by Britain-Nationalist » Tue Aug 07, 2018 9:50 am
by Ifreann » Tue Aug 07, 2018 9:55 am
Britain-Nationalist wrote:With violent crime rising in London and the nationwide terrorist threat level placed at severe, this begs the question; should the Police be armed?
by Britain-Nationalist » Tue Aug 07, 2018 9:56 am
by Vassenor » Tue Aug 07, 2018 9:56 am
by The New California Republic » Tue Aug 07, 2018 9:56 am
Britain-Nationalist wrote:With violent crime rising in London and the nationwide terrorist threat level placed at severe, this begs the question; should the Police be armed?
In my view, i would arm the Police with a standard handgun of some sort and issue assault rifles or sub-machine guns to Police Officers posted at more important locations or patrolling in major cities. I would also end the whole "diversity and multiculturalism" initiative of seemingly every police force in the UK, but thats a debate for another time.
So would you agree with Police being armed, and if not, why?
by The New California Republic » Tue Aug 07, 2018 9:58 am
Vassenor wrote:Also what does "diversity and multiculturalism" have to do with arming everyone?
by Kubumba Tribe » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:00 am
Farnhamia wrote:A word of advice from your friendly neighborhood Mod, be careful how you use "kafir." It's derogatory usage by some people can get you in trouble unless you are very careful in setting the context for it's use.
by Britain-Nationalist » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:01 am
The New California Republic wrote:Vassenor wrote:Also what does "diversity and multiculturalism" have to do with arming everyone?
It doesn't. It is probably a cheap sideways shot at the fact that the police actually have to treat everyone with some modicum of respect, regardless of their ethnicity/sexuality etc.
by Sovaal » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:01 am
by Kubumba Tribe » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:01 am
Britain-Nationalist wrote:The New California Republic wrote:It doesn't. It is probably a cheap sideways shot at the fact that the police actually have to treat everyone with some modicum of respect, regardless of their ethnicity/sexuality etc.
I really meant male officers prancing around in drag, wearing high heels or painting their nails to "support gays".
Farnhamia wrote:A word of advice from your friendly neighborhood Mod, be careful how you use "kafir." It's derogatory usage by some people can get you in trouble unless you are very careful in setting the context for it's use.
by The New California Republic » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:01 am
Kubumba Tribe wrote:What, British police aren't armed? Why???????
by Kubumba Tribe » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:02 am
Sovaal wrote:Eh, I'm not really against it, but it always seems that any of the people who propose arming the police and such just want to see them wipe out minorities.
Farnhamia wrote:A word of advice from your friendly neighborhood Mod, be careful how you use "kafir." It's derogatory usage by some people can get you in trouble unless you are very careful in setting the context for it's use.
by Sovaal » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:02 am
Kubumba Tribe wrote:What, British police aren't armed? Why???????
by Kubumba Tribe » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:03 am
Farnhamia wrote:A word of advice from your friendly neighborhood Mod, be careful how you use "kafir." It's derogatory usage by some people can get you in trouble unless you are very careful in setting the context for it's use.
by The New California Republic » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:03 am
Britain-Nationalist wrote:The New California Republic wrote:It doesn't. It is probably a cheap sideways shot at the fact that the police actually have to treat everyone with some modicum of respect, regardless of their ethnicity/sexuality etc.
I really meant male officers prancing around in drag, wearing high heels or painting their nails to "support gays".
by Kubumba Tribe » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:04 am
Farnhamia wrote:A word of advice from your friendly neighborhood Mod, be careful how you use "kafir." It's derogatory usage by some people can get you in trouble unless you are very careful in setting the context for it's use.
by Vassenor » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:05 am
by The New California Republic » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:05 am
by Genivaria » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:06 am
Britain-Nationalist wrote:The New California Republic wrote:It doesn't. It is probably a cheap sideways shot at the fact that the police actually have to treat everyone with some modicum of respect, regardless of their ethnicity/sexuality etc.
I really meant male officers prancing around in drag, wearing high heels or painting their nails to "support gays".
by Sovaal » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:07 am
by Sovaal » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:08 am
by The New California Republic » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:09 am
by An Alan Smithee Nation » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:10 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Infected Mushroom, Plan Neonie, The Kharkivan Cossacks, Tungstan
Advertisement