Right Wing Discussion Thread XIII: Do the Right thing

[Northeast American Federation]

Yes, they would have work requirements. Of course, in Ancomistan, no one could coerce you, there are no enforcers, and there is no hierarchy. You'd be required to or else....people would be really mad at you!

Do you have anything to say that's an actual argument? :^3

I come onto this thread day in and day out seeing you shilling whatever weird anarcho communism you're shilling for and the same arguments from you for and broadly the same stuff from everyone else against, so I don't really see the sense in even further perpetuating that apparently endless cycle. Why can't you just go off to the Chiapas and leave us alone already, huh? I thought that place was your ideal, so surely you'd want to live there.

[Greater Cesnica]

Uh guys, if someone were to say there's nothing wrong with marrying a 9-year-old, is that condoning or at least approving of pedophilia/pedophilic behaviours and tendencies? Asking cus... Itching to report someone.

[Torrocca]

Do you have anything to say that's an actual argument? :^3

I come onto this thread day in and day out seeing you shilling whatever weird anarcho communism you're shilling for and the same arguments from you for and broadly the same stuff from everyone else against, so I don't really see the sense in even further perpetuating that apparently endless cycle. Why can't you just go off to the Chiapas and leave us alone already, huh? I thought that place was your ideal, so surely you'd want to live there.

"WHY YOU NO LEAVE TO RED PLASE COMMIEPERSON?!?!"

Sorry, but that's also not an argument.

[Northern Davincia]

Uh guys, if someone were to say there's nothing wrong with marrying a 9-year-old, is that condoning or at least approving of pedophilia/pedophilic behaviours and tendencies? Asking cus... Itching to report someone.

It would be silly for them to believe such, but I don't think that's worthy of reporting. Don't take my word for it.

[Northeast American Federation]

I come onto this thread day in and day out seeing you shilling whatever weird anarcho communism you're shilling for and the same arguments from you for and broadly the same stuff from everyone else against, so I don't really see the sense in even further perpetuating that apparently endless cycle. Why can't you just go off to the Chiapas and leave us alone already, huh? I thought that place was your ideal, so surely you'd want to live there.

"WHY YOU NO LEAVE TO RED PLASE COMMIEPERSON?!?!"

Sorry, but that's also not an argument.

An ideology based around "hierarchy bad, capitalism is theft," one shilled for with borderline religious zealotry by you, is too ridiculous to bother actually arguing against. It'll never exist, and only a few places vaguely resembling its shadow have existed anywhere. But that's not good enough, apparently.

[Torrocca]

"WHY YOU NO LEAVE TO RED PLASE COMMIEPERSON?!?!"

Sorry, but that's also not an argument.

An ideology based around "hierarchy bad, capitalism is theft," one shilled for with borderline religious zealotry by you, is too ridiculous to bother actually arguing against. It'll never exist, and only a few places vaguely resembling its shadow have existed anywhere. But that's not good enough, apparently.

Oh golly gee, it's almost laughable to get lectured about ridiculous ideologies by someone in favor of militarism and traditional familial and gender roles, lmao.

[Northeast American Federation]

An ideology based around "hierarchy bad, capitalism is theft," one shilled for with borderline religious zealotry by you, is too ridiculous to bother actually arguing against. It'll never exist, and only a few places vaguely resembling its shadow have existed anywhere. But that's not good enough, apparently.

Oh golly gee, it's almost laughable to get lectured about ridiculous ideologies by someone in favor of militarism and traditional familial and gender roles, lmao.

Strong militaries defend society, and solid family units make for great societal bedrock. I know that sounds ridiculous to the average leftist, but hey, this is the "Right Wing" thread after all.

[Greater Cesnica]

Uh guys, if someone were to say there's nothing wrong with marrying a 9-year-old, is that condoning or at least approving of pedophilia/pedophilic behaviours and tendencies? Asking cus... Itching to report someone.

It would be silly for them to believe such, but I don't think that's worthy of reporting. Don't take my word for it.

Amin just spouted that B.S in IDT, and now I find my eyelid twitching.

[Torrocca]

Oh golly gee, it's almost laughable to get lectured about ridiculous ideologies by someone in favor of militarism and traditional familial and gender roles, lmao.

Strong militaries defend society, and solid family units make for great societal bedrock. I know that sounds ridiculous to the average leftist, but hey, this is the "Right Wing" thread after all.

Yeah, sorry but nah, the real absurdity is parroting the idea that women should be subservient to men and that we should totally keep expanding military powers.

Fuuuuuuuck that noise.

[Northeast American Federation]

Strong militaries defend society, and solid family units make for great societal bedrock. I know that sounds ridiculous to the average leftist, but hey, this is the "Right Wing" thread after all.

Yeah, sorry but nah, the real absurdity is parroting the idea that women should be subservient to men and that we should totally keep expanding military powers.

Fuuuuuuuck that noise.

Not subservient, but certainly somebody has to take care of raise the kids while the men are off at work. Having nobody take care of and raise the kids because both parents are at work(well, nobody except maybe the television and the public schools) clearly hasn't worked out.

[Greater Cesnica]

Strong militaries defend society, and solid family units make for great societal bedrock. I know that sounds ridiculous to the average leftist, but hey, this is the "Right Wing" thread after all.

Yeah, sorry but nah, the real absurdity is parroting the idea that women should be subservient to men and that we should totally keep expanding military powers.

Fuuuuuuuck that noise.

I actually approve of rampant militarism, but not in traditional family roles. Can we still be friends?

[Northeast American Federation]

Yeah, sorry but nah, the real absurdity is parroting the idea that women should be subservient to men and that we should totally keep expanding military powers.

Fuuuuuuuck that noise.

I actually approve of rampant militarism, but not in traditional family roles. Can we still be friends?

We'll have to have that debate at some later point, but yes.

[Northern Davincia]

Strong militaries defend society, and solid family units make for great societal bedrock. I know that sounds ridiculous to the average leftist, but hey, this is the "Right Wing" thread after all.

Yeah, sorry but nah, the real absurdity is parroting the idea that women should be subservient to men and that we should totally keep expanding military powers.

Fuuuuuuuck that noise.

There's a solid case to be made for traditional family structures. Children in single-parent households are more likely to be suicidal, violent, and antisocial.

[Torrocca]

Yeah, sorry but nah, the real absurdity is parroting the idea that women should be subservient to men and that we should totally keep expanding military powers.

Fuuuuuuuck that noise.

Not subservient, but certainly somebody has to take care of raise the kids while the men are off at work.

Wew laddie

Having nobody take care of and raise the kids because both parents are at work(well, nobody except maybe the television and the public schools) clearly hasn't worked out.

Actually, it's worked out pretty well, I'd say, considering how this generation seems to want less, y'know, war and shit.

[Salus Maior]

Uh guys, if someone were to say there's nothing wrong with marrying a 9-year-old, is that condoning or at least approving of pedophilia/pedophilic behaviours and tendencies? Asking cus... Itching to report someone.

Ask moderation.

[Northern Davincia]

Not subservient, but certainly somebody has to take care of raise the kids while the men are off at work.

Wew laddie

Having nobody take care of and raise the kids because both parents are at work(well, nobody except maybe the television and the public schools) clearly hasn't worked out.

Actually, it's worked out pretty well, I'd say, considering how this generation seems to want less, y'know, war and shit.

How on earth does being a latchkey kid make you anti-war?

[Salus Maior]

Not subservient, but certainly somebody has to take care of raise the kids while the men are off at work.

Wew laddie

For one, I absolutely hate the idea that housework and raising children is somehow seen as degrading and inferior. It's absolutely not, hell, it's probably the most important, far reaching thing a person can do.

That being said, men can do it too and it's not exclusive to women.

[Northeast American Federation]

Having nobody take care of and raise the kids because both parents are at work(well, nobody except maybe the television and the public schools) clearly hasn't worked out.

Actually, it's worked out pretty well, I'd say, considering how this generation seems to want less, y'know, war and shit.

Plenty of people from previous generations raised by traditional families weren't always big fans of war either. Can't just go by that. And even if you do, the mainstream media sure was quick to get behind us going into Iraq, a war which at this point most people on both sides of the aisle think was a bad idea.

[Torrocca]

Wew laddie



Actually, it's worked out pretty well, I'd say, considering how this generation seems to want less, y'know, war and shit.

How on earth does being a latchkey kid make you anti-war?

You do know that term was coined because of the fact that children went home to parentless homes because of war, right?

By that metric alone NAF's bullshit about militarism and traditional familial/gender roles is beyond asinine.

Wew laddie

For one, I absolutely hate the idea that housework and raising children is somehow seen as degrading and inferior. It's absolutely not, hell, it's probably the most important, far reaching thing a person can do.

That being said, men can do it too and it's not exclusive to women.

I mean, yeah, housework on its own isn't a problem.

The problem arises when people decide it's a good idea that one specific gender has to do that shit.

[Northern Davincia]

Wew laddie

For one, I absolutely hate the idea that housework and raising children is somehow seen as degrading and inferior. It's absolutely not, hell, it's probably the most important, far reaching thing a person can do.

That being said, men can do it too and it's not exclusive to women.

Obviously, a man should contribute to housework, but his role is that of breadwinner, first and foremost.

[Salus Maior]

For one, I absolutely hate the idea that housework and raising children is somehow seen as degrading and inferior. It's absolutely not, hell, it's probably the most important, far reaching thing a person can do.

That being said, men can do it too and it's not exclusive to women.

Obviously, a man should contribute to housework, but his role is that of breadwinner, first and foremost.

I'm less strict about that, really. So long as families stay together they can work that bit out however as far as I'm concerned.

[Conserative Morality]

Yeah, sorry but nah, the real absurdity is parroting the idea that women should be subservient to men and that we should totally keep expanding military powers.

Fuuuuuuuck that noise.

There's a solid case to be made for traditional family structures. Children in single-parent households are more likely to be suicidal, violent, and antisocial.

If by 'traditional family structures' you mean 'extended family structures', I agree.

If you mean 'the nuclear family', on the other hand...

[Torrocca]

For one, I absolutely hate the idea that housework and raising children is somehow seen as degrading and inferior. It's absolutely not, hell, it's probably the most important, far reaching thing a person can do.

That being said, men can do it too and it's not exclusive to women.

Obviously, a man should contribute to housework, but his role is that of breadwinner, first and foremost.

Oh how about no, and we not force people to conform to gender roles?

[Northeast American Federation]

There's a solid case to be made for traditional family structures. Children in single-parent households are more likely to be suicidal, violent, and antisocial.

If by 'traditional family structures' you mean 'extended family structures', I agree.

If you mean 'the nuclear family', on the other hand...

What's so horribly evil about the nuclear family?

[Torrocca]

Actually, it's worked out pretty well, I'd say, considering how this generation seems to want less, y'know, war and shit.

Plenty of people from previous generations raised by traditional families weren't always big fans of war either.

Except your entire bullshit about peddling militarism (which'll undoubtedly lead to more war) will just lead to more children coming home to empty households, despite your notion that non-traditional family structures would cause this. Hence your ideas on this matter are utterly asinine and ridiculous.