NationStates

US-SSR wrote:In a clear violation of the Second Amendment, a Nevada gun owner has been charged with felonies including concealed carry without a permit and discharging the weapon the Constitution gives him the sacred right to have. Gun owners should be up in arms over this. Why are there no protests or organized calls to Congressional offices? Anyone should be able to do anything they want to with their guns, especially if they don't harm others like this patriotic American.

Sovaal wrote:

US-SSR wrote:In a clear violation of the Second Amendment, a Nevada gun owner has been charged with felonies including concealed carry without a permit and discharging the weapon the Constitution gives him the sacred right to have. Gun owners should be up in arms over this. Why are there no protests or organized calls to Congressional offices? Anyone should be able to do anything they want to with their guns, especially if they don't harm others like this patriotic American.

Anyone else here love it when when the thread topic is literally a straw man with nothing to discuss?

The New California Republic wrote:I can't even access the article due to GDPR, and I am too lazy to use a proxy at the moment, so...

Len Hyet wrote:

The New California Republic wrote:I can't even access the article due to GDPR, and I am too lazy to use a proxy at the moment, so...

It's the dumbass who shot himself to protest Trump.

Petrasylvania wrote:

Len Hyet wrote:It's the dumbass who shot himself to protest Trump.

Yeah. Stupid librul, shooting himself with a gun instead of other people like God intended firearms to. /s

Petrasylvania wrote:

Len Hyet wrote:It's the dumbass who shot himself to protest Trump.

Yeah. Stupid librul, shooting himself with a gun instead of other people like God intended firearms to. /s

Len Hyet wrote:

Petrasylvania wrote:Yeah. Stupid librul, shooting himself with a gun instead of other people like God intended firearms to. /s

I... I don't understand. Are you... are you defending him shooting himself as a legitimate act of protest?

Gauth, shooting yourself as an act of political protest is dumb. It is so dumb there is a saying about it. You know "don't shoot yourself in the foot"? Admittedly this particular dumbass shot himself in the shoulder, but still. The dumbassery is clear.

Petrasylvania wrote:

Len Hyet wrote:I... I don't understand. Are you... are you defending him shooting himself as a legitimate act of protest?

Gauth, shooting yourself as an act of political protest is dumb. It is so dumb there is a saying about it. You know "don't shoot yourself in the foot"? Admittedly this particular dumbass shot himself in the shoulder, but still. The dumbassery is clear.

He didn't harm anyone else for one. Plus it's amusingly ironic that the NSG Gun Club is more visibly bothered by a liberal shooting himself than by the numerous threads on mass shootings.

Albrenia wrote:Well, if one absolutely must shoot someone in political protest, I do prefer it to be them shooting themselves in a nonlethal fashion. A better option would be nobody getting shot, but that would be reasonable.

US-SSR wrote:In a clear violation of the Second Amendment, a Nevada gun owner has been charged with felonies including concealed carry without a permit and discharging the weapon the Constitution gives him the sacred right to have. Gun owners should be up in arms over this. Why are there no protests or organized calls to Congressional offices? Anyone should be able to do anything they want to with their guns, especially if they don't harm others like this patriotic American.