NATION

PASSWORD

Runaway creates a kidnapper

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

should these charges stand? How would you change them?

1. Charge her, free him
2
3%
2. Charge him, free her, for the sake of future possible victims
7
11%
3. Let them both go, no harm done other than ruffling our feathers
8
12%
4. Take our time and find out who did and said what, and in what sequence; release them on bail meantime
12
18%
5. Take our time and find out who did and said what, and in what sequence; ; no bail for him
5
8%
6. Take our time znd find out who did and said what, and in what sequence; no bail for either
6
9%
7. Investigate her home for possible abuse; maybe she was right to run away
11
17%
8. Good laws and procedures can and always will be misused,
6
9%
9. Finding the girl was good; charging them was wrong,
7
11%
10. Other (please say more)
2
3%
 
Total votes : 66

User avatar
Gamergirl90
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 173
Founded: Feb 15, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Gamergirl90 » Sun Sep 30, 2018 7:04 am

Lyras wrote:
Gamergirl90 wrote:Isnt determining guily or innocence something we have trials for? Since when is it necessary to be able to prove someone committed a crime in order to arrest them?


Not 'proof beyond reasonable doubt', but certainly a 'prima facie'-standard proof. On what has been made available here, that isn't satisfied. Kidnapping requires coercion of the person being kidnapped. It must be conducted against their will. It must be able to be established to be the case. And age is not a factor here (for kidnapping itself), as there is no explicit suggestion of sexual misconduct.

No case for kidnapping to answer.


This is incorrect. Specifically this is the law in new york:

 A person is so moved or confined “without consent” when such is accomplished by (a) physical force, intimidation or deception, or (b) any means whatever, including acquiescence of the victim, if he is a child less than sixteen years old or an incompetent person and the parent, guardian or other person or institution having lawful control or custody of him has not acquiesced in the movement or confinement


When the kidnappee is under the age of 16 their consent is irrelevant

User avatar
Gamergirl90
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 173
Founded: Feb 15, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Gamergirl90 » Sun Sep 30, 2018 7:10 am

Scomagia wrote:
Gamergirl90 wrote:He transported a minor, without the knowledge and consent of her parents, to an area the did not know. Seems quite possible that he did kidnap her.

She arranged the entire thing because she wanted to run away. Should the adult be punished for enabling her running away? Absolutely. It's not okay to facilitate delinquency. But that's all this was. It wasn't a kidnapping.

Why is it NOT kidnapping? And please, before answering, actually reference the actual laws in the actual state of New York like we are actually discussing.

Becade this whole discussion seems to be a bunch of people sorta...deciding for themselves what the law is without actually looking it up. I found it. It's not hard. Took 30 seconds.

And every person who argues that it's not kidnapping because she agreed to it, she wanted it, she set it up, in the time it took you to type that you could have looked up the law in the state of NY and found the same thing I found. When under the age of 16 acquiescence of the victim does not matter
Last edited by Gamergirl90 on Sun Sep 30, 2018 7:16 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 129563
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Father Knows Best State

Postby Ethel mermania » Sun Sep 30, 2018 7:27 am

Geneviev wrote:
Pope Joan wrote:
Other than being stupid himself

The whole thing was really her fault. She arranged it. So she was more stupid.


See the adult is suppose to be the... Well adult about it. Picking up a 12 year old is bad, if her life sucked so much. DYFUS (DIVISION of youth and family services). should have been called.
https://www.hvst.com/posts/the-clash-of ... s-wl2TQBpY

The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion … but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.
--S. Huntington

The most fundamental problem of politics is not the control of wickedness but the limitation of righteousness. 

--H. Kissenger

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 129563
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Father Knows Best State

Postby Ethel mermania » Sun Sep 30, 2018 7:30 am

As to the poll. 4 & 7

I am not sure what and if any charges I want pressed, but I do want child services to take a look at the 12 year olds family.
https://www.hvst.com/posts/the-clash-of ... s-wl2TQBpY

The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion … but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.
--S. Huntington

The most fundamental problem of politics is not the control of wickedness but the limitation of righteousness. 

--H. Kissenger

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 36980
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Sun Sep 30, 2018 8:09 am

Free Arabian Nation wrote:How does one hook up with a gut?


Through the mouth, down the esophagus and then continuing through the stomach, large and small intestines, presumably.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32801
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Des-Bal » Sun Sep 30, 2018 8:44 am

Gamergirl90 wrote:Why is it NOT kidnapping? And please, before answering, actually reference the actual laws in the actual state of New York like we are actually discussing.

Becade this whole discussion seems to be a bunch of people sorta...deciding for themselves what the law is without actually looking it up. I found it. It's not hard. Took 30 seconds.

And every person who argues that it's not kidnapping because she agreed to it, she wanted it, she set it up, in the time it took you to type that you could have looked up the law in the state of NY and found the same thing I found. When under the age of 16 acquiescence of the victim does not matter


Since you've read the law so well why don't you tell me which statute should apply and why you think it fits here.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Gamergirl90
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 173
Founded: Feb 15, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Gamergirl90 » Sun Sep 30, 2018 9:52 am

Des-Bal wrote:
Gamergirl90 wrote:Why is it NOT kidnapping? And please, before answering, actually reference the actual laws in the actual state of New York like we are actually discussing.

Becade this whole discussion seems to be a bunch of people sorta...deciding for themselves what the law is without actually looking it up. I found it. It's not hard. Took 30 seconds.

And every person who argues that it's not kidnapping because she agreed to it, she wanted it, she set it up, in the time it took you to type that you could have looked up the law in the state of NY and found the same thing I found. When under the age of 16 acquiescence of the victim does not matter


Since you've read the law so well why don't you tell me which statute should apply and why you think it fits here.

What do you mean "since I've read it"? Haven't you? You wouldnt opine about whether a law was reasonably applied if you didn't actually read the law, would you?
Last edited by Gamergirl90 on Sun Sep 30, 2018 9:53 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32801
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Des-Bal » Sun Sep 30, 2018 9:57 am

Gamergirl90 wrote:
What do you mean "since I've read it"? Haven't you? You wouldnt opine about whether a law was reasonably applied if you didn't actually read the law, would you?


Let me be clear: I have read it, it doesn't apply here, I believe that you have either not read the law or not read the law careful opting instead to look to the definition of a single term.

And keep in mind, I entered this thread noting the same thing you did and coming to a different result.
Last edited by Des-Bal on Sun Sep 30, 2018 1:49 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha
Senator
 
Posts: 4364
Founded: Apr 05, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Mon Oct 01, 2018 8:40 am

Page wrote:
Saiwania wrote:
Accept or invite them in, keep them preoccupied whilst you call the police, have the police take them off of your hands. You want to lure them into a false sense of security, to not run away again. Once the police have them detained, you'll have nothing to worry about and ideally, your part or involvement is over. More importantly, you wouldn't get caught with them unnecessarily to where it looks bad.


I don't think I would want to do that, some runaways are leaving abusive homes where what their parents do to them may not actually be illegal but still really fucked up, plus with how runaways can be charged with a crime, I would feel guilty if they ended up in juvie because I called the police.

If I encountered a runaway who asked for my help, I would look up a shelter for minors and point them in that direction, and offer some food and money to help them out before parting ways. This probably isn't a popular opinion, but most runaways are that way in the first place because the system failed them, and I've heard a lot of horror stories about how kids in foster care are treated. My aunt and uncle are foster parents and they are very compassionate and competent, but that seems to be the exception rather than the rule.

I just couldn't live with myself if calling the police on a runaway got them sent back to an abusive home.

In light of this, perhaps the laws on this matter need to be re-evaluated.
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.

How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.

Previous

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Ethel mermania, Google [Bot], Kostane, La Paz de Los Ricos, Likhinia, Statesburg

Advertisement

Remove ads