Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2018 6:02 am
ehhhh, i'm not sure that this was a great idea, although i understand the motivation.
Because sometimes even national leaders just want to hang out
https://forum.nationstates.net/
The New California Republic wrote:I understand the intent behind it, it is just tragic that, as with many laws during their long gestation period, they end up as a shadow or distorted caricature of the original intent.
Mystic Warriors wrote:Kowani wrote:https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2018/09/30/california-law-sets-gender-quotas-corporate-boardrooms/1482883002/
California’s finally hit that next level of liberalism, government interference in business to ensure equality. Now, this is obviously a major win for the SJW lobby, not so much for anyone already on those boards. Beyond the normal criticism of “sexism!”, which I think someone else can handle much better than me, I think this sets a dangerous precedent. Seriously Jerry Brown, what were you thinking?
I get really tired of people using Liberalism likes a problem. And trying to fix inequality is not a bad thing.
Mystic Warriors wrote:Medwedian Democratic Federation wrote:
The Californian government is leftist. This does not necessarily apply to the disenfranchised populance.
In fact, the whole two-party system is a scam. It’s basically “the tail shaking the dog”, tricking people to believe there is an actual democracy in America.
There is none. The Rothschild/Zionist elites have already taken over the country decades ago.
Keep telling yourself that. Liberals are the vast majority here. Deal with it.
Shofercia wrote:Democrats: 8,438,268 (44.4%)
No Party Preference: 4,852,817 (25.5%)
Republicans: 4,769,299 (25.1%)
American Independents: 504,325 (2.3%)
Libertarians: 141,701 (0.7%)
Greens: 90,404 (0.5%)
Peace and Freedom: 74,282 (0.4%)
Other: 152,321 (0.8%) (and a good chunk here are reformists)
Hammer Britannia wrote:Shofercia wrote:Democrats: 8,438,268 (44.4%)
No Party Preference: 4,852,817 (25.5%)
Republicans: 4,769,299 (25.1%)
American Independents: 504,325 (2.3%)
Libertarians: 141,701 (0.7%)
Greens: 90,404 (0.5%)
Peace and Freedom: 74,282 (0.4%)
Other: 152,321 (0.8%) (and a good chunk here are reformists)
This makes me happy.
It reminds me that even in the darkest cesspools, there is hope
Mystic Warriors wrote:Scomagia wrote:Not all inequalities are a result of discrimination, you know. Inequalities don't necessarily need to be eliminated, inequalities based on discrimination do. It's not evident that the scarcity of women in executive positions is entirely or even mostly a result of discrimination.
All inequalities need to be eliminated, its just a matter of how.
Shofercia wrote:Our population is growing. In spite of that, we still have a positive net migration rate.
Great Minarchistan wrote:Shofercia wrote:Our population is growing. In spite of that, we still have a positive net migration rate.
Calling BS on that claim.
Hammer Britannia wrote:Great Minarchistan wrote:Calling BS on that claim.
I'm pretty sure he's just in denial that his state is a virgin and that the chad Texas shall take over the world
Conserative Morality wrote:I'm no fan of this system, but let's not pretend that companies are anything but hotbeds of nepotism in the upper ranks.