by Australian rePublic » Tue Sep 18, 2018 3:32 pm
by Trumptonium1 » Tue Sep 18, 2018 3:42 pm
by Albrenia » Tue Sep 18, 2018 3:44 pm
by Tretiy Rim » Tue Sep 18, 2018 3:49 pm
by Australian rePublic » Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:25 pm
Tretiy Rim wrote:Why don't you just slap them on the wrist and tell them they're being naughty?
.
by Bakery Hill » Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:26 pm
by Right wing humour squad » Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:30 pm
by Bombadil » Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:30 pm
Bakery Hill wrote:I would give them at least 16 years.
by Bombadil » Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:35 pm
Ifreann wrote:This is why you should invest in a good magnet.
by Ratateague » Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:36 pm
Ifreann wrote:This is why you should invest in a good magnet.
by Bakery Hill » Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:38 pm
Right wing humour squad wrote:I’ve worked in the export strawberry industry here in Queensland.
Don’t eat qld strawberries please, the main reason they are in store is they’ve failed a human fecal percentage test in the last three years.
by Kombinita Socialisma Demokratio » Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:44 pm
by Bombadil » Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:48 pm
Kombinita Socialisma Demokratio wrote:One year I remember it being on the local news that an unknown house had been giving out candy to children (for Halloween) with a razor blade stuck in the middle.
by Right wing humour squad » Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:51 pm
by Kombinita Socialisma Demokratio » Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:52 pm
Bombadil wrote:Kombinita Socialisma Demokratio wrote:One year I remember it being on the local news that an unknown house had been giving out candy to children (for Halloween) with a razor blade stuck in the middle.
No cases of strangers killing or permanently injuring children this way have been proven. Commonly, the story appears in the media when a young child dies suddenly after Halloween. Medical investigations into the actual cause of death have always shown that these children did not die from eating candy given to them by strangers. However, in rare cases, adult family members have spread this story in an effort to cover up murder or accidental deaths. In other incidents, a child who has been told about poisoned candy places a dangerous object or substance in a pile of candy and pretends that it was the work of a stranger. This behavior is called the copycat effect.
Folklorists, scholars, and law enforcement experts say that these stories have been "thoroughly debunked".[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoned_candy_myths
by Bombadil » Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:57 pm
Kombinita Socialisma Demokratio wrote:Bombadil wrote:
No cases of strangers killing or permanently injuring children this way have been proven. Commonly, the story appears in the media when a young child dies suddenly after Halloween. Medical investigations into the actual cause of death have always shown that these children did not die from eating candy given to them by strangers. However, in rare cases, adult family members have spread this story in an effort to cover up murder or accidental deaths. In other incidents, a child who has been told about poisoned candy places a dangerous object or substance in a pile of candy and pretends that it was the work of a stranger. This behavior is called the copycat effect.
Folklorists, scholars, and law enforcement experts say that these stories have been "thoroughly debunked".[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoned_candy_myths
Oh. I suppose sometimes news is fake even when it does not align with ones politics. It must have been the copycat effect because it showed and interviews two families who found the razor blades and showed them sticking out of the molding chocolate candy.
by Bakery Hill » Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:58 pm
Right wing humour squad wrote:Bakery Hill wrote:Why does that mean they are in store?
Because New Zealand pays a lot more for them, but part of the bilateral quarantine agreement requires periodic tests on soil, as well as treatment and other things.
So when the fecal percentage of soil test fails, they just drop them on the local market which doesn’t have the same restrictions.
And while there are growers who only supply the domestic market, they still use the same foreign labour who caused the soil test to fail. And they are less worried about in field defecation because they don’t sell to NZ.
by Bombadil » Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:59 pm
Bakery Hill wrote:Right wing humour squad wrote:
Because New Zealand pays a lot more for them, but part of the bilateral quarantine agreement requires periodic tests on soil, as well as treatment and other things.
So when the fecal percentage of soil test fails, they just drop them on the local market which doesn’t have the same restrictions.
And while there are growers who only supply the domestic market, they still use the same foreign labour who caused the soil test to fail. And they are less worried about in field defecation because they don’t sell to NZ.
What if it wasn't backpackers putting the poop in? What if it was you?
by Right wing humour squad » Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:04 pm
Bakery Hill wrote:Right wing humour squad wrote:
Because New Zealand pays a lot more for them, but part of the bilateral quarantine agreement requires periodic tests on soil, as well as treatment and other things.
So when the fecal percentage of soil test fails, they just drop them on the local market which doesn’t have the same restrictions.
And while there are growers who only supply the domestic market, they still use the same foreign labour who caused the soil test to fail. And they are less worried about in field defecation because they don’t sell to NZ.
What if it wasn't backpackers putting the poop in? What if it was you?
by Cetacea » Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:45 pm
by Page » Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:11 pm
by Australian rePublic » Wed Sep 19, 2018 4:44 am
by Trumptonium1 » Wed Sep 19, 2018 4:56 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cyptopir, Google [Bot], Ineva, Likhinia, Plan Neonie, Republics of the Solar Union, Rio Cana, Soviet Haaregrad, Talibanada, Uiiop, Zancostan
Advertisement