NATION

PASSWORD

Woman Dictators

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 203851
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Fri Aug 03, 2018 12:01 pm

Although I don't recall her holding power directly, to me, Imelda Marcos, wife and now widow of the former 10th president and dictator of the Philippines, fits the bill of dictator. By proxy.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
The United Colonies of Earth
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9992
Founded: Dec 01, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The United Colonies of Earth » Fri Aug 03, 2018 12:13 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:Although I don't recall her holding power directly, to me, Imelda Marcos, wife and now widow of the former 10th president and dictator of the Philippines, fits the bill of dictator. By proxy.

Dictators' wives since the time of Livia Drusilla and even earlier have been bitchy in their own right and if they had a stick and sack I'm sure they'd be as nasty as their husbands.
The United Colonies of Earth exists:
to bring about the settlement of all planets not yet inhabited by a sapient species within this Galaxy and Universe by the Human Race, or all members of the species Homo sapiens;
to ensure the observation and protection of the rights of all human beings;
to defend humankind from invasion, catastrophe, fraud and violence;
to represent the interests of humankind to the other governments of the Galaxy;
to facilitate the perpetuation of the unity of human civilization and infrastructure between otherwise self-governing colonies;
and to promote technological advancement and scientific discovery for the perpetuation and expansion of the unity and empowerment of all human beings.
E Stēllīs Lībertās

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 203851
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Fri Aug 03, 2018 12:20 pm

The United Colonies of Earth wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:Although I don't recall her holding power directly, to me, Imelda Marcos, wife and now widow of the former 10th president and dictator of the Philippines, fits the bill of dictator. By proxy.

Dictators' wives since the time of Livia Drusilla and even earlier have been bitchy in their own right and if they had a stick and sack I'm sure they'd be as nasty as their husbands.


No doubt. I just can't really think of a female dictator off the top of my head. Would Mary Tudor fit that descriptor? Her 5 year reign has been described as terrible.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
The United Colonies of Earth
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9992
Founded: Dec 01, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The United Colonies of Earth » Fri Aug 03, 2018 12:22 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
The United Colonies of Earth wrote:Dictators' wives since the time of Livia Drusilla and even earlier have been bitchy in their own right and if they had a stick and sack I'm sure they'd be as nasty as their husbands.


No doubt. I just can't really think of a female dictator off the top of my head. Would Mary Tudor fit that descriptor? Her 5 year reign has been described as terrible.

I guess, if she had absolute power in name or in practice.
The United Colonies of Earth exists:
to bring about the settlement of all planets not yet inhabited by a sapient species within this Galaxy and Universe by the Human Race, or all members of the species Homo sapiens;
to ensure the observation and protection of the rights of all human beings;
to defend humankind from invasion, catastrophe, fraud and violence;
to represent the interests of humankind to the other governments of the Galaxy;
to facilitate the perpetuation of the unity of human civilization and infrastructure between otherwise self-governing colonies;
and to promote technological advancement and scientific discovery for the perpetuation and expansion of the unity and empowerment of all human beings.
E Stēllīs Lībertās

User avatar
Pope Joan
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19500
Founded: Mar 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Pope Joan » Fri Aug 03, 2018 12:45 pm

Constitutional Technocracy of Minecraft wrote:Historically, there have been many female absolute monarchs (aka dictators) around the world


This drove Scots reformer John Knox livid with rage.

He penned a screed against "the diabolical reign of women' or something like that.

There was a deMedici queen on the throne of France at the time, and Mary and Elizabeth were trying to kill each other, and it was a bad time.
"Life is difficult".

-M. Scott Peck

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 203851
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Fri Aug 03, 2018 12:46 pm

Pope Joan wrote:
Constitutional Technocracy of Minecraft wrote:Historically, there have been many female absolute monarchs (aka dictators) around the world


This drove Scots reformer John Knox livid with rage.

He penned a screed against "the diabolical reign of women' or something like that.

There was a deMedici queen on the throne of France at the time, and Mary and Elizabeth were trying to kill each other, and it was a bad time.


You mean Queen Catherine de Medici?
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
The United Colonies of Earth
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9992
Founded: Dec 01, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The United Colonies of Earth » Fri Aug 03, 2018 12:48 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Pope Joan wrote:
This drove Scots reformer John Knox livid with rage.

He penned a screed against "the diabolical reign of women' or something like that.

There was a deMedici queen on the throne of France at the time, and Mary and Elizabeth were trying to kill each other, and it was a bad time.


You mean Queen Catherine de Medici?

Image Aye aye.
The United Colonies of Earth exists:
to bring about the settlement of all planets not yet inhabited by a sapient species within this Galaxy and Universe by the Human Race, or all members of the species Homo sapiens;
to ensure the observation and protection of the rights of all human beings;
to defend humankind from invasion, catastrophe, fraud and violence;
to represent the interests of humankind to the other governments of the Galaxy;
to facilitate the perpetuation of the unity of human civilization and infrastructure between otherwise self-governing colonies;
and to promote technological advancement and scientific discovery for the perpetuation and expansion of the unity and empowerment of all human beings.
E Stēllīs Lībertās

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 203851
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Fri Aug 03, 2018 12:56 pm

The United Colonies of Earth wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
You mean Queen Catherine de Medici?

Image Aye aye.


Well, for what I recall of Catherine, she was kept out of state affairs by her husband, the king. After his death, she then was in charge of her frail son, Francis. She became regent after the death of Francis and then her 10 year old son becoming the heir, Charles. Charles too died and she kept regency for her third son, Henry. She has been called ruthless. But many scholars point out that her powers were limited.

I don't know, she was known for compromising, or being able to in the beginnning. She did that with the Calvinists. But since she failed to grasp the theology behind Calvinism, she became impatient and very vindictive. IIRC, wasn't she blamed for St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre?
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Tobleste
Minister
 
Posts: 2713
Founded: Dec 27, 2017
Democratic Socialists

Postby Tobleste » Fri Aug 03, 2018 1:05 pm

Internationalist Bastard wrote:I’m sure I’m not the only one with a fascination of dictators. Even as a staunch defender of democracy, the concept of them is interesting to me. The idealogy, the cult of personality, the idea that one strong force could try to use raw strength to rule a nation, the uniforms, the fancy titles. It’s all great
But one thing I’ve noticed is that many dictators happen to be of the male persuasion. So many, in fact, that on the top of my head I couldn’t name one woman dictator
And so I went and scoured the internet for any examples, and what I turned up was....Margaret Thatcher and Indira Ghandi. Now not being either British or Indian I frankly don’t really know much about their careers, so Im not sure I can really weigh in on that, except a quick Wikipedia read has me thinking Indira probably was. But well, let’s here what mighty NSG thinks.
First a definition
Dictator
a : a person granted absolute emergency power; especially, history : one appointed by the senate (see senate 1a) of ancient Rome
b : one holding complete autocratic control : a person with unlimited governmental power
c : one ruling in an absolute (see absolute 2) and often oppressive way

And with that I’d say we’re set, so NSG, we’re there any female dictators? Who? What about them makes them a dictator?


I'd say it's 2 main factors.

1. Dictators are most likely to take power is less lawful, poorer and more violent societies (e.g. Russia in 1917, France before Napoleon, Weimer Germany or 3rd world countries today). These societies are also the ones more likely to have backward views on women's role in society and the least likely to tolerate movements like feminism.

2. Dictators typically present themselves as strong figures who can defend the nation aggressively. Women are typically seen as being weaker. Even in 2016, Clinton was constantly accused of hiding some secret illness that made her too weak to be president despite Trump dodging the draft. This means voters desperately searching for a strong leader are more likely to back a man while powerful groups like the military are more likely to undermine and disrespect female leaders.
Social Democrat
Political Compass:
Economic Left/Right: -4.63
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.26

User avatar
Pope Joan
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19500
Founded: Mar 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Pope Joan » Fri Aug 03, 2018 1:27 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
The United Colonies of Earth wrote:Image Aye aye.


Well, for what I recall of Catherine, she was kept out of state affairs by her husband, the king. After his death, she then was in charge of her frail son, Francis. She became regent after the death of Francis and then her 10 year old son becoming the heir, Charles. Charles too died and she kept regency for her third son, Henry. She has been called ruthless. But many scholars point out that her powers were limited.

I don't know, she was known for compromising, or being able to in the beginnning. She did that with the Calvinists. But since she failed to grasp the theology behind Calvinism, she became impatient and very vindictive. IIRC, wasn't she blamed for St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre?


I think she enjoyed murder and torture.

By the editorial staff od Encyclopedia Britannica"
See Article History
Massacre of St. Bartholomew’s Day, massacre of French Huguenots (Protestants) in Paris on August 24/25, 1572, plotted by Catherine de Médicis and carried out by Roman Catholic nobles and other citizens.
"Life is difficult".

-M. Scott Peck

User avatar
Pope Joan
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19500
Founded: Mar 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Pope Joan » Fri Aug 03, 2018 1:30 pm

Here is the full text of The First Blast of the Trumpet Against the Monstrous Regime of Women

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/9660/9660-h/9660-h.htm

There you can find the powerful woman leaders who upset him so.
"Life is difficult".

-M. Scott Peck

User avatar
Petrasylvania
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10647
Founded: Oct 20, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Petrasylvania » Fri Aug 03, 2018 1:32 pm

Pope Joan wrote:Here is the full text of The First Blast of the Trumpet Against the Monstrous Regime of Women

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/9660/9660-h/9660-h.htm

There you can find the powerful woman leaders who upset him so.

The title sounds like an MRM manifesto.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be proof of a pan-Islamic plot and Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand, crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of mentally ill lone wolves who do not represent their professed belief system at all.
The probability of someone secretly participating in homosexual acts is directly proportional to the frequency and loudness of their publicly professed disapproval and/or disgust for homosexuality.
If Donald Trump accuses an individual of malfeasance without evidence, it is almost a certainty either he or someone associated with him has in fact committed that very same malfeasance to a greater degree.

New Flag Courtesy of The Realist Polities

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 203851
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Fri Aug 03, 2018 1:33 pm

Pope Joan wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Well, for what I recall of Catherine, she was kept out of state affairs by her husband, the king. After his death, she then was in charge of her frail son, Francis. She became regent after the death of Francis and then her 10 year old son becoming the heir, Charles. Charles too died and she kept regency for her third son, Henry. She has been called ruthless. But many scholars point out that her powers were limited.

I don't know, she was known for compromising, or being able to in the beginnning. She did that with the Calvinists. But since she failed to grasp the theology behind Calvinism, she became impatient and very vindictive. IIRC, wasn't she blamed for St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre?


I think she enjoyed murder and torture.

By the editorial staff od Encyclopedia Britannica"
See Article History
Massacre of St. Bartholomew’s Day, massacre of French Huguenots (Protestants) in Paris on August 24/25, 1572, plotted by Catherine de Médicis and carried out by Roman Catholic nobles and other citizens.


I will admit my knowledge of Catherine's regency is limited but the info I have come across has never implied she ''enjoyed murder and torture''.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Pope Joan
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19500
Founded: Mar 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Pope Joan » Fri Aug 03, 2018 2:30 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Pope Joan wrote:
I think she enjoyed murder and torture.

By the editorial staff od Encyclopedia Britannica"
See Article History
Massacre of St. Bartholomew’s Day, massacre of French Huguenots (Protestants) in Paris on August 24/25, 1572, plotted by Catherine de Médicis and carried out by Roman Catholic nobles and other citizens.


I will admit my knowledge of Catherine's regency is limited but the info I have come across has never implied she ''enjoyed murder and torture''.


The Christian underground of that time includes Mennonites, who kept track of the atrocities against the Huguenots. Some who could escape found their way to Switzerland, where The memory was also kept by followers of Calvin and also Zwingli.
"Life is difficult".

-M. Scott Peck

User avatar
Longweather
Diplomat
 
Posts: 940
Founded: Nov 29, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Longweather » Fri Aug 03, 2018 2:41 pm

The Free Joy State wrote:

I think Empress Wu Zetian is closer to the definition of a dictator than Express Dowager Cixi. Although Cixi definitely did autocratic things (such as -- reportedly -- ordering a royal consort to throw herself down the well), she did have a co-regrent for the vast majority of her reign (the Empress Dowager Ci'an).

Wu Zetian ruled in her own right as Empress Regent, horribly executed her opponents and apparently established her own secret police. That might meet the description for a dictator.


Cixi was regent for 47 years. Ci'an died 20 years into the regency. TIL that 20 years is the "vast majority" of 47 years...

Kanaria wrote:
Constitutional Technocracy of Minecraft wrote:Angela Merkel was democratically elected in Germany's 2005 national elections

Not to mention in 2009, 2013 and 2017.


Actually, Merkel wasn't elected in 2017, she was elected in March this year. She presided over a caretaker government for 6 months because she didn't have a coalition in the Bundestag to vote her in and didn't want to settle for a minority government.
_[' ]_
(-_Q)

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 42328
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Fri Aug 03, 2018 3:28 pm

How about a few of the highly influential women behind the throne in China?
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Shrillland
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22231
Founded: Apr 12, 2010
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Shrillland » Fri Aug 03, 2018 6:29 pm

How about Ranavalona I, queen of Madagascar from 1828-1861?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranavalona_I
How America Came to This, by Kowani: Racialised Politics, Ideological Media Gaslighting, and What It All Means For The Future
Plebiscite Plaza 2024
Confused by the names I use for House districts? Here's a primer!
In 1963, Doctor Who taught us all we need to know about politics when a cave woman said, "Old men see no further than tomorrow's meat".

User avatar
Diopolis
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17734
Founded: May 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Diopolis » Fri Aug 03, 2018 6:39 pm

If I’m not much mistaken, Mao’s wife ruled in her own right after he died for a while. Eva Peron is possibly another example.
Texas nationalist, right-wing technocrat, radical social conservative, post-liberal.

User avatar
Costa Fierro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19902
Founded: Dec 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Costa Fierro » Fri Aug 03, 2018 7:16 pm

Old Tyrannia wrote:I'm not terribly familiar with Indira Gandhi, but it's plainly ridiculous to call Margaret Thatcher a dictator. She came to power by legitimate democratic means and lost power by legitimate democratic means.


Ghandi was fairly authoritarian. She implemented emergency laws in India that allowed her to arrest most of her opposition and also ruled by decree with virtually complete control over the country.
"Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist." - George Carlin

User avatar
Sovaal
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13695
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Sovaal » Sat Aug 04, 2018 11:46 am

Dictators tend to use a very, extremist and traditional power structure, even among the far left dictators, to climb to the top, so Im not surprised that the majority of them have been male.
Most of the time I have no idea what the hell I'm doing or talking about.

”Many forms of government have been tried and will be tried in this world of sin and woe.
No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is
the worst form of government, except for all the others that have been tried from time to time." -
Winston Churchill, 1947.

"Rifles, muskets, long-bows and hand-grenades are inherently democratic weapons. A complex weapon makes the strong stronger, while a simple weapon – so long as there is no answer to it – gives claws to the weak.” - George Orwell

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25657
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Sat Aug 04, 2018 12:18 pm

Sovaal wrote:Dictators tend to use a very, extremist and traditional power structure, even among the far left dictators, to climb to the top, so Im not surprised that the majority of them have been male.

I would disagree that they use a traditional power structure. Most come to power through military or bureaucratic means.
Grumpy Grandpa of the LWDT and RWDT
Kantian with panentheist and Christian beliefs. Rawlsian Socialist. Just completed studies in History and International Relations. Asexual with sex-revulsion.
The world is grey, the mountains old, the forges fire is ashen cold. No harp is wrung, no hammer falls, the darkness dwells in Durin's halls...
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts
Borderline Personality Disorder, currently in treatment. I apologize if I blow up at you. TG me for info, can't discuss publicly because the mods support stigma on mental illness.

User avatar
Oppermenia
Minister
 
Posts: 2427
Founded: Apr 03, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Oppermenia » Sat Aug 04, 2018 12:19 pm

United Muscovite Nations wrote:
Sovaal wrote:Dictators tend to use a very, extremist and traditional power structure, even among the far left dictators, to climb to the top, so Im not surprised that the majority of them have been male.

I would disagree that they use a traditional power structure. Most come to power through military or bureaucratic means.

*most*
"Stick to the pack, and the pack will provide."
We are a leftist nation that believes in the "we" over "I". That's why we are fond of wolves, because the Alpha looks after the pack.
Stick with us, and give us loyalty, and we'll do things that benefit you, and we'll stick with you.
If you cross us, however, then as a pack, we will hunt you.
Don't underestimate us.
To learn more about the nation, click here: https://www.nationstates.net/nation=oppermenia/detail=factbook

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25657
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Sat Aug 04, 2018 12:20 pm

Oppermenia wrote:
United Muscovite Nations wrote:I would disagree that they use a traditional power structure. Most come to power through military or bureaucratic means.

*most*

There are exceptions, yes, but how many dictators have come to power through tribal or feudal means?
Grumpy Grandpa of the LWDT and RWDT
Kantian with panentheist and Christian beliefs. Rawlsian Socialist. Just completed studies in History and International Relations. Asexual with sex-revulsion.
The world is grey, the mountains old, the forges fire is ashen cold. No harp is wrung, no hammer falls, the darkness dwells in Durin's halls...
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts
Borderline Personality Disorder, currently in treatment. I apologize if I blow up at you. TG me for info, can't discuss publicly because the mods support stigma on mental illness.

User avatar
Sovaal
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13695
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Sovaal » Sat Aug 04, 2018 12:21 pm

United Muscovite Nations wrote:
Sovaal wrote:Dictators tend to use a very, extremist and traditional power structure, even among the far left dictators, to climb to the top, so Im not surprised that the majority of them have been male.

I would disagree that they use a traditional power structure. Most come to power through military or bureaucratic means.
And I would argue that those are extremely traditional power strucutres, at least in modern society. Revolution and political turmoil are as old as civilisation it'self I would bet.
Most of the time I have no idea what the hell I'm doing or talking about.

”Many forms of government have been tried and will be tried in this world of sin and woe.
No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is
the worst form of government, except for all the others that have been tried from time to time." -
Winston Churchill, 1947.

"Rifles, muskets, long-bows and hand-grenades are inherently democratic weapons. A complex weapon makes the strong stronger, while a simple weapon – so long as there is no answer to it – gives claws to the weak.” - George Orwell

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25657
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Sat Aug 04, 2018 12:30 pm

Sovaal wrote:
United Muscovite Nations wrote:I would disagree that they use a traditional power structure. Most come to power through military or bureaucratic means.
And I would argue that those are extremely traditional power strucutres, at least in modern society. Revolution and political turmoil are as old as civilisation it'self I would bet.

That's not usually what we would refer to as traditional power structures, as they're both thoroughly modern.
Grumpy Grandpa of the LWDT and RWDT
Kantian with panentheist and Christian beliefs. Rawlsian Socialist. Just completed studies in History and International Relations. Asexual with sex-revulsion.
The world is grey, the mountains old, the forges fire is ashen cold. No harp is wrung, no hammer falls, the darkness dwells in Durin's halls...
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts
Borderline Personality Disorder, currently in treatment. I apologize if I blow up at you. TG me for info, can't discuss publicly because the mods support stigma on mental illness.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Cyptopir, Deblar, Google [Bot], Juristonia, Kostane, Maximum Imperium Rex, Nanatsu no Tsuki, Niolia, Pale Dawn, Stellar Colonies, The Sinclarian Provinces, Turenia, Zetaopalatopia

Advertisement

Remove ads