Advertisement
by Mushet » Tue Oct 09, 2018 8:01 am
by The Philippine Islands of Luzviminda » Tue Oct 09, 2018 8:07 am
by LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Tue Oct 09, 2018 3:13 pm
The blAAtschApen wrote:LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:You know, in 2008, I might've considered supporting retirement age if only for its effectiveness against McCain and/or to stick it to people who associate experience with wisdom as though people always learned the right lessons from experience.
Now I realize the same kind of thing could've been used against Sanders, and that wouldn't be too good.
Rather than obsessing over the ages of politicians we should focus on the ages of those who elect them. Instead of voting being an automatic right at 18, you should earn it by graduating from high school.
How many people drop out of high school. And are certain minorities not more affected by this? And wouldn't this not be another case of vote suppression?
Also, what about home schooling?
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.
by Australian rePublic » Tue Oct 09, 2018 3:20 pm
by Valrifell » Tue Oct 09, 2018 3:52 pm
Australian rePublic wrote:I'm more concerned with results than age. Also, if you're going to start comparing to the UK, the queen's in her 90's
by Hurdergaryp » Tue Oct 09, 2018 3:57 pm
by Kombinita Socialisma Demokratio » Tue Oct 09, 2018 4:03 pm
by Erythrean Thebes » Tue Oct 09, 2018 4:05 pm
by Hurdergaryp » Tue Oct 09, 2018 4:12 pm
Erythrean Thebes wrote:The question is almost too good. But can we generalize about people (Congresspeople) at a given age, or is there too much variance? Elizabeth Warren and Mitch McConnell are not the same type of "older" person by any means - but they both exhibit some evidence that "being older" influences your conduct as a politician...
It could be that intra-party politics is more influential on whether the Senators appear "out of touch" or not. In fact, the more loyal they are to the party establishment, may be the more out of touch they appear, honestly. And they tend to be older, having climbed the ranks. A younger member like Corey Booker has to either stifle his independence or risk falling outside the gravy train of the party...
by Ethel mermania » Tue Oct 09, 2018 5:10 pm
by Erythrean Thebes » Tue Oct 09, 2018 5:52 pm
Hurdergaryp wrote:Erythrean Thebes wrote:The question is almost too good. But can we generalize about people (Congresspeople) at a given age, or is there too much variance? Elizabeth Warren and Mitch McConnell are not the same type of "older" person by any means - but they both exhibit some evidence that "being older" influences your conduct as a politician...
It could be that intra-party politics is more influential on whether the Senators appear "out of touch" or not. In fact, the more loyal they are to the party establishment, may be the more out of touch they appear, honestly. And they tend to be older, having climbed the ranks. A younger member like Corey Booker has to either stifle his independence or risk falling outside the gravy train of the party...
The older you are as a career politician, the more corrupted you become in order to fit within the party doctrine perfectly?
by Second Empire of America » Tue Oct 09, 2018 11:24 pm
by Scomagia » Wed Oct 10, 2018 1:31 am
Second Empire of America wrote:I don't think we need a mandatory retirement age, but we should definitely have quotas mandating that young people should make up at least a third of legislatures.
by The Blaatschapen » Wed Oct 10, 2018 1:34 am
Second Empire of America wrote:I don't think we need a mandatory retirement age, but we should definitely have quotas mandating that young people should make up at least a third of legislatures.
by Bombadil » Wed Oct 10, 2018 1:40 am
by Forsher » Wed Oct 10, 2018 3:33 am
by The Blaatschapen » Wed Oct 10, 2018 3:38 am
Bombadil wrote:
"I’ve heard Ivanka, how good would Ivanka be? It has nothing to do with nepotism but people who know know that Ivanka would be dynamite. I’d be accused of nepotism even if there’s no one more competent in the world."
He would, especially given he has such a boner for Ivanka.
by Exxosia » Wed Oct 10, 2018 3:44 am
by Hurdergaryp » Wed Oct 10, 2018 1:41 pm
The blAAtschApen wrote:Bombadil wrote:"I’ve heard Ivanka, how good would Ivanka be? It has nothing to do with nepotism but people who know know that Ivanka would be dynamite. I’d be accused of nepotism even if there’s no one more competent in the world."
He would, especially given he has such a boner for Ivanka.
I have too many things in common with Trump
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Atrito, Duvniask, Elejamie, Europa Undivided, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Neu California, Post War America, Spirit of Hope, Stormandia, Tungstan, Unmet Player
Advertisement