CDC: 14,415 homicides by fire arms in 2016 alone

[The Two Jerseys]

So you believe convictions for violent crimes should not be a disqualification from owning guns.

Isn't there a thing like this already?

I recall the head honcho from Dog the Bounty Hunter couldn't get a gun because of his prior convictions.

There is, you won't pass your background check if you have a felony on your record.

But repeat offenders aren't worried about little things like the law.

[Licana]

So you believe convictions for violent crimes should not be a disqualification from owning guns.

So you believe the sky is red.

[Petrasylvania]

So you believe convictions for violent crimes should not be a disqualification from owning guns.

So you believe the sky is red.

Why yes, it can be.

You think the sky is only ever blue. Cute.

[Licana]

You think something you never even said or indicated. Cute.

[The Two Jerseys]

You think something you never even said or indicated. Cute.

Yes, I'd like to know how exactly how

The gun laws we have now are adequate.

We should instead focus on sending criminals to prison and keeping them there for a long time, since gun crime is often committed by repeat offenders:
Baltimore Sun: "Why are Baltimore's violent repeat offenders getting away with murder?"
Hartford Courant: "Gun Offenders Are Repeaters"

even remotely implies that I'm in favor of allowing convicted felons to buy guns...

[Telconi]

Yes, I'd like to know how exactly how

The gun laws we have now are adequate.

We should instead focus on sending criminals to prison and keeping them there for a long time, since gun crime is often committed by repeat offenders:
Baltimore Sun: "Why are Baltimore's violent repeat offenders getting away with murder?"
Hartford Courant: "Gun Offenders Are Repeaters"

even remotely implies that I'm in favor of allowing convicted felons to buy guns...

It's Gauth, that's really the only explanation.

[Petrasylvania]

Yes, I'd like to know how exactly how

The gun laws we have now are adequate.

We should instead focus on sending criminals to prison and keeping them there for a long time, since gun crime is often committed by repeat offenders:
Baltimore Sun: "Why are Baltimore's violent repeat offenders getting away with murder?"
Hartford Courant: "Gun Offenders Are Repeaters"

even remotely implies that I'm in favor of allowing convicted felons to buy guns...

Complaining about repeat offenders needing to be locked up for life instead of making sure they're not allowed to get a gun legally to begin with was telling.

[Ors Might]

Yes, I'd like to know how exactly how even remotely implies that I'm in favor of allowing convicted felons to buy guns...

Complaining about repeat offenders needing to be locked up for life instead of making sure they're not allowed to get a gun legally to begin with was telling.

If someone is too dangerous to be trusted with even a peashooter, then perhaps they’re too dangerous to be on the streets?

[Petrasylvania]

Complaining about repeat offenders needing to be locked up for life instead of making sure they're not allowed to get a gun legally to begin with was telling.

If someone is too dangerous to be trusted with even a peashooter, then perhaps they’re too dangerous to be on the streets?

There's people out on the streets legally barred from owning a gun. Are you saying they should all be rounded up and imprisoned for life instead?

That's a great idea of yours, making not carrying a gun a crime.

[Ors Might]

If someone is too dangerous to be trusted with even a peashooter, then perhaps they’re too dangerous to be on the streets?

There's people out on the streets legally barred from owning a gun. Are you saying they should all be rounded up and imprisoned for life instead?

I’m saying that once you serve your time, you should have your full rights restored.

[Telconi]

If someone is too dangerous to be trusted with even a peashooter, then perhaps they’re too dangerous to be on the streets?

There's people out on the streets legally barred from owning a gun. Are you saying they should all be rounded up and imprisoned for life instead?

or have the legal bar on owning a gun removed.

[Ors Might]

There's people out on the streets legally barred from owning a gun. Are you saying they should all be rounded up and imprisoned for life instead?

or have the legal bar on owning a gun removed.

^^

[Petrasylvania]

There's people out on the streets legally barred from owning a gun. Are you saying they should all be rounded up and imprisoned for life instead?

I’m saying that once you serve your time, you should have your full rights restored.

So repeat offenders should be allowed to carry when not in prison.

[Ors Might]

I’m saying that once you serve your time, you should have your full rights restored.

So repeat offenders should be allowed to carry when not in prison.

Yes. If you think they’ll just try to harm people once they’re out then why do you think they should be released?

[Telconi]

I’m saying that once you serve your time, you should have your full rights restored.

So repeat offenders should be allowed to carry when not in prison.

Why not? They're allowed to buy newspapers and express opinions and go to church.

[Ors Might]

So repeat offenders should be allowed to carry when not in prison.

Why not? They're allowed to buy newspapers and express opinions and go to church.

Once you commit a crime your life isn’t worthy of defending anymore. *nods*

[Wysten]

Shouldn't this be on the GC thread?

[Wysten]

The money says In God We Trust therefore binding us to the law of Thou Shalt Not Kill if not others. Japan and England do not allow private firearms ownership, why should we. The government doesn’t need them either in military. To militarize is to assemble an army of Satan soldiers.

In my nation Iname zero weapons of any sort are held by government or citizens. Instead of firearms we use anesthetic dart guns to capture violent perps.

I too want to become a daemon prince.

BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD
SKULLS FOR THE SKULL THRONE
MILK FOR THE KHORNE FLAKES

[The Two Jerseys]

Yes, I'd like to know how exactly how even remotely implies that I'm in favor of allowing convicted felons to buy guns...

Complaining about repeat offenders needing to be locked up for life instead of making sure they're not allowed to get a gun legally to begin with was telling.

I don't know where you learned reading comprehension, but you really should ask them for a refund.

Convicted felons are already prohibited from buying a gun. Where in that post did I say that they should be allowed to?

[Sovaal]

I’m saying that once you serve your time, you should have your full rights restored.

So repeat offenders should be allowed to carry when not in prison.

If they're that bad maybe they shouldn't be released.

[The South Falls]

A tick goes up for the "You can't read" defense counter.

[Telconi]

A tick goes up for the "You can't read" defense counter.

If your conclusions are the product of illiteracy, it's a valid reason to reject them.

[The Two Jerseys]

So repeat offenders should be allowed to carry when not in prison.

If they're that bad maybe they shouldn't be released.

Especially when they get back out on the streets, buy a gun from a shady guy with a van in a back alley, commit more crimes, get arrested again, plea to a lesser charge because the DA can't be bothered to do their job and make the serious charge stick, go back to prison for a couple years, get back out on the streets, buy a gun from a shady guy with a van in a back alley, commit more crimes, get arrested again, plea to a lesser charge because the DA can't be bothered to do their job and make the serious charge stick, go back to prison for a couple years, get back out on the streets, buy a gun from a shady guy with a van in a back alley, commit more crimes, get arrested again, plea to a lesser charge because the DA can't be bothered to do their job and make the serious charge stick, go back to prison for a couple years, get back out on the streets, buy a gun from a shady guy with a van in a back alley, commit more crimes, get arrested again, plea to a lesser charge because the DA can't be bothered to do their job and make the serious charge stick, go back to prison for a couple years, get back out on the streets...

[The Two Jerseys]

A tick goes up for the "You can't read" defense counter.

If your conclusions are the product of illiteracy, it's a valid reason to reject them.

Indeed.

[Kernen]

If they're that bad maybe they shouldn't be released.

Especially when they get back out on the streets, buy a gun from a shady guy with a van in a back alley, commit more crimes, get arrested again, plea to a lesser charge because the DA can't be bothered to do their job and make the serious charge stick, go back to prison for a couple years, get back out on the streets, buy a gun from a shady guy with a van in a back alley, commit more crimes, get arrested again, plea to a lesser charge because the DA can't be bothered to do their job and make the serious charge stick, go back to prison for a couple years, get back out on the streets, buy a gun from a shady guy with a van in a back alley, commit more crimes, get arrested again, plea to a lesser charge because the DA can't be bothered to do their job and make the serious charge stick, go back to prison for a couple years, get back out on the streets, buy a gun from a shady guy with a van in a back alley, commit more crimes, get arrested again, plea to a lesser charge because the DA can't be bothered to do their job and make the serious charge stick, go back to prison for a couple years, get back out on the streets...

That's not why prosecutors accept plea deals.