Advertisement

by Forsher » Sun Oct 07, 2018 12:30 am

by Forsher » Sun Oct 07, 2018 12:30 am

by Minzerland II » Sun Oct 07, 2018 12:34 am
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)

by Quantipapa » Sun Oct 07, 2018 12:37 am

by Quantipapa » Sun Oct 07, 2018 12:41 am
Eternal Lotharia wrote:Quantipapa wrote:Nothing was specifically proven. Liberals need to be equally critical of their own. Don't misinterpret me. I didn't say Judge K didn't do it. I just said liberals need to be EQUALLy critical of their own.
Otherwise their rage now is purely political because they don't want a pro-lifer to get on board, and they rather resort to a testimony about an unprovable accusation.
To gain some credibility, be equally rigorous with your own. Otherwise, your pretentiousness is clear
I'm loyally and a dedicated pro-lifer and very aware of how the press can do damage to societies so am not blinded, yet I am enraged. And I am a well educated person in terms of politics, history, international relations, and solidly educated in law too.
Nice try bub.

by Hurtful Thoughts » Sun Oct 07, 2018 12:42 am
Mokostana wrote:See, Hurty cared not if the mission succeeded or not, as long as it was spectacular trainwreck. Sometimes that was the host Nation firing a SCUD into a hospital to destroy a foreign infection and accidentally sparking a rebellion... or accidentally starting the Mokan Drug War
Blackhelm Confederacy wrote:If there was only a "like" button for NS posts....

by Mystic Warriors » Sun Oct 07, 2018 12:43 am
Quantipapa wrote:Nothing was specifically proven. Liberals need to be equally critical of their own. Don't misinterpret me. I didn't say Judge K didn't do it. I just said liberals need to be EQUALLy critical of their own.
Otherwise their rage now is purely political because they don't want a pro-lifer to get on board, and they rather resort to a testimony about an unprovable accusation.
To gain some credibility, be equally rigorous with your own. Otherwise, your pretentiousness is clear

by Mystic Warriors » Sun Oct 07, 2018 12:43 am

by Forsher » Sun Oct 07, 2018 12:44 am

by Quantipapa » Sun Oct 07, 2018 12:47 am
Mystic Warriors wrote:Quantipapa wrote:Nothing was specifically proven. Liberals need to be equally critical of their own. Don't misinterpret me. I didn't say Judge K didn't do it. I just said liberals need to be EQUALLy critical of their own.
Otherwise their rage now is purely political because they don't want a pro-lifer to get on board, and they rather resort to a testimony about an unprovable accusation.
To gain some credibility, be equally rigorous with your own. Otherwise, your pretentiousness is clear
Tell that to conservatives who give their own a pass

by Mystic Warriors » Sun Oct 07, 2018 12:48 am
Quantipapa wrote:
I'm a conservative never Trumper and have called out my own all the time. His pussy grabbing comment was enough to get me fighting my own.
What about you? Don't brush aside a comment with a "oh he/she did it too!" It's a cheap shot and an unproductive contribution to the general desire for everyone to do better.
Yes, liberals can do better.

by Kaggeceria » Sun Oct 07, 2018 12:50 am
The Black Forrest wrote:
You are a slobbering man servant of donnie?![]()
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/06/opin ... avanaugh.h

by Forsher » Sun Oct 07, 2018 12:50 am
The Caleshan Valkyrie wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:TIL Liriena's reactions here, on this forum, promote the past, what, twenty years of common right-wing behavior in America, at least, probably dating back further to the 80s, and arguably to the 60s.
Impressive!
Utterly tangential question: what does TIL mean?
I’ve seen it used but I don’t get the context.
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:Eternal Lotharia wrote:#ImpeachKav
I'm very pro-life, but is having a likely serial rapist/sexual assaulter(It is very likely to me, I'd have changed my mind if this investigation was conducted very well and thoroughly, but it wasn't, it was political to the core due to the extremely limited in scope and time, blatantly corrupt.) worth overturning the abortion legalization? This is about decency, rule of law, virtue, and human rights, dammit.
Friendly reminder that there's still no evidence to corroborate the allegation.

by Quantipapa » Sun Oct 07, 2018 12:51 am
Eternal Lotharia wrote:Quantipapa wrote:
You sound like Einstein with all that self praise.
No, simply that I'm not uneducated so you couldn't search for a petty insult. I smacked you down before you could do that. Also, nice ad hominem.
Now, reply dammit to my position now, don't derail this in an attempt to hide your weakness and how this contradicts your point.

by Liriena » Sun Oct 07, 2018 12:51 am
Quantipapa wrote:Nothing was specifically proven. Liberals need to be equally critical of their own. Don't misinterpret me. I didn't say Judge K didn't do it. I just said liberals need to be EQUALLy critical of their own.
Otherwise their rage now is purely political because they don't want a pro-lifer to get on board, and they rather resort to a testimony about an unprovable accusation.
To gain some credibility, be equally rigorous with your own. Otherwise, your pretentiousness is clear
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Kaggeceria » Sun Oct 07, 2018 12:53 am
Liriena wrote:Quantipapa wrote:Nothing was specifically proven. Liberals need to be equally critical of their own. Don't misinterpret me. I didn't say Judge K didn't do it. I just said liberals need to be EQUALLy critical of their own.
Otherwise their rage now is purely political because they don't want a pro-lifer to get on board, and they rather resort to a testimony about an unprovable accusation.
To gain some credibility, be equally rigorous with your own. Otherwise, your pretentiousness is clear
You mean like when liberals, including Senator Gillibrand, demanded Al Franken's resignation and he resigned?

by Liriena » Sun Oct 07, 2018 12:54 am
Mystic Warriors wrote:Quantipapa wrote:Nothing was specifically proven. Liberals need to be equally critical of their own. Don't misinterpret me. I didn't say Judge K didn't do it. I just said liberals need to be EQUALLy critical of their own.
Otherwise their rage now is purely political because they don't want a pro-lifer to get on board, and they rather resort to a testimony about an unprovable accusation.
To gain some credibility, be equally rigorous with your own. Otherwise, your pretentiousness is clear
Tell that to conservatives who give their own a pass
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |


by Petrasylvania » Sun Oct 07, 2018 12:57 am
Kaggeceria wrote:Liriena wrote:TIL the democrats accused Gorsuch of being a serial sex predator and nobody told me
You are deluded if you think democratic leadership are nearly as willing to play dirty as republican leadership is. If anything, one of the biggest criticisms that the left has of the democratic leadership is that they are too obsessed with "muh civility".
They sat on a letter accusing a SCOTUS nominee of sexual assault for over a month just so that they can bring it as close to the midterms as possible. Then when they revealed the letter they made the woman who wanted anonymity come forward to use her for political fodder.
Yeah, I think they're just as willing (if not moreso) to play dirty than the Republicans are.
Kaggeceria wrote:Vassenor wrote:
Of course. "Boys will be Boys" is a totally logical standpoint and not an incredibly sexist position that assumes that anyone with a Y chromosome is devoid of agency and a slave to their sexual desires.
This implies the rape actually happened.
Considering all four witnesses she named either weren't there or said it never happened I'm going to go with "she's a fucking liar".

by Kaggeceria » Sun Oct 07, 2018 12:58 am

by Quantipapa » Sun Oct 07, 2018 12:58 am
Eternal Lotharia wrote:I got 0.794 on the Kav guilt calc.Quantipapa wrote:
I sincerely am not impressed with the way liberals made their case. It's my position and I wasn't looking for a way to insult you until you verbally assaulted me with your intellectual qualifications.
With all due respect, I'm used to such comments from right wingers, legitimately, finding some way to expose me as "a hack" or "uneducated". So I slapped it down in advance, nor wanting to waste my time, and to get into the meat of the debate.

by Liriena » Sun Oct 07, 2018 12:59 am
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Kaggeceria » Sun Oct 07, 2018 12:59 am
Petrasylvania wrote:Kaggeceria wrote:They sat on a letter accusing a SCOTUS nominee of sexual assault for over a month just so that they can bring it as close to the midterms as possible. Then when they revealed the letter they made the woman who wanted anonymity come forward to use her for political fodder.
Yeah, I think they're just as willing (if not moreso) to play dirty than the Republicans are.
You called Ford a fucking liar but now that the confirmation is a done deal you're suddenly talking like she was being manipulated by the Democrats? That's cute, just like your fake sympathies for her.Kaggeceria wrote:This implies the rape actually happened.
Considering all four witnesses she named either weren't there or said it never happened I'm going to go with "she's a fucking liar".


by Kaggeceria » Sun Oct 07, 2018 1:00 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dimetrodon Empire, Duvniask, Gun Manufacturers, Ifreann, Komarovo, Neu California, Phage, Port Caverton, Valyxias
Advertisement