Religious Liberty Task Force

[Grenartia]

The Satanic Temple is the one I was thinking of.
Much of their work involves First Amendment violations.

For example, if a school starts handing out Bibles in class, they'll come along and start handing out Satanic colouring books.
Or if a monument of the Ten Comandments is erected on government property, they'll do the same with Statues of Baphomet.

A monument of the Ten Commandments on government property is a violation of the First Amendment.

Technically speaking, there's two schools of thought. One which says that freedom of religion requires freedom from religion, and one that says that government simply can't promote any one religion over the others.

[Hurdergaryp]

And they are perfectly entitled to do exactly that. Can't have a God without a Satan in order to balance things out, after all.

Satan doesn't balance God (SWT) out in Christianity iirc/afaik. God (SWT) is above Satan.

The only reason God seems attractive is because of Satan, without the threat of hellish horrors there is no reason at all to fearfully submit to a fickle God.

[Alvecia]

The Satanic Temple is the one I was thinking of.
Much of their work involves First Amendment violations.

For example, if a school starts handing out Bibles in class, they'll come along and start handing out Satanic colouring books.
Or if a monument of the Ten Comandments is erected on government property, they'll do the same with Statues of Baphomet.

A monument of the Ten Commandments on government property is a violation of the First Amendment.

That’s kind of the point. If these local governments want to allow religious iconography on government grounds, then it must allow all religious iconography, including Satanistic.
Typically though, rather than have a Satanic icon on government property they prefer to have none. Which really goes to show that they aren’t really interested in religious equality.

[Katganistan]

Can't force religion on a captive audience. Too bad.

They could once.

Unconstitutional.

[Sovaal]

A monument of the Ten Commandments on government property is a violation of the First Amendment.

That’s kind of the point. If these local governments want to allow religious iconography on government grounds, then it must allow all religious iconography, including Satanistic.
Typically though, rather than have a Satanic icon on government property they prefer to have none. Which really goes to show that they aren’t really interested in religious equality.

Consider me shocked!/s

Hell, most of the time they're not even secretive about it.

[Katganistan]

The Satanic Temple is the one I was thinking of.
Much of their work involves First Amendment violations.

For example, if a school starts handing out Bibles in class, they'll come along and start handing out Satanic colouring books.
Or if a monument of the Ten Comandments is erected on government property, they'll do the same with Statues of Baphomet.

A monument of the Ten Commandments on government property is a violation of the First Amendment.

Yup, and yet there are states that were resistant to removing them in the very very recent past.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/nation ... story.html

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ten-comman ... l-grounds/

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/201 ... 431703001/

https://www.pressherald.com/2017/10/27/ ... d-removed/