NATION

PASSWORD

MAGAThread XIV: All persons born or naturalized ...

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Maineiacs
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7316
Founded: May 26, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Maineiacs » Wed Dec 12, 2018 11:48 am

Telconi wrote:
Proctopeo wrote:Under a system that ran on direct democracy instead of the electoral college, it's likely neither would have won the nomination.
Also, still salty about her loss? Isn't she supposed to not be relevant any more? :eyebrow:


She's only relevant to Democrat Republican talking points.



FTFY
Economic:-8.12 Social:-7.59 Moral Rules:5 Moral Order:-5
Muravyets: Maineiacs, you are brilliant, too! I stand in delighted awe.
Sane Outcasts:When your best case scenario is five kilometers of nuclear contamination, you know someone fucked up.
Geniasis: Christian values are incompatible with Conservative ideals. I cannot both follow the teachings of Christ and be a Republican. Therefore, I choose to not be a Republican.
Galloism: If someone will build a wall around Donald Trump, I'll pay for it.
Bottle tells it like it is
add 6,928 to post count

User avatar
Proctopeo
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12369
Founded: Sep 26, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Proctopeo » Wed Dec 12, 2018 11:49 am

Maineiacs wrote:
Telconi wrote:
She's only relevant to Democrat Republican talking points.



FTFY

Vass is the strangest Republican I've ever met, then.
Arachno-anarchism || NO GODS NO MASTERS || Free NSG Odreria

User avatar
Zurkerx
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 10955
Founded: Jan 20, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Zurkerx » Wed Dec 12, 2018 11:50 am

Telconi wrote:
Zurkerx wrote:
I literally thought you were making this up until a quick Google search confirmed that this is true...

Well, Trump did say at one point that maybe he doesn't need a Chief of Staff so, it looks like he may not get one.


He should have taken the job IMO.


And inherit the god awful mess that Trump and his administration is in? I don't blame him, and even I wouldn't be that desperate.
A Golden Civic: The New Pragmatic Libertarian
My Words: Indeed, Indubitably & Malarkey
Retired Admin in NSGS and NS Parliament

Accountant, Author, History Buff, Political Junkie
“Has ambition so eclipsed principle?” ~ Mitt Romney
"Try not to become a person of success, but rather try to become a person of value." ~ Albert Einstein
"Trust, but verify." ~ Ronald Reagan

User avatar
Knask
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1230
Founded: Oct 20, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Knask » Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:02 pm

Zurkerx wrote:
Telconi wrote:
He should have taken the job IMO.


And inherit the god awful mess that Trump and his administration is in? I don't blame him, and even I wouldn't be that desperate.

Santorum's middle name is "god awful mess".

User avatar
Knask
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1230
Founded: Oct 20, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Knask » Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:02 pm

The National Enquirer's parent company has admitted to prosecutors that it made the $150,000 payment in "concert with" the Trump campaign in order to ensure that the woman did not publicize damaging allegations about the candidate before the 2016 presidential election.

"AMI further admitted that its principal purpose in making the payment was to suppress the woman’s story so as to prevent it from influencing the election."
Last edited by Knask on Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66773
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:04 pm

Knask wrote:The National Enquirer's parent company has admitted to prosecutors that it made the $150,000 payment in "concert with" the Trump campaign in order to ensure that the woman did not publicize damaging allegations about the candidate before the 2016 presidential election.

"AMI further admitted that its principal purpose in making the payment was to suppress the woman’s story so as to prevent it from influencing the election."


Now with added sauce.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:06 pm

Maineiacs wrote:
Telconi wrote:
She's only relevant to Democrat Republican talking points.



FTFY


Yeah. because "America is undemocratic because Hillary won the pop vote" is a Republican talking point, made by that hardcore Republican Vassenor...
Last edited by Telconi on Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
The Black Forrest
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55601
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Black Forrest » Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:07 pm

Proctopeo wrote:
Maineiacs wrote:

FTFY

Vass is the strangest Republican I've ever met, then.


I believe the comment is about H.
*I am a master proofreader after I click Submit.
* There is actually a War on Christmas. But Christmas started it, with it's unparalleled aggression against the Thanksgiving Holiday, and now Christmas has seized much Lebensraum in November, and are pushing into October. The rest of us seek to repel these invaders, and push them back to the status quo ante bellum Black Friday border. -Trotskylvania
* Silence Is Golden But Duct Tape Is Silver.
* I felt like Ayn Rand cornered me at a party, and three minutes in I found my first objection to what she was saying, but she kept talking without interruption for ten more days. - Max Barry talking about Atlas Shrugged

User avatar
Tarsonis
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27305
Founded: Sep 20, 2017
Democratic Socialists

Postby Tarsonis » Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:18 pm

Maineiacs wrote:
Tarsonis wrote:
afaiC, the international ranking of democracies can kiss our ass. The United States is not a democracy, it's a Federalist Republic.



I'm really getting tired of this meme the Right keeps rehashing that the fact that we're not a Direct Democracy means that we aren't any type of Democracy at all.


By definition we are not. A Democracy and a Republic can both be by direct vote or by representation. The difference is in a Democracy Majority rules, and in a Republic there are legal parameters to what the majority can rule on. I.e there are fundamental laws not subject to majority rule like civil rights etc. We are Republic, we have a constitution of laws that override the Majority Rule.

We’re also not a true republic either because our Constitution can be amended by super majority, thus were classified as a Democratic Republic.

The point of that meme though is that it doesn’t matter that Clinton won the PV. What matters is the Law and the Law states that the EC determines who the President is. By the EC, Trump won the presidency, legally and fair.
Last edited by Tarsonis on Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
NS Keyboard Warrior since 2005
Ecclesiastes 1:18 "For in much wisdom is much vexation, and those who increase knowledge increase sorrow"
Thucydides: “The society that separates its scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting by fools.”
1 Corinthians 5:12 "What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside?"
Galatians 6:7 "Do not be deceived; God is not mocked, for you reap whatever you sow."
T. Stevens: "I don't hold with equality in all things, but I believe in equality under the Law."
James I of Aragon "Have you ever considered that our position is Idolatry to the Rabbi?"
Debating Christian Theology with Non-Christians pretty much anybody be like

User avatar
Internationalist Bastard
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24520
Founded: Aug 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Internationalist Bastard » Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:22 pm

Tarsonis wrote:
Maineiacs wrote:

I'm really getting tired of this meme the Right keeps rehashing that the fact that we're not a Direct Democracy means that we aren't any type of Democracy at all.


By definition we are not. A Democracy and a Republic can both be by direct vote or by representation. The difference is in a Democracy Majority rules, and in a Republic there are legal parameters to what the majority can rule on. I.e there are fundamental laws not subject to majority rule like civil rights etc. We are Republic, we have a constitution of laws that override the Majority Rule.

We’re also not a true republic either because our Constitution can be amended by super majority, thus were classified as a Democratic Republic.

The point of that meme though is that it doesn’t matter that Clinton won the PV. What matters is the Law and the Law states that the EC determines who the President is. By the EC, Trump won the presidency, legally and fair.

I understand this but personally I feel like the selection process for the president shouldn’t be a complicated system that I’ve never been able to understand
Call me Alex, I insist
I am a girl, damnit
Slut Pride. So like, real talk, I’m a porn actress. We’re not all bimbos. I do not give out my information or videos to avoid conflict with site policy. I’m happy to talk about the industry or my thoughts on the career but I will not be showing you any goodies. Sorry
“Whatever you are, be a good one” Abe Lincoln

User avatar
Valrifell
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31063
Founded: Aug 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Valrifell » Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:28 pm

Internationalist Bastard wrote:
Tarsonis wrote:
By definition we are not. A Democracy and a Republic can both be by direct vote or by representation. The difference is in a Democracy Majority rules, and in a Republic there are legal parameters to what the majority can rule on. I.e there are fundamental laws not subject to majority rule like civil rights etc. We are Republic, we have a constitution of laws that override the Majority Rule.

We’re also not a true republic either because our Constitution can be amended by super majority, thus were classified as a Democratic Republic.

The point of that meme though is that it doesn’t matter that Clinton won the PV. What matters is the Law and the Law states that the EC determines who the President is. By the EC, Trump won the presidency, legally and fair.

I understand this but personally I feel like the selection process for the president shouldn’t be a complicated system that I’ve never been able to understand


Could be worse, we could have a system akin to the Venetian Republic or the Holy Roman Empire

*shudders*
HAVING AN ALL CAPS SIG MAKES ME FEEL SMART

User avatar
Trumptonium1
Senator
 
Posts: 4022
Founded: Apr 03, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Trumptonium1 » Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:29 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Trumptonium1 wrote:
If recent events are anything to go by, I presume that's Antifa's fault for rioting against democracy.

Or maybe PETA for liberating domesticated animals to heaven. Although the horse cooperated with Trump, and Trump is Hitler, and Hitler is in hell, so we know the horse must have gone there too.


>rioting against democracy

I shouldn't have to remind you that under a democratic system Clinton would've won given that she got the most actual votes.


Your interpretation of 'actual votes' appears to be a little too liberal.
Preferred pronouns: His Majesty/Your Highness

https://www.bolsonaro.com.br/
Resident Non-Pumpkin Character

User avatar
Internationalist Bastard
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24520
Founded: Aug 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Internationalist Bastard » Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:29 pm

Valrifell wrote:
Internationalist Bastard wrote:I understand this but personally I feel like the selection process for the president shouldn’t be a complicated system that I’ve never been able to understand


Could be worse, we could have a system akin to the Venetian Republic or the Holy Roman Empire

*shudders*

No anything but the worms
Call me Alex, I insist
I am a girl, damnit
Slut Pride. So like, real talk, I’m a porn actress. We’re not all bimbos. I do not give out my information or videos to avoid conflict with site policy. I’m happy to talk about the industry or my thoughts on the career but I will not be showing you any goodies. Sorry
“Whatever you are, be a good one” Abe Lincoln

User avatar
Tarsonis
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27305
Founded: Sep 20, 2017
Democratic Socialists

Postby Tarsonis » Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:31 pm

Internationalist Bastard wrote:
Tarsonis wrote:
By definition we are not. A Democracy and a Republic can both be by direct vote or by representation. The difference is in a Democracy Majority rules, and in a Republic there are legal parameters to what the majority can rule on. I.e there are fundamental laws not subject to majority rule like civil rights etc. We are Republic, we have a constitution of laws that override the Majority Rule.

We’re also not a true republic either because our Constitution can be amended by super majority, thus were classified as a Democratic Republic.

The point of that meme though is that it doesn’t matter that Clinton won the PV. What matters is the Law and the Law states that the EC determines who the President is. By the EC, Trump won the presidency, legally and fair.

I understand this but personally I feel like the selection process for the president shouldn’t be a complicated system that I’ve never been able to understand

I mean I'm not sure what to say about that other than it's pretty simple:

EC Votes apportioned to states per number of congressional districts in each state.
Winner takes all Electoral votes at the state level (with the exceptions of ME and NE who split)
Electors cast votes in what's all but a ceremonial election in December.
First to 270 wins the Presidency.

(Used to be way more complicated when Electors could vote any way they wanted, but most if not all states have passed laws requiring Electors to abide by popular vote of each state.)
NS Keyboard Warrior since 2005
Ecclesiastes 1:18 "For in much wisdom is much vexation, and those who increase knowledge increase sorrow"
Thucydides: “The society that separates its scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting by fools.”
1 Corinthians 5:12 "What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside?"
Galatians 6:7 "Do not be deceived; God is not mocked, for you reap whatever you sow."
T. Stevens: "I don't hold with equality in all things, but I believe in equality under the Law."
James I of Aragon "Have you ever considered that our position is Idolatry to the Rabbi?"
Debating Christian Theology with Non-Christians pretty much anybody be like

User avatar
Internationalist Bastard
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24520
Founded: Aug 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Internationalist Bastard » Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:33 pm

Tarsonis wrote:
Internationalist Bastard wrote:I understand this but personally I feel like the selection process for the president shouldn’t be a complicated system that I’ve never been able to understand

I mean I'm not sure what to say about that other than it's pretty simple:

EC Votes apportioned to states per number of congressional districts in each state.
Winner takes all Electoral votes at the state level (with the exceptions of ME and NE who split)
Electors cast votes in what's all but a ceremonial election in December.
First to 270 wins the Presidency.

(Used to be way more complicated when Electors could vote any way they wanted, but most if not all states have passed laws requiring Electors to abide by popular vote of each state.)

I appreciate that you underestimated my stupidity but I have no clue what that means
Call me Alex, I insist
I am a girl, damnit
Slut Pride. So like, real talk, I’m a porn actress. We’re not all bimbos. I do not give out my information or videos to avoid conflict with site policy. I’m happy to talk about the industry or my thoughts on the career but I will not be showing you any goodies. Sorry
“Whatever you are, be a good one” Abe Lincoln

User avatar
Thuzbekistan
Minister
 
Posts: 2185
Founded: Dec 29, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Thuzbekistan » Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:43 pm

Internationalist Bastard wrote:
Tarsonis wrote:
I mean I'm not sure what to say about that other than it's pretty simple:

EC Votes apportioned to states per number of congressional districts in each state.
Winner takes all Electoral votes at the state level (with the exceptions of ME and NE who split)
Electors cast votes in what's all but a ceremonial election in December.
First to 270 wins the Presidency.

(Used to be way more complicated when Electors could vote any way they wanted, but most if not all states have passed laws requiring Electors to abide by popular vote of each state.)

I appreciate that you underestimated my stupidity but I have no clue what that means

Ah, there are very good videos on the matter. I do wish to remind you that ignorance of a system is not sound reason to throw it out.
Proud Member of The Western Isles, the Best RP region on NS.
An RP I'm Proud of: Orsandian Civil War
An INTJ, -A/-T

Economic Left/Right: -5.0
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.72

User avatar
Internationalist Bastard
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24520
Founded: Aug 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Internationalist Bastard » Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:47 pm

Thuzbekistan wrote:
Internationalist Bastard wrote:I appreciate that you underestimated my stupidity but I have no clue what that means

Ah, there are very good videos on the matter. I do wish to remind you that ignorance of a system is not sound reason to throw it out.

All I’m saying is it seems more fair for people to actually know how the hell the system works
Call me Alex, I insist
I am a girl, damnit
Slut Pride. So like, real talk, I’m a porn actress. We’re not all bimbos. I do not give out my information or videos to avoid conflict with site policy. I’m happy to talk about the industry or my thoughts on the career but I will not be showing you any goodies. Sorry
“Whatever you are, be a good one” Abe Lincoln

User avatar
Thuzbekistan
Minister
 
Posts: 2185
Founded: Dec 29, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Thuzbekistan » Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:50 pm

Internationalist Bastard wrote:
Thuzbekistan wrote:Ah, there are very good videos on the matter. I do wish to remind you that ignorance of a system is not sound reason to throw it out.

All I’m saying is it seems more fair for people to actually know how the hell the system works

https://youtu.be/OUS9mM8Xbbw

There ya go.
Proud Member of The Western Isles, the Best RP region on NS.
An RP I'm Proud of: Orsandian Civil War
An INTJ, -A/-T

Economic Left/Right: -5.0
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.72

User avatar
Tarsonis
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27305
Founded: Sep 20, 2017
Democratic Socialists

Postby Tarsonis » Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:51 pm

Internationalist Bastard wrote:
Tarsonis wrote:
I mean I'm not sure what to say about that other than it's pretty simple:

EC Votes apportioned to states per number of congressional districts in each state.
Winner takes all Electoral votes at the state level (with the exceptions of ME and NE who split)
Electors cast votes in what's all but a ceremonial election in December.
First to 270 wins the Presidency.

(Used to be way more complicated when Electors could vote any way they wanted, but most if not all states have passed laws requiring Electors to abide by popular vote of each state.)

I appreciate that you underestimated my stupidity but I have no clue what that means

Okay quick and dirty version.

Each state has X amount of votes in the Electoral College, where X= the number of Seats in both The House and the Senate (DC just gets 3, because amendments)
I.e CA has 55 electoral votes (53 Congresspersons and 2 senators)
The Candidate that wins the popular vote in each states receives said Electoral Votes.
i.e Hillary won the popular vote in California, and thus received said 55 Electoral Votes.
Trump won Texas and received 38 electoral votes, (36 congresspersons and 2 senators)
The first candidate to win enough states, so that they receive at least 270 electoral votes, is the next president.

Trump won 30 States for a total of 306 Electoral Votes.
Clinton won 20 States and DC, for a total of 232 votes.
Trump wins.

Better?
Last edited by Tarsonis on Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
NS Keyboard Warrior since 2005
Ecclesiastes 1:18 "For in much wisdom is much vexation, and those who increase knowledge increase sorrow"
Thucydides: “The society that separates its scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting by fools.”
1 Corinthians 5:12 "What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside?"
Galatians 6:7 "Do not be deceived; God is not mocked, for you reap whatever you sow."
T. Stevens: "I don't hold with equality in all things, but I believe in equality under the Law."
James I of Aragon "Have you ever considered that our position is Idolatry to the Rabbi?"
Debating Christian Theology with Non-Christians pretty much anybody be like

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:52 pm

Internationalist Bastard wrote:
Thuzbekistan wrote:Ah, there are very good videos on the matter. I do wish to remind you that ignorance of a system is not sound reason to throw it out.

All I’m saying is it seems more fair for people to actually know how the hell the system works


Then learn how it works?
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Gran Virginia
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 62
Founded: Nov 29, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Gran Virginia » Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:56 pm

Internationalist Bastard wrote:
Tarsonis wrote:
By definition we are not. A Democracy and a Republic can both be by direct vote or by representation. The difference is in a Democracy Majority rules, and in a Republic there are legal parameters to what the majority can rule on. I.e there are fundamental laws not subject to majority rule like civil rights etc. We are Republic, we have a constitution of laws that override the Majority Rule.

We’re also not a true republic either because our Constitution can be amended by super majority, thus were classified as a Democratic Republic.

The point of that meme though is that it doesn’t matter that Clinton won the PV. What matters is the Law and the Law states that the EC determines who the President is. By the EC, Trump won the presidency, legally and fair.

I understand this but personally I feel like the selection process for the president shouldn’t be a complicated system that I’ve never been able to understand

The EC is a good middle ground between popular vote and state vote.

User avatar
Internationalist Bastard
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24520
Founded: Aug 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Internationalist Bastard » Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:58 pm

Tarsonis wrote:
Internationalist Bastard wrote:I appreciate that you underestimated my stupidity but I have no clue what that means

Okay quick and dirty version.

Each state has X amount of votes in the Electoral College, where X= the number of Seats in both The House and the Senate (DC just gets 3, because amendments)
I.e CA has 55 electoral votes (53 Congresspersons and 2 senators)
The Candidate that wins the popular vote in each states receives said Electoral Votes.
i.e Hillary won the popular vote in California, and thus received said 55 Electoral Votes.
Trump won Texas and received 38 electoral votes, (36 congresspersons and 2 senators)
The first candidate to win enough states, so that they receive at least 270 electoral votes, is the next president.

Trump won 30 States for a total of 306 Electoral Votes.
Clinton won 20 States and DC, for a total of 232 votes.
Trump wins.

Better?

So more states voted for trump but more people voted for Hillary
Call me Alex, I insist
I am a girl, damnit
Slut Pride. So like, real talk, I’m a porn actress. We’re not all bimbos. I do not give out my information or videos to avoid conflict with site policy. I’m happy to talk about the industry or my thoughts on the career but I will not be showing you any goodies. Sorry
“Whatever you are, be a good one” Abe Lincoln

User avatar
Gran Virginia
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 62
Founded: Nov 29, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Gran Virginia » Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:59 pm

Internationalist Bastard wrote:
Tarsonis wrote:Okay quick and dirty version.

Each state has X amount of votes in the Electoral College, where X= the number of Seats in both The House and the Senate (DC just gets 3, because amendments)
I.e CA has 55 electoral votes (53 Congresspersons and 2 senators)
The Candidate that wins the popular vote in each states receives said Electoral Votes.
i.e Hillary won the popular vote in California, and thus received said 55 Electoral Votes.
Trump won Texas and received 38 electoral votes, (36 congresspersons and 2 senators)
The first candidate to win enough states, so that they receive at least 270 electoral votes, is the next president.

Trump won 30 States for a total of 306 Electoral Votes.
Clinton won 20 States and DC, for a total of 232 votes.
Trump wins.

Better?

So more states voted for trump but more people voted for Hillary

Yes, more states, but what actually matters is more electors.

User avatar
Internationalist Bastard
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24520
Founded: Aug 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Internationalist Bastard » Wed Dec 12, 2018 1:00 pm

Gran Virginia wrote:
Internationalist Bastard wrote:So more states voted for trump but more people voted for Hillary

Yes, more states, but what actually matters is more electors.

What?
Call me Alex, I insist
I am a girl, damnit
Slut Pride. So like, real talk, I’m a porn actress. We’re not all bimbos. I do not give out my information or videos to avoid conflict with site policy. I’m happy to talk about the industry or my thoughts on the career but I will not be showing you any goodies. Sorry
“Whatever you are, be a good one” Abe Lincoln

User avatar
Tarsonis
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27305
Founded: Sep 20, 2017
Democratic Socialists

Postby Tarsonis » Wed Dec 12, 2018 1:01 pm

Thuzbekistan wrote:
Internationalist Bastard wrote:All I’m saying is it seems more fair for people to actually know how the hell the system works

https://youtu.be/OUS9mM8Xbbw

There ya go.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyIFqf3XH24

Can't beat the classics
NS Keyboard Warrior since 2005
Ecclesiastes 1:18 "For in much wisdom is much vexation, and those who increase knowledge increase sorrow"
Thucydides: “The society that separates its scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting by fools.”
1 Corinthians 5:12 "What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside?"
Galatians 6:7 "Do not be deceived; God is not mocked, for you reap whatever you sow."
T. Stevens: "I don't hold with equality in all things, but I believe in equality under the Law."
James I of Aragon "Have you ever considered that our position is Idolatry to the Rabbi?"
Debating Christian Theology with Non-Christians pretty much anybody be like

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Belarusball, Binafra, Black Raven Movement, Bracadun, Champlania, Hurtful Thoughts, Lackadaisia, Lativs, Paddy O Fernature, Socialistic Britain, Sorcery, Tarsonis, The Acolyte Confederacy, The Confederate States of America, The Jamesian Republic, Umeria, Urkennalaid, Vistulange

Advertisement

Remove ads