow the superior moral ground?

[Aellex]

I think you’d be hard pressed to find enough atheists against polygamy to make up a majority. A lot of atheists are okay with consensual adult relationships.

In that case, it would be called polyamory, which is practiced in the Western World.

It's called cheating. Slapping fancy names on it doesn't change what it is.

[Old Tyrannia]

Emperor Xi of the Jiping dynasty...

Xi is his family name, silly.

Quite apart from that, the name of the dynasty in Imperial China was never the family name of the imperial clan; it was more like the name of the state. The Han dynasty was founded by the Liu clan, the Tang dynasty was founded by the Li clan, the Song by Zhao clan and so forth. So it wouldn't be the "Xi" dynasty either, unless by coincidence a character was chosen for the dynasty's name that had the same pronunciation as the surname "Xi."

What do members of the right wing think about their legacy with the nazis, hitler and the holocuast. Please do not flame I know this is a sensitive topic but I want to know.

"You know you're literally the successors of Hitler, right? Please don't be mean to me."

I would consider the Nazis right-wing given their fundamentally hierarchical conception of society, but my own ideological views don't draw upon Nazism or Fascism at all and in fact are much closer to people who actively fought them. Churchill was right-wing too, you know.

[Aellex]

Quite apart from that, the name of the dynasty in Imperial China was never the family name of the imperial clan; it was more like the name of the state. The Han dynasty was founded by the Liu clan, the Tang dynasty was founded by the Li clan, the Song by Zhao clan and so forth. So it wouldn't be the "Xi" dynasty either, unless by coincidence a character was chosen for the dynasty's name that had the same pronunciation as the surname "Xi."

Funnily enough, the same was true of quite a few monarchy in Europe too with the de Valois and de Bourbon dynasty being still referred to as Capet even up to the Révolution.

[Katganistan]

14/88

*** Warned for trolling ***

Take it to Stormfront.

[The South Falls]

Happy new year my RWDT bois and girls!

[Bienenhalde]

Happy new year my RWDT bois and girls!

Happy New Year to you too! I hope in this new year we can all remember to be civil and charitable towards each other.

[Napkiraly]

Most atheists probably oppose polygamy, but in twenty years the left will be saying opposition to polygamy is "authortarian theocracy".

I think you’d be hard pressed to find enough atheists against polygamy to make up a majority. A lot of atheists are okay with consensual adult relationships.

True. I've tried pointing out that there are links between polygamy and increased social unrest, violence, etc and it barely registered because "muh anti-Christianity".

[Frievolk]

I think you’d be hard pressed to find enough atheists against polygamy to make up a majority. A lot of atheists are okay with consensual adult relationships.

True. I've tried pointing out that there are links between polygamy and increased social unrest, violence, etc and it barely registered because "muh anti-Christianity".

I was legit under the impression modern Christianity was very much against polygamy.

[Old Tyrannia]

True. I've tried pointing out that there are links between polygamy and increased social unrest, violence, etc and it barely registered because "muh anti-Christianity".

I was legit under the impression modern Christianity was very much against polygamy.

It is. I believe you misunderstood Napkiraly's post.

[El-Amin Caliphate]

In that case, it would be called polyamory, which is practiced in the Western World.

It's called cheating. Slapping fancy names on it doesn't change what it is.

Having multiple consensual romantic partners isn't cheating. Cheating is without the consent of one of the spouses. Polyamory is not.

[Aellex]

Having multiple consensual romantic partners isn't cheating. Cheating is without the consent of one of the spouses. Polyamory is not.

It very much is cheating. Relationship is between two persons, not more, and thus polygamists can't be anything but adulterers given they try and hold multiple relationships at once.

[El-Amin Caliphate]

Having multiple consensual romantic partners isn't cheating. Cheating is without the consent of one of the spouses. Polyamory is not.

It very much is cheating. Relationship is between two persons, not more, and thus polygamists can't be anything but adulterers given they try and hold multiple relationships at once.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infidelity:

"Infidelity (synonyms include: cheating, adultery (when married), being unfaithful, or having an affair) is a violation of a couple's assumed or stated contract regarding emotional and/or sexual exclusivity.[1] Other scholars define infidelity as a violation according to the subjective feeling that one's partner has violated a set of rules or relationship norms; this violation results in feelings of sexual jealousy and rivalry."

In this context, "violation" of a set of rules would mean that one partner betrayed relationship of their other partner, hence there being no consent from both parties.

"Polyamorous relationships are distinguished from extramarital affairs by the full disclosure and consent of all involved."

As you can see, all parties consent tobhaving multiple partners, hence, not cheating.

[Frievolk]

Having multiple consensual romantic partners isn't cheating. Cheating is without the consent of one of the spouses. Polyamory is not.

It very much is cheating. Relationship is between two persons, not more, and thus polygamists can't be anything but adulterers given they try and hold multiple relationships at once.

Romantic Relationships are not necessarily between only two persons tho.

[El-Amin Caliphate]

This as well:

"Infidelity is breaking a promise to remain faithful to a sexual partner, whether that be marriage vows sanctified by the state or privately uttered agreements between lovers."

Obvs if you're "breaking a promise" that means you are doing something without the consent of said promise and outside the other promisee's (is that a word?) wishes. Again, polyamory does not do that.

[Diopolis]

I have a ? For all right wingers. In your opinion what are the flaws of the right I’m the modern spectrum of politics?

The modern right ignores the economic necessities of their own ideas in favor of kowtowing to a few very wealthy companies and empty populism.

[Diopolis]

I know everyone is talking about the New Year (Happy New Year Everyone!) But there are some big events taking shape for January 1, 2019.

President-elect Jair Bolsonaro of Brazil (if you know who he is) will take office exactly... tomorrow. What do you think of him? Anything you support or oppose?

Such a birthday present for me.

[Kowani]

I know everyone is talking about the New Year (Happy New Year Everyone!) But there are some big events taking shape for January 1, 2019.

President-elect Jair Bolsonaro of Brazil (if you know who he is) will take office exactly... tomorrow. What do you think of him? Anything you support or oppose?

Oh, dear god no. Opposition level: 300.

[Desmosthenes and Burke]

What do members of the right wing think about their legacy with the nazis, hitler and the holocuast. Please do not flame I know this is a sensitive topic but I want to know.

The same thing that I presume the political left thinks about their legacy with Stalin, Pol Pot (the Khmer Rouge), Mao, the Kims, et al. Hitler and the National Socialists no more represent mainstream right-wing thought than Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge represent mainstream left-wing thought.

I think you’d be hard pressed to find enough atheists against polygamy to make up a majority. A lot of atheists are okay with consensual adult relationships.

Not to be excessively hubristic, but I would be willing to say that I may not find enough atheists that object to the idea of polyamory in doctrina, I would stake a significant sum that a majority of Atheists would object in praxi to polygamy in the form it is usually encountered in the modern world with its inherent abusiveness to women and perpetuation of a backward and barbarous views of women and the place of men and women in society, nevermind the social ills associated with it due to it remaining prevalent primarily in poorer and more impoverished places.

[Northern Davincia]

I know everyone is talking about the New Year (Happy New Year Everyone!) But there are some big events taking shape for January 1, 2019.

President-elect Jair Bolsonaro of Brazil (if you know who he is) will take office exactly... tomorrow. What do you think of him? Anything you support or oppose?

Oh, dear god no. Opposition level: 300.

I would say Bolsonaro will make Brazil great again, but it was never great.

[Torrocca]

Oh, dear god no. Opposition level: 300.

I would say Bolsonaro will make Brazil great again, but it was never great.

TIL'd that great = wanting to genocide indigenous Brazilians in the Amazon and wanting to destroy said Amazon entirely in the pursuit of profits

I reckon, in the most twisted, Capitalist-wanking perspective possible, that that is greatness.

[Canadensia]

I would say Bolsonaro will make Brazil great again, but it was never great.

TIL'd that great = wanting to genocide indigenous Brazilians in the Amazon and wanting to destroy said Amazon entirely in the pursuit of profits

I reckon, in the most twisted, Capitalist-wanking perspective possible, that that is greatness.

It's Brazil.

The country's past two presidents (minus Temer since he was just a fill-in) have been highly corrupt and incompetent leaders, the latter of which was outright impeached.

Bolsonaro can hardly do worse.

[Torrocca]

TIL'd that great = wanting to genocide indigenous Brazilians in the Amazon and wanting to destroy said Amazon entirely in the pursuit of profits

I reckon, in the most twisted, Capitalist-wanking perspective possible, that that is greatness.

It's Brazil.

The country's past two presidents (minus Temer since he was just a fill-in) have been highly corrupt and incompetent leaders, the latter of which was outright impeached.

Bolsonaro can hardly do worse.

[Canadensia]

It's Brazil.

The country's past two presidents (minus Temer since he was just a fill-in) have been highly corrupt and incompetent leaders, the latter of which was outright impeached.

Bolsonaro can hardly do worse.

I'm going to go out on a limb here and assume that your main quarrel with him is that he's right-wing.

Is it his policies that you find truly abhorrent or is it simply the label?

[United Muscovite Nations]

I'm going to go out on a limb here and assume that your main quarrel with him is that he's right-wing.

Is it his policies that you find truly abhorrent or is it simply the label?

Tbf, he did say he was going to have his political opponents killed.