What political ideology do you identify as?

[Kubumba Tribe]

Which is another reason why it's bogus

Wait, intelligence is bogus?

IQ is bogus

How could you say something so unislamic?

[The Xenopolis Confederation]

What's wrong with individualism, liberalism and egalitarianism?

The OP in my sig explains the issues with liberalism. The issues with individualism are well exposed in The Philosophy of Right. And egalitarianism is shit because it is only capable of measuring quantity, it makes no qualitative distinction; e.g. a man with an 80 IQ who has been to prison twice for rape and lives on state assistance gets the same say as a genius who has achieved great success and is responsible and sacrifices constantly for his country and community, because they are both the same quantity (one person).

So your issue with liberalism is "ayy lmao if taxation exists then society is all about domination and there's no point in trying to have any freedom, lol." I'm don't have time to read an entire book. Best I can figure is Hegel's issue with individualism is "Yeh but u can't be free without society and shit, also muh morality." Are you incapable of having any thought that isn't a gotcha? Sure, egalitarianism of outcome is bad, but that's neither I nor most Republicans are in favor of it. Egalitarianism of opportunity does not entail giving an upstanding genius and an idiotic criminal the same resources, only the same rights.

[The Xenopolis Confederation]

Wait, intelligence is bogus?

IQ is bogus

How could you say something so unislamic?

I'm just playin.

[Independent and Sovereign Quebec]

I answered National Socialist, although I do not wish to see a modern-day repeat of Hitler's National Socialism in America or any American-like country, unless the Jews profit off of these countries' problems to the same extent that they did in pre-Nazi Germany which is currently not the case in these countries. I understand that Jews still profit off of these countries' problems through the implementation of widespread Jewish supremacy within these countries' societies, although the implementation of modern-day National Socialism cannot exclusively focus on the Jews profiting off of America and similar countries' many problems, as there are many other groups who are profiting just as much off of these countries' many problems as the Jews are with some groups profiting even more off of them than the Jews are. A modern-day implementation of National Socialism would have to be modified so that it doesn't solely focus on combating Jewish supremacy and the Jews profiting off of other countries' problems, but on all other manifestations of groups (typically minority groups) profiting off of these countries' problems. National Socialism also needs to be modified to fight forms of cultural marxism which exist today such as: anti-white hatred, the imposition of limits on the capitalist system, the absence of a strong state that can force any political decision through without objection, gynocentrism, transgender identity politics, Islamic extremism, etc. So basically I support a non-antisemitic form of National Socialism which seeks to obligate ALL people who profit off of their countries' problems or who receive unearned benefits and entitlements at the expense of others to serve their country or those who they're benefiting at the expense of.

[Ifreann]

Half of those are just sexual lifestyles you find distasteful (and furries aren't even necessarily sexual anymore). The other half are responses and didn't just come the fuck out of nowhere.

It doesn’t matter if Furries are sexual or not pretending that you are an animal is a serious mental issue

You leave Andy Serkis alone.

[Bakery Hill]

I answered National Socialist, although I do not wish to see a modern-day repeat of Hitler's National Socialism in America or any American-like country, unless the Jews profit off of these countries' problems to the same extent that they did in pre-Nazi Germany which is currently not the case in these countries. I understand that Jews still profit off of these countries' problems through the implementation of widespread Jewish supremacy within these countries' societies, although the implementation of modern-day National Socialism cannot exclusively focus on the Jews profiting off of America and similar countries' many problems, as there are many other groups who are profiting just as much off of these countries' many problems as the Jews are with some groups profiting even more off of them than the Jews are. A modern-day implementation of National Socialism would have to be modified so that it doesn't solely focus on combating Jewish supremacy and the Jews profiting off of other countries' problems, but on all other manifestations of groups (typically minority groups) profiting off of these countries' problems. National Socialism also needs to be modified to fight forms of cultural marxism which exist today such as: anti-white hatred, the imposition of limits on the capitalist system, the absence of a strong state that can force any political decision through without objection, gynocentrism, transgender identity politics, Islamic extremism, etc. So basically I support a non-antisemitic form of National Socialism which seeks to obligate ALL people who profit off of their countries' problems or who receive unearned benefits and entitlements at the expense of others to serve their country or those who they're benefiting at the expense of.

National socialism by necessity puts limits on the capitalist system.

[Internationalist Bastard]

I answered National Socialist, although I do not wish to see a modern-day repeat of Hitler's National Socialism in America or any American-like country, unless the Jews profit off of these countries' problems to the same extent that they did in pre-Nazi Germany which is currently not the case in these countries. I understand that Jews still profit off of these countries' problems through the implementation of widespread Jewish supremacy within these countries' societies, although the implementation of modern-day National Socialism cannot exclusively focus on the Jews profiting off of America and similar countries' many problems, as there are many other groups who are profiting just as much off of these countries' many problems as the Jews are with some groups profiting even more off of them than the Jews are. A modern-day implementation of National Socialism would have to be modified so that it doesn't solely focus on combating Jewish supremacy and the Jews profiting off of other countries' problems, but on all other manifestations of groups (typically minority groups) profiting off of these countries' problems. National Socialism also needs to be modified to fight forms of cultural marxism which exist today such as: anti-white hatred, the imposition of limits on the capitalist system, the absence of a strong state that can force any political decision through without objection, gynocentrism, transgender identity politics, Islamic extremism, etc. So basically I support a non-antisemitic form of National Socialism which seeks to obligate ALL people who profit off of their countries' problems or who receive unearned benefits and entitlements at the expense of others to serve their country or those who they're benefiting at the expense of.

How can you be against limits on capitalism and people who profit off the nations misfortunes?

[Internationalist Bastard]

I feel like one day I should sit down and write my views down in full and leave a link in my sig, if for other reason then so I can say I can put my views eloquently when I try really hard

[Dark Socialism]

I answered National Socialist, although I do not wish to see a modern-day repeat of Hitler's National Socialism in America or any American-like country, unless the Jews profit off of these countries' problems to the same extent that they did in pre-Nazi Germany which is currently not the case in these countries. I understand that Jews still profit off of these countries' problems through the implementation of widespread Jewish supremacy within these countries' societies, although the implementation of modern-day National Socialism cannot exclusively focus on the Jews profiting off of America and similar countries' many problems, as there are many other groups who are profiting just as much off of these countries' many problems as the Jews are with some groups profiting even more off of them than the Jews are. A modern-day implementation of National Socialism would have to be modified so that it doesn't solely focus on combating Jewish supremacy and the Jews profiting off of other countries' problems, but on all other manifestations of groups (typically minority groups) profiting off of these countries' problems. National Socialism also needs to be modified to fight forms of cultural marxism which exist today such as: anti-white hatred, the imposition of limits on the capitalist system, the absence of a strong state that can force any political decision through without objection, gynocentrism, transgender identity politics, Islamic extremism, etc. So basically I support a non-antisemitic form of National Socialism which seeks to obligate ALL people who profit off of their countries' problems or who receive unearned benefits and entitlements at the expense of others to serve their country or those who they're benefiting at the expense of.

I think you're a National Capitalist

[The Xenopolis Confederation]

I answered National Socialist, although I do not wish to see a modern-day repeat of Hitler's National Socialism in America or any American-like country, unless the Jews profit off of these countries' problems to the same extent that they did in pre-Nazi Germany which is currently not the case in these countries. I understand that Jews still profit off of these countries' problems through the implementation of widespread Jewish supremacy within these countries' societies, although the implementation of modern-day National Socialism cannot exclusively focus on the Jews profiting off of America and similar countries' many problems, as there are many other groups who are profiting just as much off of these countries' many problems as the Jews are with some groups profiting even more off of them than the Jews are. A modern-day implementation of National Socialism would have to be modified so that it doesn't solely focus on combating Jewish supremacy and the Jews profiting off of other countries' problems, but on all other manifestations of groups (typically minority groups) profiting off of these countries' problems. National Socialism also needs to be modified to fight forms of cultural marxism which exist today such as: anti-white hatred, the imposition of limits on the capitalist system, the absence of a strong state that can force any political decision through without objection, gynocentrism, transgender identity politics, Islamic extremism, etc. So basically I support a non-antisemitic form of National Socialism which seeks to obligate ALL people who profit off of their countries' problems or who receive unearned benefits and entitlements at the expense of others to serve their country or those who they're benefiting at the expense of.

Well that's amazingly bad.

[Zawikhiztan]

Apache Heli... I mean Conservative Nationalist

[Albrenia]

I answered National Socialist, although I do not wish to see a modern-day repeat of Hitler's National Socialism in America or any American-like country, unless the Jews profit off of these countries' problems to the same extent that they did in pre-Nazi Germany which is currently not the case in these countries. I understand that Jews still profit off of these countries' problems through the implementation of widespread Jewish supremacy within these countries' societies, although the implementation of modern-day National Socialism cannot exclusively focus on the Jews profiting off of America and similar countries' many problems, as there are many other groups who are profiting just as much off of these countries' many problems as the Jews are with some groups profiting even more off of them than the Jews are. A modern-day implementation of National Socialism would have to be modified so that it doesn't solely focus on combating Jewish supremacy and the Jews profiting off of other countries' problems, but on all other manifestations of groups (typically minority groups) profiting off of these countries' problems. National Socialism also needs to be modified to fight forms of cultural marxism which exist today such as: anti-white hatred, the imposition of limits on the capitalist system, the absence of a strong state that can force any political decision through without objection, gynocentrism, transgender identity politics, Islamic extremism, etc. So basically I support a non-antisemitic form of National Socialism which seeks to obligate ALL people who profit off of their countries' problems or who receive unearned benefits and entitlements at the expense of others to serve their country or those who they're benefiting at the expense of.

Well that's amazingly bad.

Indeed.

[Four Truths]

Religious agrarian communist.

[Conserative Morality]

Revolutionary Liberal. Terror is the order of the day. =^)

[Dumb Ideologies]

Revolutionary Liberal. Terror is the order of the day. =^)

A properly maintained guillotine is edgier than any 21st century memer.

[The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord]

Revolutionary Liberal. Terror is the order of the day. =^)

If virtue be the spring of a popular government in times of peace, the spring of that government during a revolution is virtue combined with terror: virtue, without which terror is destructive; terror, without which virtue is impotent. Terror is only justice prompt, severe and inflexible; it is then an emanation of virtue; it is less a distinct principle than a natural consequence of the general principle of democracy, applied to the most pressing wants of the country ... The government in a revolution is the despotism of liberty against tyranny.

[Independent and Sovereign Quebec]

I answered National Socialist, although I do not wish to see a modern-day repeat of Hitler's National Socialism in America or any American-like country, unless the Jews profit off of these countries' problems to the same extent that they did in pre-Nazi Germany which is currently not the case in these countries. I understand that Jews still profit off of these countries' problems through the implementation of widespread Jewish supremacy within these countries' societies, although the implementation of modern-day National Socialism cannot exclusively focus on the Jews profiting off of America and similar countries' many problems, as there are many other groups who are profiting just as much off of these countries' many problems as the Jews are with some groups profiting even more off of them than the Jews are. A modern-day implementation of National Socialism would have to be modified so that it doesn't solely focus on combating Jewish supremacy and the Jews profiting off of other countries' problems, but on all other manifestations of groups (typically minority groups) profiting off of these countries' problems. National Socialism also needs to be modified to fight forms of cultural marxism which exist today such as: anti-white hatred, the imposition of limits on the capitalist system, the absence of a strong state that can force any political decision through without objection, gynocentrism, transgender identity politics, Islamic extremism, etc. So basically I support a non-antisemitic form of National Socialism which seeks to obligate ALL people who profit off of their countries' problems or who receive unearned benefits and entitlements at the expense of others to serve their country or those who they're benefiting at the expense of.

National socialism by necessity puts limits on the capitalist system.

I know, although I support a modification of National Socialism where the word "Socialism" only remains in the title. The name of the ideology could even change, although it would still be inspired off of Hitler's National Socialism but with different aspects and goals. The main goal of Hitler's National Socialism was to obligate the Jews to serve Germany, as they were profiting off of Germany's many problems that they were facing therefore National Socialism obligated them to serve and repay Germany. Since the Jews, despite still profiting off of several countries' problems today are still not profiting off of these countries' problems as much as they profited off of Germany's problems, I see no reason for National Socialism to focus as much on the Jews as it focused on them in Germany when they were genuinely profiting off of their problems. Now, National Socialism would have to be modified so that it focuses on obligating all groups who are profiting off of several countries' problems or who receive unearned benefits and entitlements at the expense of others to serve these countries, or those who they're benefiting at the expense of. Also, a modern-day version of National Socialism would have to support laissez-faire capitalism as well, since corporations are also constantly being undermined by the giving of special unearned benefits and entitlements to specific groups at the expense of other people. A combination of a non-antisemitic modified form of authoritarian National Socialism and laissez-faire capitalism would be my view of an ideal society.

[Independent and Sovereign Quebec]

I answered National Socialist, although I do not wish to see a modern-day repeat of Hitler's National Socialism in America or any American-like country, unless the Jews profit off of these countries' problems to the same extent that they did in pre-Nazi Germany which is currently not the case in these countries. I understand that Jews still profit off of these countries' problems through the implementation of widespread Jewish supremacy within these countries' societies, although the implementation of modern-day National Socialism cannot exclusively focus on the Jews profiting off of America and similar countries' many problems, as there are many other groups who are profiting just as much off of these countries' many problems as the Jews are with some groups profiting even more off of them than the Jews are. A modern-day implementation of National Socialism would have to be modified so that it doesn't solely focus on combating Jewish supremacy and the Jews profiting off of other countries' problems, but on all other manifestations of groups (typically minority groups) profiting off of these countries' problems. National Socialism also needs to be modified to fight forms of cultural marxism which exist today such as: anti-white hatred, the imposition of limits on the capitalist system, the absence of a strong state that can force any political decision through without objection, gynocentrism, transgender identity politics, Islamic extremism, etc. So basically I support a non-antisemitic form of National Socialism which seeks to obligate ALL people who profit off of their countries' problems or who receive unearned benefits and entitlements at the expense of others to serve their country or those who they're benefiting at the expense of.

Well that's amazingly bad.

Ok liberal

[Kubumba Tribe]

Well that's amazingly bad.

Ok liberal

Lol being anti-Nazi =/= liberalism

[Andocara]

Progressive

[Shrive]

Anti-Market, Democratic, Semi-internationalist, Songun Jucheist

[The Xenopolis Confederation]

Well that's amazingly bad.

Ok liberal

despacito. Liberalism is gr8, no h8 m8.

[The Xenopolis Confederation]

Anti-Market, Democratic, Semi-internationalist, Songun Jucheist

Jucheist?

[The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord]

Anti-Market, Democratic, Semi-internationalist, Songun Jucheist

Jucheist?

Juche (“Self-Reliance”) is the state philosophy of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.

In short, Shrive seems to be a member of the Juche Gang.

[Joriker]

centre-right, thinks both sides have good ideas, i am a liberal in economics and a conserative in social issues and policies.