Zurkerx wrote:I think we can do a better title people even though I have no ideas for it
Rudy, Rudy, Rudy, my dear boy....
Advertisement
by Jerzylvania » Mon Aug 13, 2018 6:32 am
Zurkerx wrote:I think we can do a better title people even though I have no ideas for it
by Petrasylvania » Mon Aug 13, 2018 8:13 am
Vassenor wrote:Oil exporting People wrote:Turkey and China have both been, for lack of a better term, hammered by the U.S. this year. Combined with Trump's stance on Japan, I wonder how much influence George Friedman's geopolitical thinking has had on Trump; we know back in 2012 Mitt Romney was reading up on his thinking. I personally own The Next 100 Years and The Next Decade, with Friedman largely being right with incredible accuracy so far.
Apparently Trump is single-handedly responsible for every bad economic policy decision Erdogan has made.
Also Trump is responsible for the sun rising in the morning and setting in the evening. Worship him.
by Zurkerx » Mon Aug 13, 2018 8:35 am
by Petrasylvania » Mon Aug 13, 2018 8:42 am
Zurkerx wrote:The Trump Administration is apparently rolling back the Military Lending Act
I wonder how some veterans may react to that, especially since Trump is Pro-Veteran.
by Uxupox » Mon Aug 13, 2018 9:19 am
Zurkerx wrote:The Trump Administration is apparently rolling back the Military Lending Act
I wonder how some veterans may react to that, especially since Trump is Pro-Veteran.
by Farnhamia » Mon Aug 13, 2018 9:45 am
Zurkerx wrote:I think we can do a better title people even though I have no ideas for it
by Zurkerx » Mon Aug 13, 2018 9:58 am
Uxupox wrote:Zurkerx wrote:The Trump Administration is apparently rolling back the Military Lending Act
I wonder how some veterans may react to that, especially since Trump is Pro-Veteran.
It's actually pretty good. There was a discussion at work about this. It's main target is the GAP(Guaranteed Auto Protection) Insurance which specifically targets service-members in which allows banks to kick back a requested loan because GAP involvement. A big con to this it's going to kid right out of high school make bad decisions about their monetary income. Hopefully financial officers pick up the slack and get them mandatory financial classes on payments that will take huge part of their monthly income.
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Mon Aug 13, 2018 10:30 am
by Sick Jumps » Mon Aug 13, 2018 10:41 am
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:Did Trump side with Saudi over the Canada Saudi dispute?
If so, thats just another shitty thing he has done.
by Vassenor » Mon Aug 13, 2018 10:47 am
Sick Jumps wrote:The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:Did Trump side with Saudi over the Canada Saudi dispute?
If so, thats just another shitty thing he has done.
He values his relationship with the Saudis and places little value on democracy or human rights, so this is not surprising. The Saudis flattered him, backed him on Iran, and increased oil output when he asked them to.
Trump also personally dislikes Trudeau. International politics is, for him, very much about the personal interactions that he has with other leaders, as stupid as that sounds.
by Zurkerx » Mon Aug 13, 2018 10:52 am
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:Did Trump side with Saudi over the Canada Saudi dispute?
If so, thats just another shitty thing he has done.
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Mon Aug 13, 2018 10:54 am
Sick Jumps wrote:The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:Did Trump side with Saudi over the Canada Saudi dispute?
If so, thats just another shitty thing he has done.
He values his relationship with the Saudis and places little value on democracy or human rights, so this is not surprising. The Saudis flattered him, backed him on Iran, and increased oil output when he asked them to.
Trump also personally dislikes Trudeau. International politics is, for him, very much about the personal interactions that he has with other leaders, as stupid as that sounds.
by Sick Jumps » Mon Aug 13, 2018 11:02 am
Zurkerx wrote:The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:Did Trump side with Saudi over the Canada Saudi dispute?
If so, thats just another shitty thing he has done.
Well, he does like strong, authoritative figures, which he doesn't consider our allies to be so...
What I heard was that they are trying to dial back the hostilities on the matter although, there's no clear reporting on this (or reliable) on what I can find.
by Sick Jumps » Mon Aug 13, 2018 11:22 am
by Petrasylvania » Mon Aug 13, 2018 11:46 am
Sick Jumps wrote:I think the basic strategy from the White House is something like "our traditional, democratic allies won't abandon us, so we should focus on improving relations with marginal, authoritarian allies, and even our enemies. Human rights are also overrated as a foreign policy priority."
by Sick Jumps » Mon Aug 13, 2018 11:55 am
Petrasylvania wrote:Sick Jumps wrote:I think the basic strategy from the White House is something like "our traditional, democratic allies won't abandon us, so we should focus on improving relations with marginal, authoritarian allies, and even our enemies. Human rights are also overrated as a foreign policy priority."
Or "Lavish rewards on countries that praise and worship me."
by Zurkerx » Mon Aug 13, 2018 12:27 pm
Sick Jumps wrote:Zurkerx wrote:
Well, he does like strong, authoritative figures, which he doesn't consider our allies to be so...
What I heard was that they are trying to dial back the hostilities on the matter although, there's no clear reporting on this (or reliable) on what I can find.
The thing people have noticed is no statement backing human rights from the State Department. Normally they would do that, even if it is irritating to the Saudis.
Pompeo did call his Canadian counterpart Freeland to discuss the matter, but other than that I haven't seen anything.
by Maineiacs » Mon Aug 13, 2018 1:44 pm
Zurkerx wrote:Sick Jumps wrote:The thing people have noticed is no statement backing human rights from the State Department. Normally they would do that, even if it is irritating to the Saudis.
Pompeo did call his Canadian counterpart Freeland to discuss the matter, but other than that I haven't seen anything.
To be fair, I don't think the world's most powerful democracy gives a damn about human rights, at least, not this current administration. It'll be ultimately up to voters in November if they want to continue this path or choose a different one. Maybe then the message will get through the White House, who knows.
by Ifreann » Mon Aug 13, 2018 1:54 pm
Maineiacs wrote:Zurkerx wrote:
To be fair, I don't think the world's most powerful democracy gives a damn about human rights, at least, not this current administration. It'll be ultimately up to voters in November if they want to continue this path or choose a different one. Maybe then the message will get through the White House, who knows.
If the Dems take the House, Trump will spend the next two years bawling about how the election was rigged.
by Zurkerx » Mon Aug 13, 2018 1:55 pm
Maineiacs wrote:Zurkerx wrote:
To be fair, I don't think the world's most powerful democracy gives a damn about human rights, at least, not this current administration. It'll be ultimately up to voters in November if they want to continue this path or choose a different one. Maybe then the message will get through the White House, who knows.
If the Dems take the House, Trump will spend the next two years bawling about how the election was rigged.
by Petrasylvania » Mon Aug 13, 2018 2:01 pm
Ifreann wrote:Maineiacs wrote:
If the Dems take the House, Trump will spend the next two years bawling about how the election was rigged.
"Russians hacked the election, folks. It's true. It's true. When they said it about me, that wasn't true, there was no collusion with Trump. But the Democrats, so much collusion, believe me."
by Tobleste » Mon Aug 13, 2018 2:19 pm
Zurkerx wrote:Maineiacs wrote:
If the Dems take the House, Trump will spend the next two years bawling about how the election was rigged.
Oh, I wouldn't be surprised if he does that, especially since it'll make his life hell with the Dems subpoenaing people and trying to grant protections for Mueller.
by Tobleste » Mon Aug 13, 2018 2:25 pm
Even when Trump does prepare for meetings or conversations with other foreign leaders, there's apparently quite a learning curve — for example, he referred to Nepal as "nipple" and Bhutan as "button" as aides prepped him for a meeting with India's prime minister, Politico reported, citing two sources with knowledge of the meeting.
by Chan Island » Mon Aug 13, 2018 2:27 pm
Tobleste wrote:http://uk.businessinsider.com/trump-reminded-of-different-time-zones-calling-world-leaders-2018-8Even when Trump does prepare for meetings or conversations with other foreign leaders, there's apparently quite a learning curve — for example, he referred to Nepal as "nipple" and Bhutan as "button" as aides prepped him for a meeting with India's prime minister, Politico reported, citing two sources with knowledge of the meeting.
I wouldn't believe it if not for the "Nambia" thing.
Conserative Morality wrote:"It's not time yet" is a tactic used by reactionaries in every era. "It's not time for democracy, it's not time for capitalism, it's not time for emancipation." Of course it's not time. It's never time, not on its own. You make it time. If you're under fire in the no-man's land of WW1, you start digging a foxhole even if the ideal time would be when you *aren't* being bombarded, because once you wait for it to be 'time', other situations will need your attention, assuming you survive that long. If the fields aren't furrowed, plow them. If the iron is not hot, make it so. If society is not ready, change it.
by Vassenor » Mon Aug 13, 2018 2:33 pm
Tobleste wrote:http://uk.businessinsider.com/trump-reminded-of-different-time-zones-calling-world-leaders-2018-8
Trump reportedly tries to call world leaders at odd hours and has to be reminded of different time zones on a 'constant basis'Even when Trump does prepare for meetings or conversations with other foreign leaders, there's apparently quite a learning curve — for example, he referred to Nepal as "nipple" and Bhutan as "button" as aides prepped him for a meeting with India's prime minister, Politico reported, citing two sources with knowledge of the meeting.
I wouldn't believe it if not for the "Nambia" thing.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: El Lazaro, HISPIDA, Kostane, Narland, Pasong Tirad, Pridelantic people, Quartum Imperium Romanum, Rusozak, Statesburg, Stratonesia, The Xenopolis Confederation, Uiiop, Volkhar
Advertisement