Page 4 of 7

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 1:16 am
by Baltenstein
Irish MP Edvard Hund approves of this bill, and and has vowed to lend his New Zealandian colleagues his unconditional support.

Image

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 4:40 am
by Forsher
Cat owners are incredibly entitled. New Zealanders in general are enormously entitled. The combination has proven disastrous.

Compare the restrictions placed on dogs, which are far less dangerous to wildlife as a result, to those placed on cats. Not even close.

Banning cats is a necessary step to move forwards. A bit like choosing a price you know you won't get to make sure you do get the lowest possible price when haggling.

There is no right-wing, property-rights based argument for cats either... they're the leading cause of property rights violations.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 4:42 am
by Forsher
Costa Fierro wrote:Omaui is a tiny little settlement at the wrong end of the South Island (just a little bit north of Bluff, famous for it's oysters), but the wish to ban cats comes from Environment Southland which is a organ of the regional council.

And it makes a lot of sense. The region is home to a lot of native bush and coastal areas, and New Zealand has a lot of birds that nest on the ground, including penguins. Cats are one of the many, many threats to New Zealand's birds and to reduce their numbers is a good thing. It wasn't that long ago that a philathropist by the name of Gareth Morgan (who subsequently formed his own political party in the 2017 election and then figured out like acting like a dick to your own party members didn't bode well for political success) suggested banning all cats from New Zealand.


Flip flopper.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 5:48 am
by Ethel mermania
Sovaal wrote:
Albrenia wrote:
Good luck overcoming the laziness of some owners and the craftiness of some cats.

I've yet to meet a cat with opposable thumbs, but then again I'm not a cat person.

Clearly there is only one way to solve this

Image

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 5:49 am
by Aellex
Cats are shit, dogs master-pets.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 6:12 am
by Constitutional Technocracy of Minecraft
Aellex wrote:Cats are shit, dogs master-pets.

http://uk.businessinsider.com/why-cats-are-better-than-dogs-2015-1

u wot m8?

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 6:27 am
by Cekoviu
Costa Fierro wrote:
Cekoviu wrote:archispirostreptus gigas makes an acceptable alternative for people who want the cuddliness, quietness, and cute faces without the ecological impact.


"A docile species, A. gigas is commonly seen in the pet trade; however, imports of A. gigas, as well as a number of other millipedes, into the USA are banned due to agricultural damage caused by the mites they carry."

I can't imagine New Zealand, which likely has vastly more stringent biosecurity measures than the US, would let these in.

captive-bred a. gigas don't have the mites, so if anybody there has bred captive ones before they were banned, they should still be perfectly legal. it's not the only option - there are native procyliosoma pedes which are even cuter and cuddlier.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 6:30 am
by Internationalist Bastard
Ollie! Get the tractor tank!

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 6:39 am
by Aellex
Constitutional Technocracy of Minecraft wrote:
Aellex wrote:Cats are shit, dogs master-pets.

http://uk.businessinsider.com/why-cats-are-better-than-dogs-2015-1

u wot m8?

1) "CaTs OwNeRs ArE sMaRtEr ThAn DoGs OwNeRs!!!!"
Not only is this retarded in its own right but the linked study is about how cat-people are more introverted and less numerous.
2) "Cats have a smaller carbon footprint than dogs."
If you want to save the planet, go bother China to stop polluting like crazy; owning a doggo for a lifetime is a mere tear in the ocean in comparison to what big companies do in a single day.
3)"Cats are less slobbery than dogs."
Huh... Just... What ?
4)"Owning a cat may reduce your risk of dying from a heart attack."
Bullshit study, again; made even more stupid by the fact that dog often are able to save their owners' life during accidents.
5)"Cats are cheaper than dogs."
Only half decent argument so far but even so, it's still a rather poor one.

In the end, we can indeed conclude Dog >> Cat. :p

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 7:04 am
by Cekoviu
Aellex wrote:
Constitutional Technocracy of Minecraft wrote:http://uk.businessinsider.com/why-cats-are-better-than-dogs-2015-1

u wot m8?

1) "CaTs OwNeRs ArE sMaRtEr ThAn DoGs OwNeRs!!!!"
Not only is this retarded in its own right but the linked study is about how cat-people are more introverted and less numerous.
2) "Cats have a smaller carbon footprint than dogs."
If you want to save the planet, go bother China to stop polluting like crazy; owning a doggo for a lifetime is a mere tear in the ocean in comparison to what big companies do in a single day.
3)"Cats are less slobbery than dogs."
Huh... Just... What ?
4)"Owning a cat may reduce your risk of dying from a heart attack."
Bullshit study, again; made even more stupid by the fact that dog often are able to save their owners' life during accidents.
5)"Cats are cheaper than dogs."
Only half decent argument so far but even so, it's still a rather poor one.

In the end, we can indeed conclude Dog >> Cat. :p

i once again posit that millipedes make better pets than either of them

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 7:10 am
by Ethel mermania
Aellex wrote:
Constitutional Technocracy of Minecraft wrote:http://uk.businessinsider.com/why-cats-are-better-than-dogs-2015-1

u wot m8?

1) "CaTs OwNeRs ArE sMaRtEr ThAn DoGs OwNeRs!!!!"
Not only is this retarded in its own right but the linked study is about how cat-people are more introverted and less numerous.
2) "Cats have a smaller carbon footprint than dogs."
If you want to save the planet, go bother China to stop polluting like crazy; owning a doggo for a lifetime is a mere tear in the ocean in comparison to what big companies do in a single day.
3)"Cats are less slobbery than dogs."
Huh... Just... What ?
4)"Owning a cat may reduce your risk of dying from a heart attack."
Bullshit study, again; made even more stupid by the fact that dog often are able to save their owners' life during accidents.
5)"Cats are cheaper than dogs."
Only half decent argument so far but even so, it's still a rather poor one.

In the end, we can indeed conclude Dog >> Cat. :p



viewtopic.php?p=34578858#p34578858

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 7:11 am
by The South Falls
Ethel mermania wrote:
Aellex wrote:1) "CaTs OwNeRs ArE sMaRtEr ThAn DoGs OwNeRs!!!!"
Not only is this retarded in its own right but the linked study is about how cat-people are more introverted and less numerous.
2) "Cats have a smaller carbon footprint than dogs."
If you want to save the planet, go bother China to stop polluting like crazy; owning a doggo for a lifetime is a mere tear in the ocean in comparison to what big companies do in a single day.
3)"Cats are less slobbery than dogs."
Huh... Just... What ?
4)"Owning a cat may reduce your risk of dying from a heart attack."
Bullshit study, again; made even more stupid by the fact that dog often are able to save their owners' life during accidents.
5)"Cats are cheaper than dogs."
Only half decent argument so far but even so, it's still a rather poor one.

In the end, we can indeed conclude Dog >> Cat. :p



viewtopic.php?p=34578858#p34578858

What ya gon' do with no thumbs?

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 7:13 am
by Ethel mermania
The South Falls wrote:

What ya gon' do with no thumbs?

Lay the red dot on the target.
Wrap my claw gently around the trigger.
And slowly retract that claw. :twisted:

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 7:15 am
by The South Falls
Ethel mermania wrote:
The South Falls wrote:What ya gon' do with no thumbs?

Lay the red dot on the target.
Wrap my claw gently around the trigger.
And slowly retract that claw. :twisted:

Well fuck I'm dead.

But can you aim with such a claw?

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 7:30 am
by Ethel mermania
The South Falls wrote:
Ethel mermania wrote:Lay the red dot on the target.
Wrap my claw gently around the trigger.
And slowly retract that claw. :twisted:

Well fuck I'm dead.

But can you aim with such a claw?

Piece of cake,

The real problem is how we cats just love to chase the red dot. I don't know I can resist.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 7:45 am
by Durzan
Actually, cats are vital to the survival of our species as a whole. Banning them won't do us any good in the long run. Limiting them would help the enviroment some, but might cause other problems as well.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 8:01 am
by Forsher
Durzan wrote:Actually, cats are vital to the survival of our species as a whole. Banning them won't do us any good in the long run. Limiting them would help the enviroment some, but might cause other problems as well.


How? what are you talking about?

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 8:17 am
by Aellex
Ethel mermania wrote:https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?p=34578858#p34578858

Image

Pupper is there to guard me against vile catish aggression !

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 8:19 am
by Roman Union
Image

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 8:47 am
by Ethel mermania
Aellex wrote:
Ethel mermania wrote:https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?p=34578858#p34578858

Image

Pupper is there to guard me against vile catish aggression !

Oh no, it's crusader pupper, scourge of the Abyssinian cat crusade of 1326.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 8:49 am
by The South Falls
Ethel mermania wrote:
The South Falls wrote:Well fuck I'm dead.

But can you aim with such a claw?

Piece of cake,

The real problem is how we cats just love to chase the red dot. I don't know I can resist.

I need to point a Laser-aim module while you're trying to kill me.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 9:17 am
by Pope Joan
Ethel mermania wrote:
Pope Joan wrote:This war has already begun in Wisconsin.

The mad birders should be quarantined and their feeding trays sown with salt.

Meow tu, brutus?


The mad birders put out poisoned cat food.

So the cat people discovered that there was no particular hunting season for certain birds, and began shooting as many of them as they could,

War!

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 9:30 am
by Krasny-Volny
The reasons they gave for this could just as easily be applied to dogs.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 9:41 am
by Forsher
Krasny-Volny wrote:The reasons they gave for this could just as easily be applied to dogs.


No, they can't.

Dogs, shockingly, aren't allowed off properties. And they're much less deadly in a garden because, shockingly, dogs are not stealth predators. They're also better domesticated and far less tempted by random pray animals.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 9:49 am
by The New California Republic
Krasny-Volny wrote:The reasons they gave for this could just as easily be applied to dogs.

The New California Republic wrote:Dogs that are pets, generally speaking, are not allowed to roam unsupervised for days or weeks at a time, hunting any small wildlife that crosses their path...