What political ideology do you identify as?

[MERIZoC]

Forward-thinking traditionalist conservative. Enlightened absolutist in governance. State capitalist in economics. Generally libertarian on social issues. Futurist on science and technology.

niBBa what

[The Union of the West]

Forward-thinking traditionalist conservative. Enlightened absolutist in governance. State capitalist in economics. Generally libertarian on social issues. Futurist on science and technology.

niBBa what

Idk man

[The Xenopolis Confederation]

I don't know the name of my ideology
Economics:
Can't decide, usually favor statism and syndicalism or anything that promotes communitarianism.
Political organization:
I think that the monarch (Traniborus) should be elected by a state senate (Syfogranti) using Hegelian dialectic on who should run the ethnostate. The Syfogranti system would be theocratic and Technocratic, the most willed and most intelligent white men would elect candidates that are chosen by the previous Syfogranti.
Social:
As far right as you can get
Militarism, hyper-masculinity, austerity, reaction, conservative despotism, evolanism, tribalism and slavery. My social views are comparable to ancient swamp tribes and the Taliban, Mysticism and violence should trump reason, collective victory over "the other" would be the absolute drive of society even if there is no "other" and it's against demons or something.
Also abolish cities.

This is the Fluorine of ideologies.

[The Xenopolis Confederation]

I do not hate Jews because they are of Semitic origin, I despise their character, their hostility to society, their apathy and their indifference. No, I am not a white supremacist. White Supremacists/ Nationalists apply the Talmud to themselves because Zionists are unafraid of White Nationalism.

For you what is National Socialism all about? Racism? Homophobia? Sexism? Identitarianism under the cover of Nationalism? No, National Socialism is, according to the site's glossary, "based on the belief that production is valuable only as a means and only in quantity sufficient to facilitate the folk purpose." No, it has nothing to do with racism, Zionist Allies after World War II twisted by wartime propaganda to demonize National Socialist Germany and accompanying selective confessions elicted via deception and duress during the Nuremburg Trials, which became the official version of that ideology for the Allies, whom far-rightists believe.

The only people who twisted National Socialism was the Nazis

Damn Nazis, they ruined Nazism!

[Kubumba Tribe]

Forward-thinking traditionalist conservative. Enlightened absolutist in governance. State capitalist in economics. Generally libertarian on social issues. Futurist on science and technology.

niBBa what

Another discord user, eh?

[Proletarian Republic of Americanada]

I agree with Marx's analysis of capitalism: exploitation of surplus value, alienation, and so on. The thing I'm figuring out is what capitalism should be replaced with and how to put the means of production in the hands of the workers in practice. I think I'll need to do a bit of reading before I make up my mind. I've read Wage Labor and Capital and now I'm reading the State and Revolution by Lenin and some articles by Daniel de Leon. After that I'll read some Rosa Luxembourg and see where I go from there.

[The Xenopolis Confederation]

Romans 13 is retarded, especially in the context of being persecuted by the Roman government, and should thusly be disregarded.

Hot take.

"Y'know those guys who killed Jesus, and are prosecuting you and have banned our religion? They're fine and you should obey them." Is the real hot take.

[Soyuz Mladorrosov]

"Y'know those guys who killed Jesus, and are prosecuting you and have banned our religion? They're fine and you should obey them." Is the real hot take.

I've always interpreted Romans 13 as a caution against violent resistance to the state, but Paul is pretty adamant that the State is God's minister and that laws be followed and taxes be paid. I haven't read the context of Romans 13 in a while, does it actually state explicitly that the government in question is in Rome?

[Mardla]

How do you expect to pay for this "powerful military interventionism" while having low taxes? Do you consider a balanced budget too fuddy-duddy for "neo" conservatism?

Cut non-military stuff. Most other stuff aside from the Military and disaster relief I prefer to be left with the states.

iirc most of the discretionary budget goes to military, and "powerful military interventionism" would only increase that.

[Proletarian Republic of Americanada]

Not quite. NazBols are actually just racist Stalinists.

No, no, no, no, no. They're currently cooperating with Gary Kasparov's United Civil Front against Putin, and have declared their own opposition to racism, anti-semitism and the like.
https://web.archive.org/web/20090515120 ... 0/253.html (Russian)

Where does the "naz" part of nazbol come from?

[A Cornstar]

Pan-Celtic Nationalist, Traditionalist, Platonic Republican.

[Soyuz Mladorrosov]

Where does the "naz" part of nazbol come from?

If NazBol was actually National Bolshevik, the naz would stand for National but NazBol is just an internet meme that comes from the National Bolsheviks admittedly interesting choice of flag.

[Prosorusiya]

Generally some kind of Utopian Socialist with democratic leanings? I mostly identify with early American experiments in primitive forms of socialism\communism, but with a Marxist slant on economics and religious affairs. Most American Utopian Socialists back in the day where a product of the Second Great Awakening & I'm more an atheist, and I fundamentally agree with Marx's analysis of the stages of economic development, which in fairness to the Utopians had not been written\weren't widely known outside Germany at the time. But I'm not a huge fan of the dictatorship of the proletariat... at least not in name anyhow, and I don't really agree with Marx on the necessity of violent uprising in all proletarian revolutions, though I see where he was coming from. I favor a technocrat approach to economic control, I really think the Soviets were in the vanguard of using an internet to identify needs and tailor the rates of production to meet demand and it is a shame the project for their photo-internet got canned thanks to the military insisting the system be able to be repurposed for wartime uses under their command (controlling god knows what, really all you would need is like a switch labeled "war" and "peace" to change the production orders in the system, or a file on usb tabled "war.exe" nowadays I suppose.).

On a practical level I'm so kind of independent liberal moderate fellow traveler, so I support the actions of the left in my country, at least as far as they align with what i believe is in our best interests, and vote relatively independently of any party line. I don't belong to any Socialist or Communist organizations, or even Leftist organizations per se, but I do work to promote their goals.

[Northland]

Somewhere between conservative liberal and liberal conservative.

[Helensburgh]

Staunch liberal. Might seem strange that I call myself both a reformed neoliberal and a liberal socialist, but I take after J.S. Mill (Mill - PBUH - preferred economic democracy to capitalism). Basically I want Liberal Democracy but with market socialism. Why neoliberal? That's in reference to both the original 1930s definition (response by many liberals to laissez-faire classical liberals) and to post-2008 neoliberals, who recognise that maybe the idea that inequality is actually good is actually wrong.

[Helensburgh]

Somewhere between conservative liberal and liberal conservative.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WboggjN_G-4

[Infected Mushroom]

I consider myself to be a liberal.

[Dark Socialism]

I don't know the name of my ideology
Economics:
Can't decide, usually favor statism and syndicalism or anything that promotes communitarianism.
Political organization:
I think that the monarch (Traniborus) should be elected by a state senate (Syfogranti) using Hegelian dialectic on who should run the ethnostate. The Syfogranti system would be theocratic and Technocratic, the most willed and most intelligent white men would elect candidates that are chosen by the previous Syfogranti.
Social:
As far right as you can get
Militarism, hyper-masculinity, austerity, reaction, conservative despotism, evolanism, tribalism and slavery. My social views are comparable to ancient swamp tribes and the Taliban, Mysticism and violence should trump reason, collective victory over "the other" would be the absolute drive of society even if there is no "other" and it's against demons or something.
Also abolish cities.

This is the Fluorine of ideologies.

highly reactive

[Mushet]

What is it with cringy, contradictory and fringe political ideologies that every third internet denizen has?

Outside of the more mainstream sites (Facebook, YouTube, etc.) the internet is a bunch of freaks and weirdos, we even have a disproportionate presence on the mainstream sites, but somewhere like NationStates is bound to attract all these freaks with their odd politics. It's just the natural order of teh interwebz.

[Mushet]

Perfect example. It's almost exclusive to right-wingers, fascists and libertarians mostly.

In all honestly, I don't know why they use said qualifiers for identifying political leanings. If you're an anarchist, I don't see how you can pair that with being, say, a monarchist. One would think that anarchy and monarchy stand on different sides of the spectrum and contradict one another. But here we are.

You don't remember Distruzio?

[Othelos]

In all honestly, I don't know why they use said qualifiers for identifying political leanings. If you're an anarchist, I don't see how you can pair that with being, say, a monarchist. One would think that anarchy and monarchy stand on different sides of the spectrum and contradict one another. But here we are.

You don't remember Distruzio? :p

Yeah, I can't believe it's already been more than a year since his nation CTE'd. He was an interesting guy.

[Mushet]

You don't remember Distruzio?

Yeah, I can't believe it's already been more than a year since his nation CTE'd. He was an interesting guy.

I though he would've been gone a lot earlier than a year. Certainly hasn't been active on the forums for years.

[Cosmopolitan borovan]

None politics is overrated

[Victoria I Penetravir]

No, True Left is in fact, Drittes Deutsches Reich from National Socialist Ministries. I am a puppet of Most Eternal Angvaria/The State of Angmar.

Hey, I know that name! Are you that same nation who was taking over Islamic region's and Christianizing them?

Not anymore, the old Penny's a far-right jerk bent on conquering 'leftists'.

Whether you chaps like it or not, I'm highly proud and confident to say that, as a real, radical leftist neither of communist nor of liberal tendencies, I am a National Socialist and a radical fascist, entirely unlike the neo-Nazis and the fashies that are, racist, identitarian, homophobic, and Islamophobic.

As an avid fan of the site Aryanism.net, and as a far-rightist converted to National Socialism, I believe that tribalism starts with the hunters and the herders and still continues to this day, and the only way to defeat the enemy is by sacrificing oneself for the sake of our fellow victims in our bodily traps. Any problem with that?

I have a problem. What are you talking about?

Don't post four times. And, if your problem was neo-Nazis in NationStates, that's not my fault. It's the fault of the rightists.

[Sutland Rep]

I’m decocratic socialist, throught I have sympathy to marxism-leninism.