Trump Gets Refund from an alleged Hooker

[Chan Island]

It is a pretty safe bet that if someone said those sorts of things about Trump then a good chunk of the people celebrating this as a victory would be screaming blue murder.

That just goes without saying.

[The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp]

The US is strange

How? She filed a lawsuit, a judge dismissed it, and awarded attorneys fees. I don't see how this is crazy or funny except for the stupid refund joke that has no basis in reality.

An (alleged) hooker sued the US President who is also Donald Trump.

[Kaggeceria]

How? She filed a lawsuit, a judge dismissed it, and awarded attorneys fees. I don't see how this is crazy or funny except for the stupid refund joke that has no basis in reality.

An (alleged) hooker sued the US President who is also Donald Trump.

Leaders in other countries also get sued.

[The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp]

An (alleged) hooker sued the US President who is also Donald Trump.

Leaders in other countries also get sued.

Not by (alleged) hookers.

[Aclion]

The only really funny parts of this for me is the use of the phrase the alleged hooker. and my growing suspicion that Stormy Daniels is doing this with a mind to get into politics.

[Kaggeceria]

The only really funny parts of this for me is the use of the phrase the alleged hooker. and my growing suspicion that Stormy Daniels is doing this with a mind to get into politics.

Nah, Avenatti's the one who wants to get into politics. Daniels is just using this to for publicity so she can make more money. Apparently she makes a lot preforming at DC strip clubs. Everyone wants to see the skank who Trump banged.

[Petrasylvania]

The only really funny parts of this for me is the use of the phrase the alleged hooker. and my growing suspicion that Stormy Daniels is doing this with a mind to get into politics.

Nah, Avenatti's the one who wants to get into politics. Daniels is just using this to for publicity so she can make more money. Apparently she makes a lot preforming at DC strip clubs. Everyone wants to see the skank who Trump banged.

They can always see Melania.

[Kaggeceria]

Nah, Avenatti's the one who wants to get into politics. Daniels is just using this to for publicity so she can make more money. Apparently she makes a lot preforming at DC strip clubs. Everyone wants to see the skank who Trump banged.

They can always see Melania.

*yawn*

Anything else?

[Costa Fierro]

I'm most amused at the fact that all those people who donated money for Daniels' legal fees are now paying Trump.

[Kaggeceria]

I'm most amused at the fact that all those people who donated money for Daniels' legal fees are now paying Trump.

"I donated my money to attack orange man, but now orange man is getting all of my moneys."

[Japan and Pacific States]

Dear god, my sides are in orbit from reading the article OP posted, I haven't had a good laugh like this in years.

[Liriena]

So she lost a defamation lawsuit. That isn't really a huge victory for Trump. IIRC, defamation is pretty tough to prove even in the best of cases.

[Petrasylvania]

So she lost a defamation lawsuit. That isn't really a huge victory for Trump. IIRC, defamation is pretty tough to prove even in the best of cases.

But it means Trump totally beat the Mueller probe!

[Ifreann]

So she lost a defamation lawsuit. That isn't really a huge victory for Trump. IIRC, defamation is pretty tough to prove even in the best of cases.

But it means Trump totally beat the Mueller probe!

Ultimate victory has been achieved! Liberalism DESTROYED! 50 state victory lap, engage!

[Shofercia]

So she lost a defamation lawsuit. That isn't really a huge victory for Trump. IIRC, defamation is pretty tough to prove even in the best of cases.

But it means Trump totally beat the Mueller probe!

I had no idea that Stormy Daniels was secretly Robert Mueller. Oh wait, she isn't. Trump was claiming Victory against Daniels, whose attorney was owned by Trump's attorney. Granted, Avenatti was also owned by Tucker Carlson, so he's not that difficult to own in a debate. No one, except for you and Iffy, is actually talking about Mueller in this thread, but I do have to wonder: will "but muh Mueller" going to be the new Liberal Battle Cry, replacing "it was Russia's fault!" as a common saying?

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojubI-sYwho (at 1:51)

But it means Trump totally beat the Mueller probe!

Ultimate victory has been achieved! Liberalism DESTROYED! 50 state victory lap, engage!

Iffy's thread derailment destroyed. Fifty internet cookies consumed! And now back to the actual thread.

I'm most amused at the fact that all those people who donated money for Daniels' legal fees are now paying Trump.

"I donated my money to attack orange man, but now orange man is getting all of my moneys."

One could even say that they were Agent Oranged

It is a pretty safe bet that if someone said those sorts of things about Trump then a good chunk of the people celebrating this as a victory would be screaming blue murder.

Personally, I'd be laughing my ass off if this was Trump as well. People say this shit about Trump all the time. Difference is that he has an actual lawyer, not a creepy porn lawyer

[Ifreann]

Ultimate victory has been achieved! Liberalism DESTROYED! 50 state victory lap, engage!

Iffy's thread derailment destroyed. Fifty internet cookies consumed! And now back to the actual thread.

I'm sorry, am I derailing your thread by making fun of the wrong person? How awful of me

[Petrasylvania]

Iffy's thread derailment destroyed. Fifty internet cookies consumed! And now back to the actual thread.

I'm sorry, am I derailing your thread by making fun of the wrong person? How awful of me

How dare we interrupt the sermon in the Church of The Donald.

[Shofercia]

Iffy's thread derailment destroyed. Fifty internet cookies consumed! And now back to the actual thread.

I'm sorry, am I derailing your thread by making fun of the wrong person? How awful of me

You're derailing the thread because you're talking about an off topic issue, the Mueller Issue. You can make jokes about Trump/Daniels, but cheer-leading the derailment regarding the Mueller probe is rather iffy.

I'm sorry, am I derailing your thread by making fun of the wrong person? How awful of me

How dare we interrupt the sermon in the Church of The Donald.

Stating an outcome of a legal case is now a Sermon in the Church of The Donald? Damn, is that what the Democrats are renaming SCOTUS once Ginsburg gets replaced?

[Right wing humour squad]

I'm sorry, am I derailing your thread by making fun of the wrong person? How awful of me

You're derailing the thread because you're talking about an off topic issue, the Mueller Issue. You can make jokes about Trump/Daniels, but cheer-leading the derailment regarding the Mueller probe is rather iffy.

How dare we interrupt the sermon in the Church of The Donald.

Stating an outcome of a legal case is now a Sermon in the Church of The Donald? Damn, is that what the Democrats are renaming SCOTUS once Ginsburg gets replaced?

Inb4 they give there next “orange man bad” response.

[Kaggeceria]

So she lost a defamation lawsuit. That isn't really a huge victory for Trump. IIRC, defamation is pretty tough to prove even in the best of cases.

But it means Trump totally beat the Mueller probe!

Has anyone here even said that?

[Mystic Warriors]

- Stacks courts in his favor doesn't equal rigging the system.


Cheating isn't funny

So you're challenging the judge's impartiality. That's a little because I don't know that the judge in question was appointed by trump and even if he was Article III judges can really only be removed with impeachment or assassination- they're pretty free from outside influences.

So we've established once again that the president is a crude slanderer, but that this judge thinks that's OK under the first amendment? That's what I'm getting from the story.

No we've established that the statements in question are better characterized as allowable rhetorical hyperbole. Hence the ruling.

Yes. Trump appoints puppets.

[Western Vale Confederacy]

So you're challenging the judge's impartiality. That's a little because I don't know that the judge in question was appointed by trump and even if he was Article III judges can really only be removed with impeachment or assassination- they're pretty free from outside influences.

No we've established that the statements in question are better characterized as allowable rhetorical hyperbole. Hence the ruling.

Yes. Trump appoints puppets.

A man appointing people he trusts (nowadays, it's called puppetry or nepotism) to positions of power!?

WHO WOULD'VE THOUGHT!?

[Vassenor]

Yes. Trump appoints puppets.

A man appointing people he trusts (nowadays, it's called puppetry or nepotism) to positions of power!?

WHO WOULD'VE THOUGHT!?

So how is that swamp draining he promised going? Because it seems like there's more corruption going on, not less.

[Western Vale Confederacy]

A man appointing people he trusts (nowadays, it's called puppetry or nepotism) to positions of power!?

WHO WOULD'VE THOUGHT!?

So how is that swamp draining he promised going? Because it seems like there's more corruption going on, not less.

What do you mean by corruption, if I may ask?

[Vassenor]

So how is that swamp draining he promised going? Because it seems like there's more corruption going on, not less.

What do you mean by corruption, if I may ask?

This is an attempt to segue into how the cronyism that's led to him stacking the government with the same Wall Street bankers he promised to get rid of from government isn't corruption, isn't it?