Theocracy Discussion Thread

[Constitutional Technocracy of Minecraft]

The only communist parties called "CPC" are the Communist Party of China (Chinese Communist Party with the words rearranged) and Communist Party of Canada (which does not endorse authoritarianism)

CPC is the official designation of the Communist Party of China.

So I don’t know where CCP comes in or what it is talking about because I can’t find anything that has CCP

First line of the Wikipedia entry:

"The Communist Party of China (CPC), also referred to as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), is the founding and ruling political party of the People's Republic of China"

Both CPC and CCP are valid acronyms - they mean the exact same nominally communist but de facto capitalist totalitarian Chinese political party.

[The Huskar Social Union]

Everything have been said, what a relief

Clarify the point about a woman aborting herself but the foetus.

[The New California Republic]

Everything have been said, what a relief

Clarify the point about a woman aborting herself but the foetus.

Don't hold your breath.

[Olerand]

Where's the terrorism?

Your sentence doesn't actually make sense, how I've read it, but are you claiming that the Republican Party of Texas, the most populous red State, is filled with radicals?
I definitely don't disagree. But I would generalize this beyond Texas, there are many States that have creationism as a part of their "scientific" curriculum. Though yet again, what to expect when a plurality (almost half even) of the country believes in creationism, while the second largest group believes in intelligent design.

And school prayers aren't mandatory in many States only because the Supreme Court, a radically different Supreme Court back in the 60s, banned them. But 80% of Republicans still support praying in schools, and in red States where not praying makes you the outcast, the libtard, how likely are kids to break this norm? About as likely as Egyptian women are to not wear the hijab or not be genitally mutilated, both of which are by no means de facto required.

Now, I certainly don't disagree that all of these positions are very radical. But it seems that Republicans like them. That might suggest something about the American right, no?

As a person that lives in the “radical state of Texas” or rather “a radical red state” your claims can not be any further from the truth. Local news does not paint, nor support those viewpoints. Nor the most locals of Texas. I rather trust the opinions of my peers, rather the words of a French foreigner.

In America we have a thing called, “big tent” politics, and it refers to a party holding many and multiple views, sometimes opposing one another, I advise you look into it.

So, all of those links, the polls, the actions of State education boards and State Republican parties, the Fox News page dedicated to the "war on Christmas" (which was somehow supposed to have something to do with terrorism but consistently resurfaces about Starbucks holiday cups), are all nill, because... Something about your local news?

An interesting counter-argument.

Your "big-tent" parties support radical opinions. Which makes them radical "big-tent" parties.

[Gospel Power]

Go away and stop thinking about religion or what i am saying, in your view God is not real, so why you are here?

Again, religion mandates that the non-religious get involved in its affairs. For unfortunately, when religion has any power, it doesn't leave the non-religious at peace, does it?

I only want to ban abortions, to teach creationism WITH evolution, to have prayers in school not to force them but TO have, those are core values

[Thermodolia]

What the fuck?

1: abortion is a murder, women right ends when a child is born, she can abort herself, but she need to leave the child alone

I think he’s saying that the woman can kill herself but only after she’s done being a broodmare.

[Saranidia]

Go away and stop thinking about religion or what i am saying, in your view God is not real, so why you are here?

Again, religion mandates that the non-religious get involved in its affairs. For unfortunately, when religion has any power, it doesn't leave the non-religious at peace, does it?

In the sense that a theocracy will favour the religious but a secular state will de facto favour the non-religious agnostics won’t it?
(Considering that they won’t have religious beliefs they need to struggle to cope with ignoring)

[Olerand]

Again, religion mandates that the non-religious get involved in its affairs. For unfortunately, when religion has any power, it doesn't leave the non-religious at peace, does it?

I only want to ban abortions, to teach creationism WITH evolution, to have prayers in school not to force them but TO have, those are core values

So those who want abortions have to live by your rules. Those who don't want to learn creationism have to live by your scientifically baseless "scientific" education. And those who don't want their tax money going to praying in schools rather than teaching are supposed to live by your waste of tax payers' moneys.

Well... My point still stands.

[The New California Republic]

Again, religion mandates that the non-religious get involved in its affairs. For unfortunately, when religion has any power, it doesn't leave the non-religious at peace, does it?

I only want to ban abortions, to teach creationism WITH evolution, to have prayers in school not to force them but TO have, those are core values

"Only".

[Olerand]

Again, religion mandates that the non-religious get involved in its affairs. For unfortunately, when religion has any power, it doesn't leave the non-religious at peace, does it?

In the sense that a theocracy will favour the religious but a secular state will de facto favour the non-religious agnostics won’t it?
(Considering that they won’t have religious beliefs they need to struggle to cope with ignoring)

Which secular State? America? No, certainly not, as evidence shows.

Truly secular States like those in Europe? Perhaps.

[The Huskar Social Union]

I think he’s saying that the woman can kill herself but only after she’s done being a broodmare.

Fuck that.

[Internationalist Bastard]

Again, religion mandates that the non-religious get involved in its affairs. For unfortunately, when religion has any power, it doesn't leave the non-religious at peace, does it?

I only want to ban abortions, to teach creationism WITH evolution, to have prayers in school not to force them but TO have, those are core values

If we’re teaching creationism what are we teaching?
Clay? Driftwood? A rib cage?

[The Huskar Social Union]

I only want to ban abortions, to teach creationism WITH evolution, to have prayers in school not to force them but TO have, those are core values

"Only".

Only.

Until they are forced on people.

[Holy Tedalonia]

As a person that lives in the “radical state of Texas” or rather “a radical red state” your claims can not be any further from the truth. Local news does not paint, nor support those viewpoints. Nor the most locals of Texas. I rather trust the opinions of my peers, rather the words of a French foreigner.

In America we have a thing called, “big tent” politics, and it refers to a party holding many and multiple views, sometimes opposing one another, I advise you look into it.

So, all of those links, the polls, the actions of State education boards and State Republican parties, the Fox News page dedicated to the "war on Christmas" (which was somehow supposed to have something to do with terrorism but consistently resurfaces about Starbucks holiday cups), are all nill, because... Something about your local news?

An interesting counter-argument.

Your "big-tent" parties support radical opinions. Which makes them radical "big-tent" parties.

The war on Christmas is more of a republican populist point of view, which that small party usually gets riled up and gather a huge radical base. Doesn’t make a dominant majority, but rather forces the other parties to begrudgingly support their head party. Why fight something when the other party is already fighting you. The Republican Party doesn’t want to fight a “2 front” war so they chose the “lesser of the 2 evils” if you will.

It’s like saying voting for trump = your a radical.

[The New California Republic]

I only want to ban abortions, to teach creationism WITH evolution, to have prayers in school not to force them but TO have, those are core values

If we’re teaching creationism what are we teaching?
Clay? Driftwood? A rib cage?

I'd be up for teaching creationism alongside evolution, as long as I'd be free to make creationism look dumb as shit when juxtaposed against evolution.

[Internationalist Bastard]

If we’re teaching creationism what are we teaching?
Clay? Driftwood? A rib cage?

I'd be up for teaching creationism alongside evolution, as long as I'd be free to make creationism look dumb as shit when juxtaposed against evolution.

So literally just teaching creationism alongside evolution

[Gospel Power]

If we’re teaching creationism what are we teaching?
Clay? Driftwood? A rib cage?

I'd be up for teaching creationism alongside evolution, as long as I'd be free to make creationism look dumb as shit when juxtaposed against evolution.

your evolution is the true shit here mate

[Sahansahiye Iran]

Nah. Theocracy sucks.

[Olerand]

So, all of those links, the polls, the actions of State education boards and State Republican parties, the Fox News page dedicated to the "war on Christmas" (which was somehow supposed to have something to do with terrorism but consistently resurfaces about Starbucks holiday cups), are all nill, because... Something about your local news?

An interesting counter-argument.

Your "big-tent" parties support radical opinions. Which makes them radical "big-tent" parties.

The war on Christmas is more of a republican populist point of view, which that small party usually gets riled up and gather a huge radical base. Doesn’t make a dominant majority, but rather forces the other parties to begrudgingly support their head party. Why fight something when the other party is already fighting you. The Republican Party doesn’t want to fight a “2 front” war so they chose the “lesser of the 2 evils” if you will.

It’s like saying voting for trump = your a radical.

Right... So... Republicans don't believe in this? They don't support fighting back on this "war"? Is (supposedly) electoral politicking now a separate act from being radical?

And as for the rest?

Well... You said it. Though, again, I would correct you and say voting for the Republicans makes you radical right-wing.

[The New California Republic]

I'd be up for teaching creationism alongside evolution, as long as I'd be free to make creationism look dumb as shit when juxtaposed against evolution.

your evolution is the true shit here mate

Yup, I agree, evolution is da shit!

[The Huskar Social Union]

Nah. Theocracy sucks.

Nailed it.

[The Huskar Social Union]

your evolution is the true shit here mate

Yup, I agree, evolution is da shit!

We need to advance the cause of evolution up in this bitch.

[Saranidia]

In the sense that a theocracy will favour the religious but a secular state will de facto favour the non-religious agnostics won’t it?
(Considering that they won’t have religious beliefs they need to struggle to cope with ignoring)

Which secular State? America? No, certainly not, as evidence shows.

Truly secular States like those in Europe? Perhaps.

America is only a secular state in name.

I don’t know of a time when America had secular rulers(the president and the house of representatives governing in a secular way for example)

[Olerand]

Which secular State? America? No, certainly not, as evidence shows.

Truly secular States like those in Europe? Perhaps.

America is only a secular state in name.

I don’t know of a time when America had secular rulers(the president and the house of representatives governing in a secular way for example)

I agree.

[Sahansahiye Iran]

Nah. Theocracy sucks.

Nailed it.

Thanks. I like to be as concise as possible.