That implies you think its ok to interfere in a private medical decision and makes choices for someone you dont know.
Advertisement
by Freezic Vast » Fri Aug 03, 2018 5:08 pm
by The Mind of the Institution » Fri Aug 03, 2018 5:09 pm
by The Mind of the Institution » Fri Aug 03, 2018 5:10 pm
by Telconi » Fri Aug 03, 2018 5:11 pm
by The Mind of the Institution » Fri Aug 03, 2018 5:11 pm
by The New California Republic » Fri Aug 03, 2018 5:12 pm
by San Lumen » Fri Aug 03, 2018 5:15 pm
by Telconi » Fri Aug 03, 2018 5:17 pm
San Lumen wrote:The Mind of the Institution wrote:
Well that's not vague or anything... I suppose that means the right of the state to choose to outlaw abortion?
And what right to do you have to tell a woman she must carry a child to term if she doesn't want too.
Should a woman who was raped or the victim of incest be forced to carry that child to term?
by Telconi » Fri Aug 03, 2018 5:21 pm
by Luminesa » Fri Aug 03, 2018 5:22 pm
by Telconi » Fri Aug 03, 2018 5:23 pm
by San Lumen » Fri Aug 03, 2018 5:24 pm
Luminesa wrote:San Lumen wrote:
Why?
If you believe in protecting all life, born and unborn, without exceptions, including being anti-death penalty and anti-euthanasia, then you wouldn’t promote abortion for said reason. Consistency in one’s beliefs. Plus society needs to do more to help women who have been raped, and not in ways that involve promoting the death of the unborn baby.
by Telconi » Fri Aug 03, 2018 5:25 pm
San Lumen wrote:Luminesa wrote:If you believe in protecting all life, born and unborn, without exceptions, including being anti-death penalty and anti-euthanasia, then you wouldn’t promote abortion for said reason. Consistency in one’s beliefs. Plus society needs to do more to help women who have been raped, and not in ways that involve promoting the death of the unborn baby.
Therefore they should be forced to carry a criminals child to term?
by Luminesa » Fri Aug 03, 2018 5:26 pm
San Lumen wrote:Luminesa wrote:If you believe in protecting all life, born and unborn, without exceptions, including being anti-death penalty and anti-euthanasia, then you wouldn’t promote abortion for said reason. Consistency in one’s beliefs. Plus society needs to do more to help women who have been raped, and not in ways that involve promoting the death of the unborn baby.
Therefore they should be forced to carry a criminals child to term?
by Telconi » Fri Aug 03, 2018 5:26 pm
by San Lumen » Fri Aug 03, 2018 5:29 pm
by Telconi » Fri Aug 03, 2018 5:32 pm
San Lumen wrote:Telconi wrote:
Why should being a criminal's child matter? Do we punish children for their father's crimes?
That is not the same thing. What if that victim does not want a child, has a career and other things? How dare you say she should give that up to carry a child she does not want.
by San Lumen » Fri Aug 03, 2018 5:33 pm
Telconi wrote:San Lumen wrote:
That is not the same thing. What if that victim does not want a child, has a career and other things? How dare you say she should give that up to carry a child she does not want.
I don't frankly care what she wants, her wants don't outweigh the child's life.
Uh, How dare I what? express and support political beliefs? Oooooh, spooky evil Telconi, voting like a monster!
by Telconi » Fri Aug 03, 2018 5:35 pm
San Lumen wrote:Telconi wrote:
I don't frankly care what she wants, her wants don't outweigh the child's life.
Uh, How dare I what? express and support political beliefs? Oooooh, spooky evil Telconi, voting like a monster!
Why is the unborn child more important then her giving up her career and nine months of her life to care for a child she does not want forced on her by a monster?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bobismh, Bovad, Google [Bot], Kostane, Spirit of Hope
Advertisement