NATION

PASSWORD

Runaway creates a kidnapper

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

should these charges stand? How would you change them?

1. Charge her, free him
2
3%
2. Charge him, free her, for the sake of future possible victims
7
11%
3. Let them both go, no harm done other than ruffling our feathers
8
12%
4. Take our time and find out who did and said what, and in what sequence; release them on bail meantime
12
18%
5. Take our time and find out who did and said what, and in what sequence; ; no bail for him
5
8%
6. Take our time znd find out who did and said what, and in what sequence; no bail for either
6
9%
7. Investigate her home for possible abuse; maybe she was right to run away
11
17%
8. Good laws and procedures can and always will be misused,
6
9%
9. Finding the girl was good; charging them was wrong,
7
11%
10. Other (please say more)
2
3%
 
Total votes : 66

User avatar
Geneviev
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16432
Founded: Mar 03, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Geneviev » Sat Sep 29, 2018 7:29 am

Eglaecia wrote:
Remnants of Exilvania wrote:Because I'm not dense, that's why.


NO REASON? Give me one, non-sexual reason as to why an adult male would take a pretty, 12 year old girl to Manhattan for a "good time"

Because she wanted it and he thought she was older.
"Above all, keep loving one another earnestly, since love covers a multitude of sins." 1 Peter 4:8

User avatar
Page
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17480
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Page » Sat Sep 29, 2018 7:34 am

19 and 12 is not an insignificant age gap, and I think the situation suggests that the 19 year old had sexual intentions.

One thing I am sure about is the girl should absolutely not be charged with a crime. Being a runaway should not be a crime in the first place.
Anarcho-Communist Against: Bolsheviks, Fascists, TERFs, Putin, Autocrats, Conservatives, Ancaps, Bourgeoisie, Bigots, Liberals, Maoists

I don't believe in kink-shaming unless your kink is submitting to the state.

User avatar
Cekoviu
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16954
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cekoviu » Sat Sep 29, 2018 7:36 am

Des-Bal wrote:
Cekoviu wrote:honestly, i have no idea how somebody could possibly think a twelve-year-old is 18. that on its own sounds pretty stupid.

https://www.timesunion.com/news/article ... 262135.php

Here's her uncropped amber alert picture, she looks older than a few of the 18 year olds I know.

how????
pro: women's rights
anti: men's rights

User avatar
Remnants of Exilvania
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11214
Founded: Mar 29, 2015
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Remnants of Exilvania » Sat Sep 29, 2018 7:37 am

Eglaecia wrote:
Remnants of Exilvania wrote:How do you know he conspired to have sexual intercourse with a minor?

Because I'm not dense, that's why.

Geneviev wrote:That's ridiculous. There's no reason to believe that was his intent. She was lucky.

NO REASON? Give me one, non-sexual reason as to why an adult male would take a pretty, 12 year old girl to Manhattan for a "good time"

Pity and domestic abuse?
Last edited by Remnants of Exilvania on Sat Sep 29, 2018 7:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ex-NE Panzerwaffe Hauptmann; War Merit Cross & Knights Cross of the Iron Cross
Ex Woodhouse Loyalist & Ex Inactive BLITZKRIEG Foreign Relations Minister
REST IN PEACE HERZOG FRIEDRICH VON WÜRTTEMBERG! † 9. May 2018
Furchtlos und Treu dem Hause Württemberg für alle Ewigkeit!

User avatar
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha
Senator
 
Posts: 4364
Founded: Apr 05, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Sat Sep 29, 2018 7:40 am

Eglaecia wrote:
Remnants of Exilvania wrote:Because I'm not dense, that's why.


NO REASON? Give me one, non-sexual reason as to why an adult male would take a pretty, 12 year old girl to Manhattan for a "good time"

Appeal to ignorance much? Just because you don't know the motive doesn't mean the one you arbitrarily name has to be the real one.
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.

How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.

User avatar
Eglaecia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 628
Founded: May 23, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Eglaecia » Sat Sep 29, 2018 7:41 am

Geneviev wrote:
Eglaecia wrote:NO REASON? Give me one, non-sexual reason as to why an adult male would take a pretty, 12 year old girl to Manhattan for a "good time"

Because she wanted it and he thought she was older.

She is twelve years old. TWELVE FUCKING YEARS OLD. He is 19 years old. NINTEEN YEARS OLD. WHY THE HELL IS THIS OKAY TO YOU?? SHE IS TOO YOUNG TO CONSENT.
Catholique, Intégraliste, Distributiste | Catechism of Pope St. Pius X | Rerum Novarum | On Integralism
"The blood of the martyrs is the seed of the church."
Great British Unionist and Celtic Cultural Revivalist
"We shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be."

User avatar
Geneviev
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16432
Founded: Mar 03, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Geneviev » Sat Sep 29, 2018 7:47 am

Eglaecia wrote:
Geneviev wrote:Because she wanted it and he thought she was older.

She is twelve years old. TWELVE FUCKING YEARS OLD. He is 19 years old. NINTEEN YEARS OLD. WHY THE HELL IS THIS OKAY TO YOU?? SHE IS TOO YOUNG TO CONSENT.

She looks at least sixteen. He couldn't have known. She organized the whole thing and chose to go with him. He did nothing wrong and there is no evidence that he intended to do anything to her. I think that she was extremely lucky that she didn't arrange something with someone who would hurt her.
"Above all, keep loving one another earnestly, since love covers a multitude of sins." 1 Peter 4:8

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32801
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Des-Bal » Sat Sep 29, 2018 7:48 am

Eglaecia wrote:She is twelve years old. TWELVE FUCKING YEARS OLD. He is 19 years old. NINTEEN YEARS OLD. WHY THE HELL IS THIS OKAY TO YOU?? SHE IS TOO YOUNG TO CONSENT.


Nobody is saying otherwise, they're saying you can't impute a sexual motive without evidence.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Pope Joan
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19500
Founded: Mar 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Pope Joan » Sat Sep 29, 2018 9:57 am

Geneviev wrote:
Pope Joan wrote:
Other than being stupid himself

The whole thing was really her fault. She arranged it. So she was more stupid.


In a way it seems almost like a sting operation, except the goal was not to get the guy in trouble but just to get herself into NYC
"Life is difficult".

-M. Scott Peck

User avatar
Pope Joan
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19500
Founded: Mar 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Pope Joan » Sat Sep 29, 2018 10:14 am

Des-Bal wrote:
Eglaecia wrote:She is twelve years old. TWELVE FUCKING YEARS OLD. He is 19 years old. NINTEEN YEARS OLD. WHY THE HELL IS THIS OKAY TO YOU?? SHE IS TOO YOUNG TO CONSENT.


Nobody is saying otherwise, they're saying you can't impute a sexual motive without evidence.


Suppose I am an anonymous HS grad with no reputation and no street cred, Suddenly I show up with a hot chick and start showing her around. Suddenly my cred goes up. Right there could be a motive.
"Life is difficult".

-M. Scott Peck

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32801
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Des-Bal » Sat Sep 29, 2018 10:17 am

Pope Joan wrote:
Suppose I am an anonymous HS grad with no reputation and no street cred, Suddenly I show up with a hot chick and start showing her around. Suddenly my cred goes up. Right there could be a motive.


Or "One of my online friends wants to hang out in the city" or "This person sounds like they're having a hard time, this would mean a lot to them."
Hell I volunteered with underprivileged kids, hung out with them, and took them fishing. I was being of service to my community not trying to get my dick wet.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Pope Joan
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19500
Founded: Mar 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Pope Joan » Sat Sep 29, 2018 10:20 am

Des-Bal wrote:
Pope Joan wrote:
Suppose I am an anonymous HS grad with no reputation and no street cred, Suddenly I show up with a hot chick and start showing her around. Suddenly my cred goes up. Right there could be a motive.


Or "One of my online friends wants to hang out in the city" or "This person sounds like they're having a hard time, this would mean a lot to them."
Hell I volunteered with underprivileged kids, hung out with them, and took them fishing. I was being of service to my community not trying to get my dick wet.


Kudos to you

Unfortunately many good deeds have been made to seem suspicious these days
"Life is difficult".

-M. Scott Peck

User avatar
Diopolis
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17734
Founded: May 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Diopolis » Sat Sep 29, 2018 11:55 am

Everyone involved was stupid more than criminal. That being said, wasting police time like that should bring some kind of penalty.
Texas nationalist, right-wing technocrat, radical social conservative, post-liberal.

User avatar
Dogmeat
Senator
 
Posts: 3638
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Dogmeat » Sat Sep 29, 2018 1:04 pm

TBH I don't know what I would do if a runaway asked me for a place to stay. Reporting them might not stop them from running, and refusing them runs the risk that they end up with someone worse.
Immortal God Dog
Hey boy, know any tricks?
天狗

User avatar
Victorious Decepticons
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8817
Founded: Sep 15, 2008
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Victorious Decepticons » Sat Sep 29, 2018 4:19 pm

Sounds like the sort of thing I would think was fine to do when I was 12, assuming I trusted the other person. I still think it's a fine thing to do. I say let 'em both go, no charges, and a "sorry for being worthless killjoys and wrecking up your exciting night out."

"But it's dangerous!"

So what? Someone else's fears should never be a reason to hold a person back at any age. A safe life is an atrociously boring life. Plus, almost anything that's exciting is dangerous. That's precisely what makes it exciting - and fun.

I've been told that many activities would win me a Darwin, but I'm still here and my award hasn't been minted yet. I'd say I'm a decent enough judge of what's actually too dangerous and what's fearmongering hooey. Going to the Big City should be tops on the list for anyone who lives in some dull town, and it's disturbing that anyone thinks that having the brains to figure out how to get it done is any sort of bad. Good for her, and I hope she doesn't get busted next time.

As for the guy, I might admonish him to check the ID of any future passengers, but that's it. He was probably someone like me, who could imagine being the kid wanting to see The Big City, and would be glad to help make it happen due to self-identifying with that mindset.

That said, I do supposedly-dangerous things as a standard course of action, and "become a professional storm chaser" is on my bucket list. To listen to the fearmongers, you'd think I would have a cabinet full of Darwin Awards by now, yet I haven't won any and don't expect to. (Nor do I want to.)

In big cities, the biggest danger I've found, assuming I wasn't poking my nose into restricted property like construction sites, was simply getting lost. It's dang easy to get lost in a place like NYC, especially as a kid, and it can take hours of fishing around to get back to the right road. However, in today's world of cell phones and Google Maps, even that danger should be totally nerfed now.

tl;dr: There is nothing at all wrong with what either of them did, and they should both be let go with all charges dropped.
Last edited by Victorious Decepticons on Sat Sep 29, 2018 4:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
No war RPs; no open RPs.

Explosive .50 cal shells vs. Decepticons: REAL, IRL PROOF the Decepticons would laugh at them - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeVTZlNQfPA
Newaswa wrote:What is the greatest threat to your nation?
Vallermoore wrote:The Victorious Decepticons.

Bluquse wrote:Imperialist, aggressive, and genociding aliens or interdimensional beings that would most likely slaughter or enslave us
rather than meet up to have a talk. :(

TurtleShroom wrote:Also, like any sane, civilized nation, we always consider the Victorious Decepticons a clear, present, and obvious threat we must respect, honor, and leave alone in all circumstances. Always fear the Victorious Decepticons.


The Huskar Social Union wrote: ... massive empires of genocidal machines.

User avatar
Pope Joan
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19500
Founded: Mar 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Pope Joan » Sat Sep 29, 2018 4:26 pm

Dogmeat wrote:TBH I don't know what I would do if a runaway asked me for a place to stay. Reporting them might not stop them from running, and refusing them runs the risk that they end up with someone worse.


That seems to me to be a good approach, put yourself in that guy's shoes.

I do hope that her home environment gets investigated
"Life is difficult".

-M. Scott Peck

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32801
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Des-Bal » Sat Sep 29, 2018 4:26 pm

Victorious Decepticons wrote:Sounds like the sort of thing I would think was fine to do when I was 12, assuming I trusted the other person. I still think it's a fine thing to do. I say let 'em both go, no charges, and a "sorry for being worthless killjoys and wrecking up your exciting night out."

"But it's dangerous!"

So what? Someone else's fears should never be a reason to hold a person back at any age. A safe life is an atrociously boring life. Plus, almost anything that's exciting is dangerous. That's precisely what makes it exciting - and fun.

I've been told that many activities would win me a Darwin, but I'm still here and my award hasn't been minted yet. I'd say I'm a decent enough judge of what's actually too dangerous and what's fearmongering hooey. Going to the Big City should be tops on the list for anyone who lives in some dull town, and it's disturbing that anyone thinks that having the brains to figure out how to get it done is any sort of bad. Good for her, and I hope she doesn't get busted next time.

As for the guy, I might admonish him to check the ID of any future passengers, but that's it. He was probably someone like me, who could imagine being the kid wanting to see The Big City, and would be glad to help make it happen due to self-identifying with that mindset.

That said, I do supposedly-dangerous things as a standard course of action, and "become a professional storm chaser" is on my bucket list. To listen to the fearmongers, you'd think I would have a cabinet full of Darwin Awards by now, yet I haven't won any and don't expect to. (Nor do I want to.)

In big cities, the biggest danger I've found, assuming I wasn't poking my nose into restricted property like construction sites, was simply getting lost. It's dang easy to get lost in a place like NYC, especially as a kid, and it can take hours of fishing around to get back to the right road. However, in today's world of cell phones and Google Maps, even that danger should be totally nerfed now.

tl;dr: There is nothing at all wrong with what either of them did, and they should both be let go with all charges dropped.


It wasn't a night out she left without warning and didn't call her parents for three days. They had absolutely no way of knowing she wasn't handcuffed to a radiator in somebody's basement. Her actions made it very reasonable for her parents to get the police involved and deserve to be punished.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 36918
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Sat Sep 29, 2018 5:01 pm

He's 19? Legally an adult. A stupid adult, but an adult.
He drove a minor to NYC and left her on her own. That is definitely endangering her.

Yes, he's a kidnapper. Sorry to destroy your world view.

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Sat Sep 29, 2018 5:06 pm

Geneviev wrote:She looks at least sixteen. He couldn't have known. She organized the whole thing and chose to go with him. He did nothing wrong and there is no evidence that he intended to do anything to her. I think that she was extremely lucky that she didn't arrange something with someone who would hurt her.


Looks aren't enough to go off of, unless the person in question is very young or very old to where it is obvious. If you're an adult, it pays off to do due diligence as expected. For meeting anyone from offline, I know I'm asking for a driver's license and looking up their number to verify their date of birth or alternative government documentation. Papers please!

If an adult does this, and practices some common sense, they'll never have any problems with regards to this. It is not so hard to stay legal.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42050
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Fartsniffage » Sat Sep 29, 2018 5:07 pm

She was charged with being a runaway, while he was charged with kidnapping,


Running away from home is a crime a 12 year old can be charged with in the US?

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Sat Sep 29, 2018 5:10 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:Running away from home is a crime a 12 year old can be charged with in the US?


We can't assume that every child that runs away from home is fleeing from abuse. Sometimes kids are just bad and are just being a delinquent or are too adventurous and are just leaving their parents because they find their rules too stifling or whatever.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Uxupox
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13447
Founded: Nov 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Uxupox » Sat Sep 29, 2018 5:11 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
She was charged with being a runaway, while he was charged with kidnapping,


Running away from home is a crime a 12 year old can be charged with in the US?


Interestingly enough yes.
Economic Left/Right: 0.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.00

User avatar
Costa Fierro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19902
Founded: Dec 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Costa Fierro » Sat Sep 29, 2018 5:12 pm

Pope Joan wrote:His friend who was with him, but not charged (questioned as a material witness though) said he thought all along that she was of age.


Lesson learned: don't believe anything anyone says on a dating app.

Katganistan wrote:He's 19? Legally an adult. A stupid adult, but an adult.
He drove a minor to NYC and left her on her own. That is definitely endangering her.

Yes, he's a kidnapper. Sorry to destroy your world view.


Except that's not quite the case. Kidnapping would indicate that she was taken without her will. She wasn't. She had set the whole thing up herself and willingly got into his vehicle. The absence of any force or coercion would not support any charges of kidnapping, regardless of how many mental gymnastics one needs to perform to come to this conclusion.
"Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist." - George Carlin

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42050
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Fartsniffage » Sat Sep 29, 2018 5:12 pm

Uxupox wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
Running away from home is a crime a 12 year old can be charged with in the US?


Interestingly enough yes.


That's one of the most insane things I've ever heard, and I follow Trumps twitter account...

User avatar
Free Arabian Nation
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1802
Founded: May 02, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Arabian Nation » Sat Sep 29, 2018 5:12 pm

How does one hook up with a gut?
العرب الأحرار
I don't use NS Stats, for they are against the will of Liberty and God.

News
Open to TGs


PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Atrito, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Fartsniffage, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Ifreann, Inferior, Kannap, Kyuabar, La Paz de Los Ricos, La Xinga, Magical Hypnosis Border Collie of Doom, Niolia, Ozral, Pale Dawn, Plan Neonie, Port Carverton, The Kharkivan Cossacks, Tungstan

Advertisement

Remove ads