Advertisement
by Idzequitch » Sat Dec 01, 2018 1:21 pm
by Greater vakolicci haven » Sat Dec 01, 2018 1:33 pm
Idzequitch wrote:Greater vakolicci haven wrote:She called him the n-word, got up in his face and started slapping him, then began following him around apparently. Yeah, he went too far but it seems he was prevoked.
The chiefs acted very quickly and didn't do enough to investigate it seems.
Provocation doesn't give him license to beat her up. The woman is not blameless by any means, but you just can't do what he did in response. It's illegal.
The Chiefs acted quickly because they already knew about the incident, had discussed it with Hunt, and what he told them didn't match what they saw. Employers don't like being lied to. Plus the video is pretty self-explanatory. I can't think of many circumstances that would have validated his actions.
by Idzequitch » Sat Dec 01, 2018 1:36 pm
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:Idzequitch wrote:Provocation doesn't give him license to beat her up. The woman is not blameless by any means, but you just can't do what he did in response. It's illegal.
The Chiefs acted quickly because they already knew about the incident, had discussed it with Hunt, and what he told them didn't match what they saw. Employers don't like being lied to. Plus the video is pretty self-explanatory. I can't think of many circumstances that would have validated his actions.
That's true, but their is an organisation that's supposed to deal with issues of this kind, well...several actually. They're not the Kansas city chiefs.
by Greater vakolicci haven » Sat Dec 01, 2018 2:00 pm
Idzequitch wrote:Greater vakolicci haven wrote:That's true, but their is an organisation that's supposed to deal with issues of this kind, well...several actually. They're not the Kansas city chiefs.
Sure, leave the legal process to the folks whose job it is. Meanwhile, if Hunt fails to live up to the personal conduct standards the Chiefs require of their employees, they're well within their rights to terminate him.
by Idzequitch » Sat Dec 01, 2018 2:02 pm
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:Idzequitch wrote:Sure, leave the legal process to the folks whose job it is. Meanwhile, if Hunt fails to live up to the personal conduct standards the Chiefs require of their employees, they're well within their rights to terminate him.
It doesn't mean it isn't self-destructive idiocy though, gotta put the team above your moral code.
by United Kingdom of Poland » Sat Dec 01, 2018 2:12 pm
by Greater vakolicci haven » Sat Dec 01, 2018 2:48 pm
Idzequitch wrote:Greater vakolicci haven wrote:It doesn't mean it isn't self-destructive idiocy though, gotta put the team above your moral code.
That's where we disagree. Success at all costs is not a good model. Especially since their reputation suffers when they continue to roster and start a man of questionable moral fiber.
by Greater vakolicci haven » Sat Dec 01, 2018 2:50 pm
United Kingdom of Poland wrote:Just to point out as well, he's likely to be in a holding cell by the end of next week given the video. Why waste the roster spot?
by Jerzylvania » Sat Dec 01, 2018 2:55 pm
United Kingdom of Poland wrote:Just to point out as well, he's likely to be in a holding cell by the end of next week given the video. Why waste the roster spot?
by Greater vakolicci haven » Sat Dec 01, 2018 2:57 pm
by Idzequitch » Sat Dec 01, 2018 3:25 pm
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:Jerzylvania wrote:
Good point.
Also, most fans are actually sane and don't want to cheer for a wife beater or some other kind of felon.
If the Giants cut Barkley or Beckham for something of this kind I would not be happy in the slightest, let the police worry about the law and let the giants try and remember how to win football games.
by Greater vakolicci haven » Sat Dec 01, 2018 3:32 pm
Idzequitch wrote:Greater vakolicci haven wrote:If the Giants cut Barkley or Beckham for something of this kind I would not be happy in the slightest, let the police worry about the law and let the giants try and remember how to win football games.
Well, no. No one is happy about it. We all wish that all the best talent would be in the league. And probably it would be if these people could just follow the law.
by Idzequitch » Sat Dec 01, 2018 3:35 pm
by Greater vakolicci haven » Sat Dec 01, 2018 3:52 pm
Idzequitch wrote:Greater vakolicci haven wrote:If he isn't charged for it he isn't charged for it.
So they should just congratulate him for getting away with it? Especially in a case like this where there's no remotely rational way to deny he did it? No. That's not the world I want to live in. Thanks anyway.
by Idzequitch » Sat Dec 01, 2018 3:55 pm
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:Idzequitch wrote:So they should just congratulate him for getting away with it? Especially in a case like this where there's no remotely rational way to deny he did it? No. That's not the world I want to live in. Thanks anyway.
They should breathe a sigh of relief and warn him not to be such an idiot again.
by Jerzylvania » Sat Dec 01, 2018 5:30 pm
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:Jerzylvania wrote:
Good point.
Also, most fans are actually sane and don't want to cheer for a wife beater or some other kind of felon.
If the Giants cut Barkley or Beckham for something of this kind I would not be happy in the slightest, let the police worry about the law and let the giants try and remember how to win football games.
by Idzequitch » Sat Dec 01, 2018 5:36 pm
Jerzylvania wrote:Greater vakolicci haven wrote:If the Giants cut Barkley or Beckham for something of this kind I would not be happy in the slightest, let the police worry about the law and let the giants try and remember how to win football games.
IIRC you went through all of this nonsense the last time an NFL player got arrested and got the boot. Your argument is still no better than the last time.Greater vakolicci haven wrote:If he isn't charged for it he isn't charged for it.
They aren't the only people Kareem Hunt has to answer to in the matter. There is the Hunt family, no relation, which must consider PR. Most of the public doesn't want to cheer for a guy (making a huge salary playing football) which they saw beat a woman on video. And these people know their kids probably saw him beat a woman on Facebook or whatever. I don't blame the KC Chiefs here for making a business decision. Or the league, as they have rights too.
by Ameriganastan » Sat Dec 01, 2018 5:46 pm
Edward Richtofen wrote:Ameri's so tough that he criticized an Insane Asylum and was promptly let out
Sinovet wrote:Ameri's like Honey badger. He don't give a fuck.
Krazakistan wrote: He is a force of negativity for the sake of negativity
Onocarcass wrote:Trying to change Ameri, is like trying to drag a 2 ton block of lead with your d**k.
Immoren wrote:When Ameri says something is shit it's good and when Ameri says some thing is good it's great. *nods*
by Idzequitch » Sat Dec 01, 2018 5:49 pm
Ameriganastan wrote:I've gotta stop thinking football teams from Georgia won't fuck up sure things...
by Ranoria » Sat Dec 01, 2018 9:14 pm
Idzequitch wrote:
The really sad thing is that the league has been aware of this for months, but it takes a video surfacing to kick their sorry butts into gear. If it takes video to force the NFL to do something, that sets a terrible precedent, as many violent incidents are not recorded.
by Greater vakolicci haven » Sat Dec 01, 2018 9:15 pm
Ranoria wrote:Idzequitch wrote:The really sad thing is that the league has been aware of this for months, but it takes a video surfacing to kick their sorry butts into gear. If it takes video to force the NFL to do something, that sets a terrible precedent, as many violent incidents are not recorded.
What, so they should cut and suspend him indefinitely based on a woman saying she got hit? It’s too easy to falsely accuse a guy of something and get away with it.
by Mystic Warriors » Sat Dec 01, 2018 9:18 pm
Ranoria wrote:Idzequitch wrote:The really sad thing is that the league has been aware of this for months, but it takes a video surfacing to kick their sorry butts into gear. If it takes video to force the NFL to do something, that sets a terrible precedent, as many violent incidents are not recorded.
What, so they should cut and suspend him indefinitely based on a woman saying she got hit? It’s too easy to falsely accuse a guy of something and get away with it.
by Greater vakolicci haven » Sat Dec 01, 2018 9:27 pm
by Greater vakolicci haven » Sat Dec 01, 2018 9:32 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bursken, Cyptopir, Dimetrodon Empire, El Lazaro, Elejamie, Emotional Support Crocodile, General TN, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Google [Bot], Improper Classifications, Ithania, Kreushia, La Paz de Los Ricos, Magical Hypnosis Border Collie of Doom, Maximum Imperium Rex, Pale Dawn, Republics of the Solar Union, The Black Forrest, The Jamesian Republic, Tungstan
Advertisement