What political ideology do you identify as?

[Soyuz Mladorrosov]

In all honestly, I don't know why they use said qualifiers for identifying political leanings. If you're an anarchist, I don't see how you can pair that with being, say, a monarchist. One would think that anarchy and monarchy stand on different sides of the spectrum and contradict one another. But here we are.

It's a strange phenomenon, these pseudo-ideologies. Most of the time they're just the personal creations of the individual that holds them, shallow and vapid, bereft of any actual substance like praxis.

[Kubumba Tribe]

What even is Mein Kampf?

I was gonna bring that up

I don't know the name of my ideology
Economics:
Can't decide, usually favor statism and syndicalism or anything that promotes communitarianism.
Political organization:
I think that the monarch (Traniborus) should be elected by a state senate (Syfogranti) using Hegelian dialectic on who should run the ethnostate. The Syfogranti system would be theocratic and Technocratic, the most willed and most intelligent white men would elect candidates that are chosen by the previous Syfogranti.
Social:
As far right as you can get
Militarism, hyper-masculinity, austerity, reaction, conservative despotism, evolanism, tribalism and slavery. My social views are comparable to ancient swamp tribes and the Taliban, Mysticism and violence should trump reason, collective victory over "the other" would be the absolute drive of society even if there is no "other" and it's against demons or something.
Also abolish cities.

Primitivist racism and sexism much?

Somewhere between National Socialism and regular Fascism appeals to me. Huge fan of Horst Wessel Lied and its musical variants. The music speaks to me as well as the uniforms, regalia, and so on. Provided the state isn't too abusive, there can be plenty of benefits in giving it tons more control over the regulation and direction of daily life.

And racism. Don't forget that part.

Consider Ben Klassen (the proponent of the 14 Words) and the Creativity Movement. In what ways do they twist National Socialism into a racist ideology? They are rightists because they did not know what National Socialism is really all about. National Socialism is all about quality, not ethnicity.

Yes.

There is a difference between anti-Zionism and anti-semitism. The latter has come to mean Arabs and not only including Jews.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitism


No it hasn't.

Antisemitism (also spelled anti-Semitism or anti-semitism) is hostility to, prejudice, or discrimination against Jews.

Tbh its definition should be changed.

I’m beginning to wonder if they are a puppet of a certain leftist professor

No, True Left is in fact, Drittes Deutsches Reich from National Socialist Ministries. I am a puppet of Most Eternal Angvaria/The State of Angmar.

Hey, I know that name! Are you that same nation who was taking over Islamic region's and Christianizing them?

[The South Falls]

I know someone who is a socialist anarcho-technocrat who thinks that women should be enslaved and that the Mexican race should exterminate blacks

Were they sober when they told you this?

[Dark Socialism]

I know someone who is a socialist anarcho-technocrat who thinks that women should be enslaved and that the Mexican race should exterminate blacks

Were they sober when they told you this?

100% sober
My closest friend since fifth grade

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

In all honestly, I don't know why they use said qualifiers for identifying political leanings. If you're an anarchist, I don't see how you can pair that with being, say, a monarchist. One would think that anarchy and monarchy stand on different sides of the spectrum and contradict one another. But here we are.

It's a strange phenomenon, these pseudo-ideologies. Most of the time they're just the personal creations of the individual that holds them, shallow and vapid, bereft of any actual substance like praxis.

I often wonder if it's a way to stroke their ego. Over inflate importance of the way they think perhaps. Because when you deconstruct the ideology, it doesn't make much sense.

[The South Falls]

Were they sober when they told you this?

100% sober
My closest friend since fifth grade

This is an insane point of view.


Maybe they played too much HOI.

[The Xenopolis Confederation]

I cosnider myself a moderate right-libertarian. Lower taxes, less economic red tape, less government spending, extremely stringent preservation of individual rights, military non-interventionism, men's rights activism, equal opportunity, constitutional direct democracy.

[The Xenopolis Confederation]

What is it with cringy, contradictory and fringe political ideologies that every third internet denizen has?

It would be entertaining if it wasn't so worrying.

[The Xenopolis Confederation]

Christian (Anarchism)

I advocate the following kind of society:
1. a decentralized federation of local, religious communes (no larger than a few hundred, or a thousand at the most- not a city but a neighborhood or a single block)
2. in deep, spiritual, voluntary association and cooperation with one another based upon the principal of unity in Christ. Not related to one another hierarchically, (including economic hierarchy and cultural hierarchy) and not compelled to associate with one another through violence
3. fundamentally founded on the principle of koinonia, which is to say, mutual participation. This is the highest form of inclusion, unity, equality, democracy, Christian charity, and communist mutual aid. It must be the the guiding principle within the local commune, wherever communes work together, and between the commune and the outcasts in other societies with whom they voluntarily associate.
4. not founded on representative democracy, but rather, direct democracy,
5. in each of which all property is held in common by the whole commune, according to the principle from each according to their ability, to each according to their need,
6. operating not according to hierarchy but according to radical egalitarianism, not appointing spiritual leaders but recognizing the importance of the distinctive contributions of all ages and kinds of life experience, not vesting authority in any person.
7. using restorative justice rather than retributive systems of justice,
8. believing in the full equality of all genders and sexualities in keeping with the principle "in Christ there is no male nor female",
9. giving so much to those outside the commune that those within it live at the same level as the poorest in the surrounding society; or, using no more than they need and giving away the rest.
10. avoiding cults of personality, in keeping with the principle "call no one teacher, for you have one teacher."
11. having a radical ethic of nonviolence which refuses even to judge or condemn, but insists on doing good even for evil people, and which maintains a sense of proportion in opposing not just riots but also violent systems, and unbearable conditions that make riots inevitable,
12. placing a high degree of value on human life,
13. rejecting racism and casteism, opposing racial and ethnic segregation and affirming that the same principle of unity in Christ is meant to apply across races and ethnicities in keeping with in Christ there is no Jew nor Greek.
14. opposing ableism in three key ways: first, by the principle of non-judgment, which makes life bearable for the mentally ill, second, by embracing neither primitivism nor transhumanism, both are which are harmful to the disabled, and third, by practicing anarcho-communism rather than anarcho-collectivism: not replicating the wage system, but appreciating the different kinds of contributions that different kinds of minds and bodies are suited for,
15. striving to practice monogamy, but being understanding and kind to those who for various reasons fail to meet this goal rather than sanctioning them (consider both Jesus' teachings on divorce and his response to the woman caught in adultery)
16. rejecting egoism in favor of compassion, rejecting both individualism and collectivism in favor of communitarianism,
17. rejecting national identity and national borders,
18. refusing to work with or support the institutions of prisons, police, mental institutions, states and their courts and militaries.

Completely incompatible with Romans 13.

Romans 13 is retarded, especially in the context of being persecuted by the Roman government, and should thusly be disregarded.

[The Xenopolis Confederation]

Whether you chaps like it or not, I'm highly proud and confident to say that, as a real, radical leftist neither of communist nor of liberal tendencies, I am a National Socialist and a radical fascist, entirely unlike the neo-Nazis and the fashies that are, racist, identitarian, homophobic, and Islamophobic.

As an avid fan of the site Aryanism.net, and as a far-rightist converted to National Socialism, I believe that tribalism starts with the hunters and the herders and still continues to this day, and the only way to defeat the enemy is by sacrificing oneself for the sake of our fellow victims in our bodily traps. Any problem with that?

I have a problem. What are you talking about?

[Soyuz Mladorrosov]

I often wonder if it's a way to stroke their ego. Over inflate importance of the way they think perhaps. Because when you deconstruct the ideology, it doesn't make much sense.

Probably is, tbh. Having their own unique 'ideology' makes them seem more special than they are.

It would be entertaining if it wasn't so worrying.

I agree, while they may have wildly different particular ideologies, they tend to drift towards the alt-right.

[Kirav]

It's a strange phenomenon, these pseudo-ideologies. Most of the time they're just the personal creations of the individual that holds them, shallow and vapid, bereft of any actual substance like praxis.

I often wonder if it's a way to stroke their ego. Over inflate importance of the way they think perhaps. Because when you deconstruct the ideology, it doesn't make much sense.

I think it's mostly either a) young kids who just mash together whichever ideologies they think are cool , or b) people who don't want to admit that their political views are fairly conventional, so they have to say "I'm a culturally libertarian eco-socialist monarchist" instead of "I vote for Labour but I don't like SJWs and the Queen is fine."

[Luminesa]

Whether you chaps like it or not, I'm highly proud and confident to say that, as a real, radical leftist neither of communist nor of liberal tendencies, I am a National Socialist and a radical fascist, entirely unlike the neo-Nazis and the fashies that are, racist, identitarian, homophobic, and Islamophobic.

As an avid fan of the site Aryanism.net, and as a far-rightist converted to National Socialism, I believe that tribalism starts with the hunters and the herders and still continues to this day, and the only way to defeat the enemy is by sacrificing oneself for the sake of our fellow victims in our bodily traps. Any problem with that?

Uhhhhhhhhhhhh...Yes?

[Mardla]

"noun NORTH AMERICAN informal derogatory
a person with left-wing or liberal views"

Did you get that definition from Breitbart, Parkus?

No, google. :3

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

I often wonder if it's a way to stroke their ego. Over inflate importance of the way they think perhaps. Because when you deconstruct the ideology, it doesn't make much sense.

I think it's mostly either a) young kids who just mash together whichever ideologies they think are cool , or b) people who don't want to admit that their political views are fairly conventional, so they have to say "I'm a culturally libertarian eco-socialist monarchist" instead of "I vote for Labour but I don't like SJWs and the Queen is fine."

That last bit is more honest, IMO, than just making up something that sounds cool to your ears. Because, like I said, when you deconstruct the ideology, when you define each and every part of it, very often, there's contradiction. I know it's conventional, and it can sound flat, but it would be, as an adult, more honest to admit why you voted or believe a certain way than making up something flashy.

[Dark Socialism]

Too many ideologies

[LiberNovusAmericae]

You should add libertarian or capitalist as an option

Agreed, I'm a moderate right libertarian, so I had to chose 'other' as my political ideology.

As for my beliefs. I believe in low taxes, small government, minimal amounts of regulations, private property rights, and personal freedom. I'm an atheist, and thus believe that church and state should remain separate. I do think that a western country should promote western values though.

[Mardla]

Completely incompatible with Romans 13.

Romans 13 is retarded, especially in the context of being persecuted by the Roman government, and should thusly be disregarded.

Hot take.

[Democratic Formosa]

I’m an anarchist, for sure. If I had to put an adjective to the ideology, it’d be syndicalist, probably because it seems a more practical approach to anarchism than most other forms I’ve encountered but I also naturally get a boner for the CNT so it could just be that instead.

[Vergiss]

Western chauvinist / nationalist

Western nationalist? Oh, so a faux-nationalist and pseudo-globalist.

Globalists are a plague to society.

[Soyuz Mladorrosov]

Globalists are a plague to society.

Huh, are you always this original?

[The Union of the West]

Forward-thinking traditionalist conservative. Enlightened absolutist in governance. State capitalist in economics. Generally libertarian on social issues. Futurist on science and technology.

[Las Palmeras]

Economically: Probably just a centrist who's into whatever can be seen as practical considering I view the Left and Right as medicines or poisons depending on the dose.

Socially...Its more confusing; for a time I was "progressive" but I think that Social Justice lingo alienates the working class. I'm under the idea that all groups seek institutional power and that only decent education and a strong social contract can create safety words for society so that people or the Government don't try to screw each-other too hard.

On nation: I was never patriotic to begin with because my double nationality made me confused. Because I'm studying for a licentiate in history I expected I'd get more patriotic or choose a side but specializing on Mesoamerica only made me more apathetic in this...studying ruins, long-term processes, and man-made environmental-related disasters may do that.

[Arlenton]

Neoconservatism would probably be the most accurate for me. Could be debated though, I guess.

Free trade, low taxes, states' rights, powerful military, interventionism, law and order, constitutional rights, and all that fun stuff.

How do you expect to pay for this "powerful military interventionism" while having low taxes? Do you consider a balanced budget too fuddy-duddy for "neo" conservatism?

Cut non-military stuff. Most other stuff aside from the Military and disaster relief I prefer to be left with the states.

[Pearmainia]

I'm in limbo. I'm not anti-capitalist, but not an ancap exactly? I'd say I'm a minarchist