Trump Gets Refund from an alleged Hooker

[Sacara]

Title gave me a good laugh. Props to OP.

[Page]

It was a baseless lawsuit to begin with. There are plenty of things Trump should be sued, impeached, and prosecuted for: Daily violation of the Emoluments Clause, crimes against humanity (putting migrant children in brutal prison camps in worse conditions than convicted murderers), more crimes against humanity (supporting Saudi Arabia's genocide in Yemen), deliberately trying to undermine the Constitution in violation of the oath of office, etc.

I don't care who he had sex with. I don't care who he paid off. His sex life is irrelevant, I care that our country is under the control of a sociopath criminal with less understanding of constitutional law and geopolitics than your average 4th grader.

[Shofercia]

It was a baseless lawsuit to begin with. There are plenty of things Trump should be sued, impeached, and prosecuted for: Daily violation of the Emoluments Clause, crimes against humanity (putting migrant children in brutal prison camps in worse conditions than convicted murderers), more crimes against humanity (supporting Saudi Arabia's genocide in Yemen), deliberately trying to undermine the Constitution in violation of the oath of office, etc.

I don't care who he had sex with. I don't care who he paid off. His sex life is irrelevant, I care that our country is under the control of a sociopath criminal with less understanding of constitutional law and geopolitics than your average 4th grader.

I just want to point out that the effort that all five of the UNSC permanent members are putting into ignoring the atrocities in Yemen, and have someone bring that up when the US, China, Russia, France, and/or the UK start complaining about Human Rights of someone other than their citizens/allies, and/or those who can have access to citizenship. Without powerful support, your Human Rights mean nothing, unless you're a citizen of the UNSC-5 and/or their affiliates. Yemen should be etching this into everyone's memory.

[Luziyca]

This is probably one of those things you would expect from The Onion.

It's as if real life is trying to drive The Onion out of business.

[Shofercia]

This is probably one of those things you would expect from The Onion.

It's as if real life is trying to drive The Onion out of business.

The Onion-Babylon Bee Debate would've been more entertaining than one between Trump and Clinton

[Des-Bal]

t's as if real life is trying to drive The Onion out of business.

Again, how?

[Diopolis]

She's probably still, on net, making money from the free publicity even with having to pay Trump's attorney fees.

[Kaggeceria]

Hehe, porn star and her creepy porn lawyer absolutely btfo.

[Risottia]

Berlusconi was better. He was the first politician to get a Parliament deliberate that he wasn't shagging an underage prostitute knowingly.

[Mystic Warriors]

So? She had to give up because Trump rigged the system.

[Kaggeceria]

So? She had to give up because Trump rigged the system.

>"rigged the system"

lmao explain how he did this.

[Diopolis]

So? She had to give up because Trump rigged the system.

I don't think she cares whether she wins or loses, she just wanted the publicity.

[Chan Island]

It's all Berlusconi and his Bunga-bunga all over again. Couldn't give less of a fig what Trump is doing in his bedroom, as long as nobody is getting hurt. Glad to see this sorry side story finished up.

[Vassenor]

It's all Berlusconi and his Bunga-bunga all over again. Couldn't give less of a fig what Trump is doing in his bedroom, as long as nobody is getting hurt. Glad to see this sorry side story finished up.

It wasn't even about that. It was about the public comments he made about her after the story broke.

And is still making about her.

[Mystic Warriors]

So? She had to give up because Trump rigged the system.

>"rigged the system"

lmao explain how he did this.

- Stacks courts in his favor doesn't equal rigging the system.


Cheating isn't funny

[Kaggeceria]

>"rigged the system"

lmao explain how he did this.

- Stacks courts in his favor doesn't equal rigging the system.


Cheating isn't funny

I assume you have evidence that the judge who presided over her case was a Trump-appointee then.

[Chan Island]

It's all Berlusconi and his Bunga-bunga all over again. Couldn't give less of a fig what Trump is doing in his bedroom, as long as nobody is getting hurt. Glad to see this sorry side story finished up.

It wasn't even about that. It was about the public comments he made about her after the story broke.

And is still making about her.

So we've established once again that the president is a crude slanderer, but that this judge thinks that's OK under the first amendment? That's what I'm getting from the story.

[The South Falls]

It's as if real life is trying to drive The Onion out of business.

The Onion-Babylon Bee Debate would've been more entertaining than one between Trump and Clinton

Some weird shit would have had to go down.

[Des-Bal]

- Stacks courts in his favor doesn't equal rigging the system.


Cheating isn't funny

So you're challenging the judge's impartiality. That's a little because I don't know that the judge in question was appointed by trump and even if he was Article III judges can really only be removed with impeachment or assassination- they're pretty free from outside influences.

So we've established once again that the president is a crude slanderer, but that this judge thinks that's OK under the first amendment? That's what I'm getting from the story.

No we've established that the statements in question are better characterized as allowable rhetorical hyperbole. Hence the ruling.

[Chan Island]

- Stacks courts in his favor doesn't equal rigging the system.


Cheating isn't funny

So you're challenging the judge's impartiality. That's a little because I don't know that the judge in question was appointed by trump and even if he was Article III judges can really only be removed with impeachment or assassination- they're pretty free from outside influences.

So we've established once again that the president is a crude slanderer, but that this judge thinks that's OK under the first amendment? That's what I'm getting from the story.

No we've established that the statements in question are better characterized as allowable rhetorical hyperbole. Hence the ruling.

Fair enough.

[The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp]

The US is strange

[Des-Bal]

The US is strange

How? She filed a lawsuit, a judge dismissed it, and awarded attorneys fees. I don't see how this is crazy or funny except for the stupid refund joke that has no basis in reality.

[Vassenor]

It is a pretty safe bet that if someone said those sorts of things about Trump then a good chunk of the people celebrating this as a victory would be screaming blue murder.

[Petrasylvania]

It is a pretty safe bet that if someone said those sorts of things about Trump then a good chunk of the people celebrating this as a victory would be screaming blue murder.

But of course. IOKIYAR. Then again what to expect of a group that thinks little of women who aren't submissice Serena Joys?

[Diopolis]

It is a pretty safe bet that if someone said those sorts of things about Trump then a good chunk of the people celebrating this as a victory would be screaming blue murder.

Someone says these sorts of things about Trump every day and no one gives a crap.