NATION

PASSWORD

Breastfeeding during a flight...

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Bombadil
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18715
Founded: Oct 13, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Bombadil » Mon Oct 15, 2018 6:46 am

Uan aa Boa wrote:
Trumptonium1 wrote:Are you implying that the intentions of the parent in taking their baby with them makes absolutely any mitigating difference at all to the consequences and thus the common sense resolutions?

Take a car. Nobody can hear the kid there. Apart from you, but then that kid was your choice to make, not society's. Why should other people suffer your child's screams?

When adults scream on a flight, be it mental illness or drunkenness, they are taken off the flight by the police, including mid-flight stops. In many airlines, they are prevented from entering in the first place. Why shouldn't that be extended to toddlers and newborns?

If you could find a way to harness all that indignation you could probably heat your house for free.


To each according to their ability.. he’s really a communist at heart..
Eldest, that's what I am...Tom remembers the first raindrop and the first acorn...he knew the dark under the stars when it was fearless — before the Dark Lord came from Outside..

十年

User avatar
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34994
Founded: Dec 18, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Mon Oct 15, 2018 6:46 am

Trumptonium1 wrote:
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:What you described is not equivalent to this situation.

A 'dump' is physical. A baby crying is a sound.

A 'dump' is unsanitary and will have health risks involved. A baby crying is just annoying. But it is not a threat to your body.

Besides, why should airlines loose profits from people with young families not buying a ticket?

That hurts the economy, it hurts the company, it hurts the employees. Why should business lose profits beacuse you want to restrict air travel business rights?

I thought you where Reals>Feels. Guess not sense you being annoyed for a few hours is so important to you over the lives that depend on young families flying.


It is a threat to your health if you are triggered by high pitched sounds. Some people have PTSD remember?

I thought you liberals were all about protecting people from being triggered.

Clapping is too loud so we must resort to jazz hands but a single mother being unable to control her demon spawn is just an okay 100-decibel inconvenience that must be suffered by all?


Nice referencing to arguments that I'm not making. Never said I want to ban clapping, and as a matter of fact I don't want to.

People who have PTSD most likely have earplugs. Buy some earplugs. They range from 10$-30$.

Also, still no explanation for why you want to hurt business profits other then "muh feelings of annoyince".

User avatar
Caracasus
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7918
Founded: Apr 23, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Caracasus » Mon Oct 15, 2018 6:47 am

Uan aa Boa wrote:
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:Why would anyone put it past evolution to have males respond to evidence of successful childbirth by wanting to give her another baby, and in turn, getting aroused? Can we really be sure that's any less "natural?" And if we can't, isn't it a little hypocritical to treat how "natural" one is relevant, and not the other?

So what if someone in the vicinity does find breastfeeding arousing? It's not being done for their benefit.


Never got why people bring this up either. If someone's getting a stiffy from watching breastfeeding, then I'd really hope that they'd realise that the correct way to respond would be to think about something really boring till things settle down rather than bitch about it online.
As an editor I seam to spend an awful lot of thyme going threw issues and checking that they're no oblivious errars. Its a tough job but someone's got too do it!



Issues editor, not a moderator.

User avatar
An Alan Smithee Nation
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7623
Founded: Apr 18, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby An Alan Smithee Nation » Mon Oct 15, 2018 6:52 am

I read the title as Breastfeeding during a fight. Really need new glasses.

I have no problem with breastfeeding, or babies screaming, or children in general. Maybe just charge people a premium if they want to go on flights without children.
Everything is intertwinkled

User avatar
Trumptonium1
Senator
 
Posts: 4022
Founded: Apr 03, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Trumptonium1 » Mon Oct 15, 2018 6:52 am

Scottish Socialists wrote:
Trumptonium1 wrote:Take a car. Nobody can hear the kid there. Apart from you, but then that kid was your choice to make, not society's. Why should other people suffer your child's screams?

Aye pal, let them drive from Heathrow to Tenerife. That’ll solve the problem.


There's a tunnel to France and a ferry to Tenerife. No need to thank me, just a quick google search is satisfactory. Although one might ask why you're taking a newborn there in the first place?

People drive from Alaska to Argentina and from London to Sydney and from Cape Town to Paris all the time.

Scottish Socialists wrote:Look, babies on planes are annoying.
Either that parent can silence them with a game, a toy, or sleep, or you can plug in your headphones or earplugs and blissfully be unaware of the crying child.

Just deal with it.


Or we can ban them from flights. No need to inconvenience the majority for the benefit of a minority.

I like the latter option.
Last edited by Trumptonium1 on Mon Oct 15, 2018 6:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
Preferred pronouns: His Majesty/Your Highness

https://www.bolsonaro.com.br/
Resident Non-Pumpkin Character

User avatar
Uan aa Boa
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1130
Founded: Apr 23, 2017
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Uan aa Boa » Mon Oct 15, 2018 6:53 am

Trumptonium1 wrote:No need to heat my house for free, I already found a way to substitute sleeping for liberal tear consumption as my primary source of energy.

I guess you like liberal baiting, but you seem to find so many things actionably insufferable that the word snowflake does kinda spring to mind.

Caracasus wrote:
Uan aa Boa wrote:Never got why people bring this up either. If someone's getting a stiffy from watching breastfeeding, then I'd really hope that they'd realise that the correct way to respond would be to think about something really boring till things settle down rather than bitch about it online.

At a societal level we seem to spend loads of time demanding more exposed breasts punctuated by short bursts of demanding fewer. You'll have spotted the irony of this being started by a Sun article.

User avatar
The Free Joy State
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 16402
Founded: Jan 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Free Joy State » Mon Oct 15, 2018 6:55 am

Caracasus wrote:
Uan aa Boa wrote:So what if someone in the vicinity does find breastfeeding arousing? It's not being done for their benefit.


Never got why people bring this up either. If someone's getting a stiffy from watching breastfeeding, then I'd really hope that they'd realise that the correct way to respond would be to think about something really boring till things settle down rather than bitch about it online.

Apparently, the complainant in this instance was a woman, who called the breastfeeding woman "disgusting" and accused her of trying to lure her man away.

Frankly, this speaks to the woman's lack of security in her relationship, if she thinks that one glimpse of lactating bosom will draw her husband/boyfriend/etc. away. It also speaks of the woman who complained needing something to do on the plane. Perhaps a good book or magazine to read?
Last edited by The Free Joy State on Mon Oct 15, 2018 6:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
"If there's a book that you want to read, but it hasn't been written yet, then you must write it." - Toni Morrison

My nation does not represent my beliefs or politics.

User avatar
Caracasus
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7918
Founded: Apr 23, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Caracasus » Mon Oct 15, 2018 6:57 am

Uan aa Boa wrote:
Trumptonium1 wrote:No need to heat my house for free, I already found a way to substitute sleeping for liberal tear consumption as my primary source of energy.

I guess you like liberal baiting, but you seem to find so many things actionably insufferable that the word snowflake does kinda spring to mind.

Caracasus wrote:

At a societal level we seem to spend loads of time demanding more exposed breasts punctuated by short bursts of demanding fewer. You'll have spotted the irony of this being started by a Sun article.


The sun's a weird one. Banging on about pedoes in the same paper that boasted about how young Sam Fox was when they got her to model topless. One of these days I reckon we'll discover that the head offices are just a portal to some inter dimensional sewerage system.
As an editor I seam to spend an awful lot of thyme going threw issues and checking that they're no oblivious errars. Its a tough job but someone's got too do it!



Issues editor, not a moderator.

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45993
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Mon Oct 15, 2018 6:58 am

It's some Twilight Zone level shit when we cheer parents bringing their brat along into a scenario where it is likely to cause a greater number of people than them discomfort and inconvenience, deride the uninvolved people who suffer said consequences as being selfish if they complain, and hiss that the victims should have prepared for the eventuality at their own expense.
Last edited by Dumb Ideologies on Mon Oct 15, 2018 6:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
Are these "human rights" in the room with us right now?
★彡 Professional pessimist. Reactionary socialist and gamer liberationist. Coffee addict. Fun at parties 彡★
Freedom is when people agree with you, and the more people you can force to act like they agree the freer society is
You are the trolley problem's conductor. You could stop the train in time but you do not. Nobody knows you're part of the equation. You satisfy your bloodlust and get away with it every time

User avatar
Trumptonium1
Senator
 
Posts: 4022
Founded: Apr 03, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Trumptonium1 » Mon Oct 15, 2018 6:58 am

Uan aa Boa wrote:
Trumptonium1 wrote:No need to heat my house for free, I already found a way to substitute sleeping for liberal tear consumption as my primary source of energy.

I guess you like liberal baiting, but you seem to find so many things actionably insufferable that the word snowflake does kinda spring to mind.


Don't think the concept of snowflake applies to people who long for a return to the distant past of 2005 when people had more brains and were more considerate. Thanks Obama.
Preferred pronouns: His Majesty/Your Highness

https://www.bolsonaro.com.br/
Resident Non-Pumpkin Character

User avatar
Valrifell
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31063
Founded: Aug 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Valrifell » Mon Oct 15, 2018 7:02 am

Trumptonium1 wrote:
Uan aa Boa wrote:I guess you like liberal baiting, but you seem to find so many things actionably insufferable that the word snowflake does kinda spring to mind.


Don't think the concept of snowflake applies to people who long for a return to the distant past of 2005 when people had more brains and were more considerate. Thanks Obama.


I'm surprised you actually found a way to work liberal bait that reply.
HAVING AN ALL CAPS SIG MAKES ME FEEL SMART

User avatar
Scottish Socialists
Diplomat
 
Posts: 695
Founded: Dec 27, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Scottish Socialists » Mon Oct 15, 2018 7:04 am

Trumptonium1 wrote:
Scottish Socialists wrote:Aye pal, let them drive from Heathrow to Tenerife. That’ll solve the problem.


There's a tunnel to France and a ferry to Tenerife. No need to thank me, just a quick google search is satisfactory. Although one might ask why you're taking a newborn there in the first place?

People drive from Alaska to Argentina and from London to Sydney and from Cape Town to Paris all the time.

Scottish Socialists wrote:Look, babies on planes are annoying.
Either that parent can silence them with a game, a toy, or sleep, or you can plug in your headphones or earplugs and blissfully be unaware of the crying child.

Just deal with it.


Or we can ban them from flights. No need to inconvenience the majority for the benefit of a minority.

I like the latter option.

Aye, driving from Heathrow to Tenerife takes 60 hours.
The flight takes 4 hours.
For a weeks holiday, 3 days are spent getting there, and 3 getting back.
What’s even the point then?

Besides, people bring their kids on holiday when they go on holiday, because, funnily enough, babies enjoy holidays as well.
And babysitters are expensive, yo.
Just fly.
☭ People's Republic of Scotland ☭
"I detest the Tories and everything they stand for." - Nicola Sturgeon
MON THE RANGERS!

“Did I miss the train or did the train miss me?” - Gary Brannan

Click here for advice.

Pro: The EU, The SNP, Independent Kurdistan, Scottish Nationalism, Social Democracy, Rangers F.C
Anti: British nationalism, Brexit, the UK, Conservatives, the Labour Party, Putin, Celtic F.C, Liz Truss
iSideWith results | 8values Results

User avatar
Caracasus
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7918
Founded: Apr 23, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Caracasus » Mon Oct 15, 2018 7:06 am

Eh, let's face it in an ideal world planes would have more room and more ability to (for example) lay on quiet sections and family sections. We'd also have better and cheaper public transport and it wouldn't cost three times as much to take the train as it would to fly.

However we don't. So it's probably an idea to invest in a set of headphones and something decent to listen to/watch if you're planning to fly if you don't have a kid to take with you and a big bag of toys and shiny distractions if you do.
As an editor I seam to spend an awful lot of thyme going threw issues and checking that they're no oblivious errars. Its a tough job but someone's got too do it!



Issues editor, not a moderator.

User avatar
Uan aa Boa
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1130
Founded: Apr 23, 2017
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Uan aa Boa » Mon Oct 15, 2018 7:07 am

Trumptonium1 wrote:Don't think the concept of snowflake applies to people who long for a return to the distant past of 2005 when people had more brains and were more considerate. Thanks Obama.

Pretty sure people travelled with kids and breastfed in public before 2005. Fairly sure Obama does neither. As for considerate, you appear to be the one who finds your fellow humans challenging to be around without reaching for the ban hammer.

Maybe I just don't spend enough time in NSG.

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 129585
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Ethel mermania » Mon Oct 15, 2018 7:08 am

Caracasus wrote:
Uan aa Boa wrote:So what if someone in the vicinity does find breastfeeding arousing? It's not being done for their benefit.


Never got why people bring this up either. If someone's getting a stiffy from watching breastfeeding, then I'd really hope that they'd realise that the correct way to respond would be to think about something really boring till things settle down rather than bitch about it online.


Weird. And would think a "thank you" would be a more appropriate response.
https://www.hvst.com/posts/the-clash-of ... s-wl2TQBpY

The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion … but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.
--S. Huntington

The most fundamental problem of politics is not the control of wickedness but the limitation of righteousness. 

--H. Kissenger

User avatar
Heloin
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26091
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Heloin » Mon Oct 15, 2018 7:08 am

Trumptonium1 wrote:People drive from Alaska to Argentina and from London to Sydney and from Cape Town to Paris all the time.

Driving from Alaska to Argentina is currently mostly impossible, London to Sydney is also an impossible drive. Cape Town to Paris, that's alot of war zones to drive through with a baby. Maybe you should wear earplugs on the plane?

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163951
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Mon Oct 15, 2018 7:09 am

Dumb Ideologies wrote:It's some Twilight Zone level shit when we cheer parents bringing their brat along into a scenario where it is likely to cause a greater number of people than them discomfort and inconvenience, deride the uninvolved people who suffer said consequences as being selfish if they complain, and hiss that the victims should have prepared for the eventuality at their own expense.

Yes, the crazy people are the ones who think we should just put up with babies on planes, not the guy who think that someone should drive for 59 hours rather than cause him minimal discomfort on a flight.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Caracasus
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7918
Founded: Apr 23, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Caracasus » Mon Oct 15, 2018 7:10 am

Uan aa Boa wrote:
Trumptonium1 wrote:Don't think the concept of snowflake applies to people who long for a return to the distant past of 2005 when people had more brains and were more considerate. Thanks Obama.

Pretty sure people travelled with kids and breastfed in public before 2005. Fairly sure Obama does neither. As for considerate, you appear to be the one who finds your fellow humans challenging to be around without reaching for the ban hammer.

Maybe I just don't spend enough time in NSG.


Obama invented breastfeeding and travelling. Before that, humans reproduced by laying eggs on the beach and waiting for them to hatch before they made their long journey to the open ocean. Not by airplane either.
As an editor I seam to spend an awful lot of thyme going threw issues and checking that they're no oblivious errars. Its a tough job but someone's got too do it!



Issues editor, not a moderator.

User avatar
The Holy Therns
Post Czar
 
Posts: 30591
Founded: Jul 09, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Holy Therns » Mon Oct 15, 2018 7:12 am

Dumb Ideologies wrote:
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:Buy some earplugs before going on a flight.

Problem solved.


Get everyone else to buy precautionary earplugs rather than not letting babies on the flight? Nah.

At the very least, fine the parents sufficient to provide complimentary earplugs for the next half dozen rows, plus a substantial administration fee.


What an appropriately childish attitude.
Platitude with attitude
Your new favorite.
MTF transperson. She/her. Lives in Sweden.
Also, N A N A ! ! !
Gallade wrote:Love, cake, wine and banter. No greater meaning to life (〜^∇^)〜

Ethel mermania wrote:to therns is to transend the pettiness of the field of play into the field of dreams.

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45993
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Mon Oct 15, 2018 7:16 am

Ifreann wrote:
Dumb Ideologies wrote:It's some Twilight Zone level shit when we cheer parents bringing their brat along into a scenario where it is likely to cause a greater number of people than them discomfort and inconvenience, deride the uninvolved people who suffer said consequences as being selfish if they complain, and hiss that the victims should have prepared for the eventuality at their own expense.

Yes, the crazy people are the ones who think we should just put up with babies on planes, not the guy who think that someone should drive for 59 hours rather than cause him minimal discomfort on a flight.


Screaming baby next to you is not "minimal" discomfort but glad to see you've come to agree with my position Iffy.

At the moment our team is going for fines and compensation as a transitional demand rather than going straight to the right to pick up the baby and whack the parents about the face with it, but we're seeing how the conversation goes.
Are these "human rights" in the room with us right now?
★彡 Professional pessimist. Reactionary socialist and gamer liberationist. Coffee addict. Fun at parties 彡★
Freedom is when people agree with you, and the more people you can force to act like they agree the freer society is
You are the trolley problem's conductor. You could stop the train in time but you do not. Nobody knows you're part of the equation. You satisfy your bloodlust and get away with it every time

User avatar
Trumptonium1
Senator
 
Posts: 4022
Founded: Apr 03, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Trumptonium1 » Mon Oct 15, 2018 7:18 am

Scottish Socialists wrote:
Trumptonium1 wrote:
There's a tunnel to France and a ferry to Tenerife. No need to thank me, just a quick google search is satisfactory. Although one might ask why you're taking a newborn there in the first place?

People drive from Alaska to Argentina and from London to Sydney and from Cape Town to Paris all the time.



Or we can ban them from flights. No need to inconvenience the majority for the benefit of a minority.

I like the latter option.

Aye, driving from Heathrow to Tenerife takes 60 hours.
The flight takes 4 hours.
For a weeks holiday, 3 days are spent getting there, and 3 getting back.
What’s even the point then?

Besides, people bring their kids on holiday when they go on holiday, because, funnily enough, babies enjoy holidays as well.
And babysitters are expensive, yo.
Just fly.


If someone is taking their newborn to Tenerife then that is a good signal their child needs to be taken away from them before they become an utterly insufferable spoilt brat. Holiday from what? From sitting at home?

Unless I am missing something here and you're not talking about newborns. But if someone still has a screaming and crying child - let alone breastfed - at age three plus they also need to be immediately taken into care by the state. Clearly failed parenting.
Last edited by Trumptonium1 on Mon Oct 15, 2018 7:18 am, edited 2 times in total.
Preferred pronouns: His Majesty/Your Highness

https://www.bolsonaro.com.br/
Resident Non-Pumpkin Character

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45993
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Mon Oct 15, 2018 7:18 am

The Holy Therns wrote:
Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Get everyone else to buy precautionary earplugs rather than not letting babies on the flight? Nah.

At the very least, fine the parents sufficient to provide complimentary earplugs for the next half dozen rows, plus a substantial administration fee.


What an appropriately childish attitude.


Waah. I hope you're not criticising, that'd be very selfish :p
Are these "human rights" in the room with us right now?
★彡 Professional pessimist. Reactionary socialist and gamer liberationist. Coffee addict. Fun at parties 彡★
Freedom is when people agree with you, and the more people you can force to act like they agree the freer society is
You are the trolley problem's conductor. You could stop the train in time but you do not. Nobody knows you're part of the equation. You satisfy your bloodlust and get away with it every time

User avatar
The Holy Therns
Post Czar
 
Posts: 30591
Founded: Jul 09, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Holy Therns » Mon Oct 15, 2018 7:20 am

Dumb Ideologies wrote:
The Holy Therns wrote:
What an appropriately childish attitude.


Waah. I hope you're not criticising, that'd be very selfish :p


Wow. You sure showed me. I feel so discredited. This is totally the same thing.
Platitude with attitude
Your new favorite.
MTF transperson. She/her. Lives in Sweden.
Also, N A N A ! ! !
Gallade wrote:Love, cake, wine and banter. No greater meaning to life (〜^∇^)〜

Ethel mermania wrote:to therns is to transend the pettiness of the field of play into the field of dreams.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163951
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Mon Oct 15, 2018 7:25 am

Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Yes, the crazy people are the ones who think we should just put up with babies on planes, not the guy who think that someone should drive for 59 hours rather than cause him minimal discomfort on a flight.


Screaming baby next to you is not "minimal" discomfort but glad to see you've come to agree with my position Iffy.

Compared to the inconvenience of driving a route one would otherwise fly, it very much is.

At the moment our team is going for fines and compensation as a transitional demand rather than going straight to the right to pick up the baby and whack the parents about the face with it, but we're seeing how the conversation goes.

Trumptonium1 wrote:Or we can ban them from flights. No need to inconvenience the majority for the benefit of a minority.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Hammer Britannia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5390
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Hammer Britannia » Mon Oct 15, 2018 7:25 am

Ban Brest

Screw the city and the female organ
All shall tremble before me

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Floofybit, Kingdom of frances, Likhinia, Miami Jai-Alai 3, Ohnoh, Osheiga, Picairn, Port Carverton, Statesburg, Tiami, Turkish Commune, Xind

Advertisement

Remove ads